"Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway" <LordAndroc...@October2012.org>
wrote in message news:wrucs.377575$4z5.319897@fx08.am4...

"Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway" <LordAndroc...@October2012.org>
wrote in message news:tTscs.220303$jS5.89735@fx27.am4...

Now, can you point out any mathematical errors in SR, or any
inconsistencies?

==============================================
Yes, you fucking moron.
t’A-tB = rAB/(c+v)
tB-tA  = rAB/(c-v)
t’A-tB = tB-tA.

ref:
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/figures/img11.gif

First of all c-v and c+v shouldn’t exist at all since it is claimed that the
speed of light is the same in all frames of reference,

and second you have to have your head up your arse not to be able
to see 1/(5-3) = 0.5 does not equal 1/(5+3) = 0.125
but of course you DO have your head up your arse.
The inconsistency is
we establish by definition that the “time” required by light to travel from
A to B equals the “time” it requires to travel from B to A,
imbecile.
Einstein – dumbest bastard to have ever existed (after Webb).
-- This message is brought to you from the keyboard of
Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway

_________________________________________________________________________
Couple of basic errors. A definition cannot be an inconsistency in physics;

============================================
I didn’t expect you to admit you are a stupid cunt, Webb, dumbfucks
like you never do.
Just because the liar Einstein calls his inconsistent third postulate a
definition doesn’t make it a definition, and it is inconsistent because
rAB/(c-v) does not equal rAB/(c+v) and no wishful thinking can make
it so, you fucking imbecile.

Your question was answered, you useless squirming wanker, the “couple
of basic errors” are all Einstein’s and there are many more than a couple.

“In the first place it is clear that the equations must be linear on account
of the properties of homogeneity which we attribute to space and time.”

and in the second place it is clear his equations are NOT linear, but that’s
way beyond your shit-filled head’s understanding.
____________________________________________
Actually, they are linear transformations,

==================================
You fucking liar, you don’t even know what a coordinate
transformation is.

x –> x’ = x-vt is a linear coordinate transformation.
x’ –> xi = (x-vt)/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) is non-linear abject nonsense,

____________________________________________________
No
==============================================
x –> x’ = x-vt is a linear coordinate transformation.
x’ –> xi = (x-vt)/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) is non-linear abject nonsense, Mr. “No” Webb, you crazy clueless cunt.
Are you deliberately trying to cultivate an image of mental instability,
you fucking LYING idiot? If not, why do you this, you stupid cunt?
Are you genuinely mentally ill, with a proper medical diagnosis,
you deranged psychotic bastard?
Rhetorical question, you have demonstrated you are insane.
-- This message is brought to you from the keyboard of
Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway