Re: What if on Expansion

[HVAC]

On 11/18/2012 8:11 AM, G=EMC^2 wrote:
> What if as the universe expands new galaxies have to be created
> continuously to keep its density the same? Hmmmm That is good
> thinking I can live with that. TeBet


Created how? By god?










--
"OK you cunts, let's see what you can do now" -Hit Girl
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjO7kBqTFqo .. 变亮
http://www.richardgingras.com/tia/images/tia_logo_large.jpg

[Smiler]

On Sun, 18 Nov 2012 08:57:14 -0500, HVAC wrote:

> On 11/18/2012 8:11 AM, G=EMC^2 wrote:
>> What if as the universe expands new galaxies have to be created
>> continuously to keep its density the same? Hmmmm That is good thinking
>> I can live with that. TeBet
>
>
> Created how? By god?

And why does the density of the universe have to remain stable?
To match the density of his brain?

--
Smiler,

The godless one. a.a.# 2279

All gods are tailored to order. They're made to

exactly fit the prejudices of their believers.

[Lofty Goat]

On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 01:41:44 +0000, Smiler wrote:

> On Sun, 18 Nov 2012 08:57:14 -0500, HVAC wrote:
>
>> On 11/18/2012 8:11 AM, G=EMC^2 wrote:
>>> What if as the universe expands new galaxies have to be created
>>> continuously to keep its density the same? Hmmmm That is good
>>> thinking I can live with that. TeBet
>>
>>
>> Created how? By god?
>
> And why does the density of the universe have to remain stable?
> To match the density of his brain?

I think he's thinking of he Steady State theory.

Even the people who proposed it decided it was wrong.

--
Goat

[HVAC]

On 11/18/2012 8:41 PM, Smiler wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Nov 2012 08:57:14 -0500, HVAC wrote:
>
>> On 11/18/2012 8:11 AM, G=EMC^2 wrote:
>>> What if as the universe expands new galaxies have to be created
>>> continuously to keep its density the same? Hmmmm That is good thinking
>>> I can live with that. TeBet
>>
>>
>> Created how? By god?
>
> And why does the density of the universe have to remain stable?
> To match the density of his brain?
>

The laws of thermodynamics are far above Bert's head.

[G=EMC^2]

Balancing makes stable TEBET

[Smiler]

On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 06:48:37 -0500, HVAC wrote:

> On 11/18/2012 8:41 PM, Smiler wrote:
>> On Sun, 18 Nov 2012 08:57:14 -0500, HVAC wrote:
>>
>>> On 11/18/2012 8:11 AM, G=EMC^2 wrote:
>>>> What if as the universe expands new galaxies have to be created
>>>> continuously to keep its density the same? Hmmmm That is good
>>>> thinking I can live with that. TeBet
>>>
>>>
>>> Created how? By god?
>>
>> And why does the density of the universe have to remain stable? To match
>> the density of his brain?
>>
>>
> The laws of thermodynamics are far above Bert's head.

As is much else.

[HVAC]

On 11/19/2012 5:59 PM, G=EMC^2 wrote:
> O

>>>>> What if as the universe expands new galaxies have to be created
>>>>> continuously to keep its density the same? Hmmmm That is good thinking
>>>>> I can live with that. TeBet
>>
>>>> Created how? By god?
>>
>>> And why does the density of the universe have to remain stable?
>>> To match the density of his brain?
>>
>> The laws of thermodynamics are far above Bert's head.
>>
>> --

> Balancing makes stable TEBET


There is your answer, Smiler...."Balancing makes stable".











--

[G=EMC^2]

Nothing is over my head. 2nd law in a nut shell. "little energy is
always wasted." I have a density theory. I'm clever TeBet

[Smiler]

On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 19:13:46 -0500, HVAC wrote:

> On 11/19/2012 5:59 PM, G=EMC^2 wrote:
>> O
>>>>>> What if as the universe expands new galaxies have to be created
>>>>>> continuously to keep its density the same? Hmmmm That is good
>>>>>> thinking I can live with that. TeBet
>>>
>>>>> Created how? By god?
>>>
>>>> And why does the density of the universe have to remain stable? To
>>>> match the density of his brain?
>>>
>>> The laws of thermodynamics are far above Bert's head.
>>>
>>> --
>> Balancing makes stable TEBET
>
>
> There is your answer, Smiler...."Balancing makes stable".

Can you please get Bert to translate that from Gibberish into English?
Preferably whilst he's balancing on a tightrope across Niagra Falls.

[Father Haskell]

On Nov 18, 8:57 am, HVAC <h...@physisist.net> wrote:
> On 11/18/2012 8:11 AM, G=EMC^2 wrote:
>
> > What if as the universe expands new galaxies have to be created
> > continuously to keep its density the same?  Hmmmm That is good
> > thinking I can live with that. TeBet
>
> Created how?  By god?

Turtles. An infinite number of them.

[HVAC]

On 11/20/2012 9:36 PM, G=EMC^2 wrote:
>
>>>>> And why does the density of the universe have to remain stable?
>>>>> To match the density of his brain?
>>
>>>> The laws of thermodynamics are far above Bert's head.
>>
>>>> --
>>> Balancing makes stable TEBET
>>
>> There is your answer, Smiler...."Balancing makes stable".
>>
>> --

> Nothing is over my head. 2nd law in a nut shell. "little energy is
> always wasted." I have a density theory. I'm clever TeBet

There is just no way to argue with logic like THAT.



Hope you have a good Thanksgiving, Bert.







--

[HVAC]

On 11/20/2012 9:42 PM, Smiler wrote:
>
>>>>> And why does the density of the universe have to remain stable? To
>>>>> match the density of his brain?
>>>>
>>>> The laws of thermodynamics are far above Bert's head.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>> Balancing makes stable TEBET
>>
>>
>> There is your answer, Smiler...."Balancing makes stable".
>
> Can you please get Bert to translate that from Gibberish into English?
> Preferably whilst he's balancing on a tightrope across Niagra Falls.

I would, but for some strange reason Bert doesn't like me.

[HVAC]

Ah...But who created the Primordial Turtle?

[Benj]

On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 07:38:14 -0500, HVAC wrote:

> On 11/20/2012 9:46 PM, Father Haskell wrote:
>> On Nov 18, 8:57 am, HVAC<h...@physisist.net> wrote:
>>> On 11/18/2012 8:11 AM, G=EMC^2 wrote:
>>>
>>>> What if as the universe expands new galaxies have to be created
>>>> continuously to keep its density the same? Hmmmm That is good
>>>> thinking I can live with that. TeBet
>>>
>>> Created how? By god?
>>
>> Turtles. An infinite number of them.
>
> Ah...But who created the Primordial Turtle?

Obviously, the Primords. If you have any further science enigmas please
don't hesitate to ask. We are here for you, Harlow. You're welcome.

[HVAC]

On 11/21/2012 7:59 AM, Benj wrote:
>
>>>> Created how? By god?
>>>
>>> Turtles. An infinite number of them.
>>
>> Ah...But who created the Primordial Turtle?
>
> Obviously, the Primords. If you have any further science enigmas please
> don't hesitate to ask. We are here for you, Harlow. You're welcome.

Have a great Thanksgiving, BJ.

[G=EMC^2]

Gravity creates and its force is infinite.It creates matter from
aether energy that is infinite.Galaxies are in infinite growing Ooops
I just gave out the BB,and the evolution of universes I'm clever
TreBert

[HVAC]

On 11/21/2012 9:17 AM, G=EMC^2 wrote:
>
>
> Gravity creates and its force is infinite.It creates matter from
> aether energy that is infinite.Galaxies are in infinite growing Ooops
> I just gave out the BB,and the evolution of universes I'm clever

Everything you just said is 100% wrong. Do you care?

[G=EMC^2]

Out of balance comes m "spin is in"and out of that comes "wobble" and
out of that comes "what is waving" It comes down to no perfect circle.
All this is over "pig heads" Brain dead. Hate thoughts . TeBet

[Benj]

On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 06:17:26 -0800, G=EMC^2 wrote:

> Gravity creates and its force is infinite.It creates matter from aether
> energy that is infinite.Galaxies are in infinite growing Ooops I just
> gave out the BB,and the evolution of universes I'm clever TreBert

You are ignorant beyond belief. There is NOTHING correct in the above
statement. The BB is one of the biggest mistakes in all of physics. Just
ask Bert if you doubt it.

[Smiler]

On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 07:26:32 -0500, HVAC wrote:

> On 11/20/2012 9:42 PM, Smiler wrote:
>>
>>>>>> And why does the density of the universe have to remain stable? To
>>>>>> match the density of his brain?
>>>>>
>>>>> The laws of thermodynamics are far above Bert's head.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>> Balancing makes stable TEBET
>>>
>>>
>>> There is your answer, Smiler...."Balancing makes stable".
>>
>> Can you please get Bert to translate that from Gibberish into English?
>> Preferably whilst he's balancing on a tightrope across Niagra Falls.
>
>
> I would, but for some strange reason Bert doesn't like me.

Nor me, but the feeling's mutual.

[Smiler]

On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 06:17:26 -0800, G=EMC^2 wrote:

> On Nov 21, 7:59�am, Benj <bjac...@iwaynet.net> wrote:
>> On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 07:38:14 -0500, HVAC wrote:
>> > On 11/20/2012 9:46 PM, Father Haskell wrote:
>> >> On Nov 18, 8:57 am, HVAC<h...@physisist.net> �wrote:
>> >>> On 11/18/2012 8:11 AM, G=EMC^2 wrote:
>>
>> >>>> What if as the universe expands new galaxies have to be created
>> >>>> continuously to keep its density the same? �Hmmmm That is good
>> >>>> thinking I can live with that. TeBet
>>
>> >>> Created how? �By god?
>>
>> >> Turtles. �An infinite number of them.
>>
>> > Ah...But who created the Primordial Turtle?
>>
>> Obviously, the Primords. �If you have any further science enigmas
>> please don't hesitate to ask. We are here for you, Harlow. You're
>> welcome.
>
> Gravity creates and its force is infinite.

You've never heard of the inverse square law?

> It creates matter from aether

The non-existent aether?

> energy that is infinite.

Nothing, except for your stupidity, Bert, is infinite.

> Galaxies are in infinite growing

Is that meant to be English?

<remaining gibberish snipped>

[HVAC]

On 11/21/2012 6:42 PM, Smiler wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 06:17:26 -0800, G=EMC^2 wrote:
>
>> Gravity creates and its force is infinite.
>
> You've never heard of the inverse square law?
>
>> It creates matter from aether
>
> The non-existent aether?
>
>> energy that is infinite.
>
> Nothing, except for your stupidity, Bert, is infinite.
>
>> Galaxies are in infinite growing
>
> Is that meant to be English?
>
> <remaining gibberish snipped>

What I find amazing is these unnamed people, (Painus) who instead of
correcting Bert and calling him on his tomfoolery, encourage him in
his fucktardery. Bert is a victim of his severe lack of education
(highest grade completed 4) and now incipient Alzheimer's. But when
these 'do gooders' throw gasoline on the fire by cheering on his idiocy,
the results are what you see in his posts.

[G=EMC^2]

WOW TeBet

[Brad Guth]

Don't pay any attention to that clown behind the cloak of mainstream
physics and science. Some of what you offer is edgy and perhaps not
always as true as it could have been worded.

Matter from aether is asking a lot more of physics than most of us can
accept. However change that aether to "God fart" from the polar jet
of a monstrous black hole, and that analogy could fly, and there has
to be at least one other universe.

[HVAC]

On 11/21/2012 7:26 PM, G=EMC^2 wrote:
>
>>
>> You are ignorant beyond belief. There is NOTHING correct in the above
>> statement. The BB is one of the biggest mistakes in all of physics. Just
>> ask Bert if you doubt it.
>
> WOW TeBet

Bert. Why don't you say 'wow' when Painus makes his claim that the big
bang never happened? I hate two-faced fucks like you.

[Smiler]

On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 19:09:10 -0500, HVAC wrote:

> On 11/21/2012 6:42 PM, Smiler wrote:
>> On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 06:17:26 -0800, G=EMC^2 wrote:
>>
>>> Gravity creates and its force is infinite.
>>
>> You've never heard of the inverse square law?
>>
>>> It creates matter from aether
>>
>> The non-existent aether?
>>
>>> energy that is infinite.
>>
>> Nothing, except for your stupidity, Bert, is infinite.
>>
>>> Galaxies are in infinite growing
>>
>> Is that meant to be English?
>>
>> <remaining gibberish snipped>
>
>
> What I find amazing is these unnamed people, (Painus) who instead of
> correcting Bert and calling him on his tomfoolery, encourage him in his
> fucktardery. Bert is a victim of his severe lack of education (highest
> grade completed 4) and now incipient Alzheimer's. But when these 'do
> gooders' throw gasoline on the fire by cheering on his idiocy, the results
> are what you see in his posts.

Are you sure those unnamed people are intelligent enough to know that Bert
is wrong?

[G=EMC^2]

Right or wrong I spoke to great men,and friends with great minds.The
liked m thinking. Can't win them all.

[HVAC]

On 11/22/2012 6:40 PM, Smiler wrote:
>
>>> Nothing, except for your stupidity, Bert, is infinite.
>>>
>>>> Galaxies are in infinite growing
>>>
>>> Is that meant to be English?
>>>
>>> <remaining gibberish snipped>
>>
>>
>> What I find amazing is these unnamed people, (Painus) who instead of
>> correcting Bert and calling him on his tomfoolery, encourage him in his
>> fucktardery. Bert is a victim of his severe lack of education (highest
>> grade completed 4) and now incipient Alzheimer's. But when these 'do
>> gooders' throw gasoline on the fire by cheering on his idiocy, the results
>> are what you see in his posts.
>
> Are you sure those unnamed people are intelligent enough to know that Bert
> is wrong?

I mean unless you are suffering from some form of a stroke, Bert's
Alzheimer's-induced brand of idiotic post cannot be viewed in any other
manner except to know that he is wrong.

These people who shall remain nameless (Painus), encourage Bert due to
some misplaced sense of being politically correct.

To them, ALL points of view are equally valid and Bert is simply
'thinking outside the box'.

[G=EMC^2]

Just another hate post of the racist pig TeBet

[Benj]

On Fri, 23 Nov 2012 05:11:05 -0800, G=EMC^2 wrote:

> On Nov 23, 7:58 am, HVAC <h...@physisist.net> wrote:

>> > Are you sure those unnamed people are intelligent enough to know that
>> > Bert is wrong?

> Just another hate post of the racist pig TeBet

You tell him, Herb! There is nobody here intelligent enough to contradict
your imaginary friend Bert. And you are clearly much more clever than HVAC
even though he tells everyone he knows it all. People who do that are
disgusting.

[HVAC]

On 11/23/2012 8:11 AM, G=EMC^2 wrote:
>
>>> Are you sure those unnamed people are intelligent enough to know that Bert
>>> is wrong?
>>
>> I mean unless you are suffering from some form of a stroke, Bert's
>> Alzheimer's-induced brand of idiotic post cannot be viewed in any other
>> manner except to know that he is wrong.
>>
>> These people who shall remain nameless (Painus), encourage Bert due to
>> some misplaced sense of being politically correct.
>>
>> To them, ALL points of view are equally valid and Bert is simply
>> 'thinking outside the box'.
>>
>> --

> Just another hate post of the racist pig TeBet

No Bert. There is no hate and there is no racism. I am simply calling
them as I see them. The fact that you are so senile that you can't even
see it is comical yet sad at the same time.

Good luck to you as the veil of Alzheimer's is drawn over what remains
of your mind.







--