Sheepshagger "Henry Wilson DSc." <..@..>
quoted & wrote:
... after Sheepshagger Henry wondered and wrote:
Incidentally, is it true that some of your ancestors used
to wander the Sahara looking for gold or lost camels?
... with everybody's ancestry diverting 2^n per generation
it may have been as well a common ancestor of ours that
was searching, Henry. However, Henry, my line found the
gold and kept it, got the camels, sold them & kept the money
with which they bought sheep farms in your Aussie outback
and hired you as a sheep shagger. Androcles pointed that
out to you for many years now. --- Henry, listen, don't be so
self-conscious about it. --- Henry, there is no shame in
earning your keep by manual labor, as is the case for you.
Sheepshagger Henry kept on lamenting & wrote:
Are you related to Mahammed Hanson, the nomadic
Saharan camel abuser?
It is heart-rendering to see how your exposure to
the constant "mah, mah, mah", of your wooly friends
has made you "mad" and confused to such an extent
that you have no idea what _2^n_ means.... ahahaha...
So, let me try and reach you on your level of mentation in
a different way, Henry: I have never seen nor met that
"Mahammed Hanson" but let me show you how closely
YOU are related to him:
1) Send 100 e-mails to your in laws friend & acqaintencies.
---------------------------- 100 = 10^2 pweople got mail
2) Ask that each one of theses folks to repeat (1), so that
---------------------------- 1e4 = 10^(2+2) NEW folks get mail
3) tell theses folks now to repeat (1), so that
---------------------------- 1e6 = 10^(2+2+2 ) NEW folks get mail
4) tell this # 3 lot now to repeat (1), so that
---------------------------- 1e8 = 10^(2+2+2 +2) NEW folks get mail
5) Make the 5th round with these folks and you will see that
~ one third into it, some 7 Billion folks = every person on
Earth has receide an e-mail.
So, Henry, do that. Arrange just 5 such e-mail spreads and
you will meet your yearned for relative Mahammed Hanson.
Do you git it now, Henry you git?
Until you do Henry, I shall repost what had substance which
has a velocity that was clearly beyond your event horizon:
---- Linus Segal aka "linuxgal" <linux...
who is a kike in drag wrote:
----- Rich Haley aka Harlow "HVAC" <mr.h...
OP Rich Haley aka Harlow wrote:
Two leaders of the OPERA collaboration, which stunned the
world in September when it announced data suggesting
that neutrinos could travel faster than the speed of light,
have stepped down & got Shitcanned, cuz the problen was
blamed on a faulty cable connection.
Moral of this story: Don't fuck with Einstein.
True, but ONLY the "moral" is such, cuz there are still
hordes of Einstein Dingleberries that stick to the belief
that, at any cost, the speed of light cannot be surpassed.
That belief is gospel, DESPITE Einstein's own assertion,
in his 1905 paper, wherein he said:
|||AE||| "the velocity of light "c" in our theory (SR) plays the
|||AE||| part, physically, of an infinitely great velocity."
1) The story of "c" being constant is long & murky as
the physics community arbitrated and decided that "c"
must be a CONSTANT. The particle physics dudes
even set "c = 1" as an example of "c" having been
DEFENDED as being constant (Google codata/MIST)
-- If "c" would be left left as having a variable value,
then all other fundamental physical constants would
change in their size according the to the value that
this "c-variable" has in each environment that it is
.... & the entire house of current theoreatical physics
would crumble like a house of cards, because of the
need of a theory for every given or looked at event.
2) The definition of a "constant 'c' in __vacuum__" is
murky too, as there exists __no true physical vacuum__.
A true physical vacuum is devoid of every physical
asset and therefore cannot be observed.
This true physical vacuum is at the one end of physics
where known physical laws break down, like with the
also, by definition unobservable, black holes on the
other end of the spectrum.
3) The value of "c" as currently defined (not as its
arbitrated Cs measured size) has its roots in the
cosmologies, all of which use as their basis the
1234 cosmic envelope that says:
c = (GM/R)^1/2 = (GMH)^1/3 = (GM*b)^1/4
which shows why the physical vacuum is not zero
but is dependent on spatial mass-energy density,
and needs to be so to keep notions (1) & (2) afloat.
4) Einstein's notion of "c" being "physically, an infinitely
great velocity" is physically impossible and only valid in
an imaginary universe that is devoid of mass-energy which
a locus & construct that has no physical meanings.
To that end it is hilarious to notice that Einstein referred
to pastor LeMaitre's cosmology as "Catholic Science"
while Einstein with his "Juden Physik" fervently believed
that his own "Jewish Shit don't stink", & is so supported
by hordes of Einstein's Dingleberries who all worship
Albert's sphincter. with a relativistic passion.... ahaha
IOW, Einstein was wrong and overreaching himself
with the properties of " 'c' being an infinitely great
velocity", and his subsequent "biggest blunder" was
merely a bagatelle resulting therefrom.
Linus Segal listen, the "Moral of this story" is:
Segal, you "Fucked yourself with Einstein's Shitcan"
that contains his SR/GR.... ahahahAHAHAHA...
Thanks for the laughs though, you splendid Shicksah
______Utilitarian Physics ________
Note to Einstein Dingleberries and FTL fanatics:
MMX proselytizers say "Physics can do without Aether"
Therefore there is NO Aether, they insist.
Relativists say "Physics can do without FTL"
Therefore there is NO FTL, they insist.
The history of physics is rife with such utilitarian paradigms.
This is known as__Politically Correct Physics__, PC-Science.
AGW & CC are the glaring heuristic examples thereof.
------- LOTs of money in such gags ------------