>>>> Guess what, Mr. Obama, you just lost my vote in 2012. >>> Waaaaah. I have yet to hear your complaint about Mr. Bush. >> Since America won't prosecute, Europe will.
> Try drinking less political kool-aid and more Prozac.
Tell us about climate science you science illiterate religious fuck.
>>>>> Torture, Domestic Surveillance, High Crimes?
>>>>> Guess what, Mr. Obama, you just lost my vote in 2012. >>>> Waaaaah. I have yet to hear your complaint about Mr. Bush. >>> Since America won't prosecute, Europe will.
>> Try drinking less political kool-aid and more Prozac.
> Tell us about climate science you science illiterate religious fuck.
> >>>> Torture, Domestic Surveillance, High Crimes?
> >>>> Guess what, Mr. Obama, you just lost my vote in 2012. > >>> Waaaaah. I have yet to hear your complaint about Mr. Bush. > >> Since America won't prosecute, Europe will.
> > Try drinking less political kool-aid and more Prozac.
> Tell us about climate science you science illiterate religious fuck.
I can! "Climate science" requires that you (in order):
1. draw up your conclusions.
2. Assemble the data to support (1) above.
3. Create a computer model to support (1) above, using the data filtered in (2) above.
4. Get a shill to create a giant infomercial to proclaim your conclusions to the world. It might even get a Nobel Prize for the effort.
>>>>>> Fuck Your God, Obama. >>>>>> And fuck your God damned CIA too. >>>>>> Torture, Domestic Surveillance, High Crimes? >>>>>> Guess what, Mr. Obama, you just lost my vote in 2012.
Deaf Power wrote: >>>>> Waaaaah. I have yet to hear your complaint about Mr. Bush.
Thomas wrote: >>>> Since America won't prosecute, Europe will.
Jim wrote: >>> Try drinking less political kool-aid and more Prozac.
Thomas wrote: >> Tell us about climate science you science illiterate religious fuck.
Jim wrote: > Like I said, try more Prozac. For starters, I'm hardly religious > You're a delusional fruitcake.
hanson wrote:
... ahahahaha... That's a very promising thread!. Don't stop now, guys. Thomas, are you gonna be back, for a retort, after dinner, and having followed Jim's advice to increase your Fluoxetine uptake?... ahahaha... ahahahaha...
>>>>>>> Fuck Your God, Obama. >>>>>>> And fuck your God damned CIA too. >>>>>>> Torture, Domestic Surveillance, High Crimes? >>>>>>> Guess what, Mr. Obama, you just lost my vote in 2012.
> Deaf Power wrote: >>>>>> Waaaaah. I have yet to hear your complaint about Mr. Bush.
> Thomas wrote: >>>>> Since America won't prosecute, Europe will.
> Jim wrote: >>>> Try drinking less political kool-aid and more Prozac.
> Thomas wrote: >>> Tell us about climate science you science illiterate religious fuck.
> Jim wrote: >> Like I said, try more Prozac. For starters, I'm hardly religious >> You're a delusional fruitcake.
> hanson wrote: > ... ahahahaha... That's a very promising thread!. Don't stop now, > guys. Thomas, are you gonna be back, for a retort, after dinner, > and having followed Jim's advice to increase your Fluoxetine > uptake?... ahahaha... ahahahaha...
Naaaa, they always slam my nntp after a comment like that.
It takes a few hours for the service to be restored.
You realize I'm just testing the constitution, right?
I wouldn't want to be running on a faulty document.
Oops, you can't add sci.chem to that, something has to be removed. So many questions, so little time, which usenet newsgroup to remove, and thus deny my constitutional test code. Ok, I'm decider, sci.chem goes.
>> Deaf Power wrote: >>>>>>> Waaaaah. I have yet to hear your complaint about Mr. Bush.
>> Thomas wrote: >>>>>> Since America won't prosecute, Europe will.
>> Jim wrote: >>>>> Try drinking less political kool-aid and more Prozac.
>> Thomas wrote: >>>> Tell us about climate science you science illiterate religious fuck.
>> Jim wrote: >>> Like I said, try more Prozac. For starters, I'm hardly religious >>> You're a delusional fruitcake.
>> hanson wrote: >> ... ahahahaha... That's a very promising thread!. Don't stop now, >> guys. Thomas, are you gonna be back, for a retort, after dinner, >> and having followed Jim's advice to increase your Fluoxetine >> uptake?... ahahaha... ahahahaha...
Thomas wrote: > Naaaa, they always slam my nntp after a comment like that. > It takes a few hours for the service to be restored. > You realize I'm just testing the constitution, right? > I wouldn't want to be running on a faulty document. > Oops, you can't add sci.chem to that, something has to be removed. So many > questions, so little time, which usenet newsgroup to remove, and thus deny > my constitutional test code. Ok, I'm decider, sci.chem goes.
hanson wrote:
Tommy, that's a bad retort. You just reinforced what Jim has suspected you of and recommended for you. Listen to him Whining to me will fall on deaf ear in this case. I whish you tough all the best for you recovery. Now go back to or at Jim. hanson
>> Deaf Power wrote: >>>>>>> Waaaaah. I have yet to hear your complaint about Mr. Bush.
>> Thomas wrote: >>>>>> Since America won't prosecute, Europe will.
>> Jim wrote: >>>>> Try drinking less political kool-aid and more Prozac.
>> Thomas wrote: >>>> Tell us about climate science you science illiterate religious fuck.
>> Jim wrote: >>> Like I said, try more Prozac. For starters, I'm hardly religious >>> You're a delusional fruitcake.
>> hanson wrote: >> ... ahahahaha... That's a very promising thread!. Don't stop now, >> guys. Thomas, are you gonna be back, for a retort, after dinner, >> and having followed Jim's advice to increase your Fluoxetine >> uptake?... ahahaha... ahahahaha...
Thomas wrote: > Naaaa, they always slam my nntp after a comment like that. > It takes a few hours for the service to be restored. > You realize I'm just testing the constitution, right? > I wouldn't want to be running on a faulty document. > Oops, you can't add sci.chem to that, something has to be removed. So many > questions, so little time, which usenet newsgroup to remove, and thus deny > my constitutional test code. Ok, I'm decider, sci.chem goes.
hanson wrote:
Tommy, that's a bad retort. You just reinforced what Jim has suspected you of and recommended for you. Listen to him. Whining to me will fall on deaf ear in this case. I whish you though all the best for you recovery. Now go back to or at Jim. hanson
Thomas wrote:
God doesn't give a fuck what you think, Hanson.
hanson Congrats!, Tommy, now that you have elevated yourself from being "the decider" to being "God" ... you, T. Elifritz, you have a problem. ... Look in your initial intro-paragraph above. You said ::TE:: Fuck Your God, Obama.... Tom, you seem to say that Obama ought to fuck you, or that you wanna fuck yourself. Either way, bad scene, Tommy... But rest assured, both events are gonna happen... ahahaha... Yet, thanks for the laughs... ahahaha... ahahahahanson
>>>>>>>> Fuck Your God, Obama. >>>>>>>> And fuck your God damned CIA too. >>>>>>>> Torture, Domestic Surveillance, High Crimes? >>>>>>>> Guess what, Mr. Obama, you just lost my vote in 2012.
>> Deaf Power wrote: >>>>>>> Waaaaah. I have yet to hear your complaint about Mr. Bush.
>> Thomas wrote: >>>>>> Since America won't prosecute, Europe will.
>> Jim wrote: >>>>> Try drinking less political kool-aid and more Prozac.
>> Thomas wrote: >>>> Tell us about climate science you science illiterate religious fuck.
>> Jim wrote: >>> Like I said, try more Prozac. For starters, I'm hardly religious >>> You're a delusional fruitcake.
>> hanson wrote: >> ... ahahahaha... That's a very promising thread!. Don't stop now, >> guys. Thomas, are you gonna be back, for a retort, after dinner, >> and having followed Jim's advice to increase your Fluoxetine >> uptake?... ahahaha... ahahahaha...
> Naaaa, they always slam my nntp after a comment like that.
> It takes a few hours for the service to be restored.
> You realize I'm just testing the constitution, right?
> I wouldn't want to be running on a faulty document.
> Oops, you can't add sci.chem to that, something has to be removed. So > many questions, so little time, which usenet newsgroup to remove, and > thus deny my constitutional test code. Ok, I'm decider, sci.chem goes.
If you use COX they will cut your NG service if someone complains about your anti negroe post if you post it on the wrong NG . But only for a few days and you really have to post it to a group that is not like this one where it does not belong. This is why I use 4 different accounts and such. Keep ahead of the ass holes that oppress free speech. Note ( do not advertise for cotton pickers on the black personals ng ) But after a while they get tired of all the complaints and just give up.
Waaaaah. I have yet to hear your complaint about Mr. Bush.
Thomas wrote:
Since America won't prosecute, Europe will.
Jim wrote:
Try drinking less political kool-aid and more Prozac.
Thomas wrote:
Tell us about climate science you science illiterate religious fuck.
Jim wrote:
Like I said, try more Prozac. For starters, I'm hardly religious You're a delusional fruitcake.
hanson wrote:
... ahahahaha... That's a very promising thread!. Don't stop now, guys. Thomas, are you gonna be back, for a retort, after dinner, and having followed Jim's advice to increase your Fluoxetine uptake?... ahahaha... ahahahaha...
Thomas wrote:
Naaaa, they always slam my nntp after a comment like that. It takes a few hours for the service to be restored. You realize I'm just testing the constitution, right? I wouldn't want to be running on a faulty document. Oops, you can't add sci.chem to that, something has to be removed. So many questions, so little time, which usenet newsgroup to remove, and thus deny my constitutional test code. Ok, I'm decider, sci.chem goes.
hanson wrote:
Tommy, that's a bad retort. You just reinforced what Jim has suspected you of and recommended for you. Listen to him. Whining to me will fall on deaf ear in this case. I whish you though all the best for you recovery. Now go back to or at Jim. hanson
Thomas wrote:
God doesn't give a fuck what you think, Hanson.
hanson wrote:
Congrats!, Tommy, now that you have elevated yourself from being "the decider" to being "God" ... you, T. Elifritz, you have a problem. ... Look in your initial intro-paragraph above. You said ::TE:: Fuck Your God, Obama.... Tom, you seem to say that Obama ought to fuck you, or that you wanna fuck yourself. Either way, bad scene, Tommy... But rest assured, both events are gonna happen... ahahaha... Yet, thanks for the laughs... ahahaha... ahahahahanson
Two primates, fucking. Hanson. (1) That's so weird how reality works with or without God. (2)
hanson wrote:
... ahahahaha... Indeed, Jim pegged you right, Tommy. Your Prozac has put you into a different state of reality.... (1) you being a primate plus your own Doppelgļæ½nger & you trying to escape from your bad scene by your yearning: (2) Tommy to become yourself again i.e. a lonely nobody...
Try to achieve this by reducing your daily Prozac doses, gradually, along with the waning of the Full moon... and in 2-3 weeks your own cosmic life form may be back to normal again & hopefully decouple from your lunatic cycling.
However, the Fluoride in the Prozac, which crosses the Blood Brain Barrier appears to have caused already bad permanent cerebral changes and damages, (atrophy), in you. Bad Scene for you, indeed, Tommy.
So, Tommy, keep on being fumy instead of funny... for in the former condition you are much more hilarious. Thanks for the laughs, chum... ahahaha....ahahanson.
hanson wrote: >> God doesn't give a fuck what you think, Hanson. >> That's so weird how reality works with or without God. > Your Prozac has put you into a different state of reality.... > Try to achieve this by reducing your daily Prozac doses > However, the Fluoride in the Prozac
I don't take Prozac, my biological and pharmacological skills are much more sophisticated and efficient than mere taking of mass produced highly refined synthetic chemical compounds. I'm a scientist, remember?
I'm not a 'businessman' (aka politician, militarist, theist, deist etc.)
The closest I get to those kinds of things are vitamins and aspirin.
You may now return to praising Mr. Obama's 'Faith Based Initiatives'.
"kT" aka Thomas Elifritz, the "comic life form" which was once a <cosmic -- lifeform.org>, before he became a habitual Prozac
patient now wrote:
I don't take Prozac, my biological and pharmacological skills are much more sophisticated and efficient than mere taking of mass produced highly refined synthetic chemical compounds.The closest I get to those kinds of things are vitamins and aspirin.
hanson wrote:
... ahahahaha... but that is what all habitual and addicted (ab)users like yourself say... & as Jim Pennino's cyber diagnosis has shown in:
Thomas Elifritz, the "comic life form" wrote: I'm a scientist, remember? I'm not a 'businessman' (aka politician, militarist, theist, deist etc.)
hanson wrote:
Yeah right,.. Sure, Tommy, sure... ahahahaha... you are a "scientist" like all those many other posters in these NGs claim to be... and AFA a your Prozac habit, public records do shown that self-anointed "scientists" like yourself are the biggest and most loyal clients of the pharmaceutical industry which makes Prozac.
Thomas Elifritz, the "comic life form" wrote: You may now return to praising Mr. Obama's 'Faith Based Initiatives'.
hanson wrote:
... ahahahaha.... See, Tommy, right here you have demonstrated an example of your cerebral atrophy due to your Prozac habit. 'Faith Based Initiatives' were Mr. Bush's gag and gig... ahahaha... Thanks for the laughs, though... ahahahaha... ahahahahanson
> > >>>> Torture, Domestic Surveillance, High Crimes?
> > >>>> Guess what, Mr. Obama, you just lost my vote in 2012. > > >>> Waaaaah. I have yet to hear your complaint about Mr. Bush. > > >> Since America won't prosecute, Europe will.
> > > Try drinking less political kool-aid and more Prozac.
> > Tell us about climate science you science illiterate religious fuck.
> I can! "Climate science" requires that you (in order):
> 1. draw up your conclusions.
> 2. Assemble the data to support (1) above.
> 3. Create a computer model to support (1) above, using the data filtered > in (2) above.
> 4. Get a shill to create a giant infomercial to proclaim your > conclusions to the world. It might even get a Nobel Prize for the effort.
science based natural life form, utter dependent upon sunlight, soil and plants, living on a planet with a molten core, asteroid and comet threats, and seven billion other nationalistic religious assholes.
You think you're doing me a disservice, hanson, but actually you're doing me a favor. Thank you so much for playing the usenet game with me.
> > > >>>> Torture, Domestic Surveillance, High Crimes?
> > > >>>> Guess what, Mr. Obama, you just lost my vote in 2012. > > > >>> Waaaaah. I have yet to hear your complaint about Mr. Bush. > > > >> Since America won't prosecute, Europe will.
> > > > Try drinking less political kool-aid and more Prozac.
> > > Tell us about climate science you science illiterate religious fuck.
> > I can! "Climate science" requires that you (in order):
> > 1. draw up your conclusions.
> > 2. Assemble the data to support (1) above.
> > 3. Create a computer model to support (1) above, using the data filtered > > in (2) above.
> > 4. Get a shill to create a giant infomercial to proclaim your > > conclusions to the world. It might even get a Nobel Prize for the effort.
> You don't understand how science works, do you?
> Tater
I understand how AGW global warming "science" works. In REAL science, you look at all of the data first, without preconceived notions, THEN you draw up theories to explain the data.
What I described above sums up the state of "climate science" today.
>> On Apr 7, 8:10 pm, Orval Fairbairn <o_r_fairbairn@earth_link.net> >> wrote: >>> In article <gcTCl.11200$%k2.3...@newsfe07.iad>,
>>> kT <cos...@lifeform.org> wrote: >>>> j...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> In sci.physics kT <cos...@lifeform.org> wrote: >>>>>> Deaf Power wrote: >>>>>>> On Tue, 07 Apr 2009 19:24:18 -0500, kT <cos...@lifeform.org> wrote: >>>>>>>> Fuck Your God, Obama. >>>>>>>> And fuck your God damned CIA too. >>>>>>>> Torture, Domestic Surveillance, High Crimes? >>>>>>>> Guess what, Mr. Obama, you just lost my vote in 2012. >>>>>>> Waaaaah. I have yet to hear your complaint about Mr. Bush. >>>>>> Since America won't prosecute, Europe will. >>>>> Try drinking less political kool-aid and more Prozac. >>>> Tell us about climate science you science illiterate religious fuck. >>> I can! "Climate science" requires that you (in order):
>>> 1. draw up your conclusions.
>>> 2. Assemble the data to support (1) above.
>>> 3. Create a computer model to support (1) above, using the data filtered >>> in (2) above.
>>> 4. Get a shill to create a giant infomercial to proclaim your >>> conclusions to the world. It might even get a Nobel Prize for the effort. >> You don't understand how science works, do you?
>> Tater
> I understand how AGW global warming "science" works. In REAL science, > you look at all of the data first, without preconceived notions, THEN > you draw up theories to explain the data.
And then when you get new data that doesn't support your 'theory'?
> > > > >>>> Torture, Domestic Surveillance, High Crimes?
> > > > >>>> Guess what, Mr. Obama, you just lost my vote in 2012. > > > > >>> Waaaaah. I have yet to hear your complaint about Mr. Bush. > > > > >> Since America won't prosecute, Europe will.
> > > > > Try drinking less political kool-aid and more Prozac.
> > > > Tell us about climate science you science illiterate religious fuck.
> > > I can! "Climate science" requires that you (in order):
> > > 1. draw up your conclusions.
> > > 2. Assemble the data to support (1) above.
> > > 3. Create a computer model to support (1) above, using the data filtered > > > in (2) above.
> > > 4. Get a shill to create a giant infomercial to proclaim your > > > conclusions to the world. It might even get a Nobel Prize for the effort.
> > You don't understand how science works, do you?
> > Tater
> I understand how AGW global warming "science" works. In REAL science, > you look at all of the data first, without preconceived notions, THEN > you draw up theories to explain the data.
> What I described above sums up the state of "climate science" today.
No, it doesn't, unless by using climate science in quotes you mean something other than scientific study of the climate.
d above sums up the state of "climate science" today.
> No, it doesn't, unless by using climate science in quotes you mean > something other than scientific study of the climate.
Dorinda Outram provides a good example of a standard, intellectual definition of the Enlightnment:
"Enlightenment was a desire for human affairs to be guided by rationality rather than by faith, superstition, or revelation; a belief in the power of human reason to change society and liberate the individual from the restraints of custom or arbitrary authority; all backed up by a world view increasingly validated by science rather than by religion or tradition."
> d above sums up the state of "climate science" today.
>> No, it doesn't, unless by using climate science in quotes you mean >> something other than scientific study of the climate.
> Dorinda Outram provides a good example of a standard, intellectual > definition of the Enlightnment:
> "Enlightenment was a desire for human affairs to be guided by > rationality rather than by faith, superstition, or revelation; a belief > in the power of human reason to change society and liberate the > individual from the restraints of custom or arbitrary authority; all > backed up by a world view increasingly validated by science rather than > by religion or tradition."
> >> On Apr 7, 8:10 pm, Orval Fairbairn <o_r_fairbairn@earth_link.net> > >> wrote: > >>> In article <gcTCl.11200$%k2.3...@newsfe07.iad>,
> >>> kT <cos...@lifeform.org> wrote: > >>>> j...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >>>>> In sci.physics kT <cos...@lifeform.org> wrote: > >>>>>> Deaf Power wrote: > >>>>>>> On Tue, 07 Apr 2009 19:24:18 -0500, kT <cos...@lifeform.org> wrote: > >>>>>>>> Fuck Your God, Obama. > >>>>>>>> And fuck your God damned CIA too. > >>>>>>>> Torture, Domestic Surveillance, High Crimes? > >>>>>>>> Guess what, Mr. Obama, you just lost my vote in 2012. > >>>>>>> Waaaaah. I have yet to hear your complaint about Mr. Bush. > >>>>>> Since America won't prosecute, Europe will. > >>>>> Try drinking less political kool-aid and more Prozac. > >>>> Tell us about climate science you science illiterate religious fuck. > >>> I can! "Climate science" requires that you (in order):
> >>> 1. draw up your conclusions.
> >>> 2. Assemble the data to support (1) above.
> >>> 3. Create a computer model to support (1) above, using the data filtered > >>> in (2) above.
> >>> 4. Get a shill to create a giant infomercial to proclaim your > >>> conclusions to the world. It might even get a Nobel Prize for the effort. > >> You don't understand how science works, do you?
> >> Tater
> > I understand how AGW global warming "science" works. In REAL science, > > you look at all of the data first, without preconceived notions, THEN > > you draw up theories to explain the data.
> And then when you get new data that doesn't support your 'theory'?
I haven't seen any yet! Please provide!
> You're a fucking retard. Forever. Get used to it.
kT, please tell us in the cyber world just HOW you became such an accomplished ignoranus!
1. Were you born that way? 2. Did you work hard to achieve it? 3. Did you attend the finest liberal universities and suck up to the most left-wing professors? 4. Was it some combination of the above?
