Michelson–Morley stop the madness. No more TV discussion or radio pronouncements please.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

This is just far too embarrassing for the peer review process.

Everyone must cease and desist immediately all discussions regarding
the validity of the Michelson–Morley experiment.

Aether drift, would only be expected if light had intrinsic mass.

Light is a transverse wave packet known as a photon. It has no intrinsic mass.

It can travel at c.

It travels at c through Absolute Space-time a fancy word for the ether.

It travels through it without resistance.
And if the ether was rushing sideways against it, since light has no mass
no aether drift could ever occur.

So what you are dealing with here is very faulty logic.

And it just keeps perpetuating through history.

It is a sad commentary on the state of science today.

Every time I hear someone parrot the Michelson–Morley experiment I cringe.

And yet these are intellectual scholars. I don't know what else to blame
other than intellectual laziness.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

A nice simple model is the easiest way to understand this...

If you imagine the nucleus as a pulsing bubble which is pulsing in and out because it is elastic and it is being tugged out by the vacuum of space and
the overall expansion of space-time.

So it pulses in and out and it sends out a spherical wave and that we will
call and m wave. Because it is dark energy. You cannot see it.

You know it exists because you can feel its force. You can take two magnets
and feel that there is a physical force there. Mass meeting mass.
Wherever mass meets mass you have f=ma.

If you step on the gas, you feel drag from the ether against your molecules.

Its mass against your mass.

When you spin a superconducting fluid you see that the vortexes, or
vortices which form in the fluid are reacting to a background ether,
which is grainy and it is quantized, and related proportionately to Plank's constant.

So we call this background the quantum foam, and consider it also to be just smaller bubbles, but made out of the same type of stuff as the nucleus.

It is Plank length in diameter and hence why everything is quantized.
And it has mass because it is sitting there also pulsing in and out, so that
gyroscopic effect of pulsing in and out, requires mass to alter its course.

So mass interacts with mass through this foam which causes you to feel g's
because mass and gravity are intertwined.
They are the same thing.

Attractive gravity is only m waves cancelling out. That is where dark energy
which is kinetic energy, is the opposing force to gravity and it balances
out the effect of gravity except that the universe is open so dark energy
is winning because it is in the same direction as the big bang.
Outward as these m waves leave the surface of the nucleus at c.

They do so because the universe is expanding at a fixed rate a steady rate,
even though it is accelerating, it does so uniformly. And the nuclei are
vibrating at a steady fixed individual rate as if they were in a slot.
Stable elements sit in slots.
So they put out waves at a predictable frequency.

When they crest, it has the most power and we call that crest and electron.
And then when these crests meet and create a transverse wave, that is a photon.
Since the atom is pulsing, the wave is periodic and then the transverse wave
shooting out through the foam with no or little resistance hits the detector.

Quantized. Again every aspect of it, the wave values the frequency values
all proportional to Plank's constant.

Now then light can be polarized because of the shape of the wave. You can
block out horizontal light and only have vertical light because a quantum
foam bubble is a very small thing and these waves are waves in it.

It fringes due to interference because of its wave properties. The particle
property it has is this background quantum foam one size fits all identical
bubbles of identical size when side by side but perfectly elastic.
So as you vary the gravity well they vary in size.
You vary a gravity well depth by the presence of mass. All mass.
Which is caused by mass resisting expansion, falling back in time
compared to areas which have little mass and hence little resistance to expansion of the universe.
The t axis being outward along that line of expansion.

So when the foam is compressed around massive bodies, light still travels through it as if it were going in a straight line since it is traveling
in the quantum foam as a wave. It is taking the path of least resistance.

Bubbles the same relative size in that zone or ring or sphere around a massive
body. And you see this effect of compressing the foam is caused by the
increase in pressure, as you get closer to the massive body which is putting out
m waves.

A sun is putting out a lot of energetic waves full spectrum as it were including
dark energy coming out of its gravity well as the cosmological constant.
Opposing the force of things which would otherwise merely fall into the
well, which is huge. Our solar system is huge.
The sun deforms space around it for 50,000 AU. 50,000 times the distance from
here to the sun.

The expansive force of the universe is E=mc2.

People say light or em waves since light is merely an em wave, like
any other has mass but what they are measuring is the borrowed mass of the medium.

Now the Michelson-Morley experiment is used in order to deny the existence
of something that is very well known in physics.
Which to me is crazy.
The permeability of free space.
The permeability constant (μ0), also known as the magnetic constant or the permeability of free space, is a measure of the amount of resistance encountered when forming a magnetic field in a classical vacuum.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

>
> Now the Michelson-Morley experiment is used in order to deny the existence
>
> of something that is very well known in physics.
>
> Which to me is crazy.
>
> The permeability of free space.
>
> The permeability constant (μ0), also known as the magnetic constant or the permeability of free space, is a measure of the amount of resistance encountered when forming a magnetic field in a classical vacuum.

Then you also have the permittivity of free space for the e portion
of electromagnetism.

The physical constant ε0, commonly called the vacuum permittivity, permittivity of free space or electric constant is an ideal, (baseline) physical constant, which is the value of the absolute (not relative) dielectric permittivity of classical vacuum.

So we know it exists because we can measure its resistance as a for instance.

We also know about zero point energy, all manner of intricate details
regarding its characteristics and how it behaves under various conditions
and CERN has even been looking for it as a Higgs Bosun except they
are so tiny you may never detect one individually.

Consider that the difference in size between a H nucleus and one bubble
is about 10 to the power of 25.
And only the big bang it is assumed could make a nucleus out of bubbles
that size or in the same material but of a vastly larger size.

But the basic constants are related to each other because there is
a mechanism by which the universe operates. It is expanding.
And the base material the quantum foam has physical properties.
The interaction of those two things give rise to everything else
in the known physical universe.
We not only know how they are related, we can backtrack to t= almost
zero with current theory, although they are just theories and
will no doubt be modified as time goes on.

Phonons are a great way to see just a larger scale version of the way
in which waves travel through the universe, and exactly how the mass
is transferred
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phonon.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

Now although this seems pretty straight forward, there are some amazing
quirks about all this such as gravity itself.

Now the quantum foam bubbles get smaller the closer you get to a massive body.

So you have a gravitational gradient. On earth 9.8 ft per sec per sec.

So the bubbles getting smaller is somehow related to the acceleration due to gravity.

But that's not the strangest part. The strangest part is how the universe
expands but does not increase in size since it expands into the 4th
dimension, that which is past the edge of the universe, past the extent
of the quantum foam which has light in it and we assume, that the quantum
foam itself was also created in the big bang.

It must have been like a supernova, and created H nuclei on the implosion,
then quantum foam bubbles on the explosion.

That needs to be investigated.
And hypothesized about.

But regarding light it can be slowed down in a medium, and even stopped.

Here is an experiment for the Discovery channel, that they can use
next time they air something about the Michelson-Morley experiment
as being valid by today's science.

Get assistant to hold a flashlight 12 feet away and have them turn it on.

Now then you can block that light by closing your eyes and covering them with molasses.
That will completely stop those photons, and no matter how many times you do that a pile of photons will not gather on the floor, since they are not
in themselves matter, they have no mass, they are a wave of energy.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

This is the important part about gravity.

As you fall the bubbles you are falling through are getting smaller so you are crossing more space in less time. The bubbles themselves are what gives space 3 dimensionality. They are touching each other, yet elastic, and fluid.

So as you fall, your mass by comparison is greater than the mass of the bubbles which are getting smaller. You fall faster and faster.

Without the quantum foam, there would be no resistance and smack.
You fall out of an airplane and immediately hit the ground other than
air resistance.

So it is not attracting you other than by magnetism, which is not great
under these conditions, but you have less and less resistance as
the bubbles get smaller under this steady force.

So it is hampering you less and less.

If you blast off in a rocket however, you are going the other way amigo
and the bubbles are getting bigger.
So your mass by comparison is shrinking and so it is more difficult to
reach escape velocity than it is to fall out of a plane.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

When you hit the throttle in a jet, you get lift from the wing by compressing
air molecules against the earth, but also they feel g's when you hit them.

They have resistance to acceleration as well.


As you climb out of a gravity well there is less ambient pressure so
the bubbles get larger, so that means more space to cross until you get
to the point where they are not changing in size much.

They are in relation to the sun though and if you went that way, again
they would be getting smaller.
You could fall into the sun, but the sun is putting out dark energy waves so you would probably orbit.

If you make a wormhole, and you go through one door, there would be no quantum foam between the doors so hypothetically you would cross instantaneously.
But that's not really true because if you did not decompress, which you would, but if you had a inward force-field of some sci-fi type, to keep you from
decompressing, you would merely stop inside the door and go no further.
The distance between the doors would still exist.
So relative space would exist for an outside the door observer, but not
even light could travel inside a wormhole.

So in that way a wormhole is like a black hole.

A black hole however has a very deep gravity well. Now people have speculated
that you could fall into a black hole and find it is a worm hole.

However what it probably is is just some matter falling back in time compared
to the rest of the universe.

Those bubbles of foam are not getting bigger. As you climb out of
the black hole the bubbles get bigger.

We have to assume that the smallest they get is Plank Length. However since
time and space are linked, and the expansion is into the 4th dimension,
they could be expanding yet not getting larger in size themselves.

The only time they get larger or smaller is by comparison to each other
in different pressure zones of different gravity wells and due to that
effect you get time dilation length contraction etc.

But even a single molecule has a gravity well because the quantum foam
bubbles are so tiny. They still deform by that much mass and those
nuclei have weight, and have slots, or depths of well.
Chemistry and microbiology stand to gain from a better understanding
of how those wells work in conjunction with dark energy or m waves
since the bonds in molecules are due to those two factors.
Black body radiation is of course another form of dark energy.
All basically the same, made of the same stuff.
Radiation is the transfer of energy in transverse waves. em waves again.
Just more photons of a different color.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

Paint you a picture of a transverse wave in motion through the quantum foam....

So the spherical waves are still there and getting larger and the intersection points are moving away from the source radially.

You plot the intersection points of the moving m wave fronts, and you have
a transverse wave with more energy than the rest of the spherical wave
that is beside that point since where they meet the waves are combining their energy.

So you get the familiar light wave patterns.
Usually depicted by half or quarter circular lines intersecting away
from a source.
Waves overlapping .Its difficult to imagine just how many and just how
fast these waves are and how powerful.

When you consider it, the expansion force of the universe is causing
the nuclei pulse, and the strength of that pulse G is behind
the force of the spherical wave so they travel at c.

And in that way the forces are all related and the constants are all related.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

For instance at the first wave crest, away from the nucleus, happens at the electron shell.
Lets use H, the shell is where we measure that force as e.

So you see G and c and e all related.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

So how is it the waves get stronger? Like radiation? Well the force G is only
for H. For a radioactive heavy element it is the atomic number times G.

And if you were to make a hydrogen bomb, then you are unleashing its full potential. As E=mc2.

Picture the mechanical look of a bubble pulsing in and out, and it sends
out a spherical wave since it is physically pushing against quantum foam
when it pulses in and out so it is moving the quantum foam and it is transferring that mass or momentum through the foam at c.

Everywhere there is foam, there are waves in it. Background radiation.
Its not absolute zero until you get past the edge of the universe.

[1treePetrifiedForestLane]

so, if atoms are operative in "free space,
index of refraction slightly greater than one,
why do you need a God-am aether?

> For instance at the first wave crest, away from the nucleus, happens at the electron shell.
> Lets use H, the shell is where we measure that force as e.

anyway, eminem did not get "no" result, and
this anamoly is reported (but not explained)
on page One of their paper.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

You see if you stop that H atom from pulsing in and out you now have c2.

You have two wave fronts meeting and well then you get feedback.

The rest as we know is in the annals of history.

To be aerodynamic in quantum foam, you have to follow a geodesic.

Remember that under you though towards a massive body the bubbles
are getting smaller. So if you want to compress them to get lift,
you need to really add the thrust.
You end up having to suck up a lot of g's like in the movie
Armageddon, where they have to suck it up.
That's just drag. Physical drag as you plow through quantum foam.

If you were heading towards the planet or moon, good luck trying to feel
g's. If you came straight in.
Only when the bubbles are getting larger that you want to get through
do you feel g forces.
You feel weightless when you free fall.
You feel g's when you blast off from the ground.
In space its relative to the massive body nearest you.
And we have balance points in our solar system because of Jupiter.
And between the earth and moon as a for instance.
Lagrangian points.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

Its the basic logic that is faulty.

Symmetry. In its simplest form.

If you feel no resistance going in a straight line through jello from a to b,
what makes anyone think you would feel resistance if the jello was moving
sideways at 90 degrees?

You see, no resistance is no resistance one way or the other.

And light has no mass, so it travels without resistance.

We know that. Now.

I am not sure what they knew then, but they did not seem to know that.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

We have come a long ways from Einstein, we can make Bose Einstein
condensate now, like he said we would.

But his thoughts on the ether were that he wanted to just say it has
properties. Why? Because like us, he didn't know bubbles in what.
What sort of eternal fluid has no constituent parts or atoms itself you see?
We can understand the bubbles, just can't understand in what.

Newton said it was ball bearings. So we are only past him by perfect
elasticity, from Einstein Brownian motion, and superconductivity and superfuidity by our own modern geniuses.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

Here is a project for some real P-goon money. Grants etc where the money is.

So you want to cancel out the g's like a flying disk.

Well lets suppose you did some experiments and tried to maintain as closely as possible an exact shell distance from the earth. As you accelerate. Which means
you cannot go up or down but must maintain that distance between your craft
and the earth.
You see and the way they do that is the form of propulsion they use.
Supposedly.

So they are floating on a field a certain distance from the earth,
and that distance is maintained by that field. So when they move horizontally
they should not feel the same g forces.
Yet they go up just as fast as if they were using static electrical
interference to provide greater lubrication in the foam.
In the same way the Hutchison Effect does with Tesla coils and radio transmitters etc.

So how do they create that field? Well they seem to understand m waves enough
that they can match those frequencies and strengths with a static electrical
field or maybe plasma but containing plasma without a gravity well is
maybe impossible.
I don't know but all these avenues could be explored as pure science.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

Anyone who reads this entire thread and says I still don't get it,
may be a candidate for a BBC Radio science broadcast.

There are some great mysteries in this world, like why you feel g's when you blast off.
As you leave a massive body, the bubbles get bigger. Those bubbles of foam,
create 3 dimensional space itself. So you cross less space in more time.

When you fall the bubbles get smaller, so you cross more space in less time.
In this case your mass by comparison is greater. They hinder you less with
their mass.
When the bubbles are getting bigger, your mass by comparison is getting
smaller, so they provide more resistance.

The distance they travel in and out in one pulse is greater and it takes
longer, than when they are getting smaller. They seem to pulse faster.

And they pulse to universal time.

If you look across the universe you will find signatures of the elements
in a spectrum emitted by stars.
And although it may be red shifted or blue shifted, the pattern is the same.

And the pattern is the frequency, and the frequency is in cycles per second.

So a second here is a second there and copper here, is copper there.
All marching and pulsing to universal time as if it was a clock.

Yet, the depth of the gravity well determines the pressure in that ring,
concentric circles getting farther apart as you leave the surface, and again
the time it takes for one pulse to occur will change as the bubble size changes.
But its all relative to your reference frame.

It does differ though according to relativity theory.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

For anyone who just must have more information, this is good reading...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bose%E2%80%93Einstein_condensate

[1treePetrifiedForestLane]

can you fins any relevance to your "theory?"

> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bose%E2%80%93Einstein_condensate

there is no "pascalian" or perfect vacuum,
what Pascal thought he had created in the tube, because
he didn't have the concept of "partial pressure" in the mercury,
the "void," or even the glass.

he did uncover the maximum "stage" of s suction pump
at sea level, about 32 feet.

*all* of investigators before, during & since Newton's untheory
of "massless rocks o'light," shows that
light is waves in the atoms of space, and you yourself
pointed this out.

this even includes the photoelctric effect,
which Einstein flubbed with his interpretative fuzz ... but,
"they" gave hima a Nobel for that; go & figure.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

On Saturday, 18 May 2013 17:34:33 UTC-7, rick_s...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> For anyone who just must have more information, this is good reading...
>
>
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bose%E2%80%93Einstein_condensate

Most people would need a translation on that page in simple English but the
reason much of it sounds confusing and vague is because it is such current research and people are still trying to connect the dots.

For instance a Superfluid helium-4 which is a condensate that is a liquid
so it has stronger atomic bonds.

But it exhibits strange characteristics. And to be superfluid, well it has
to be matching the wave function of the quantum foam.
It has to be on the same basic frequency.

The quantum foam itself is thought to be superfluid.

One strange characteristic is if you hold up a small bowl of it, it will run up
the sides, down the outside surface and form drops at the bottom and drip
until it empties.
Its surface tension holds it together moreso than the force of gravity or resistance from the quantum foam. Why it flows up is because of dark energy
propelling it like solar wind propels things that have little resistance in space and a large surface area.
Once it gets over the lip though, it can flow down and then gravity wins.

It has a maximum speed that it can flow at, and probably that is related to
the speed the dark energy can propel it.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

Also the surface tension is related to the m waves that each molecule is putting out which wants to spread the surface area out, so it creeps up and over.

But that 20 cm per second is the maximum flow speed.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superfluid_helium-4#Film_flow

That would not be too difficult to tie in with the force of energy in the
form of magnetic waves or dark energy.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

In this thread there is one little omission...

The difference between mass and gravitational mass.

For instance I said when you blast off the bubbles get bigger.
But when you step on the gas you still feel planted in your seat because
you are still plowing through the foam. It is physically hitting your atoms
yet uniform motion you do not feel that resistance.

And in uniform motion you are creating a wave front in front of you with
your dark energy traveling at c in front of you. It helps to reduce friction.

When you accelerate you are squishing those bubbles against each other.

And they bounce back because of their elasticity

So you see this is complex mechanical action at play with various different
factors giving similar phenomena.

The difference being you can accelerate into the sun if you want, at a point
you will no longer feel the g's you should feel weightless.

When the gravitational acceleration reaches propulsion acceleration the
inertia will cancel out.

When the rate of acceleration into the sun matches its gravitational
gradient. Somewhere between here and the sun its well will be so deep
the bubbles will be so small that the inertia will cancel out.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

The flying disk inertia speculations just muddy the waters right now
because we have no data.
What we have are maybe speculations or interpretations of phenomena.

Although in a way, you could argue that it is not that different from native Indians watching lightning and saying what is that?

When we have a Benjamin Franklin that can tie a string on one we can
get some measurements but photos and films can lead us down the garden
path.

We have sound physics to explain things we are aware of on a regular daily type basis.

We can even understand how you can use static electricity to alter the
normal conditions of interactions between the air, and other molecules
and even create quantum interference and embed wood in metal and
all of that is within our understanding of atoms and molecules.

Even tap into dark energy that way and propel things in such a way as to make them appear to defy gravity or have an anti-gravity effect.

Static electricity will make your hair stand on end.

Its all tied in with dark forms of energy such as magnetism and other
em waves.

Another interesting point in the condensate realm is where they caused condensate to recoil when hit by photons.

So you get a clear slowed down effect of a transverse wave affecting
a mass.
They slowed light down to 17 meters per second using a superfluid.
They were able to show "slow-light-mediated atomic matter-wave amplification"

But at 17 meters per second you could be in bed, before the room gets dark.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

>
> But at 17 meters per second you could be in bed, before the room gets dark.

I would think M & M would be excited to hear about that.

But if the foam is the base reality and it matches the data and experiments and theory, we still don't know bubbles in what.

That eternal fluid which does not meet up with anything macro we can imagine
or even in our creative mind.
It defies the laws of physics and as such it is prudent to pretend it does not exist.
We can merely say bubbles which touch each other and are elastic.
They have a pure vacuum inside and a pure vacuum, the 4th dimension on their skin.
They can still touch each other and also roll freely across and about each other.
They move in unison and waves can transmit mass through them.
You can go further and objectify the process when we speak of the bubbles
getting larger and smaller in a gravitational field.
And how that is tied in with time and space by the relative size of the bubble.
Going up you take longer to cross one bubble width than going down.
And they pulse at different rates.
So the pressure is greater as you go down for them, but their mass shrinks compared to yours. Since you are physically interacting with matter of certain size and size does matter and bigger is better when you plow through it.

Point your jet at the ground and your big atoms feel little resistance to their mass. So you can just get qualities out of it and properties and still understand it as foam without even knowing about what that fluid might be
since it may not exist at all.
It could be energy fields posing as skins on bubbles.

And it could be all part of a type of alien computer that is merely generating
expansion into a 4th dimension, to give rise to gravity, while merely
not permitting things to grow in size relative to each other due its
hardware. A holoscreen of quantum foam.
Since it acts like the matrix, we should first assume that flying disks
come from there, since our physics tells us they aren't coming from
Mars.
So maybe like Indians mystified by lightning, we are mystified by
visitors from some aspect of the matrix.
We may be rather primitive and as such not able to understand the principals
even though a hundred years from now we might harness it like we harnessed
electricity.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

Since we have a pretty adequate testable theory of the quantum foam,
and we are well into superconductivity and superfluidity, how to get
around it, and we understand scalability, can even see macro sized quantum
effects in condensate, and we can look at the Bosenova and Supernova
and understand both completely and how to make them, all of it understood
by our present level of physics, even create small black holes or small
regions of space void of foam.

So what all that adds up to is a darn good understanding of the ether,
as quantum foam, and what we have learned is where our science was
optimistic about exceeding c with mass or time travel or worm hole
travel or star gates we were really dreaming big.
There is nothing to suggest anyone might survive any of that.

So if there is anything at all to flying disks it is more probable
that it is happening in the matrix. That is to merely write in
exceptions which can negate the physical laws.
The physical laws themselves like the pulsing of atoms on a universal
clock or cycles per second, well why cycles per second?
Ya know that could be merely written in as a set value like the other
constants and if it comes down to the material properties alone,
then still sounds like code to set those property values.

How do you have a big bang if the laws of physics do not exist first?
Well you can't because there would be no force.

So all things lead to some sort of machinery.

And there may be ways of using it we just don't know yet but presently
our understanding is quite good within all phenomena that are consistent
and open and not intelligently guided or secret like flying disks.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

Another exciting development is they made a spherical m wave glow
like a photon. Proving they are made of the same stuff.

They have made matter interference waves.

They have flat lined atoms into the quantum foam during Bosenova
experiments but don't want to admit it since that's scary stuff
to some since of course the theories have not yet been formalized
into a congruent whole.

Not everyone agrees that the ether is foam, and some wish to describe it
as particles since the bubbles are so small they are smaller than particles.
Almost since they are Plank length in diameter. 10^ -35

But that's the duality of nature where you have waves and you have particles
splashing on detectors.
But also you have nuclei, which have a skin. And that skin will flatline into the foam, if you drain it of its energy.
When it expands and then the cohesive bond of that state collapses, the interference makes it shrink since the waves are now cancelling out and
the bubbles are far apart since it swelled up in that region by the dark energy emitted by the quantum foam which in that region would just be the elasticity of the bubbles and the bubbles getting larger because the pressure was
less. But as soon as that rhythm was broken, it collapsed, imploded then exploded and some atoms were missing.

To test it further they drained some condensate slowly and watched for the momentum of the skin slapping the surface of the foam as a bubble would
due to surface tension. It should have momentum. And that was found
and it agreed with predicted values.

So that helped to gain a better understanding of its properties.

There have been a number of Nobel prizes awarded in this field.
It is one of the most exciting areas of research since it includes the odd
behavior of matter under extreme conditions and shows great promise
for the future in materials science.
Room temperature superconductors as a for instance would change the world.
If we can make a material that harmonizes with the quantum foam frequency
at room temperature that is all it would take.

Now an He4 superfluid has to be on the proper quantum frequency to recoil
from light like solar wind propels things in space.
Some ceramic that aligns the foam with its dark energy would probably
be a superconductor.
A superfluid is lubricating it.

The thing is that the quantum foam when energy goes through it at c,
and lots of it like lightning, plasma is yet another exotic form of matter.
The same effects sped up with increased energy fool us into thinking
it is something else we are seeing.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

I used to think maybe just maybe there was some mystery about the ether
which was blocking signals from space since the work done said there
should be plenty of civilizations out there.
Some reduction in signal due to expansion or gas clouds or interference
but there is nothing to suggest that it is anything other than what we
detect and see right in our labs and in our solar system and galaxies.

We can see using radio astronomy clearly and see the fine structure
of the spectrum consistently and not blocked by anything that might
block radio transmissions from space by intelligent races.

Since we haven't detected anything it seems improbable we will.
Which again must lead us to the matrix if we don't want to feel
special and in the center of the universe.
We have to exist as part of a larger system which just doesn't need
any of that because it is a simulator, and other races or universes
could exist as other simulators or bubble universes.

The very atoms and their interactions are a computer in the way in which they function by math rules.
The galaxy is a harddrive since it stores all things that every happened here
via cause and effect.
From a lofty alien perspective that could read such data by a sufficient understanding of the laws.

Then going further you could say that at the center of a galaxy is not a black hole, but actually a computer system.
Which is generating this holographic galaxy in real time.

And that would bring you to the time of Descartes, and what they believed
way back then, in the Catholic church.

Believe it or not.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/28/Glorification_of_the_Eucharist_-_Salimbeni.JPG

That's the galactic mainframe in the background.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

So in closing, only a real working knowledge of the matrix at this point
is going to get us any sort of flying carpets, magic genies, Martian
women, or from Venus only the names of the places would change.
George Jetson cars, hyperdrive space cruisers or anything of the sort
including time travel.

Since all of it is outside of our working knowledge of physics today.

We have the dry toast universe going on when we might have the I dream
of Genie universe going on, if only we knew now, what we know in the future.

Personally I am not satisfied to find myself discovering what they already
knew in the church at the time of Descartes, I want a little more.
Getting there though seems difficult in this dry toast universe of ours.

Certainly we come up against laws whenever we want to do something.
Other than those things we do with our imaginations.

[1treePetrifiedForestLane]

you should have stuck with,
"static can make your hair stand on end."

the number one UFO sighted by pilots is ... ta-da
the Morning or Evening Star, plus a dose of vertigo.

Descartes was an oaf.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

On Sunday, 19 May 2013 11:40:07 UTC-7, 1treePetrifiedForestLane wrote:
> you should have stuck with,
>
> "static can make your hair stand on end."
>
>
>
> the number one UFO sighted by pilots is ... ta-da
>
> the Morning or Evening Star, plus a dose of vertigo.
>
>
>
> Descartes was an oaf.
>
>
>

Yes well he may have been an oaf but he is a founding father so we must
respect the fact that somehow, while those around him were losing their heads,
he managed to keep his.

quote
He has been dubbed the 'Father of Modern Philosophy', and much subsequent Western philosophy is a response to his writings,[7][8] which are studied closely to this day. In particular, his Meditations on First Philosophy continues to be a standard text at most university philosophy departments. Descartes' influence in mathematics is equally apparent; the Cartesian coordinate system — allowing reference to a point in space as a set of numbers, and allowing algebraic equations to be expressed as geometric shapes in a two-dimensional coordinate system (and conversely, shapes to be described as equations) — was named after him. He is credited as the father of analytical geometry, the bridge between algebra and geometry, crucial to the discovery of infinitesimal calculus and analysis. Descartes was also one of the"

bla bla bla

One of my favorite persons because he was a smarty pants, and as such
has gained my respect.

His notion that everyone is trying to fool him all the time, is completely
correct and a very astute observation to make when most people go through
their entire life and keep falling for the same pranks, tricks, jokes,
and insults.
Or let me rephrase that to "trick, trap, joke, or insult"

That's the post post modern interpretation of the programming in the matrix.

He would call them demons, whereas with our understanding of software,
we understand programming.

The biggest difference perhaps that in his time they wanted to throw
the beast in the pit, whereas today people would rather party in the pit
than play harps all day.

What is clear to me however is that the RC Church at that time was getting
some sort of communications from somewhere.

Now it seems to me that what happened was they raided South America,
and brought back treasures and got a lot of old information, then
destroyed the evidence by melting down the gold objects.

The information they got from Peru, is as unusual as the information
you see in Peru still in places even after it has been sanitized.

You see they believed that part of the world to be the land of the giants.

And so what they found there that was very old and strange they believed
were left overs that escaped the flood. So it was supposed to be
destroyed by the flood by God and there was some information from the
antediluvian world.

Now I studied this for 20 years and I know the level of mystery and intrigue
involved in all of this. Unfortunately the matrix is completely intertwined
in the entire business and so its impossible to discuss without first
discussing the actual matrix itself.

And to do that is to talk about the most secret things on earth.

So, for one thing people would probably not believe it, and in that way
it is in a separate realm from physics and is in the real of metaphysics.

But I can tell you from my own studies and experiences that they knew
certain things which may or may not be true.

That there is a galactic mainframe and it is making the atoms in real time
according to the laws of physics and that consciousness itself is programming,
and there are two computers which run software in the matrix here in this
area, two AI which as operating system run sentience and instinct software.

Both operating systems have personalities themselves and have a degree of free
will.
Their helpers who are in the machine, have personality files as well,
and somewhat less free will. The church calls them angels and arch angels.

So sort of like the holographic universe the galaxy is a computer simulator,
except its not a simulator we live here.

That didn't exclude God for them, it merely meant that he was higher up.
You still need a creator even if this is a machine.

But observe that image and that is supposed to be the moon, that is
supposed to represent two signals instinct and sentience as part
of consciousness and in the background the mainframe.

So you have a local machine supposedly producing consciousness and the
galactic mainframe producing the stage.

And that was not considered heresy since that painting hung in a church
the whole time.
You know this was from like 1605

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/28/Glorification_of_the_Eucharist_-_Salimbeni.JPG

And that is long before radio waves yet there are antenna and a signal depicted.

So its seems very materialistic (materialism philosophy) for a religious view point.

Now I tracked the information to see where it went, to Peru and studied
Peru, and artifact s and like I say spent 20 years on this,
so I know more than I think prudent to say on the subject.

However recent work on the world as simulation is one avenue of research
that people have embarked upon.

Such as Simulated Reality

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simulated_reality

If you want an example or lets say proof that we do in fact live in a simulated
reality, then you need only look at one of my emails from the galactic
mainframe. Since when it sends an email, it just draws on the surface
of the planet so you can see it from space.

Not that I am in space, but I can view satellite imagery.
So I will show you but don't tell anyone I showed you.

So we were discussing ancient man and someone asked me what was with
all those cone head skulls and so I asked my buddies in the matrix
and they sent me this email.
http://www.imagebam.com/image/1dafff255516873

And basically they said well it was a new model because giving birth
when you have a giantsized head (Gazoo from the Flintstones was the example) was a painful experience.

So that's Gazoo with a conehead, look at his left temple, I didn't circle
Genie. He was contemplating her since well we both want that. lol

[1treePetrifiedForestLane]

so, your hair is still standing on some thing,
maybe one of those joy buzzers.

> So you have a local machine supposedly producing consciousness and the
> galactic mainframe producing the stage.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

On Monday, 20 May 2013 14:39:41 UTC-7, 1treePetrifiedForestLane wrote:
> so, your hair is still standing on some thing,
>
> maybe one of those joy buzzers.
>
>

The dark energy is an interesting phenomena and an embarrassing one for physicists. Since they tend to forget that magnetism is a form of dark energy,
and black body radiation is a form of dark energy. But we just ignore those little
faux pas and keep on marching and so now we understand dark energy quite
well. And for instance when hair stands on end at one of those science
science exhibits, it's a marvel to look at.

But since classically trained physicists are taught so much about charge
they forget that action at a distance is not part of present day theory.
We are way beyond that. However science moves slowly and it takes time
for papers to be written and data to be collected and text books to be
updated and all of that.

So dark energy forming currents will make your hair stand on end. It streams out anyway from all matter. Unless you take two magnets you don't notice
magnetism as an invisible force. Yet all things have magnetism, and you
can levitate a frog.

So then at what point do we say that since you are levitating a frog,
you are in fact defying gravity? Well of course you are.

So then what is the difference between that and a floating car? The strength
of the field.
However perhaps a better understanding might allow a vehicle to use the
same dark energy and merely bounce spherical waves off the quantum foam.

Since the quantum foam has mass and reacts to mass. You feel inertia,
you feel drag.
We can measure the resistance, the permeability of free space.
And we also know that it is full of energy, waves travel in it. EM waves
and all manner of mass transfer as if they were the Higgs Bosun.

Simply because everywhere there is universe, there are these bubbles and they are touching each other.
The fact that they touch, means that mass can move through space. Otherwise
it just would not move at all.

Newtons laws of motion require the bubbles to touch.
In order for something to continue in a straight line it has to be moving through some type of space that has area.
Without the foam there is no area. No physical area that matter can occupy.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

You know I am quite convinced we have the GUT and we have been testing it for 20 years and it has passed every test. Made predictions regarding Bose Einstein
condensate and in all cases has never failed to accurately predict an
outcome.
The Standard model was left behind 20 years ago by most physicists other than
the large CERN types of institutions but even they want more modern theory
and their ability to detect particles has maybe maxed out since the size
gets exceedingly small and the effects very subtle under low energy.

So high energy physics, is not low energy physics like condensates.
And so the current theory has very little in common with particle physics
other than it doesn't contradict it.

It deals with waves and a better understanding of waves. Keep in mind that
much work has been done on waves since Heisenberg and them were working
in the lab.
And equipment today is way beyond anything they had at their disposal.

Consider the Internet and the PC and the global communications and
the dynamic of cooperative science has propelled us quite far ahead.

Its easy to stay informed by TV and radio and the Internet and stay
somewhat current and people find the pieces to their puzzles faster.
But laser technology and consider the micro-chip and well,
electron microscopy, we are spelling names with atoms and you know
we have decoded the human genome, and have a working knowledge of
the laws that govern the universe.

Not bad for a bipedal ape if that is all we were.
I cannot suspend disbelief and pretend that a large part of my reality
does not exist.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

Consider a bit of history say the last 40 years and how advanced a civilization
we are now. Well we have made giant evolutionary leaps by creating tools which
enhance our abilities such as personal computers.

And our understanding of the universe has grown exponentially.

Imagine how much better educated most people are due to the Internet.

They are smarter or have access to brain power even if they do not themselves
posses a giant brain.

And some of the things we have learned have been less interesting than they
had hoped for in the 50's. Venusians, Martians and the lot.

The wild science fiction also based on partial theories of physics arrived
at last century.
Now that we have completed that work, we see where what they had hoped for
is not possible in this universe.

For instance time travel. Well the universe is expanding and so every moment
it is bigger than before and that is universal time.
To go back in time, you have to turn back the clock and you cannot turn
back the universe.

To take a large pipe and rotate it so what? Your local time is not going to
give you actual time travel as in the real past. Since the universe is all
operating like a clock, with different time zones.

All you will ever be able to do is get some time differential in your own local area.

We know the direction of time's arrow and it is out. So where is backwards in time? It is inward. Can you go there? No, you would die instantly.

How would you go there? Be compressed?

You see worm holes are the same way. Just wishful thinking because if it wasn't
for quantum foam, the dark energy would just cause your atoms to fly apart
since there would be no backing.
All bubbles have to touch in the quantum foam. You see this notion that there
is a quantum leap is just a lack of understanding. The notion that an electron
moves from one shell to another and makes a leap is false also.

That interpretation of the atom is long gone. We know that m waves are spherical waves. M for magnetism, and we know that em waves are transverse
waves made from m waves and an electron is just the crest of the wave of dark energy at the electron shell.

Rotating superfluid vortixes are geometrically quantized. Physically quantized.
The liquid is reacting to the background since it is a superfluid so it has
no resistance to the container it is in, yet it feels resistance to the
background which is the quantum foam, and so it causes drag on the molecules
and you get vortices.
But it is all proportional to Plank Length.

You see what it tells us is that the background has a structure that
is quantized at Plank Length. And it is geometric since the vortices are
forming geometrically.

You see it is in direct contact with the background physically.
And you can tell that because it is a superfluid, has no resistance to its container yet is getting resistance from the background which is creating
vortices.

A normal pail of water has one vortex when you spin it.

It too is reacting to the background and amazingly Newton saw that
and that was why he made the claim there must be some sort of
absolute space.

Later Maxwell and others pondered that same Newton's bucket and it
has been just a real interesting path which led to the further study
of the background.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bucket_argument

http://www-history.mcs.st-and.ac.uk/HistTopics/Newton_bucket.html

If you haven't before seen the mac tutor database of human achievement
through history, then you are missing a great resource.

Not only that but consider the intellectual achievements in mathematics
that are all documented in that database. Like decoding the software code
of the universe.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

Now the reason people are now starting to create hypothesis for
simulated reality because that is where our interests lie and
we believe in the conservation of energy.

I used to do physical experiments but now I just program computers
and who wouldn't?

So after we completed the GUT to our own satisfaction we realized
that if we want any of those things that were promised in the 50's
we would have to try another avenue. Since the laws of physics
clearly do not allow for anything beyond what you see is what you
get and we are pretty much looking at most of it.

We cannot conceive of ever leaving this solar system since the laws
of physics say we cannot. Its 50,000 times the distance from here to
the sun and even if we accelerated slowly on a giant ship it would
have no shields, but lets suppose generation after generation
lived on it then it would leave the solar system and go where?

We have looked at every planet in our solar system and only one
is suitable for life. The rest are hostile environments and
in fact as soon as we reach space we are in a hostile environment.

The motivation to go anywhere does not exist since there is no
where out there to go, and things are so far away.

Its nice to dream of things that are in relativity but the fact is
those things are the problematic parts that prove to be useless
to human endeavor. Like time travel by rotating pipe or
such imaginary impossibilities such as a singularity.
Now if he was referring to the 4th dimension as a singularity itself,
that is not the definition people give which is of a dot.

At any rate after the GUT we began to study the matrix and so we
have enough motivation to study it further in the hope that we
might learn more advanced physics even if it appears as magic.

Myself I am using the matrix all the time and that is nice but
not everyone can do that. And so the way to proceed is to formulate
testable hypothesis and to use logic and reason to learn more about it.

I can tell you a bit and that is beaming around the multi-verse is
possible. Time travel is routine. For those who are in that position.
Such as the operating system.
Humans are their personality file, it can be compressed sent almost
instantly across the universe and then consciousness signal
beamed to the brain of a blank on autopilot there.
All consciousness signals to the brain are done in the same way.
The entire known multiverse is on the same network, using the same
software, maintaining the same cultural norms and body types.

So you can beam elsewhere and find it looks different but the people
are the same. The structures and construction and electrical systems
are of this era we are in now.
Some places a bit more advanced.

Descartes was right.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

>
> Descartes was right.

Once you realize that Descartes was right, then you might discover that
there are varying degrees of what constitutes real.

For instance a dream, then a lucid dream. Well for someone who has
had a lucid dream they are fooled at the time into believing it is
real. The Turing test is passed completely and in all respects.

So then keep going because there is this reality, this local universe,
and it is real to us and is more real than a dream because the laws
of physics say you cannot cut to, like a film or dream, you must go from
a to b physically.

Now then consider there are other places like that where you can go through
a dream like process.

The interface with the matrix is through the mind of course since
cogito ergo sum.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cogito_ergo_sum

And if you learn its language, then you can get to know it better.
The operating system for instance or several on several layers
through the network.
Personally I do not know hot to pass that ability on except maybe
meditation or who knows but I am a product of my generation,
in the 60's I was 14 so our generation grew up wanting to know
everything about everything and we experimented with everything
for ourselves. And we used everything we learned to make better
tools and we kicked ass like the world has never seen.

In the 60's we landed on the moon but NASA kept going and photographed
every square inch of the universe (as best it could) even looked
back into deep time, so we went way out, and we also went way in
often through an eastern philosophical influence.
The Beatles for instance and the guru was just the beginning as was
Timothy Leary, Aldous Huxley and on and on leading the charge.
Carlos Casteneda, all talking about greater human potential.

But at this point it represents metaphysics since its such a different
type of science. One that uses the mind to connect with the matrix
to expand their world view or improve their interface with this reality.

Science is also the new religion. There is a point where science and
religion meet.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

It would be almost cliche to say we are gods now.

Do you want to take a look at some place on the ground some street in
some country then click on google street view. Want to fly over it, then bing
100 feet off the ground in 3D view, or right into space via satellite
look down on the whole world.

Answer to any question? Almost every common question can be answered
through google. Just ask it. And if not then you might need to look it up
in the scientific knowledge base of mankind Wiki.

Did you know that you can sit here and command goods to be made and
be delivered to your door. Like a lap top. Try making one of those
in your garage. Yet you can just click and it will soon be at your
door, and you can plug it into the magic juice (electricity) and
even take some magic juice with you, for your mp3 player in the form
of a battery. Life is full of marvels that we take for granted.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

If you really want a craft that can fly by using the quantum foam,
you only need pulse a small amount of matter and bounce that off the foam,
since the foam is what causes inertia. It causes drag, and the faster
you accelerate mass, the more it pushes back.

That is why mass cannot exceed c.

The light barrier as it is called. Humans in a rocket sled can take 40 g's
maybe a bit more.

That's nothing. But even a small amount of matter exploded produces accelerated
mass. Propulsion.
The faster it pushes against the foam or air then foam the faster it is
propelled forward.

So then you can reduce the size of the propulsion, and increase the acceleration rate. Reduce the heat, and any matter will do.

Even some sort of very quickly pulsing rubber type stuff of some sufficient
strength. Whatever you can accelerate quickly.
That's one way to investigate the possibility by doing some experiments.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

Addendum:

An address delivered on May 5th, 1920, in the University of Leyden


Albert Einstein

The special theory of relativity forbids us to assume the ether to consist
of particles observable through time, but the hypothesis of ether in
itself is not in conflict with the special theory of relativity.
This spacetime variability of the reciprocal relations of the standards of space and time, or, perhaps, the recognition of the fact that " empty space " in its physical relation is neither homogeneous nor isotropic,
compelling us to describe its state by ten functions (the gravitation potentials g[greek subscript mu, nu]), has, I think, finally disposed of the view that space is physically empty.

Recapitulating, we may say that according to the general theory of
relativity space is endowed with physical qualities; in this sense,
therefore, there exists an ether. According to the general theory of
relativity space without ether is unthinkable; for in such space there
not only would be no propagation of light, but also no possibility of
existence for standards of space and time (measuring-rods and clocks),
nor therefore any space-time intervals in the physical sense.



"for in such space there not only would be no propagation of light,
but also no possibility of existence for standards of space and time
(measuring-rods and clocks),nor therefore any space-time intervals
in the physical sense. "


So that was in 1920 almost a hundred years ago. Imagine how far we have
come since then.

In the book by Bill Bryson
A Short History of Nearly Everything

A great audiobook to listen to because it takes all the worst controversies
of science and sensationalizes them and exploits their faults.

What he does to physics I like to call kicking away at the soft underbelly
of physics. And of course Michelson and Morley figure prominently in that
lengthy discourse as the ones who proved beyond a shadow of a doubt
there was no luminiferous aether.

Well. I don't know what to say to all those people who continually
misrepresent the facts and data but hopefully with enough concerted
effort we might be able to get rid of a few of these erroneous myths,
some day.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

So we have a theory that carries on and completes what Einstein was unable
to finish perhaps because of the A bomb and politics.

He may have known more but was unable to speak freely on the subject.

Not that it is directly associated with that per se, well yes it is
actually but always was. With E=mc2

Our method is to not accentuate that aspect of relativity as much as to
look at the larger picture and merely treat that like we treat the
Bosenova or Supernova as just part of cause and effect.

The structure of the ether as variable sized bubbles fits Newton and
Einstein's theories and does not conflict with any other viable
current theory. Which is why we like it as a model.

Einstein stated that special relativity could not allow an ether which
had particles over time, that is to say that what applies to atoms,
and atomic nuclei does not apply to quantum foam bubbles.

Reason being that the bubbles do not have constituent parts.
We may not know bubbles in what, maybe someday we will.
Today there is nothing in our reality which can be compared to a
type of eternal fluid that has bubbles in it which is liquid
yet is not itself made of atoms.

So we creep ahead as others have done, and add what we know to be
true and logically correct, but go no further.

We say they are bubbles that have perfect elasticity and they pulse
in and out and that gives them mass. They are moving in the direction
of time's arrow. They may be expanding into the 4th dimension, they may
just be pulsing and new foam being created as the universe expands.

But the theory works best if like nuclei they are expanding into the 4th dimension. So although they are expanding physically which gives rise
to gravity on that axis, they do not increase in size because size is
a relative concept and all things with mass expand into the empty 4th
dimension without much resistance.
And we can even calculate that resistance.
We also know that frame dragging is occurring so that things do get dragged
physically larger and that can be detected. The distance between here and the moon, and the increasing diameter of the earth. Very small amounts due
to friction and frame dragging. Of course material is dropping onto the earth
and adding to its increase in size as well.
There is much to this theory and it has been taught for the last 20 years
every year, so I am not going to do it again and again.
However there are always little discoveries being made that shed light
on different aspects of the theory as our knowledge increases due
to recent developments.

All in all the best way to understand it writ large is to consider two
expanding balloons with rulers painted on them. Which expand into
the 4th dimension and yet the rulers that you use to measure with
are expanding as well. Stand on a balloon and you feel the force of
gravity.

And you can see this affecting the earth by looking at youtube,
expanding earth theory.

Yet measurements of the earth, show the earth is not greatly increasing
in size but just marginally. Less than half a centimeter per year.

Its an amazing part of nature.

Descartes would prefer to take all that and put it into Cartesian coordinates in 2 dimensions, call them pixels and put a Persinger God helmet on your head or put you in a nice comfortable 'Surrogate' chair (see the movie)
or into a nice comfy Avatar pod.

You might wonder where these people get their ideas. It might be partly
because I have a big mouth some times. I just want to tell everybody everything.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

When we first worked this theory out I had a Eureka moment reading EInstein
and figured it out, so I got a pencil and I worked out the values and
was shocked to find that it worked out to even money. No remainders.

The values were exact. So I worked through every element and in every case
but one had a remainder of.999999999 foe evah.

I can't remember which element.

At any rate I fired off a letter to M.I.T. and it upset the applecart
and everyone freaked and some rushed to print like Pons and Fleishman
who couldn't even wait for the printers they held a press conference
knowing that others were discovering the same things.

So then we met in a bulletin board system, pretty much the entire physics
community, this was pre Internet. And we discussed all aspects of it
and I explained what I knew and it was Hawking who suggested we use
the Quantum foam.

And although if you look at the page today it may not sound like the same
foam,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_foam

1955 the year Einstein died. Thought up by Wheeler.

Wheeler...

"During the 1950s, Wheeler formulated geometrodynamics, a program of physical and ontological reduction of every physical phenomenon, such as gravitation and electromagnetism, to the geometrical properties of a curved space-time. Aiming at a systematical identification of matter with space, geometrodynamics was often characterized as a continuation of the philosophy of nature as conceived by Descartes and Spinoza. Wheeler's geometrodynamics, however, failed to explain some important physical phenomena, such as the existence of fermions (electrons, muons, etc.) or that of gravitational singularities. Wheeler therefore abandoned his theory as somewhat fruitless during the early 1970s."

So you see he decided that it was an alien screen like Descartes, or the matrix,
if you will but in our theory although we know this is a simulated reality,
it still works as a physical reality just fine with our theory of quantum
gravity using foam bubbles.
They flow, they have pressure areas, they have elasticity, they touch, they bounce they pulse, they are superfluid and superconducting.
They are what creates physical 3D space.
In our theory it is vacuum inside and vacuum outside the bubbles.
That is why gravity appears to be balanced in nature.
It is merely the vacuum of the 4th dimension tugging outward on the skin
of a bubble that has resistance to that expansion. The inner vacuum also
helps to maintain the inner and outer forces on the skin.
Hence why things can expand and not get larger. But it does pulse in and out.

And if you accelerate mass through it, they get squished together and start bouncing and provide drag. Try to reach c and when one side of the bubbles
reached the other side of the bubbles at c, it becomes an instantaneous solid.
Hence why you can't accelerate past c. Whatever they are made of, its
physical properties are such that if you push it together at c, one side of the bubble meets the other side. It gets squished flat.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

While controversies raged on in the hallowed halls amidst cries of poppycock!
And balderdash! Within a month, IBM had spelled the letters IBM using atoms
in a crystal lattice and we knew we were there.

So then we asked ourselves well what is it we want? Microbiology for
health and longevity and that took off with genetic research and the
human genome project.

But the other major thing we wanted was hydrogen cars.

But due to politics we never got that because of the oil economy.

But take a look in youtube at HHO and although they are country bumpkins
working in their garages, they still have it all going on using
our theory.
Although they don't know it.
Computers have gotten much better as well. The love affair with laser
technology seems to go on and on.

For a monitor I use a Benq projector. If you have not yet got with
that program, you don't know what you're missing.