Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

The Ultimate 9-11 Insider

0 views
Skip to first unread message

knews4...@yahoo.com

unread,
Mar 11, 2010, 7:32:27 PM3/11/10
to
http://letsrollforums.com/dr-philip-d-zelikow-t16841.html?s=dba1ea0798231c76b8e0334b85a19f72&

So Zelikow, the guy who wrote The 9/11 Commission Report, was an
expert in how to misuse public trust and create PUBLIC MYTHS.

If 9/11 was nothing but a huge HOAX, you would naturally expect that
the event itself would have to be perfectly scripted.

In 1998, Zelikow actually wrote Catastrophic Terrorism about imagining
"the transformative event" three years before 9/11.

Here are Zelikow's 1998 words. Readers should imagine the
possibilities for themselves, because the most serious constraint on
current policy is lack of imagination.

An act of catastrophic terrorism that killed thousands or tens of
thousands of people and/or disrupted the necessities of life for
hundreds of thousands, or even millions, would be a watershed event in
America's history.

It could involve loss of life and property unprecedented for peacetime
and undermine Americans' fundamental sense of security within their
own borders in a manner akin to the 1949 Soviet atomic bomb test, or
perhaps even worse.

Constitutional liberties would be challenged as the United States
sought to protect itself from further attacks by pressing against
allowable limits in surveillance of citizens, detention of suspects,
and the use of deadly force. More violence would follow, either as
other terrorists seek to imitate this great "success" or as the United
States strikes out at those considered responsible.

Like Pearl Harbor, such an event would divide our past and future into
a "before" and "after."

The effort and resources we devote to averting or containing this
threat now, in the "before" period, will seem woeful, even pathetic,
when compared to what will happen "after."

Our leaders will be judged negligent for not addressing catastrophic
terrorism more urgently.

http://www.ksg.harvard.edu/visions/publication/terrorism.htm

Iarnrod

unread,
Mar 11, 2010, 9:45:32 PM3/11/10
to
On Mar 11, 5:32 pm, knowsknothing...@shit-for-brains-jew-hater.kook
spewed his delusions publicly, embarrassing his mommy no end:

<<usual unsupported delusions... nothing new here>>

knews4...@yahoo.com

unread,
Mar 11, 2010, 10:00:03 PM3/11/10
to

Iarnrod

unread,
Mar 11, 2010, 10:29:08 PM3/11/10
to
On Mar 11, 8:00 pm, knowsknothing...@jew-hating-inbred-goober.com
exposed his idiocy to the world:

> And Securacom running "security."

It didn't, you know, and also Marvin Bush was not an officer in it.
I'll bet you "think" differently, kook! Another lie from
knowsknothing!

knews4...@yahoo.com

unread,
Mar 11, 2010, 10:56:57 PM3/11/10
to

Iarnrod

unread,
Mar 11, 2010, 11:36:53 PM3/11/10
to
On Mar 11, 8:56 pm, knowsknothing...@jew-hating-inbred-goober.com

exposed his idiocy to the world:
> On Mar 11, 7:29 pm, Iarnrod <iarn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > On Mar 11, 8:00 pm, knowsknothing...@jew-hating-inbred-goober.com
> > exposed his idiocy to the world:
>
> > > And Securacom running "security."
>
> > It didn't, you know, and also Marvin Bush was not an officer in it.
> > I'll bet you "think" differently, kook! Another lie from
> > knowsknothing!
>
> http://www.google.com/search?q=bush+securacom+wtc&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&a...

I see your kooker cite, and raise you a truthful site:

http://www.911myths.com/html/stratesec.html

You cannot stand even one minute with your lies, can you, Jew-hating
nutbag? BWAHAHAHAHAAA!!

knews4...@yahoo.com

unread,
Mar 12, 2010, 1:34:22 PM3/12/10
to
On Mar 11, 8:36 pm, Ioonyrod <iarn...@yahoo.com> keep distracting from
the truth to cover for PNAC:
> On Mar 11, 8:56 pm, knowsthetruth...@loverofallmankind.com
> exposed Loonyrod to the world:

>
> > On Mar 11, 7:29 pm, Iarnrod <iarn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Mar 11, 8:00 pm, knowsPNACplanned911...@criminalhating.com
> > > exposed PNAC kingpins to the world:

>
> > > > And Securacom running "security."
>
> > > It didn't, you know, and also Marvin Bush was not an officer in it.
> > > I'll bet you "think" differently, kook! Another lie from
> > > knowsknothing!
>
> >http://www.google.com/search?q=bush+securacom+wtc&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&a...
>
> I see your kooker cite, and raise you a truthful site:
>
> http://www.911myths.com/html/stratesec.html
>
> You cannot stand even one minute with your lies, can you, Jew-hating
> nutbag? BWAHAHAHAHAAA!!

You are America and freedom hating PNAC Zionist supporting terrorist
scum.
http://www.fourwinds10.com/siterun_data/government/fraud/911_attack/news.php?q=1207934314

Iarnrod

unread,
Mar 12, 2010, 3:41:15 PM3/12/10
to
On Mar 12, 11:34 am, knowsknothing...@shit-for-brains-jew-hater.kook

spewed his delusions publicly, embarrassing his mommy no end:
> On Mar 11, 8:36 pm, Mighty Iarnrod kicked this fool's ass with the proven TRUTH:
>
>
>
> > On Mar 11, 8:56 pm, knowsknothing...@shit-for-brains-jew-hater.kook

spewed his delusions publicly, embarrassing his mommy no end:
>
> > > On Mar 11, 7:29 pm, Iarnrod <iarn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Mar 11, 8:00 pm, knowsknothing...@shit-for-brains-jew-hater.kook

spewed his delusions publicly, embarrassing his mommy no end:
>
> > > > > And Securacom running "security."
>
> > > > It didn't, you know, and also Marvin Bush was not an officer in it.
> > > > I'll bet you "think" differently, kook! Another lie from
> > > > knowsknothing!
>
> > >http://www.google.com/search?q=bush+securacom+wtc&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&a...
>
> > I see your kooker cite, and raise you a truthful site:
>
> >http://www.911myths.com/html/stratesec.html
>
> > You cannot stand even one minute with your lies, can you, Jew-hating
> > nutbag? BWAHAHAHAHAAA!!
>
> You are America and freedom hating PNAC Zionist supporting terrorist
> scum.http://www.fourwinds10.com/siterun_data/government/fraud/911_attack/n...

YOU are the America-hating scum, you proven LIAR. You are
pathological. You cannot even NAME ONE THING that I have lied abotu
because such a thing is IMPOSSIBLE -- it doesn't exist.

YOUR lies, however, are comprised of every thing you say. FACT which I
have proven.

Hey, have you discovered yet that you were LYING about Marvin Bush and
Securacom? Huh? Will your head explode if only one of your lies goes
off in a "controlled demolition" of your stupid kooker head, Jew-
hating goober?

Michael Moroney

unread,
Mar 12, 2010, 4:19:37 PM3/12/10
to
Iarnrod <iar...@yahoo.com> writes:

>YOU are the America-hating scum, you proven LIAR. You are
>pathological. You cannot even NAME ONE THING that I have lied abotu
>because such a thing is IMPOSSIBLE -- it doesn't exist.

>YOUR lies, however, are comprised of every thing you say. FACT which I
>have proven.

>Hey, have you discovered yet that you were LYING about Marvin Bush and
>Securacom? Huh? Will your head explode if only one of your lies goes
>off in a "controlled demolition" of your stupid kooker head, Jew-
>hating goober?

You have to remember that ChewToy suffers from a very severe case of
mental kooktardation. His case is so severe that he doesn't even know
that he is lying when he puts forth the lies that his kookmeisters tell
him to. He "thinks" he is helping America with his lies, and doesn't
realize he is actually hurting America by distracting from the largest
external threat to the US (Islamofascists who still want to attack us
again, as spectacularly as possible) and blaming it on the previous
administration of fools, or The JOOOZ!!.

I don't know the details, but mental kooktardation erects a sort of
mental Berlin Wall in what's left of their victims' "minds", and any
facts that attempt to cross it get machinegunned and left to die. I
don't know how the kookmeisters get or keep control and infect them with
kooktardation. I wonder if there is some hypnosis embedded in those
Youtube kookvideos somehow,which is why kooktarded people are always
trying to get you to watch one rather than answer a simple question.
They no longer have enough "minds" left to write an answer to "what do
you think really happened that day?", but they do have enough reflexes to
type in URLs to kooksites, as their kookmeisters have programmed them to
spread kooktardation as far as possible.

The only worse case of mental kooktardation I've seen is "Henry", who
is worse off from huffing toilet bowl cleaner or something.

knews4...@yahoo.com

unread,
Mar 12, 2010, 4:52:45 PM3/12/10
to
On Mar 12, 1:19 pm, moro...@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
wrote:

Losers.
Why don't you try some FACTS?
http://www.fourwinds10.com/siterun_data/government/fraud/911_attack/news.php?q=1207934314
These are the America hating cronies you support.

Michael Moroney

unread,
Mar 12, 2010, 6:10:43 PM3/12/10
to
knews4...@yahoo.com writes:

>On Mar 12, 1:19 pm, moro...@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
>wrote:
>>

>> You have to remember that ChewToy suffers from a very severe case of

>> mental kooktardation. ...

>> They no longer have enough "minds" left to write an answer to "what do
>> you think really happened that day?", but they do have enough reflexes to
>> type in URLs to kooksites, as their kookmeisters have programmed them to
>> spread kooktardation as far as possible.

>Losers.


>Why don't you try some FACTS?
>http://www.fourwinds10.com/siterun_data/government/fraud/911_attack/news.php?q=1207934314
>These are the America hating cronies you support.

See what I mean? He can't "think" enough to respond to my post, other
than to slavishly post yet another kooksite link.

spudnik

unread,
Mar 12, 2010, 6:17:38 PM3/12/10
to
what a bunch of silliness. the only real question is,
how much energy was in "de planes,"
compared to the rather small amount that is required
for a "controlled demo?" that is to say,
were the planes not adequate bombs?

thus:
the "official" report (NIST) does have interesting stuff in it
-- I linked to it via the link to Wiki --
for example, "Figure 9.3. Minimum heating of reinforced heavy columns
to initiate global collapse," which shows "temperature range
for a 50% redicution in steel strength," as opposed
to the typical desideratum of "melting" that is promoted.

> http://www.mujca.com

thus:
please, don't bother
with the pro-hominemania of your supposed status
as a practicing physicist and/or trained netdoggy!
proabably most of the interpretation of the EPR "paradox"
results,
a la Alain Aspect et al, is due to the ideal of a photon,
in assinging all of the energy of the wave-front
as a "mass" (electron-voltage, say) of a particle, whence
the wave-energy was somehow collected
by the photoeletrical device. here are two ways to get over this: a)
just consider the practice of audio quantization, the phonon; b)
show how the photoelectrical device is actually tuned
to absorb a particular frequency of light.
so, is the "phonon" just one cycle of the period of the sound,
and
like-wise, is the photon just one cycle of the frequency?

--Light: A History!
http://wlym.com

--Weber's electron, Moon's nucleus!
http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/

--The Ides of March Are Coming:
Pro-Impeachment Democrat
Wins Nomination in Texas!
http://larouchepub.com/pr_lar/2010/lar_pac/100303kesha_victory.html

Curly Surmudgeon

unread,
Mar 12, 2010, 7:39:43 PM3/12/10
to

Why would you expect anyone to respond to your rants and
mischaracterizations?

--
Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Republicans: Party Without a Conscious
Democrats: Party Without a Spine
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Iarnrod

unread,
Mar 12, 2010, 8:17:12 PM3/12/10
to
On Mar 12, 5:39 pm, Curly Surmudgeon <CurlySurmudg...@live.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 23:10:43 +0000, moro...@world.std.spaamtrap.com
>
>
>
> (Michael Moroney) wrote:

> > knews4u2c...@yahoo.com writes:
>
> >>On Mar 12, 1:19 pm, moro...@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
> >>wrote:
>
> >>> You have to remember that ChewToy suffers from a very severe case of
> >>> mental kooktardation.  ...
>
> >>> They no longer have enough "minds" left to write an answer to "what do
> >>> you think really happened that day?", but they do have enough reflexes
> >>> to type in URLs to kooksites, as their kookmeisters have programmed
> >>> them to spread kooktardation as far as possible.
>
> >>Losers.
> >>Why don't you try some FACTS?
> >>http://www.fourwinds10.com/siterun_data/government/fraud/911_attack/
>
> news.php?q=1207934314
>
> >>These are the America hating cronies you support.
>
> > See what I mean?  He can't "think" enough to respond to my post, other
> > than to slavishly post yet another kooksite link.
>
> Why would you expect anyone to respond to your rants and
> mischaracterizations?

NAME ONE THING that he has mischaracterized, Kurly Kook.

And while we're at it, NAME ONE THING on the kooksite link that you
"think" is true. We'll start there. <chuckle>

As I love to say about 9/11 kooks, "You can't and you won't."

knews4...@yahoo.com

unread,
Mar 12, 2010, 11:20:25 PM3/12/10
to

Michael Moroney

unread,
Mar 12, 2010, 11:26:34 PM3/12/10
to
Curly Surmudgeon <CurlySu...@live.com> writes:

>On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 23:10:43 +0000, mor...@world.std.spaamtrap.com
>(Michael Moroney) wrote:

>> knews4...@yahoo.com writes:

>>>Losers.
>>>Why don't you try some FACTS?
>>>http://www.fourwinds10.com/siterun_data/government/fraud/911_attack/
>news.php?q=1207934314
>>>These are the America hating cronies you support.
>>
>> See what I mean? He can't "think" enough to respond to my post, other
>> than to slavishly post yet another kooksite link.

>Why would you expect anyone to respond to your rants and
>mischaracterizations?

It was ChewToy who is ranting and mischaracterizing what happened that
day. Wait, "mischaracterizing" is the wrong word. A better one might be..
..."lying".

But that's the tragedy of severe mental kooktardation. The sufferers
of this horrible affliction don't even know they're lying, that's what
it does to you. Likes of ChewToy and "Henry" make fools of themselves for
the likes of Iarnrod to play with and rip to shreds.

knews4...@yahoo.com

unread,
Mar 13, 2010, 1:26:05 AM3/13/10
to
This guy?
On Mar 12, 8:26 pm, moro...@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moron)
wrote:
> Curly Surmudgeon <CurlySurmudg...@live.com> writes:
> >On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 23:10:43 +0000, moro...@world.std.spaamtrap.com
> >(Michael Moron) wrote:

> >> knews4u2c...@yahoo.com writes:
> >>>Losers.
> >>>Why don't you try some FACTS?
> >>>http://www.fourwinds10.com/siterun_data/government/fraud/911_attack/
> >news.php?q=1207934314
> >>>These are the America hating cronies you support.
>
> >> See what I mean?  He can't "think" enough to respond to my post, other
> >> than to slavishly post yet another kooksite link.
> >Why would you expect anyone to respond to your rants and
> >mischaracterizations?
>
> It was ChewToy who is ranting and mischaracterizing what happened that
> day.  Wait, "mischaracterizing" is the wrong word.  A better one might be..
> ..."lying".
>
> But that's the tragedy of severe mental kooktardation.  The sufferers
> of this horrible affliction don't even know they're lying, that's what
> it does to you.  Likes of ChewToy and "Henry" make fools of themselves for
> the likes of Iarnrod to play with and rip to shreds.

Yea riiiiiiiiiiiiggggggggghhhhhhhht.........
Or these guys?
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8119854514684528700#docid=-5236492071990669218

Peter Webb

unread,
Mar 13, 2010, 1:41:53 AM3/13/10
to
If you have a more plausible theory than the explanation in the NIST report,
I would love to hear it.

Or is the official explanation the most plausible that you know of, as well?


Curly Surmudgeon

unread,
Mar 13, 2010, 2:18:31 AM3/13/10
to
On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 04:26:34 +0000, mor...@world.std.spaamtrap.com
(Michael Moroney) wrote:

> Curly Surmudgeon <CurlySu...@live.com> writes:
>
>>On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 23:10:43 +0000, mor...@world.std.spaamtrap.com
>>(Michael Moroney) wrote:
>
>>> knews4...@yahoo.com writes:
>
>>>>Losers.
>>>>Why don't you try some FACTS?
>>>>http://www.fourwinds10.com/siterun_data/government/fraud/911_attack/
>>news.php?q=1207934314
>>>>These are the America hating cronies you support.
>>>
>>> See what I mean? He can't "think" enough to respond to my post, other
>>> than to slavishly post yet another kooksite link.
>
>>Why would you expect anyone to respond to your rants and
>>mischaracterizations?
>
> It was ChewToy who is ranting and mischaracterizing what happened that
> day.

You haven't shown that. By responding with ad homenims and slime you're
going to be Bozo Filtered.

> Wait, "mischaracterizing" is the wrong word. A better one might
> be.. ..."lying".

You haven't proven that either. Not a shred of evidence, just bile.

> But that's the tragedy of severe mental kooktardation. The sufferers of
> this horrible affliction don't even know they're lying, that's what it
> does to you. Likes of ChewToy and "Henry" make fools of themselves for
> the likes of Iarnrod to play with and rip to shreds.

You're describing yourself more than knews. He, she, it, supplies links
and cites while you and your deniers piss, moan and try to tell us what
knews thinks.

'nuff said, do as you wish.

--
Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Republican Doctrine: Privatize Profits, Socialize Losses
The Democratic Doctrine: Privatize Profits, Socialize Losses
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

knews4...@yahoo.com

unread,
Mar 13, 2010, 2:40:15 AM3/13/10
to
On Mar 12, 10:41 pm, "Peter Webb"

Do you believe in Coincidence Theories?
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8119854514684528700#docid=-5236492071990669218

I don't.

knews4...@yahoo.com

unread,
Mar 13, 2010, 2:56:51 AM3/13/10
to

Ala

unread,
Mar 13, 2010, 8:56:31 AM3/13/10
to

<knews4...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:c8c5e601-bf4c-486f...@v34g2000prm.googlegroups.com...

>I don't.

I do

Several years ago, I was watching one of those old making of newsreels about
Vincente Minnelli's Lust for Life.

The narrator was talking about how Vincente was working so hard on the movie
and had a breakdown.

But then I realized that they might be talking about Vincent Van Gogh, the
subject of the movie. I still can't tell when they were talking about
Minelli and Van Gogh. I'm wondering, could they have had so much in common
that Minelli also painted? It turns out, yes Minelli painted.

Also, minelli was born in Chicago as Lester Minelli. Did he change his name
to Vincente in honor of the artist. Maybe. His father's name was also
Vincent.

So, as I am contemplating all this, I find there is a Dutch film director
Theo Van Gogh. Who was murdered by a terrorist while I am watching this
very documentary.

I hope nothing weird happens to Liza when you are reading this.

Iarnrod

unread,
Mar 13, 2010, 2:17:34 PM3/13/10
to
On Mar 12, 11:26 pm, knowsknothing...@shit-for-brains.kook lied:
> This guy?
> On Mar 12, 8:26 pm, moro...@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)

> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Curly Surmudgeon <CurlySurmudg...@live.com> writes:
> > >On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 23:10:43 +0000, moro...@world.std.spaamtrap.com
> > >(Michael Moroney) wrote:
> > >> knowsknothing...@shit-for-brains.kook lied:

> > >>>Losers.
> > >>>Why don't you try some FACTS?
> > >>>http://www.fourwinds10.com/siterun_data/government/fraud/911_attack/
> > >news.php?q=1207934314
> > >>>These are the America hating cronies you support.
>
> > >> See what I mean?  He can't "think" enough to respond to my post, other
> > >> than to slavishly post yet another kooksite link.
> > >Why would you expect anyone to respond to your rants and
> > >mischaracterizations?
>
> > It was ChewToy who is ranting and mischaracterizing what happened that
> > day.  Wait, "mischaracterizing" is the wrong word.  A better one might be..
> > ..."lying".
>
> > But that's the tragedy of severe mental kooktardation.  The sufferers
> > of this horrible affliction don't even know they're lying, that's what
> > it does to you.  Likes of ChewToy and "Henry" make fools of themselves for
> > the likes of Iarnrod to play with and rip to shreds.
>
> Yea riiiiiiiiiiiiggggggggghhhhhhhht.........

Yep.

You're in tatters. I have had you cowering in FEAR for months at the
demand that you NAME ONE TING, just one little thing, in ANY of your
posts that you "think" is actually true. You can't and you won't
because you know that as soon as you do I will rip it apart for the
deluded foolishness that it is.

> Or these guys?http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8119854514684528700#docid=-52...

Kooks all. NAME ONE THING in that hour and 48 minute video that you
believe. Just one. You can't and you won't

Iarnrod

unread,
Mar 13, 2010, 2:22:59 PM3/13/10
to
On Mar 13, 12:18 am, Curly Surmudgeon <CurlySurmudg...@live.com>
wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 04:26:34 +0000, moro...@world.std.spaamtrap.com
>
>
>
> (Michael Moroney) wrote:

> > Curly Surmudgeon <CurlySurmudg...@live.com> writes:
>
> >>On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 23:10:43 +0000, moro...@world.std.spaamtrap.com
> >>(Michael Moroney) wrote:
>
> >>> knews4u2c...@yahoo.com writes:
>
> >>>>Losers.
> >>>>Why don't you try some FACTS?
> >>>>http://www.fourwinds10.com/siterun_data/government/fraud/911_attack/
> >>news.php?q=1207934314
> >>>>These are the America hating cronies you support.
>
> >>> See what I mean?  He can't "think" enough to respond to my post, other
> >>> than to slavishly post yet another kooksite link.
>
> >>Why would you expect anyone to respond to your rants and
> >>mischaracterizations?
>
> > It was ChewToy who is ranting and mischaracterizing what happened that
> > day.
>
> You haven't shown that.

Yes he has, Kurly Kook.

> By responding with ad homenims and slime you're
> going to be Bozo Filtered.

YOU are the one engaging in ad hominems. You're so stupid you don't
even know what an ad hominem is. Tossing insults isn't ad hominem,
kookbar. What YOU do -- reject proven facts merely because they stem
from government-led investigations, is ad hominem. Suggest you learn
the difference before looking like a dope again.

> > Wait, "mischaracterizing" is the wrong word.  A better one might
> > be.. ..."lying".
>
> You haven't proven that either.

Yes he has. Your flailing-armed denial isn't going anywhere.

> Not a shred of evidence, just bile.

ALL of the evidence is on our side, Kurly Kook. There's no one piece
of evidence that doesn't support the official findings, NONE. OTOH,
ALL of the evidence contradicts the kooker theories. How to you
respond to THAT?

> > But that's the tragedy of severe mental kooktardation.  The sufferers of
> > this horrible affliction don't even know they're lying, that's what it
> > does to you.  Likes of ChewToy and "Henry" make fools of themselves for
> > the likes of Iarnrod to play with and rip to shreds.
>
> You're describing yourself more than knews.

Nope.

> He, she, it, supplies links and cites

You're lying, Kurly Kook. Knowsknothing does not supply evidence, he
supplies links to other kooks saying the same disproven bullshit.
There is no such thing as proof by repeated assertion. His and their
claims have been shown to be wrong and physically impossible. Q.E.D.
They are WORTHLESS except as entertainment value.

> while you and your deniers

YOU kooks are the deniers, denying physics, gravity, science, and
proven FACT.

Iarnrod

unread,
Mar 13, 2010, 2:24:37 PM3/13/10
to
On Mar 13, 12:40 am, knowsknothing...@shit-for-brains.kook lied:

> On Mar 12, 10:41 pm, "Peter Webb"
>
> <webbfam...@DIESPAMDIEoptusnet.com.au> wrote:
> > If you have a more plausible theory than the explanation in the NIST report,
> > I would love to hear it.
>
> > Or is the official explanation the most plausible that you know of, as well?
>
> Do you believe in Coincidence Theories?
>
> I don't.

You don't believe in proven facts, nutbag.

You actually believe in sideways gravity! You believe in cartoon magic
silent and invisible explosives. You believe 16+ seconds is 6 seconds.
You're certifiable insane AND a pathological liar. FACT.

Michael Moroney

unread,
Mar 13, 2010, 2:27:28 PM3/13/10
to
knews4...@yahoo.com writes:

>This guy?
>On Mar 12, 8:26 pm, moro...@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moron)

oooh, I haven't heard that since around third grade...

>wrote:

>> It was ChewToy who is ranting and mischaracterizing what happened that
>> day. Wait, "mischaracterizing" is the wrong word. A better one might be..
>> ..."lying".
>>
>> But that's the tragedy of severe mental kooktardation. The sufferers
>> of this horrible affliction don't even know they're lying, that's what
>> it does to you. Likes of ChewToy and "Henry" make fools of themselves for
>> the likes of Iarnrod to play with and rip to shreds.

>Yea riiiiiiiiiiiiggggggggghhhhhhhht.........
>Or these guys?

>http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3D8119854514684528700#docid=3D-5236=
>492071990669218

And Once Again, ChewToy demonstrates his inability to debate the issue,
or do anything more than post link after link to kooksites.

Michael Moroney

unread,
Mar 13, 2010, 2:34:19 PM3/13/10
to
knews4...@yahoo.com writes:

>On Mar 12, 10:41 pm, "Peter Webb"
><webbfam...@DIESPAMDIEoptusnet.com.au> wrote:
>> If you have a more plausible theory than the explanation in the NIST report,
>> I would love to hear it.
>>
>> Or is the official explanation the most plausible that you know of, as well?

>Do you believe in Coincidence Theories?

>http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3D8119854514684528700#docid=3D-5236=
>492071990669218

>I don't.

And Yet Again, ChewToy demonstrates that he cannot answer a simple
question other than to grunt a nonanswer and post yet another kooksite
link.

Michael Moroney

unread,
Mar 13, 2010, 2:42:54 PM3/13/10
to
Curly Surmudgeon <CurlySu...@live.com> writes:

>On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 04:26:34 +0000, mor...@world.std.spaamtrap.com
>(Michael Moroney) wrote:

>>>> See what I mean? He can't "think" enough to respond to my post, other
>>>> than to slavishly post yet another kooksite link.
>>
>>>Why would you expect anyone to respond to your rants and
>>>mischaracterizations?
>>
>> It was ChewToy who is ranting and mischaracterizing what happened that
>> day.

>You haven't shown that.

I don't have to. Anyone can read ChewToy's posts and see for themselves.

> By responding with ad homenims and slime you're
>going to be Bozo Filtered.

Oooh, like you supposedly already did the last time you couldn't face the
facts?

>> Wait, "mischaracterizing" is the wrong word. A better one might
>> be.. ..."lying".

>You haven't proven that either. Not a shred of evidence, just bile.

Iarnrod has already posted plenty of evidence, again and again and again.
No need to repeat that yet again.

>> But that's the tragedy of severe mental kooktardation. The sufferers of
>> this horrible affliction don't even know they're lying, that's what it
>> does to you. Likes of ChewToy and "Henry" make fools of themselves for
>> the likes of Iarnrod to play with and rip to shreds.

>You're describing yourself more than knews. He, she, it, supplies links
>and cites while you and your deniers piss, moan and try to tell us what
>knews thinks.

ChewToy as an "it"? That may explain it. ChewToy is nothing but a bot,
running on a PC somewhere, programmed to do nothing more than to reply to
posts with kooksite URLs. It doesn't debate because it *can't* debate -
it's just a bot, a computer program.

knews4...@yahoo.com

unread,
Mar 13, 2010, 3:18:35 PM3/13/10
to
On Mar 13, 11:27 am, moro...@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
wrote:

> knews4u2c...@yahoo.com writes:
> >This guy?
> >On Mar 12, 8:26 pm, moro...@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moron)
>
> oooh, I haven't heard that since around third grade...
>

Last year huh?

> >wrote:
> >> It was ChewToy who is ranting and mischaracterizing what happened that
> >> day.  Wait, "mischaracterizing" is the wrong word.  A better one might be..
> >> ..."lying".
>

Like NIST.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4026073566596731782#

> >> But that's the tragedy of severe mental kooktardation.  The sufferers
> >> of this horrible affliction don't even know they're lying, that's what
> >> it does to you.  Likes of ChewToy and "Henry" make fools of themselves for
> >> the likes of Iarnrod to play with and rip to shreds.
> >Yea riiiiiiiiiiiiggggggggghhhhhhhht.........
> >Or these guys?

> >http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3D8119854514684528700#docid=3...


> >492071990669218
>
> And Once Again, ChewToy demonstrates his inability to debate the issue,
> or do anything more than post link after link to kooksites.

NIST is complicit in a treasonous cover-up.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4026073566596731782#

PV

unread,
Mar 13, 2010, 3:44:48 PM3/13/10
to
mor...@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) writes:
>I don't know the details, but mental kooktardation erects a sort of
>mental Berlin Wall in what's left of their victims' "minds", and any
>facts that attempt to cross it get machinegunned and left to die. I

Skeptic Magazine used to describe the "woo woo" mindset like a watch
mainspring. Turn the stem in a way that supports their beliefs, and the
spring is wound even tighter. Turn it the other way ... and nothing
happens. *
--
* PV Something like badgers, something like lizards, and something
like corkscrews.

Curly Surmudgeon

unread,
Mar 13, 2010, 3:57:27 PM3/13/10
to
On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 19:42:54 +0000, mor...@world.std.spaamtrap.com
(Michael Moroney) wrote:

You're history. Buh-bye!

knews4...@yahoo.com

unread,
Mar 13, 2010, 4:19:12 PM3/13/10
to
On Mar 13, 11:24 am, Ioonyrod <iarn...@yahoo.com> snipped, lied, and
spewed in order to distract:
> On Mar 13, 12:40 am, knowsNISTdrylab@insidejoblies:

>
> > On Mar 12, 10:41 pm, "Peter Webb"
>
> > <webbfam...@DIESPAMDIEoptusnet.com.au> wrote:
> > > If you have a more plausible theory than the explanation in the NIST report,
> > > I would love to hear it.
No.
You wouldn't.
You've proven it.

>
NIST dry-lab'd the conclusions.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LrNF6ulrWao
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iXTlaqXsm4k&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v3mudruFzNw&feature=related

> > > Or is the official explanation the most plausible that you know of, as well?
>

No.
Buildings don't collapse like that.
If they did we wouldn't need controlled demolition.
We could just start a few fires on a few floors and watch them
"collapse."
www.ae911truth.org
http://www.bentham-open.org/pages/content.php?TOCPJ/2009/00000002/00000001/7TOCPJ.SGM

> > Do you believe in Coincidence Theories?
>
> > I don't.

Yet that is the "official" line of events.


>
> You don't believe in proven facts, nutbag.
>

I believe you are a lying windbag from Mossad and/or a pathological
liar.

The facts are right here.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eDvNS9iMjzA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iXTlaqXsm4k&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v3mudruFzNw&feature=related
If you disagree you can surely post a response to this analysis right
there on youtube.
I'm sure you can post some name calling and arm waving "debunked" or
"dismissed."

> You actually believe in sideways gravity!

No.
You keep lying and say stupid things I never said.
It takes explosive force to launch beams weighing tons hundreds of
feet laterally.
They weren't made of rubber an didn't jump 600 feet sideways.

>You believe in cartoon magic

I believe the WTC "cartoon" caveman "attack" is a fraud by the Elite
Magi.

> silent and invisible explosives.

118 eye witnesses say otherwise.
What were you doing?
Watching Maury?

>You believe 16+ seconds is 6 seconds.

WTC 7 Fell at free fall.
NIST admits it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v3mudruFzNw&feature=related

> You're certifiable insane AND a pathological liar. FACT.

Projection noted.

NIST is not addressing the evidence.
They are dry - labbing.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4026073566596731782#

Michael Moroney

unread,
Mar 13, 2010, 5:01:02 PM3/13/10
to
knews4...@yahoo.com writes:

>On Mar 13, 11:27=A0am, moro...@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
>wrote:

>> >> It was ChewToy who is ranting and mischaracterizing what happened that
>> >> day. Wait, "mischaracterizing" is the wrong word. A better one might be..
>> >> ..."lying".

>Like NIST.
>http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3D4026073566596731782#

>> And Once Again, ChewToy demonstrates his inability to debate the issue,
>> or do anything more than post link after link to kooksites.

>NIST is complicit in a treasonous cover-up.

>http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3D4026073566596731782#

Oh ChewToy, you're so funny. I repeatedly point out your inability
to engage in any sort of debate but can only post kooksite links, so
what do you do in response? Post links to not one, but two kookpages!

You really must be a bot. A mentally kooktarded bot.

knews4...@yahoo.com

unread,
Mar 13, 2010, 5:20:25 PM3/13/10
to
On Mar 13, 12:44 pm, pv+luses...@pobox.com (PV) wrote:

> moro...@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moron) writes:
> >I don't know the details, but mental kooktardation erects a sort of
> >mental Berlin Wall in what's left of their victims' "minds", and any
> >facts that attempt to cross it get machinegunned and left to die.  

So that is how you do it.
You must have a ton of experience.


>
> Skeptic Magazine used to describe the "woo woo" mindset like a watch
> mainspring. Turn the stem in a way that supports their beliefs, and the
> spring is wound even tighter. Turn it the other way ... and nothing
> happens. *

Idiot.
Your "woo-woo" is cavemen make three steel structures "collapse" from
fires for the first time in history.


> --
> * PV    Something like badgers, something like >lizards, and something

>         like corkscrews, but never like facts.

Dork.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v3mudruFzNw&feature=related

Message has been deleted

knews4...@yahoo.com

unread,
Mar 13, 2010, 7:05:37 PM3/13/10
to

There are no "findings."
There is some speculation and conjecture in their Dry-lab tactics.

> ALL of the evidence contradicts the kooker theories. How to you
> respond to THAT?
>

No.
You are lying again and again.
But you knew that.

> > > But that's the tragedy of severe mental kooktardation.  The sufferers of
> > > this horrible affliction don't even know they're lying, that's what it
> > > does to you.  

And who would no better than you from experience.

>Likes of ChewToy and "Henry" make fools of themselves for
> > > the likes of Iarnrod to play with and rip to shreds.
>
> > You're describing yourself more than knews.
>
> Nope.
>
> > He, she, it, supplies links and cites
>
> You're lying, Kurly Kook.

No, you are lying again and projecting on others.
I've supplied about 50 different links at least.
Want more again?

http://veritas911.livejournal.com
http://www.youtube.com/user/DavidChandler911#p/p

>Knowsknothing does not supply evidence, he
> supplies links to other kooks saying the same disproven bullshit.

Yet you haven't cited a one.

> There is no such thing as proof by repeated assertion.

Then why do you keep asserting "debunked" without any cites?

>His and their
> claims have been shown to be wrong and physically impossible. Q.E.D.

You've done nothing but spew. Q.E.D.
All that arm waving without on cite.
Besides all the ones you snip.
Amazing.

> They are WORTHLESS except as entertainment value.
>
> > while you and your deniers
>
> YOU kooks are the deniers, denying physics, gravity, science, and
> proven FACT.

Yea, riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiigggggggggggghhhhhttt......
http://www.youtube.com/user/DavidChandler911#p/p

Geeez, you are such a lying loser.
Go back to Maury for your facts.

Iarnrod

unread,
Mar 13, 2010, 7:44:24 PM3/13/10
to
On Mar 13, 1:18 pm, knews4u2c...@yahoo.com wrote:
> On Mar 13, 11:27 am, moro...@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
> > >wrote:
> > >> It was ChewToy who is ranting and mischaracterizing what happened that
> > >> day.  Wait, "mischaracterizing" is the wrong word.  A better one might be..
> > >> ..."lying".
>
> Like NIST

Yet knowknothing is totally impotent when asked to NAME ONE THING he
"thinks" is a lie in the NIST report..

He can't and he won't.


> > >> But that's the tragedy of severe mental kooktardation.  The sufferers
> > >> of this horrible affliction don't even know they're lying, that's what
> > >> it does to you.  Likes of ChewToy and "Henry" make fools of themselves for
> > >> the likes of Iarnrod to play with and rip to shreds.
> > >Yea riiiiiiiiiiiiggggggggghhhhhhhht.........
> > >Or these guys?
> > >http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3D8119854514684528700#docid=3...
> > >492071990669218
>
> > And Once Again, ChewToy demonstrates his inability to debate the issue,
> > or do anything more than post link after link to kooksites.
>
> NIST is complicit in a treasonous cover-up.

NAME ONE THING, nutbag. You're great at arm waving flailing and lying
but pretty shit-poor when it comes to PUTTING UP YOUR EVIDENCE.

Iarnrod

unread,
Mar 13, 2010, 7:45:22 PM3/13/10
to
On Mar 13, 1:57 pm, Curly Surmudgeon <CurlySurmudg...@live.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 19:42:54 +0000, moro...@world.std.spaamtrap.com
>
>
>
> (Michael Moroney) wrote:
> > Curly Surmudgeon <CurlySurmudg...@live.com> writes:
>
> >>On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 04:26:34 +0000, moro...@world.std.spaamtrap.com

Once again, Kurly the Kooker can't stand to listen to FACTS. Too
funny!!!

Michael Moroney

unread,
Mar 13, 2010, 8:44:29 PM3/13/10
to
Curly Surmudgeon <CurlySu...@live.com> writes:

>You're history. Buh-bye!

Too much of a chicken to actually debate the issue, I see. You're just
as much afraid of the facts as ChewToy is.

knews4...@yahoo.com

unread,
Mar 13, 2010, 9:16:51 PM3/13/10
to
On Mar 13, 5:44 pm, moro...@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
wrote:

> Curly Surmudgeon <CurlySurmudg...@live.com> writes:
> >You're history.  Buh-bye!
>
> Too much of a chicken to actually debate the issue, I see.  You're just
> as much afraid of the facts as ChewToy is.

Yet all I do is post facts of which you claim I am "afraid."

Iarnrod

unread,
Mar 13, 2010, 9:44:28 PM3/13/10
to
On Mar 13, 7:16 pm, knowsknothing...@shit-for-brains.kook lied:

> On Mar 13, 5:44 pm, moro...@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
> wrote:
>
> > Kooky Surmudgeon <CurlySurmudg...@dead.com> deluded himself and ran from the FACTS:

> > >You're history.  Buh-bye!
>
> > Too much of a chicken to actually debate the issue, I see.  You're just
> > as much afraid of the facts as ChewToy is.
>
> Yet all I do is post facts of which you claim I am "afraid."

Uh, earth to knowsknothing... YOU HAVE YET TO POST A FACT!!

Holy CRAP, do you actually "think" the lies and kooksites you post,
which have been conclusively shown to be LIES and PHYSICALLY
IMPOSSIBLE, can still be called "facts?"

You are pathological, for sure!

<snicker>

knews4...@yahoo.com

unread,
Mar 13, 2010, 10:49:56 PM3/13/10
to
On Mar 13, 6:44 pm, Iarnrod <iarn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Mar 13, 7:16 pm, knowsknothing...@shit-for-brains.kook lied:
>
> > On Mar 13, 5:44 pm, moro...@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
> > wrote:
>
> > > Kooky Surmudgeon <CurlySurmudg...@dead.com> deluded himself and ran from the FACTS:
> > > >You're history.  Buh-bye!
>
> > > Too much of a chicken to actually debate the issue, I see.  You're just
> > > as much afraid of the facts as ChewToy is.
>
> > Yet all I do is post facts of which you claim I am "afraid."
>
> Uh, earth to knowsknothing... YOU HAVE YET TO POST A FACT!!

And so you snip the subject fact rather than actually discussing it.

Here is more for you to snip.


"There's three things to remember: claim everything, explain nothing,
deny everything."--Prescott Bush, Father to G. H.W. Bush, Grandfather
of Shrub

http://www.ae911truth.org/flashmov11.htm
min 1:15, top down demolition
min 1:34, bodies pulverized

"The CIA owns everyone of any significance in the major media."
Willam Colby, Director CIA

cop welfare

unread,
Mar 13, 2010, 11:02:59 PM3/13/10
to
On Mar 13, 4:01 pm, moro...@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
wrote:

http://archive.democrats.com/display.cfm?id=181
scroll to near the bottom.
absolute proof that conpiracy 'theory' can become conspiracy 'fact',
asshole.
hope this helps.

Peter Webb

unread,
Mar 13, 2010, 11:38:53 PM3/13/10
to
Please tell us the TRUTH of what happened on 9/11.

Why won't you?


knews4...@yahoo.com

unread,
Mar 13, 2010, 11:43:03 PM3/13/10
to
On Mar 13, 4:44 pm, Ioonyrod <iarn...@yahoo.com> snipped his way out
of the corner and lied:

> On Mar 13, 1:18 pm, knews4u2c...@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> > On Mar 13, 11:27 am, moro...@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moron)

NIST is Dry-labbing.
http://www.youtube.com/user/DavidChandler911#p/c/206C1F5EDFC83824/2/v3mudruFzNw

Peter Webb

unread,
Mar 13, 2010, 11:48:58 PM3/13/10
to
Do you have a more plausible explanation of what happened than that in the
NIST report?

If so, what is it?

Or is the NIST explanation the most plausible you know of?


Iarnrod

unread,
Mar 13, 2010, 11:49:51 PM3/13/10
to
On Mar 13, 8:49 pm, knews4u2c...@yahoo.com wrote:
> On Mar 13, 6:44 pm, Iarnrod <iarn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > On Mar 13, 7:16 pm, knowsknothing...@shit-for-brains.kook lied:
>
> > > On Mar 13, 5:44 pm, moro...@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
> > > wrote:
>
> > > > Kooky Surmudgeon <CurlySurmudg...@dead.com> deluded himself and ran from the FACTS:
> > > > >You're history.  Buh-bye!
>
> > > > Too much of a chicken to actually debate the issue, I see.  You're just
> > > > as much afraid of the facts as ChewToy is.
>
> > > Yet all I do is post facts of which you claim I am "afraid."
>
> > Uh, earth to knowsknothing... YOU HAVE YET TO POST A FACT!!
>
> And so you snip the subject fact rather than actually discussing it.

IDIOT.... POST A FACT and we will discuss it. We will discuss it so
thoroughly that even a shit-for-brains moron like you won't escape the
fact that you have been proven wrong.

All you do is post assertions. You DENY facts that I give you. You
flail your arms helplessly while you drown in a sea of facts that
prove your wrong.

> Here is more for you to snip.

You fuckwad, NAME ONE THING. We your betters have no intention of
wading into your morass of disproven kooksites. YOU...NAME ONE THING.
Stop posting links to bullshit, and NAME ONE THING.

You can't and you won't.

Iarnrod

unread,
Mar 13, 2010, 11:51:46 PM3/13/10
to

It heps convince the world you're an insane nutbag. AWOL criminal Bush
stealing the 2000 election has nothing to do with 9/11. Seek
professional help, asshole.

Iarnrod

unread,
Mar 13, 2010, 11:54:29 PM3/13/10
to
On Mar 13, 9:43 pm, knowsknothing...@shit-for-brains.kook lied
pathologically:
> On Mar 13, 4:44 pm, Mighty Iarnrod continued to pound this stupid kooker's ass deep into hard ground with the proven TRUTH:
>
> > On Mar 13, 1:18 pm, knowsknothing...@shit-for-brains.kook lied pathologically:
>
> > > On Mar 13, 11:27 am, moro...@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)

> > > > >wrote:
> > > > >> It was ChewToy who is ranting and mischaracterizing what happened that
> > > > >> day.  Wait, "mischaracterizing" is the wrong word.  A better one might be..
> > > > >> ..."lying".
>
> > > Like NIST
>
> > Yet knowknothing is totally impotent when asked to NAME ONE THING he
> > "thinks" is a lie in the NIST report..
>
> > He can't and he won't.

<<crickets>>Thanks knowsknothing for proving me correct yet again,

> > > > >> But that's the tragedy of severe mental kooktardation.  The sufferers
> > > > >> of this horrible affliction don't even know they're lying, that's what
> > > > >> it does to you.  Likes of ChewToy and "Henry" make fools of themselves for
> > > > >> the likes of Iarnrod to play with and rip to shreds.
> > > > >Yea riiiiiiiiiiiiggggggggghhhhhhhht.........
> > > > >Or these guys?
> > > > >http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3D8119854514684528700#docid=3...
> > > > >492071990669218
>
> > > > And Once Again, ChewToy demonstrates his inability to debate the issue,
> > > > or do anything more than post link after link to kooksites.
>
> > > NIST is complicit in a treasonous cover-up.
>
> > NAME ONE THING, nutbag. You're great at arm waving flailing and lying
> > but pretty shit-poor when it comes to PUTTING UP YOUR EVIDENCE.
>
> NIST is Dry-labbing.

You're dry-humping, knowsknothing, You got nothing. All your claims
are disproven and most are physically impossible like your silent and
invisible explosives. You've lost, but it's funny that you keep
posting your idiocy.

cop welfare

unread,
Mar 13, 2010, 11:59:38 PM3/13/10
to
> professional help, asshole.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

fuck you.

cop welfare

unread,
Mar 14, 2010, 12:01:13 AM3/14/10
to
On Mar 13, 10:38 pm, "Peter Webb"

<webbfam...@DIESPAMDIEoptusnet.com.au> wrote:
> Please tell us the TRUTH of what happened on 9/11.
>
> Why won't you?

larnrod can't even disprove that he's an old bitch.
and he isn't

Iarnrod

unread,
Mar 14, 2010, 12:21:40 AM3/14/10
to

No, I don't think so, dearie. See, you'd need to have a big boy's dick
for that and I am afraid you simply don't qualify.

Iarnrod

unread,
Mar 14, 2010, 12:23:11 AM3/14/10
to

Wow, you're one confused little kooker, aren't you!

This explains your insane belief that Criminal Bush stealing the
election in 2000 somehow means 9/11 is an inside job. Wow. So much
stupidity in one small cranial cavity!

Ala

unread,
Mar 14, 2010, 9:16:12 AM3/14/10
to

"cop welfare" <cop.w...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:2ab69575-bc63-49d1...@t20g2000yqe.googlegroups.com...

>fuck you.

Yous guys must be unfamiliar with the concept of freedom of speech meaning
that anyone is free to respond, in any way they wish, to ignorant
bull.


ESPECIALLY IF YOU SEND it soliciting a response with "what do you think",
which is the implied invitation in every usenet post

cop welfare

unread,
Mar 14, 2010, 1:17:17 PM3/14/10
to
On Mar 14, 8:16 am, "Ala" <alackr...@comcast.net> wrote:
> "cop welfare" <cop.welf...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> which is the implied invitation in every usenet post- Hide quoted text -

>
> - Show quoted text -

well, then i don't have much choice, so you say.
on the other hand, if all that were true in normal conversation,
things would get pretty noisy.
if i don't address someone directly, and they chime in with a comment,
i interpret that as not minding one's own bizness or a less serious
form thereof.
any remark i make at that point is in fair territory.
i don't see any 'ignorant bull' in this case, btw.
"conspiracy 'theory' can become conspiracy 'fact'.''
if you disagree...
you disagree.

Michael Moroney

unread,
Mar 14, 2010, 2:12:07 PM3/14/10
to
knews4...@yahoo.com writes:

>On Mar 13, 12:44=A0pm, pv+luses...@pobox.com (PV) wrote:
>> moro...@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moron) writes:
>> >I don't know the details, but mental kooktardation erects a sort of
>> >mental Berlin Wall in what's left of their victims' "minds", and any

>> >facts that attempt to cross it get machinegunned and left to die. =A0

>So that is how you do it.
>You must have a ton of experience.

No, I have no experience in brainwashing the stupid, making them into
kooktards. It was your kookmeister who did that to you.

>Idiot.
>Your "woo-woo" is cavemen make three steel structures "collapse" from
>fires for the first time in history.

That "caveman" you speak of was certainly no caveman on 9/11/2001. He
was living openly and blatantly in Taliban-controlled Afghanistan.
Unfortunately he escaped.

He also has thousands of minions who are willing to lay down their
lives at his bidding. You can do a lot if you have so many people
willing to die for your cause.

Kind of like your kookmeister, who has apparently dozens of kooktards
willing to kook all over Usenet and Youtube at his bidding. Have you
reached the point where you are willing to die at your kookmeister's
bidding yet? I hope not.

knews4...@yahoo.com

unread,
Mar 14, 2010, 2:15:02 PM3/14/10
to

But you'll just rant on screaming "impossible" and snip the link to
the evidence.
http://www.youtube.com/user/DavidChandler911#p/p
What is "impossible" is the NIST could be so corrupt and get away with
it.
Not for long.
Here is some more "impossible" in the Official Conspiracy Theory.
http://citizeninvestigationteam.blogspot.com/2010/01/pilots-for-911-truth-release-new-tech.html

spudnik

unread,
Mar 14, 2010, 4:00:19 PM3/14/10
to
what is the comparison of the amount of energy in "de planes,"
compared with that required for Cheeny's "controlled demo,"
attaching bombs at leisure in the basement?

> >http://letsrollforums.com/dr-philip-d-zelikow-t16841.html?s=dba1ea079...
> > So Zelikow, the guy who wrote The 9/11 Commission Report, was an
> > expert in how to misuse public trust and create PUBLIC MYTHS.

> >http://www.ksg.harvard.edu/visions/publication/terrorism.htm
> Coincidence theory rules?http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8119854514684528700#docid=-52...

thus:
allow the "reconcilliators" to allow Waxman's Cap & Trade Phase Two
to pass, mandatorizing the large USA voluntary cap & trade, as
in the much-larger EU cap & trade, and you won't be
able to afford to build a rickety PV-field.

> ø Current coal, crude and natural gas reserves are
> more than adequate for the next century and more.

thus:
the ratio of He3/He4, coming out of the midocean ridges & vents,
has been said to be similar to that in the solar wind.

glad to see that Gold's theory was also made by Mendeleev, but
that doesn't mean that it's correct. there was also a statement,
"the measured geological age of the new oil was quantifiably different
than the oil
pumped in the '70s" and, also,
"oil extracted from varying depths from the same oil field have the
same chemistry
– oil chemistry does not vary as fossils vary with increasing depth;"
so,
what is the method to date it?

> >>>>> Dr. Gold strongly believes that oil is a "renewable, primordial soup
> >>>>> continually manufactured by the Earth under ultrahot conditions and
> >>>>> tremendous pressures. As this substance migrates toward the surface,
> >>>>> it is attached by bacteria, making it appear to have an organic origin
> >>>>> dating back to the dinosaurs."
> >>> 1- Solar power is only marginally useful and that
> >>> only in Space!

thus:
so, is the "phonon" just one cycle of the period of the sound,
and like-wise, is the photon just one cycle of the frequency (sik) ??

--Light: A History!
http://wlym.com

--Weber's electron, Moon's nucleus!
http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/

--The Ides of March Are Coming:
Pro-Impeachment Democrat
Wins Nomination in Texas!
http://larouchepub.com/pr_lar/2010/lar_pac/100303kesha_victory.html

Iarnrod

unread,
Mar 14, 2010, 5:50:32 PM3/14/10
to

YOU GAVE NO EVIDENCE, KOOKER!! You have yet to NAME ONE THING to give
evidence for, you incredibly dense piece of shit. HELLO?!?!? Earth to
knowsknothing-- NAME ONE THING!!

You have yet to even offer one thing. You just post kooklinks. Aer you
a fuckin' PARROT or can you think for yourself at all?

> What is "impossible" is the NIST could be so corrupt and get away with
> it.

Well, by accident of your illiteracy you actually wrote something
true.

Read what you wrote again, nitwit. BWAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAAAA!!!


> Here is some more "impossible" in the Official Conspiracy Theory.http://citizeninvestigationteam.blogspot.com/2010/01/pilots-for-911-t...

NAME ONE THING IN THAT that you "think" is true, shit-for-brains. You
are on the cusp of discovering just how stupid you truly are!
Go=======>

Hint: You can't and you won't.

knews4...@yahoo.com

unread,
Mar 14, 2010, 7:32:41 PM3/14/10
to
On Mar 14, 2:50 pm, Ioonyrod <iarn...@yahoo.com> spewed again:

> On Mar 14, 12:15 pm, knews4u2c...@yahoo.com wrote:
> > On Mar 13, 5:44 pm, Iarnrod <iarn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Mar 13, 1:18 pm, knews4u2c...@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> > > > On Mar 13, 11:27 am, moro...@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moron)

> > > > > >wrote:
> > > > > >> It was ChewToy who is ranting and mischaracterizing what happened that
> > > > > >> day.  Wait, "mischaracterizing" is the wrong word.  A better one might be..
> > > > > >> ..."lying".
>
> > > > Like NIST
>
Replace links that losers snip.
http://www.youtube.com/user/DavidChandler911#p/p

Yes, NIST is corrupt to the core.

> Read what you wrote again, nitwit. BWAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAAAA!!!
>

NIST is corrupt to the core.

> > Here is some more "impossible" in the Official Conspiracy Theory.http://citizeninvestigationteam.blogspot.com/2010/01/pilots-for-911-t...
>
> NAME ONE THING IN THAT that you "think" is true, shit-for-brains. You
> are on the cusp of discovering just how stupid you truly are!
> Go=======>
>
> Hint: You can't and you won't.

"There's three things to remember: claim everything, explain nothing,


deny everything."--Prescott Bush, Father to G. H.W. Bush, Grandfather
of Shrub

http://www.ae911truth.org/flashmov11.htm
min 1:15, top down demolition.


min 1:34, bodies pulverized

"The CIA owns everyone of any significance in the major media."

William Colby, Director CIA

Iarnrod

unread,
Mar 14, 2010, 11:26:07 PM3/14/10
to
On Mar 14, 5:32 pm, knowsknothing...@brain-damaged-kooker.com spewed
more pathological lies:
> On Mar 14, 2:50 pm, Mighty Iarnrod spanked this kooker fool silly again:
> > On Mar 14, 12:15 pm, knowsknothing...@brain-damaged-kooker.com spewed more pathological lies:
> > > On Mar 13, 5:44 pm, Mighty Iarnrod spanked this kooker fool silly again:
>
> > > > On Mar 13, 1:18 pm, knowsknothing...@brain-damaged-kooker.com spewed more pathological lies:
>
> > > > > On Mar 13, 11:27 am, moro...@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)

> > > > > > >wrote:
> > > > > > >> It was ChewToy who is ranting and mischaracterizing what happened that
> > > > > > >> day.  Wait, "mischaracterizing" is the wrong word.  A better one might be..
> > > > > > >> ..."lying".
>
> > > > > Like NIST
>
> Replace links that losers snip.

Snip kooklink that is full of disproven LIES.


> > > > Yet knowknothing is totally impotent when asked to NAME ONE THING he
> > > > "thinks" is a lie in the NIST report..
>
> > > > He can't and he won't.

<<CRICKETS>> Knowsknothing will NEVER rise to the challenge to NAME
ONE THING, making his pathetic lying obvious to the world.

BWAHAHAAAHAHAAAA!!!! You didn't even read what you wrote, you
illiterate drug-addicted Jew-hating goober.

YOU SAID IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR NIST TO BE CORRUPT. Quote from
knowsknothign, above, who has no idea how stupid he is: "What is


"impossible" is the NIST could be so corrupt and get away with it."

Holy SHIT but your stump-stupid!


> > Read what you wrote again, nitwit. BWAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAAAA!!!
>
> NIST is corrupt to the core.

Not what you wrote, you fuckin idiot Jew-hating moron. Instead of
fucking your sister, you shoulda gone to school. HERE is what you
wrote, dickweed: "What is "impossible" is the NIST could be so corrupt


and get away with it."

> > > Here is some more "impossible" in the Official Conspiracy Theory.http://citizeninvestigationteam.blogspot.com/2010/01/pilots-for-911-t...


>
> > NAME ONE THING IN THAT that you "think" is true, shit-for-brains. You
> > are on the cusp of discovering just how stupid you truly are!
> > Go=======>
>
> > Hint: You can't and you won't.
>

> "There's three things to remember: ....

No, kookshit, there's only one thing to remember ... that you are
CHICKEN and a COWARD and FAILURE who cannot NAME ONE THING.

I knew you would fail. We all did. You are an utter failure. All you
have is your lies to keep you warm.

Michael Moroney

unread,
Mar 16, 2010, 2:15:15 PM3/16/10
to
cop welfare <cop.w...@gmail.com> writes:

What the hell does that have anything at all to do with the collapses of
the towers? We all know that conspiracies happen. Hell, one that's
actually on-topic is 19 terrorists conspired with each other and others,
to hijack four jetliners and crash them into buildings on 9/11/01.

0 new messages