>On 8 Ott, 20:04, Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealm...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> On a sunny day (Mon, 8 Oct 2012 10:21:51 -0700 (PDT)) it happened Casimiro
>> <fa.mo...@yahoo.it> wrote in
>> <c509ded3-7d99-4680-b7f1-2b2a8148f...@j12g2000vbm.googlegroups.com>:
>> >On 8 Ott, 14:58, Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealm...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >> On a sunny day (Mon, 8 Oct 2012 05:47:07 -0700 (PDT)) it happened Casimiro
>> >> <fa.mo...@yahoo.it> wrote in
>> >> <605b7e49-b897-4e54-8880-3a2192d7e...@c20g2000vbz.googlegroups.com>:
>> >> >The death... sister Death may visit us every nught, my dear. May be
>> >> >all should be ignored. Amen.
>> >> As to your experiment,
>> >> and microwave reflections.
>> >> Did you try with the magic T fixed in a closed metal box, and then rotating that box?
>> >> It would not surprise me a bit of the arms of the T were radiation / receiving,
>> >> and then any reflections from walls etc etc would change if you turned it,
>> >> and cause a different level at the detector.
>> >> Just like radar...
>> >You must see attently my video: the lagit tee is closed in a metallic
>> >box soldered accurately.
>> >This night I weaked and wrotten the preface of my relation. You can
>> >reed here:
>> >http://www.2shared.com/document/xN_G7Vt-/preface.html
>> That is a very nice intro.
>> I want to think for a while about your results before making some stupid remark perhaps :-)
>> Does not putting metal containg thermal insulation foil affect the impedances on that PCB?
On a sunny day (Mon, 8 Oct 2012 22:26:38 -0700 (PDT)) it happened Casimiro
<fa.mo...@yahoo.it> wrote in
<5031fc39-0517-490e-aa85-8fb221ebc...@k6g2000vbr.googlegroups.com>:
>See: inside the box it is only the rigid coaxial cable with the two
>detector diodes. No any PCB.
OK.
You mentioned the 'tides' of the moon affecting your experiment (you did not say which one and how).
Take this test please:
Was the affected experiment the horizontal ring? If not goto pizza.
Was the experiment done vertical less sensitive to those tides than when horizontal? If not goto pizza.
Are you located close to the coast / sea / beach ? If not goto pizza.
WINNER!
You are measuring reflections from ground water level.
You have re-invented ground penetrating radar.
The ground water level will change with the tides a bit,
the ground water acts like a large metal reflector just below your laboratory.
This is all based on my theory that you are experiencing reflections :-)
No magic, no Nobel, have an expresso.
Next experiment
end
> On a sunny day (Mon, 8 Oct 2012 22:26:38 -0700 (PDT)) it happened Casimiro
> <fa.mo...@yahoo.it> wrote in
> <5031fc39-0517-490e-aa85-8fb221ebc...@k6g2000vbr.googlegroups.com>:
> >> That is a very nice intro.
> >> I want to think for a while about your results before making some stupid remark perhaps :-)
> >> Does not putting metal containg thermal insulation foil affect the impedances on that PCB?
> >Do you think that? Why a PCB could affect the impedence?
> >If you refer to
> >http://youtu.be/q_OriOq5x5g
> >See: inside the box it is only the rigid coaxial cable with the two
> >detector diodes. No any PCB.
> OK.
> You mentioned the 'tides' of the moon affecting your experiment (you did not say which one and how).
> Take this test please:
> Was the affected experiment the horizontal ring? If not goto pizza.
> Was the experiment done vertical less sensitive to those tides than when horizontal? If not goto pizza.
> Are you located close to the coast / sea / beach ? If not goto pizza.
> WINNER!
> You are measuring reflections from ground water level.
> You have re-invented ground penetrating radar.
> The ground water level will change with the tides a bit,
> the ground water acts like a large metal reflector just below your laboratory.
> This is all based on my theory that you are experiencing reflections :-)
> No magic, no Nobel,
> have an expresso.
> Next experiment
> end
> pizza:
> relax, think of better explanation.
> end
mah...
If you are again interest read this
Summary-
Description of a new phase detector of microwaves.
In spite of measurements with light of Michelson Morley (et alteri),
always failed, this microwaves detector permits the detection of
microscopic phase shifts, till to 1/1000000 of a cycle.
THEORY
The “phase Doppler”
– Commonly the phase of a wave was never considered in Doppler effect,
where only frequency is considered. A brief analysis is then
necessary.
And interesting.
Is possible, with the phase Doppler, to measure the velocity of the
medium, although if don’t exists relative motion. Being a phase
Doppler” the displacement of wave fronts of a wave travelling in space
with you, comparing the phase of fronts tell you if you are moving or
not: is enough to turn the detector 90°. Up today this simple
phenomenon is unexplored by physics.
The phase changes , tourning 90°, in proportion of v/c , where v is
the displacement speed of source in the medium, and c is the
propagation speed in still medium of an electromagnetic perturbation.
Then the phase Doppler to be expected in astronomic movements, as
rotation of Earth, will be a very little fraction of a cycle. But
red-shift and blue shift tell us the big velocities of galaxies!
Light and radiowaves are not both electromagnetic waves, subjected
both to same lows?
The experiment with radiowaves need simply
1 - a good syntetized generator,
2- any space where the wave travels – for instance a well screened
closed space in a waveguide, or also in a coaxial cable . This one
because Heaviside teaches that propagation in wire-lines obeys to the
same lows as flat waves in the free space, simply slower.
3- a good phase discriminator, to detect the distance of fronts of
start and that of arrival of the same wave, or phase shift, when
orienting all that set up in the space.
The discriminator , by experience, must be placed inside the measured
space. Every microscopic movement of diodes, walls of waveguide,
connector to generator, can produce phase variations. All must be
hermetically soldered.
Every gap or hole modifies the phase! The connection to generator must
be shorter possible. If do you use coaxial cable this one must be
soldered completely to ground of the box, and soldered the cover.
I used in all my experiments a Gigatronix 7200 as oscillator. All
other models of generators are usable, if syntetized. This is very
important, because the null frequency of quadrature discriminator
senses some Hertz s!
Frequency is imposed by the null frequency of discriminator. Then
frequency steps must be of a minimum of 1 KHz.
RF power must be 10 dBm , (10 mW) for a d.c. output ranging from of
some milliVolt , to some ...Volt (obtained only with circular
waveguide).
Every laboratory in the world can easily repeat this experiment! Is
the beauty of electronics, for me survival son of classical Physics!
> On a sunny day (Mon, 8 Oct 2012 22:26:38 -0700 (PDT)) it happened Casimiro
> <fa.mo...@yahoo.it> wrote in
> <5031fc39-0517-490e-aa85-8fb221ebc...@k6g2000vbr.googlegroups.com>:
> >> That is a very nice intro.
> >> I want to think for a while about your results before making some stupid remark perhaps :-)
> >> Does not putting metal containg thermal insulation foil affect the impedances on that PCB?
> >Do you think that? Why a PCB could affect the impedence?
> >If you refer to
> >http://youtu.be/q_OriOq5x5g
> >See: inside the box it is only the rigid coaxial cable with the two
> >detector diodes. No any PCB.
> OK.
> You mentioned the 'tides' of the moon affecting your experiment (you did not say which one and how).
> Take this test please:
> Was the affected experiment the horizontal ring? If not goto pizza.
> Was the experiment done vertical less sensitive to those tides than when horizontal? If not goto pizza.
> Are you located close to the coast / sea / beach ? If not goto pizza.
> WINNER!
> You are measuring reflections from ground water level.
> You have re-invented ground penetrating radar.
> The ground water level will change with the tides a bit,
> the ground water acts like a large metal reflector just below your laboratory.
> This is all based on my theory that you are experiencing reflections :-)
> No magic, no Nobel,
> have an expresso.
> Next experiment
> end
> pizza:
> relax, think of better explanation.
> end
Thank you for your theory, really "magic".
How a coaxial cable, closed in COMPLETLY SCREENED BOX, could be
a...radar of water? Are you a gambler?
Are you cultor of occult sciences?
I constated a strange coincidence with TERRESTRIAL tides. It's with
gravitational field. Nobody till now noted it.
Is'nt the first time that the three fields are connected? And
connection thru the ether?
If you are interested wait the remaining thousand pages that I , if
gods will give me time, I will write.
> On 9 Ott, 10:43, Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealm...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > On a sunny day (Mon, 8 Oct 2012 22:26:38 -0700 (PDT)) it happened Casimiro
> > <fa.mo...@yahoo.it> wrote in
> > <5031fc39-0517-490e-aa85-8fb221ebc...@k6g2000vbr.googlegroups.com>:
> > >> That is a very nice intro.
> > >> I want to think for a while about your results before making some stupid remark perhaps :-)
> > >> Does not putting metal containg thermal insulation foil affect the impedances on that PCB?
> > >Do you think that? Why a PCB could affect the impedence?
> > >If you refer to
> > >http://youtu.be/q_OriOq5x5g
> > >See: inside the box it is only the rigid coaxial cable with the two
> > >detector diodes. No any PCB.
> > OK.
> > You mentioned the 'tides' of the moon affecting your experiment (you did not say which one and how).
> > Take this test please:
> > Was the affected experiment the horizontal ring? If not goto pizza.
> > Was the experiment done vertical less sensitive to those tides than when horizontal? If not goto pizza.
> > Are you located close to the coast / sea / beach ? If not goto pizza.
> > WINNER!
> > You are measuring reflections from ground water level.
> > You have re-invented ground penetrating radar.
> > The ground water level will change with the tides a bit,
> > the ground water acts like a large metal reflector just below your laboratory.
> > This is all based on my theory that you are experiencing reflections :-)
> > No magic, no Nobel,
> > have an expresso.
> > Next experiment
> > end
> > pizza:
> > relax, think of better explanation.
> > end
> Thank you for your theory, really "magic".
> How a coaxial cable, closed in COMPLETLY SCREENED BOX, could be
> a...radar of water? Are you a gambler?
> Are you cultor of occult sciences?
> I constated a strange coincidence with TERRESTRIAL tides. It's with
> gravitational field. Nobody till now noted it.
> Is'nt the first time that the three fields are connected? And
> connection thru the ether?
> If you are interested wait the remaining thousand pages that I , if
> gods will give me time, I will write.
forget: it could become the conjunction ringle of three fields, as the
electric current was the conjunction between electricity and
magnetism... Don't you note the importance? Only crazy theories?
On a sunny day (Tue, 9 Oct 2012 22:02:22 -0700 (PDT)) it happened Casimiro
<fa.mo...@yahoo.it> wrote in
<3ab04cb1-468d-4d6b-8e7a-05541016a...@w2g2000vbc.googlegroups.com>:
>forget: it could become the conjunction ringle of three fields, as the
>electric current was the conjunction between electricity and
>magnetism... Don't you note the importance? Only crazy theories?
Well, the Nobel in physics this year DID go to someone else.
You will have to get used to people shooting your dreams down.
Science is that way, sorry if it disturbed your life-long illusions.
Try posting to sci.physics.reseach.
Its moderated.
:-)
On a sunny day (Tue, 9 Oct 2012 21:57:07 -0700 (PDT)) it happened Casimiro
<fa.mo...@yahoo.it> wrote in
<34bce975-c49b-4586-9a07-80b642cfc...@10g2000vbu.googlegroups.com>:
>> WINNER!
>> You are measuring reflections from ground water level.
>> You have re-invented ground penetrating radar.
>> The ground water level will change with the tides a bit,
>> the ground water acts like a large metal reflector just below your laboratory.
>> This is all based on my theory that you are experiencing reflections :-)
>> No magic, no Nobel,
>> have an expresso.
>> Next experiment
>> end
>> pizza:
>> relax, think of better explanation.
>> end
>Thank you for your theory, really "magic".
>How a coaxial cable, closed in COMPLETLY SCREENED BOX, could be
>a...radar of water? Are you a gambler?
No coax is perfect.
Coax couples to box, box to environment.
I am not claiming may analysis is right,
but I do claim you give zero data and a lot of hot air.
You have failed to produce even once decent drawing plus data for even one experimen,
you olny talk hot air.
> Are you cultor of occult sciences?
>I constated a strange coincidence with TERRESTRIAL tides. It's with
>gravitational field. Nobody till now noted it.
>Is'nt the first time that the three fields are connected? And
>connection thru the ether?
>If you are interested wait the remaining thousand pages that I , if
>gods will give me time, I will write.
On 10 Ott, 11:14, Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealm...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On a sunny day (Tue, 9 Oct 2012 22:02:22 -0700 (PDT)) it happened Casimiro
> <fa.mo...@yahoo.it> wrote in
> <3ab04cb1-468d-4d6b-8e7a-05541016a...@w2g2000vbc.googlegroups.com>:
.
> Try posting to sci.physics.reseach.
> Its moderated.
> :-)
> On a sunny day (Tue, 9 Oct 2012 21:57:07 -0700 (PDT)) it happened Casimiro
> <fa.mo...@yahoo.it> wrote in
> <34bce975-c49b-4586-9a07-80b642cfc...@10g2000vbu.googlegroups.com>:
> >> WINNER!
> >> You are measuring reflections from ground water level.
> >> You have re-invented ground penetrating radar.
> >> The ground water level will change with the tides a bit,
> >> the ground water acts like a large metal reflector just below your laboratory.
> >> This is all based on my theory that you are experiencing reflections :-)
> >> No magic, no Nobel,
> >> have an expresso.
> >> Next experiment
> >> end
> >> pizza:
> >> relax, think of better explanation.
> >> end
> >Thank you for your theory, really "magic".
> >How a coaxial cable, closed in COMPLETLY SCREENED BOX, could be
> >a...radar of water? Are you a gambler?
> No coax is perfect.
> Coax couples to box, box to environment.
> I am not claiming may analysis is right,
> but I do claim you give zero data and a lot of hot air.
Yes, of coarse, I know. For this I screened completly the junctions.
And again putted in the box a microwave absorber.
Now I'm writing . I have too much and is laborious to choise them.
> You have failed to produce even once decent drawing plus data for even one experimen,
> you olny talk hot air.
> > > If you change the path length between source and detector there
> > > WILL be a shift. What is that supposed to prove?
> > Of coarse. For this I preferred rigid coaxial cable to waveguide in
> > which the antennas could move some micron.
> > ==========================================
> > I still fail to understand what you are trying to prove.
> The medium existence, or ether. Simple.
> ===========================================================
> Oh, I see. You want to prove something that doesn’t exist, does.
> > MMX was set up to measure the speed of light in the supposed aether
> > with the knowledge of the Earth’s velocity in that stationary medium,
> > so what is the purpose of using coaxial cable carried along with
> > source and detector in place of an aether wind?
> The light or radio waves are the same phenomenon: both are
> electromagnetic waves, differing only in frequency.
> =============================================
> There are electric waves and there are magnetic waves, but there
> are no magnetoelectric or electromagnetic waves. Electric waves
> that have the same frequency and direction as the magnetic wave
> are displaced in phase by 90 degrees, so they are different. Simple.
> But wavelengths of centimeters are easier measurable than angstrom
> waves!
> ==========================
> Whoopee! How exciting! Huge Ferris wheels are easier measurable than
> tiny roller skate wheels! Simple! Lots of exclamation marks because
> this is really thrilling!!!!!
> For centimeters waves exist precision instruments and an improved
> technique.
> Coaxial cable is matter thru which ether travels simply slower than in
> free space.
> ===================================
> Aether travels through matter like Santa Claus travels on a sleigh
> and visits all the children on Xmas Eve. I have news for you.
> Santa and aether are myths and this a physics forum, sonny.
> It’s time you grew up. Simple.
> > The direct analogy is the sound inside the plane. The air outside
> > is rushing past at 500 mph, but the air inside is calm and carries
> > sound normally.
> You say that ether is still on the earth?
> ==================================
> No. I say aether is nonsense, but Santa is needed to
> deliver presents under Xmas trees for children. Simple.
> But I measure a velocity. Tens kilometers/s. This I deduce
> from changes of wavelength of radiowaves moving my instrument ,
> detected with phase detector.
> ============================
> Velocity of what, relative to what?
> I measure presents under the Xmas tree. The presents are real,
> so Santa put them there really fast, he has millions of homes
> to visit in one night. Santa travels much faster than light. Simple.
> Now you tie a piece of string between two cans
> > and pulling it taught, talk into one can and are heard in the other
> > with the string as the sound carrying medium to simulate your
> > coax. What’s the point?
> The string is the medium.
> ======================================
> So sound waves needs no air and magnetic fields needs no aether, but
> presents under Xmas trees need Santa. Simple. What is your point?
> > The simple answer to MMX is the same as a game of table tennis
> > on the plane. The speed of light and ping pong balls is source
> > dependent and has nothing whatever to do with the aether/air
> > outside the plane, and of course there is no aether anyway.
> > Light and radio waves are carried by alternating electric and
> > magnetic fields, not a mechanical aether.
> Ether is'nt mechanical, is simply the support of magnetic, electric
> and gravitational fields.
> May be the "dark matter" of modern physics...
> ====================================
> Santa isn’t human, he’s simply the delivery agent supported
> by reindeer and the help of elves to make all the toys. Simple.
> Maybe the dark angel of ancient idiocy. Simple.
> > The ball with fly better
> > without air, you can play squash in the cargo bay of the space
> > shuttle under airless conditions, and so will light. Aether and
> > relativity are nonsense.
> > If you want to do something useful, measure the speed of radio
> > waves in waveguides. Don’t take Einstein’s word for it, he was
> > an idiot. It’ll be different to that of the speed of light and you’ll
> > be the first to find it. And repeat at a different frequency.
> Sorry, I pursue with my head.
> ===========================
> Pity your sorry head is full of aether with no brain. Tell
> your aether story to the children. Over and out. Simple.
> -- This message is brought to you from the keyboard of
> Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway
Well, I'm following the teachings of fool people as friar Willelm from
Occam, who teachs that before to change old theories is neccessary to
try
and try again if the phenomenon can be explained with them...
Then I would apply this teaching to the Maxwell theory before to adopt
crazy
explainations as "compression-dilation of the space-time" of
Einstein, contrary to holy and forgotten COMMON SENSE. - who gambled
with mathematical non sense (as said your great astro physic Dingle -
Occam and Dingle... do you know?
Common sense were not the basic foundation of old british civilty? As
conservatorism ? Common sense completly forgoten?
Einstein was of the other school, the Kant's logic, rational and
abstract. And the common sense for him hav'nt sense.
> > > > If you change the path length between source and detector there
> > > > WILL be a shift. What is that supposed to prove?
> > > Of coarse. For this I preferred rigid coaxial cable to waveguide in
> > > which the antennas could move some micron.
> > > ==========================================
> > > I still fail to understand what you are trying to prove.
> > The medium existence, or ether. Simple.
> > ===========================================================
> > Oh, I see. You want to prove something that doesn’t exist, does.
> > >MMXwas set up to measure the speed of light in the supposed aether
> > > with the knowledge of the Earth’s velocity in that stationary medium,
> > > so what is the purpose of using coaxial cable carried along with
> > > source and detector in place of an aether wind?
> > The light or radio waves are the same phenomenon: both are
> > electromagnetic waves, differing only in frequency.
> > =============================================
> > There are electric waves and there are magnetic waves, but there
> > are no magnetoelectric or electromagnetic waves. Electric waves
> > that have the same frequency and direction as the magnetic wave
> > are displaced in phase by 90 degrees, so they are different. Simple.
> > But wavelengths of centimeters are easier measurable than angstrom
> > waves!
> > ==========================
> > Whoopee! How exciting! Huge Ferris wheels are easier measurable than
> > tiny roller skate wheels! Simple! Lots of exclamation marks because
> > this is really thrilling!!!!!
> > For centimeters waves exist precision instruments and an improved
> > technique.
> > Coaxial cable is matter thru which ether travels simply slower than in
> > free space.
> > ===================================
> > Aether travels through matter like Santa Claus travels on a sleigh
> > and visits all the children on Xmas Eve. I have news for you.
> > Santa and aether are myths and this a physics forum, sonny.
> > It’s time you grew up. Simple.
> > > The direct analogy is the sound inside the plane. The air outside
> > > is rushing past at 500 mph, but the air inside is calm and carries
> > > sound normally.
> > You say that ether is still on the earth?
> > ==================================
> > No. I say aether is nonsense, but Santa is needed to
> > deliver presents under Xmas trees for children. Simple.
> > But I measure a velocity. Tens kilometers/s. This I deduce
> > from changes of wavelength of radiowaves moving my instrument ,
> > detected with phase detector.
> > ============================
> > Velocity of what, relative to what?
> > I measure presents under the Xmas tree. The presents are real,
> > so Santa put them there really fast, he has millions of homes
> > to visit in one night. Santa travels much faster than light. Simple.
> > Now you tie a piece of string between two cans
> > > and pulling it taught, talk into one can and are heard in the other
> > > with the string as the sound carrying medium to simulate your
> > > coax. What’s the point?
> > The string is the medium.
> > ======================================
> > So sound waves needs no air and magnetic fields needs no aether, but
> > presents under Xmas trees need Santa. Simple. What is your point?
> > > The simple answer toMMXis the same as a game of table tennis
> > > on the plane. The speed of light and ping pong balls is source
> > > dependent and has nothing whatever to do with the aether/air
> > > outside the plane, and of course there is no aether anyway.
> > > Light and radio waves are carried by alternating electric and
> > > magnetic fields, not a mechanical aether.
> > Ether is'nt mechanical, is simply the support of magnetic, electric
> > and gravitational fields.
> > May be the "dark matter" of modern physics...
> > ====================================
> > Santa isn’t human, he’s simply the delivery agent supported
> > by reindeer and the help of elves to make all the toys. Simple.
> > Maybe the dark angel of ancient idiocy. Simple.
> > > The ball with fly better
> > > without air, you can play squash in the cargo bay of the space
> > > shuttle under airless conditions, and so will light. Aether and
> > > relativity are nonsense.
> > > If you want to do something useful, measure the speed of radio
> > > waves in waveguides. Don’t take Einstein’s word for it, he was
> > > an idiot. It’ll be different to that of the speed of light and you’ll
> > > be the first to find it. And repeat at a different frequency.
> > Sorry, I pursue with my head.
> > ===========================
> > Pity your sorry head is full of aether with no brain. Tell
> > your aether story to the children. Over and out. Simple.
> > -- This message is brought to you from the keyboard of
> > Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway
> Well, I'm following the teachings of fool people as friar Willelm from
> Occam, who teachs that before to change old theories is neccessary to
> try
> and try again if the phenomenon can be explained with them...
> Then I would apply this teaching to the Maxwell theory before to adopt
> crazy
> explainations as "compression-dilation of the space-time" of
> Einstein, contrary to holy and forgotten COMMON SENSE. - who gambled
> with mathematical non sense (as said your great astro physic Dingle -
> Occam and Dingle... do you know?
> Common sense were not the basic foundation of old british civilty? As
> conservatorism ? Common sense completly forgoten?
> Einstein was of the other school, the Kant's logic, rational and
> abstract. And the common sense for him hav'nt sense.
> On a sunny day (Thu, 4 Oct 2012 13:30:22 -0700 (PDT)) it happened Casimiro
> <fa.mo...@yahoo.it> wrote in
> <47a8b9cc-35fe-4702-b6c8-afcdc05df...@r9g2000vbf.googlegroups.com>:
> >On 4 Ott, 21:50, Helmut Wabnig <hwabnig@.- --- -.dotat> wrote:
> >> On Thu, 4 Oct 2012 11:24:38 -0700 (PDT), Casimiro <fa.mo...@yahoo.it>
> >> wrote:
> >> >On 4 Ott, 20:20, Casimiro <fa.mo...@yahoo.it> wrote:
> >> >> On 4 Ott, 20:15, Helmut Wabnig <hwabnig@.- --- -.dotat> wrote:
> >> >> > On Thu, 4 Oct 2012 10:40:54 -0700 (PDT), Casimiro <fa.mo...@yahoo.it>
> >> >> > wrote:
> >> >> > >On 4 Ott, 18:25, Helmut Wabnig <hwabnig@.- --- -.dotat> wrote:
> >> >> > >.
> >> >> > >> First learn how to level your signal generator before you start
> >> >> > >> revolutioning physics.
> >> >> > >Yes, of course, I first did it:
> >> >> > >Please see this for instance:
> >> >> > >Note: I discovered why the T is said "magic" : in detecting the FIRST
> >> >> > >ORDER DOPPLER that Maxwell said "impossible" in the Earth. (but at his
> >> >> > >times he did'nt know the radio waves, discovered eight years after his
> >> >> > >death by Hertz)
> >> >> I know it. But at 5 MHz he could'nt discover the anisotropy!
> >> >I wrote to Cahill but he denies the anisotropy. He made experiments
> >> >with coaxial cables long tens meters, or with light.
> >> >With microwaves nobody made experiments of anisotropy. May be the
> >> >inventor of magic T, for that he named it "magic"!
> >> Where on the frequency scale does "microwave" start?
> >> Is 1700 MHz sufficient?
> >> Then there is the GPS System.
> >> (Sleeping lions awake!)
> >> w.
> >It's indifferent what a frequency you choose. The measure is made
> >inside a conducting box (Faraday screen) in a rigid coaxial cable, at
> >various frequency. You have seen three magic tee interferometers
> >operating on three frequency. The frequency is determinated by the
> >null output, when the vectors are in quadrature. (Because the phase
> >discriminator is in quadrature only at a determinated frequency.) This
> >discriminator detects very little phase angles, as you see. The
> >ether's wind I measured is easly computed because it acts directly on
> >the wavelength, shortning or alonging if against or favorable the
> >propagation's direction of the wave.
> So, compute the speed of the ether wind,
> and for your position north of the equator it should then vary in a 24 hour
> sequence as you rotate in the earth orbit in the same, and then the opposite direction
> every day night.
> Assuming that variation is big enough to measure.
> Leave it running for a week, show the paper tape...
> Then for a year, as earth orbist sun...
> Then for a ??? as earth and sun move .. spiral arms galaxy..
> You need a lot of paper :-)
Not at all! I'm measuring only a VERTICAL speed. It means that the
ether is "raining"... strange ether, but that is what I measure...
