Peckish bird briefly downs big atom smasher
Leonard
by Staff Writers
Space Daily Express
<space...@spacedaily.com>
Geneva (AFP) Nov 9, 2009
A peckish bird briefly knocked out part of the world's biggest atom smasher
by causing a chain reaction with a piece of bread, the European Organisation
for Nuclear Research (CERN) said Monday.
Bits of a French loaf dropped on an external electrical power supply caused
a short circuit last week, triggering failsafe devices that shut down part
of the cooling system of the giant experiment to probe the secrets of the
universe, CERN said.
The system was restored several hours after the incident last Tuesday while
the multi-billion dollar Large Hadron Collider was barely affected, a
spokeswoman said.
"The bird escaped unharmed but lost its bread," CERN said in a statement.
"On Tuesday 3 November, a bird carrying a baguette bread caused a short
circuit in an electrical outdoor installation that serves sectors 7-8 and
8-1 of the LHC," it added.
"The knock-on effects included an interruption to the operation of the LHC
cryogenics system."
The 27 kilometre-long (17 mile) particle collider, which runs in a circular
tunnel under the French-Swiss border near the city of Geneva, has been
plagued by problems since it was briefly started up in September 2008.
However, CERN said the latest incident was minor and did not affect attempts
to restart the accelerator later this month following repairs.
"It made for a small warming from absolute zero (minus 273 degrees Celsius,
minus 459 degrees Fahrenheit) on the Celsius scale to minus 268 degrees but
the machine was not stopped," CERN spokesman Renilde Vanden Broek told AFP.
"Everything returned to normal a few hours later and operations were able to
resume in the night of November 5," she added.
Designed to shed light on the origins of the universe, the LHC at CERN took
nearly 20 years to complete and cost six billion Swiss francs (3.9 billion
euros, 4.9 billion dollars) to build.
The bird was believed to be an owl.
������
Political correctness is destroying Europe.
America will be the next down the PC tube
greased by academic idiots like Scott Erb,
Noam Chumpsky, and Ward Churchill, and
Slick Willy & Hilly, Algore & Pelosi, and
now Barak Hussein Muhammad Obama, too.
Magnetic
But with great probability their secretaries will drop my letters into
rubbish.
So, if you do not want to play in Russian Roulette, compose your own
letter or agree with mine.
Dear President!
I am the author of the theory of magnetic hole. According to this
theory magnetic holes can be created soon at the Large Hadron
Collider. That will lead to the collaptical explosion of the Earth.
November the 30-th, according to the preliminary plan for the Large
Hadron Collider, the collisions of protons with energies of 0.45 TeV
will be implemented, the 14-th of December - collisions with energies
of 3.5 TeV. If the magnetic collapse starts, it will be impossible to
stop it. It will end with ejection of the Earth’s shell into outer
space.
I give the following probabilities:
A. 10% - magnetic collapse will start at 0.45 TeV;
B. 50% - magnetic collapse will start at 3.5 TeV, if A did not
happen;
C. 70% - magnetic collapse will start at 7 TeV, if B did not happen.
30% I leave to my mistake.
Why is such confidence?
Compare Newtonian black hole and magnetic hole:
GMm / r = mc^2 / 2;
pB = mc^2.
It was obtained two independent proofs that the equality pB = mc^2 is
reached at the energies, achievable in modern colliders,
http://darkenergy.narod.ru/magtren.html
There are many arguments in favor the fact that magnetic holes exist,
and astronomers see them, but call them on the error as black holes,
http://darkenergy.narod.ru/argen.html
It was found several crude errors and criminal lies in the assessment
documents about the safety of LHC, http://darkenergy.narod.ru/tezeng.html
The Earth after the magnetic collapse will transform into a small
region of exited superconducting vacuum. This region’s diameter is
about 10 meters. The thickness is about 2.5 meters.
--
> > According to Russian online “opinion poll” at November 6, 2009, 52% of
> > respondents had said that LHC is the dearth threat.
> > But as we can see, CERN continues their preparations to this crime
> > experiment. Conclusion - the science is criminal now!
> So you think some country will bomb the LHC before it can get'm?
To bomb the LHC now is better, than LHS destroy the Earth. CERN
physicists do not want to listen about magnetic hole. They are
potential killers of our planet. CERN physicists must be put into
prison now; - otherwise they kill all of us.
The rate of MH’s growth is not known exactly. Magnetic Hole can
destroy the Earth in the period from 1000 seconds to 1000 days. If
the
second is correct, then you will wish to bomb the LHC yourself. But
then it would not save you already. Because Magnetic Holes would
already grow inside the Earth.
I repeat: the probability of Earth explosion, caused by LHC, is about
50 %.
--
Listen, “Inertial”.
You did not understand what magnetic hole is. It is quite had.
But you can try if I am a liar or a stupid boy by solving two my
simple problems.
1. Let the length of free path of a particle is equal to 1 meter, r =
1 m.
Let the radius of the object is equal to 1000 meters, R = 1000 m.
How many collisions will undergo the particle in order to exit the
object?
Solution. R/r = 1000. N = (R/r)^2 = 1 000 000.
2. How many Earth’s protons will ruin the dangerous particle if R/r =
10^9?
A. CERN’s solution: N = (R/r)^2 = 10^18.
B. My solution: The Earth has its own gravity field. Consequently,
the
trajectory of a particle between collisions will not be straight
line,
but curved to the center of attraction. As a result the dangerous
particle will constantly drift to the center of the Earth. As a
result
the dangerous particle will ruin about N/n Earth’s protons, where:
N – the total number of Earth’s protons; n – the number of created
dangerous particles.
Dear "Inertial", which solution is correct: mine or CERN’s?
That was one crude error, made in the CERN’s safety documentation.
I had fount three such errors and one false assertion.
CERN will kill you if you will not ruin this criminal organization.
Harry, you have only about 20 days to do that and save your and your
children’s lives.
--
> Are you seriously suggesting that science should be driven by public
> opinion?
Physicists in their majority are confident that heavy particles,
created at LHC will decay.
That is a crude error.
LHC can create a particle with the mass by 10 000 times greater than
the mass of proton.
To imagine this, compare the masses of a human and of a railway train.
Imagine the situation if biologists would make a creature with the
mass of railway train, but having the human size. What will happen to
you if this creature would seat at the roof of your house, exactly
over you? Any roof will be broken and you would be smashed into a
thin
film and pushed deep into the ground.
Now imagine a proton, as soap bubble, and a liquid drop of the same
size.
What will happen to protons, if the bubble has a field, attracting
protons?
Protons would be ruined and their remnants would condense onto the
drop.
Particle physicists have no such imagination. Those idiots think that
proton consists from three point-like quarks. In fact proton is
composed from some continuous substance, rotating with relativistic
velocity. This rotating substance creates three mixed electro-
magneto-
weak poles: u, u, d. At strong magnetic field this three-pole
construction can be ruined, and the two-pole construction can be
created. This process is accompanied by ejection of positron.
There are two independent math proves that this reconstruction can be
performed at energies about 0,25 TeV per colliding particle, if the
magnetic moment of resulting two-pole particle is the same as the
magnetic moment of proton. If its value is different, then the needed
energy would also be different.
Official science is corrupted and rotten organism. It will never
approve the idea, created at the camp of independent researchers.
Official science would better explode the Earth, than say that
magnetic holes are possible and that LHC is deadly dangerous for our
civilization. That is why the official science is criminal now. So,
do
not think that CERN would stop the LHC. CERN will kill us all with
probability about 50%
--
Note 2:
The time needed the microscopic black hole capture the whole Earth is
mach greater than million years. Consequently, they are safe for now
living people on the Earth.
The time needed the magnetic hole capture the whole Earth is about
1000 seconds. Consequently, magnetic holes can explode the Earth and
Solar system.
Note 3:
We know two types of explosions chemical and nuclear.
Astronomers see the third type of explosions – collaptical.
At nuclear explosion only few thousand’s parts of explosive rest
energy is realized in the form of radiation and kinetic energy of
fragments.
At some stellar collaptical explosions about a half of rest energy of
the star is realized in the form of radiation and kinetic energy of
the rejected stellar shell.
What type of collaptical explosions do astronomers observe:
gravitational into black hole or magnetic into magnetic hole?
Is it possible to switch the magnetic collapse at collider?
My answers: The observed collapses are magnetic ones. Magnetic
collapse can be switched on by powerful colliders.
LHC will be switched on in the mead-November; the first collisions
are
waited in a few weeks later. Do we survive or do we start into outer
space?
Dear physicists, you again and again repeat the biggest error of
Stephen Hawking.
In the CERN's article “The safety of the LHC”
http://public.web.cern.ch/public/en/LHC/Safety-en.html you can find a
dozen of comparisons with cosmic rays.
Hawking: "The world will not come to an end when the LHC turns on.
The
LHC is absolutely safe. ... Collisions releasing greater energy occur
millions of times a day in the earth's atmosphere and nothing terrible
happens."
This error will cost us the life of our Civilization.
The biggest error is in the comparison of A and B.
A. Collisions of protons at LHC;
B. Collisions of cosmic protons with atmospheric protons.
Similarity: Energies in A and B are sufficient in order to make
microscopic magnetic holes.
Difference: Velocities of created holes relatively surrounding matter
are drastically great.
A. Magnetic holes, made on LHC, can have very small velocities.
B. According to conservation law of 4-momentum, cosmic holes have
relativistic velocities.
Result:
A. LHC’s holes capture slowly moving particles and grow. The bigger
hole becomes – the bigger its rate of growth.
B. Atmosphere particles move relatively holes with relativistic
velocities and, correspondingly, they have TeV kinetic energy,
relatively holes. As a result, magnetic holes evaporate immediately.
Such collisions lead to creation of showers of secondary particles.
Physicists observe such showers.
Analogy:
Let’s compare the behavior of “nuclear quasi-hole” with the behavior
of magnetic hole. Let’s investigate two cases:
A. Bombarding particles are neutrons, having the kinetic energies,
equal to several in eV.
B. Bombarding neutrons have kinetic energies, equal to several TeV.
Approximate result:
A. Collapse:
p+n -> d;
d+n -> t -> He3+e;
He3+n -> He4;
He4+n -> He5;
He5+n -> He6 -> Li6+e;
Li6+n -> Li7;
Li7+n -> Li8 -> Be8+e;
Be8+n -> Be9;
Be9+n -> Be10;
...
U235+n -> X+Y+2n
X+n ->...; Y+n ->...
two branches;
...
four branches;
...
eight branches;
...
Collaptical explosion!
B. Evaporation. TeV-energy neutrons will ruin the nucleus in the
backward order in crude approximation.
Nuclear collapse is impossible because the repulsive electrostatic
forces of protons. That is way, I named nucleus by “nuclear quasi-
holes”.
Magnetic collapse has no limit. Magnetic hole will grow till there is
the food, - the matter of planet or star.
Sam Wormley
> I wrote the letters to President of EU, to President of USA...
> But with great probability their secretaries will drop my letters into
> rubbish.
And, why not? No point in wasting their time.
Michael Moroney
>I give the following probabilities:
>A. 10% - magnetic collapse will start at 0.45 TeV;
>B. 50% - magnetic collapse will start at 3.5 TeV, if A did not
>happen;
>C. 70% - magnetic collapse will start at 7 TeV, if B did not happen.
>30% I leave to my mistake.
Fool. The earth has been struck several times by single protons with
dozens of joules of energy each. That is orders of magnitudes more
energy than LHC can ever produce. (Google "Oh my God particle" for details)
No black hole came streaming down to the earth, devouring it, since you
and I are still here.
How many even more energetic particles struck Earth in the past, unnoticed?
>Why is such confidence?
Because you are an idiot.
Magnetic
> >I give the following probabilities:
> >A. 10% - magnetic collapse will start at 0.45 TeV;
> >B. 50% - magnetic collapse will start at 3.5 TeV, if A did not
> >happen;
> >C. 70% - magnetic collapse will start at 7 TeV, if B did not happen.
> >30% I leave to my mistake.
> Fool. The earth has been struck several times by single protons with
> dozens of joules of energy each. That is orders of magnitudes more
> energy than LHC can ever produce. (Google "Oh my God particle" for details)
> No black hole came streaming down to the earth, devouring it, since you
> and I are still here.
> How many even more energetic particles struck Earth in the past, unnoticed?
Idiot, can you reed?
I repeat:
Michael Moroney
>> >I give the following probabilities:
>> >A. 10% - magnetic collapse will start at 0.45 TeV;
>> >B. 50% - magnetic collapse will start at 3.5 TeV, if A did not
>> >happen;
>> >C. 70% - magnetic collapse will start at 7 TeV, if B did not happen.
>> >30% I leave to my mistake.
>> Fool. The earth has been struck several times by single protons with
>> dozens of joules of energy each. That is orders of magnitudes more
>> energy than LHC can ever produce. (Google "Oh my God particle" for details)
>> No black hole came streaming down to the earth, devouring it, since you
>> and I are still here.
>> How many even more energetic particles struck Earth in the past, unnoticed?
>Idiot, can you reed?
>I repeat:
>Hawking: "The world will not come to an end when the LHC turns on.
>The LHC is absolutely safe. ... Collisions releasing greater energy
>occur
>millions of times a day in the earth's atmosphere and nothing
>terrible
>happens."
Exactly.
>The biggest error is in the comparison of A and B.
>A. Collisions of protons at LHC;
>B. Collisions of cosmic protons with atmospheric protons.
>Similarity: Energies in A and B are sufficient in order to make
>microscopic magnetic holes.
>Difference: Velocities of created holes relatively surrounding matter
>are drastically great.
>A. Magnetic holes, made on LHC, can have very small velocities.
>B. According to conservation law of 4-momentum, cosmic holes have
>relativistic velocities.
Gibberish. A proton with 51 joules has more than 7 orders of magnitude
more energy than the 14 TeV the LHC can produce. You have to consider the
particles from the original collision which produces energetic debris, but
the energetic collisions those secondary particles undergo, and the next
generation, and the next... By the time it's all done, some of the
resulting particles will be going down, some up, some near stationary
etc., all from one initial impact. Also, the earth has been bombarded
by these things for something like 4 billion years, but so far hasn't
been "eaten" by any black hole. Nor has any star suddenly vanished into
a black hole, they're being bombarded as well.
>Analogy:
>Let's compare the behavior of 'nuclear quasi-hole' with the behavior
>of magnetic hole. Let's investigate two cases:
Let's compare the behavior of the pink meadow fairy and the green forest
sprite. Let's investigate two cases:
My fictional creations are just as relevant as your fictional creations.
Magnetic
> more energy than the 14 TeV the LHC can produce. You have to consider the
> particles from the original collision which produces energetic debris, but
> the energetic collisions those secondary particles undergo, and the next
> generation, and the next... By the time it's all done, some of the
> resulting particles will be going down, some up, some near stationary
> etc., all from one initial impact. Also, the earth has been bombarded
> by these things for something like 4 billion years, but so far hasn't
> been "eaten" by any black hole. Nor has any star suddenly vanished into
> a black hole, they're being bombarded as well.
There are two 10 kg bottles with neutrons.
Additional requirements, used in the model:
1. free neutrons do not decay;
2. proton do not capture neutron;
3. any nuclei, heavier than proton, can capture free neutron;
4. neutrons do not interact with the matter of bottle;
5. the density of neutrons in the bottle is the same as of water.
A. Let somebody put one slowly moving nucleus into the bottle.
Neutrons will begin to be captured by the growing and dividing
nuclei.
In a couple of moments this laboratory will be exploded; a town will
look like Hiroshima after the nuclear attack.
B. If somebody will bombard the same bottle by nuclei, having the
kinetic energy about several TeV, he will see that nuclei are ruined
in collisions and formed a cloud of protons and neutrons.
Say honestly. Which experiment are you ready to perform A or B?
Magnetic
Where dozens of meteorites with traces of life come from?
Were there thousands of physicists, thinking that the man is not able
to explode his own planet?
Will our bodies will be packet into comets and sent to other star
systems as seeds of new life?
What a crafty gene govern by you to hasten our biospheres suicidal
reproduction?
Why this crafty gene forbid discussing about Phaeton, strange
meteorites, the possibility of biospheres suicidal reproduction.
The answer: Civilizations, which have no such gene do not able to
reproduce, as a result, - impossible. Consequently, this congenital
gene must be extremely strong.
Who will win: our mind or this crafty gene of biospheres
reproduction?
I’ll put probabilities grounded on my intuition.
Where is Phaeton?
1. It was not formed – 1%.
2. It was ruined by asteroid or something of that kind - 4%.
3. It was exploded by its civilization – 90%.
4. Something else – 5%.
If it was exploded by its civilization, then we must see some
evidences. Yes, there are plenty of them: strange meteorites with
traces of life; angular form of asteroids; chemical composition of
asteroids say that had formed inside the planet.
What device did use the Phaeton’s civilization in order to explode
their planet?
1. Nuclear bomb in “necessary” place – 1%
2. Collider like our LHC – 50%
3. Other devices – 49%
As a result we can see that probability, grounded on the “Phaeton
argument” gives 0.9*0.5=0.45=45%.
I have dozens of arguments proving the extreme danger of LHC.
There are also two absolutely independent math deductions, giving
almost the same result. According to this result magnetic hole can be
created at LHC energies.
According to this theory magnetic holes can be created soon at the
Large Hadron Collider. That will lead to the collaptical explosion of
the Earth.
November the 30-th, according to the preliminary plan for the Large
Hadron Collider, the collisions of protons with energies of 0.45 TeV
will be implemented, the 14-th of December - collisions with energies
of 3.5 TeV. If the magnetic collapse starts, it will be impossible to
stop it. It will end with ejection of the Earth's shell into outer
space.
I give the following probabilities:
A. 10% - magnetic collapse will start at 0.45 TeV;
B. 50% - magnetic collapse will start at 3.5 TeV, if A did not
happen;
C. 70% - magnetic collapse will start at 7 TeV, if B did not happen.
30% I leave to my mistake.
Why is such confidence?
Sam Wormley
>
> A. Let somebody put one slowly moving nucleus into the bottle.
> Neutrons will begin to be captured by the growing and dividing
> nuclei.
Better keep it away from your balls then.
jmfbahciv
Half-gamate production?
/BAH
Magnetic
knowledge, and you will see the probability of Earth’s explosion.
And what is your result?
BTW CERN’s result is less than 10^-31 or 10^-33%.
IDIOTS!!!
Magnetic
your children were not killed by CERN.
Phone CERN leaders, say them, let they save their children and stop
LHC.
Collisions with energies, more than 0,1 TeV, must be forbidden by
international law.
Propagandists of these experiments must be considered as a criminal
persons, because they risk by the life of the whole Earth.
Barb Knox
<f3eafc10-961b-4d59...@f16g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>,
Magnetic <magnet...@yandex.ua> wrote:
> What happened with Phaeton?
> Where dozens of meteorites with traces of life come from?
> Were there thousands of physicists, thinking that the man is not able
> to explode his own planet?
> Will our bodies will be packet into comets and sent to other star
> systems as seeds of new life?
> What a crafty gene govern by you to hasten our biospheres suicidal
> reproduction?
> Why this crafty gene forbid discussing about Phaeton, strange
> meteorites, the possibility of biospheres suicidal reproduction.
> The answer: Civilizations, which have no such gene do not able to
> reproduce, as a result, - impossible. Consequently, this congenital
> gene must be extremely strong.
> Who will win: our mind or this crafty gene of biospheres
> reproduction?
>
> I�ll put probabilities grounded on my intuition.
Which is as reasonable as assigning probabilities based on dice throws,
or on astrological configurations.
> Where is Phaeton?
I presume you mean the hypothetical planet that disintegrated to form
the asteroid belt. Here's what Wikipedia has to say
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phaeton_(hypothetical_planet)>:
: Planet Phaeton today
:
: Today, the Phaeton hypothesis has been superseded by the accretion
: model. Most astronomers today believe that the asteroids in the
: main belt are remnants of the protoplanetary disk, and in this region
: the incorporation of protoplanetary remnants into the planets was
: prevented by large gravitational perturbations induced by Jupiter
: during the formative period of the solar system.
:
: However the hypothesis continues to be advocated by some
: non-scientists. One notable proponent is Zecharia Sitchin, who has
: proposed, based on his reading of ancient Sumerian mythology,
: that the planet known to the Sumerians as Tiamat was destroyed by
: a rogue planet known as Nibiru. However, his work is widely regarded
: as pseudoscience.
:
: In 1988, Donald W. Patten wrote a book entitled _Catastrophism and
: the Old Testament_ outlining the theory that a planet he called
: Astra overtook Mars and, upon reaching the Roche Limit, broke apart
: much like the comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 did when it reached Jupiter's
: Roche Limit in 1994.
:
: In UFO and channelling related sources, Phaeton is also known as
: "Maldek".
> 1. It was not formed � 1%.
FWIW (which isn't much at all), my intuition says 99%.
> 2. It was ruined by asteroid or something of that kind - 4%.
> 3. It was exploded by its civilization � 90%.
> 4. Something else � 5%.
> If it was exploded by its civilization, then we must see some
> evidences. Yes, there are plenty of them: strange meteorites with
> traces of life; angular form of asteroids; chemical composition of
> asteroids say that had formed inside the planet.
Cites, please.
> What device did use the Phaeton�s civilization in order to explode
> their planet?
>
> 1. Nuclear bomb in �necessary� place � 1%
> 2. Collider like our LHC � 50%
> 3. Other devices � 49%
>
> As a result we can see that probability, grounded on the �Phaeton
> argument� gives 0.9*0.5=0.45=45%.
Or, 0% * whatever% = 0%.
> I have dozens of arguments proving the extreme danger of LHC.
I'm sure you do, FSVO "proving".
[SNIP]
--
---------------------------
| BBB b \ Barbara at LivingHistory stop co stop uk
| B B aa rrr b |
| BBB a a r bbb | Quidquid latine dictum sit,
| B B a a r b b | altum viditur.
| BBB aa a r bbb |
-----------------------------
Sam Wormley
> Dear peope! Make something to save your live, to save your mother and
> your children were not killed by CERN.
> Phone CERN leaders, say them, let they save their children and stop
> LHC.
Magnetic, be a man and die like everybody else! You are such
a cry baby.
Magnetic
No. I'll fight. And advise you, Sam, to tern on your brain.
Best wishes, Ivan.