Some worldwide organization must approve several lows, for example
such as:
It is prohibited to conduct experiments with colliding particles with
the energy more than 1 TeV.
It is prohibited to conduct experiments with ultra cold neutrons in
large amounts.
It is prohibited to conduct underground nuclear tests.
Best regards and sorry for my English.
Ivan Gorelik, Russia.
1) BULLSHIT
2) Fermi exclusion
3) BULLSHIT
4) idiot
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2
You are an idiot. FERMI EXCLUSION, you braying jackass.
"Neutron stars have extremely great magnetic field. Why?"
Hey fucking stooopid - yer gonna carry a sign saying End Of The World
and you don't know shit about anything? Neutron stars are
superconductors that have trapped the compressed magnetic field of
their progenitor stars, you hopeless imbecile. Ideal gas or magnetic
field it's the same EOS.
Mommy, mommy, I got a stain on my panties! Now everybody will get
syphilis!
Why don't you suck up to a bunch of religious newsgroups pulling
photon belts out of their asses?
You should fear the cold, dead, ex-KGB eyes of Putin.
[snip]
Uncle Al wrote: ... 1) BULLSHIT
2) Fermi exclusion...
Ivan Gorelik wrote: …Have you children, the most idiotic idiot?
You have only few month to save them, - stop collider!
Fermi exclusion is excluded by different orbital moments of neutrons.
Neutron stars have extremely great magnetic field. Why?…
Uncle Al wrote: …You are an idiot. FERMI EXCLUSION, you braying
jackass…
Ivan Gorelik wrote: …You are a popka-durak. By the way, what is
braying jackass?…
Uncle Al wrote: …Neutron stars are superconductors that have trapped
the compressed magnetic field of their progenitor stars, you hopeless
imbecile. Ideal gas or magnetic field it's the same EOS…
Ivan Gorelik wrote: Ha-ha-ha! Superconductor or superfluid? Inside the
star or in its core? In neutron star or in magnetar?
There are several EOS for neutron matter? Which of them do you prefer?
Pair of neutrons (fermions) with the same spin orientation is boson
with spin 1.
Uncle Al wrote: …Mommy, mommy, I got a stain on my panties! Now
everybody will get syphilis! …
Ivan Gorelik wrote:
You have only few months to save your syphilis from cosmic start into
outer space to bust panspermia. Stop collider!
Ivan Gorelik wrote: He is my friend, I’ll ask him to send a couple of
MIG-23 on that damned collider.
Jeff^Relf wrote: Putin is human, Russia has oil, slander is the
product of a weak mind.
Ivan Gorelik wrote: Yes! Putin is human, but CERN is blind and
preparing the terrorist act against humanity. Collisions of particles
with energy more than 1 TeV are deadly dangerous for Civilization.
Nah, chernobyl was not that big a deal? It's not like kids in
Hiroshima and Vietnam have birth defects. Global genetic decay isn't
all that bad for the species. Look at the bright side, it will allow
retards to blend in moar smoothly. Besides that, scientists need to do
important work other than address the global issues. It's worth
wasting the money on. They might find the blozon.
Vanessa Hudgens, 19, just sang and danced her way into a $2.75 million
home in Studio City, Cal. Zac Efron can now visit Hudgens unchaperoned
in her six bedroom, 6.5 bath, 5,200 sq. ft. home -- which includes
pool, spa and a "barbeque island,"
The two-story home had been on the market for almost a year and had
been most recently priced at $3,299,000. Hudgens plays "good girl"
Gabriella Montez in the "High School Musical" franchise. "High School
Musical 3: Senior Year" is set to be released this month. She recently
finished filming "Bandslam," directed by Todd Graff, and is working on
her second album, to be released next year.
http://www.latimes.com/classified/realestate/hotprop/la-hm-hotprop11-2008oct11,0,7886375.story
http://www.tmz.com/2008/10/12/vanessa-hudgens-buy-mansion-fit-for-a-teen/
In order to make it, the temperature of surrounding medium must be
very small. At the collider there are some places with the temperature
about 0K.
Russia has internet connections to the world already??
cal
What a dumb question?
Are you that uninformed about the world?
I always say: "real men read the Pravda"
Imagine Fox news creating a Russian version of their website?
I'm sure people would wet their pants laughing at Billo the Clown.
Now suht up, you!
BWHAHAHA
The truth is painfull
The bond energy of n-th neutron with neutron hole is equal to energy,
which one must spend in order to turn the 1-spired coil on 90 degrees
relatively the coil consisting of n-1 spires. Before the turn the
coils lied in the plane xy. It is supposed also that coil can
penetrate across another coil if one of them moves along z - axis. The
electrical currents are equal in both coils.
n=2; E2=pB;
n=3; E3=p(2B);
n=4; E4=p(3B);
...
n=n; En=p((n-1)B);
where: p - magnetic moment of neutron (1-spired coil); B - magnetic
field, created by one spire of stationery coil.
The total bond energy, Etotal, we'll have by adding the right parts of
all Ei.
Etotal = pB+p(2B)+...p((n-1)B) = (n-1)*n*p*B/2.
The specific bond energy:
e = Etotal/n = (n-1)*p*B/2.
Minimal n, at which the neutron hole become stable relatively neutron
decay into proton, electrons and antineutrino, can be found from
equation:
m(neutron)-e/c = m(proton)+m(electron).
Minimal n, at which the neutron hole begins to capture protons,
transforming them into neutrons, positrons, neutrinos, can be found
from equation:
m(neutron)+m(positron)-e/c^2 = m(proton).
It is known, that in the center of a secular spire with the radius R,
and with electrical current I:
B=mu0*I/(2R).
Magnetic moment of the same spire:
p=I*S=I*pi*R^2.
The bond energy of 2-spired coil:
E2=pB=mu0*pi*I^2*R/2.
We know the magnetic moment of neutron p=0,966*10^-26 J/T, and using
formulae p=IS, I=q/t=q*c/(2*pi*R), S=pi*R^2, we can write:
E2=mu0*q^3*c^3/(16*pi*p), E2=2,86e-13 Дж.
Let's compare it with the rest energy of neutron: mc^2/E2 = 527.
Let's find n, at which the neutron hole become stable relatively
neutron decay.
e/c^2 = m(neutron)- m(proton) - m(electron).
(n-1)*p*B/2 = (m(neutron)- m(proton) - m(electron))*c^2.
n = 2.
Let's find n, at which the neutron hole begins to capture protons.
n = 2*(m(neutron)- m(proton) + m(positron))*c^2/(E2) + 1 = 3.
Let's find n, at which the total bond energy are equal to rest mass of
its all neutrons. (If the number of neutrons are bigger than this n,
than the mass of naked neutron hole becomes negative, but its total
mass are positive, because the total mass have additional mass of
magnetic field.)
Etotal/c^2 = n*m(neutron)
n=2*c^2*m(neutron)/ E2 + 1 = 1055
This number corresponds approximately to 1 TeV.
LHC will give 7 times more.
Speculations.
Schwarzschild radius has variable value. The z-cross-section of
neutron hole looks as 8-digit.
Mass of neutron hole is anisotropic. This explains plane structure of
galaxies, existence of radio-jets, plane accretion. Anisotropic
gravitational force, created by the huge neutron hole, situated in the
center of our Galaxy, can explain the hidden mass of Galaxy.
What we'll have at the LHC? Mass-creating Higgs, or neutron hole,
transforming matter's mass into huge magnetic field?
1) It is not excluded, that they have already been created, and they
are growing now somewhere inside the Earth.
2) According to the definitions above, there is a difference between
neutron hole and neutron droplet. The first is more fantastic, the
second is closer to reality. The neutron droplet will also have such
quantities as:
n, at which the neutron droplet become stable relatively neutron
decay;
n, at which the neutron droplet begins to capture protons.
These numbers will be greater for neutron droplet, and are not
computed yet. In order to find them one must write computer program.
May be, I’ll try to do that some day.
The existence of the third n, at which the total binding energy is
equal to rest mass all neutrons, was unexpected by me, because its
existence looks unscientific. It seems that n can be eliminated by
introducing the orbital quantum numbers, - the circumferences will be
transformed into ellipses, and every one of them will be slightly
shifted relatively former ellipse. As a result, n and n will grow, n
will disappear, but the limiting specific binding energy will
appear.
3) There is one more unknown value – the critical temperature of
ferromagnetism destruction. The bigger is the newborn neutron droplet/
hole, the bigger is this critical temperature. For example, 1TeV
embryo needs safe temperature below than 1K; 2TeV embryo needs safe
temperature below 10K; 3TeV embryo needs temperature below 100K… But
we do not know those temperatures yet.
They don't have to, because...
Hmm... I wonder if it's because they don't feel the need to
propagandize Russians, or because of Russian's excellent English
language skills? Anyway, they are profit driven, and there would have
to be a ROI for them to do that.