Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Mexico Pioneers Opposition to Heisenberg Energy-Time Uncertainty, as well as Analysis of Non-Commutative Geometry
4 views
Skip to first unread message
Osher
May 18, 2013, 2:11:22 PM5/18/13
to
See:
1) "Quantum operations: technical or fundamental challenge," Bogdan Mielnik, Cinvestav (Mexican research equivalent of University of California or University of Texas, for example), Mexico, arXiv:1305.3664v1 [quant-ph] 16 May 2013.
The paper studies unitary operations of idealized semiclassical fields and in particular of sharp potential kicks performed by sofgtly varyingg external fields to contribute to the Aharonov-Bohm criticism of Heisenberg's time-energy Uncertainty and to analyze and precisely limit or calculate limits of position measurements and non-commutative geometry.
The paper ties in with Probable Causation/Influence P(A-->B) and thereby with 4-Interaction Unification through various things such as the non-relativistic quadratic time-dependent Hamiltonian in 1 dimension:
2) H(t) = p^2/2 + beta(t)q^2/2, q and p canonical position and momentum variables, mass m = 1 for simplicity
and the Schrodinger Equation for various simplified cases such as the above or else:
3) H = -(1/2)Dxx(w) + [V(x) - E]w(x) = 0
as well as unitary operators which are exponentials to quadratic arguments and which in oscillator pulse contexts generate "squeezed Fourier transformations", and one-dimensional control with quadratic potential:
4) potential = beta(t)q^2/2 where beta(2) is piecewise continuous, bounded, smmetric for t < = T in a nontrivial operation interval [-T, T].
Probable Causation/Influence has already been shown by me in previous postings here to relate to 4-Interaction Unification through various quadratic and linear functions/operators, and to relate to unbounded and unlimited space and time and speed which are anti-Uncertainty and at least outside the Solar System arguably anti-"Universal Relativistic" in recent arxiv papers by others.
Osher Doctorow
1) "Quantum operations: technical or fundamental challenge," Bogdan Mielnik, Cinvestav (Mexican research equivalent of University of California or University of Texas, for example), Mexico, arXiv:1305.3664v1 [quant-ph] 16 May 2013.
The paper studies unitary operations of idealized semiclassical fields and in particular of sharp potential kicks performed by sofgtly varyingg external fields to contribute to the Aharonov-Bohm criticism of Heisenberg's time-energy Uncertainty and to analyze and precisely limit or calculate limits of position measurements and non-commutative geometry.
The paper ties in with Probable Causation/Influence P(A-->B) and thereby with 4-Interaction Unification through various things such as the non-relativistic quadratic time-dependent Hamiltonian in 1 dimension:
2) H(t) = p^2/2 + beta(t)q^2/2, q and p canonical position and momentum variables, mass m = 1 for simplicity
and the Schrodinger Equation for various simplified cases such as the above or else:
3) H = -(1/2)Dxx(w) + [V(x) - E]w(x) = 0
as well as unitary operators which are exponentials to quadratic arguments and which in oscillator pulse contexts generate "squeezed Fourier transformations", and one-dimensional control with quadratic potential:
4) potential = beta(t)q^2/2 where beta(2) is piecewise continuous, bounded, smmetric for t < = T in a nontrivial operation interval [-T, T].
Probable Causation/Influence has already been shown by me in previous postings here to relate to 4-Interaction Unification through various quadratic and linear functions/operators, and to relate to unbounded and unlimited space and time and speed which are anti-Uncertainty and at least outside the Solar System arguably anti-"Universal Relativistic" in recent arxiv papers by others.
Osher Doctorow
Osher
May 18, 2013, 2:19:04 PM5/18/13
to
On Saturday, May 18, 2013 11:11:22 AM UTC-7, Osher wrote:
> See:
>
>
>
> 1) "Quantum operations: technical or fundamental challenge," Bogdan Mielnik, Cinvestav (Mexican research equivalent of University of California or University of Texas, for example), Mexico, arXiv:1305.3664v1 [quant-ph] 16 May 2013.
>
Both Brazil (which has even more pioneering work than Mexico) and Mexico (which latter is still not one of the best Inventive-Creative research nations in Physics and Math as reflected by ArXiv papers, although Brazil is) should not be taken as indicative of Latino nations' Public performance in Physics and Mathematics, any more than the U.K. (one of the most Inventive/Creative nations in these fields) has a very Inventive-Creative Public in these fields. The Inventivess/Creativity tends to be quite rare in most nations, regardless of what a few arXiv researchers or even sci.physics or other usenet researchers produce. Apparently there is a big gulf between the Public (vast Majority of the Public, anyway), which tends to be employed in "boring" fields of repetitive type unrelated to direct Physics-Mathematics Inventive-Creative research, and the few pioneers in Physics or Mathematics (or for that matter Astrophysics, Biophysics, etc.) research.
> See:
>
>
>
> 1) "Quantum operations: technical or fundamental challenge," Bogdan Mielnik, Cinvestav (Mexican research equivalent of University of California or University of Texas, for example), Mexico, arXiv:1305.3664v1 [quant-ph] 16 May 2013.
>
Osher Doctorow
0 new messages