15 May 2007
Physicists may have solved a long-standing mystery about sand dunes
on Mars. The dunes looks as if they should have been created by the
action of wind, but the Martian atmosphere is so still and thin that
it was thought impossible for wind to have played a part. New
computer simulations suggest that the wind can indeed drive the sand
dunes on Mars -- it's just that the dunes are formed far more slowly
than back on Earth (Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 198001).
Astronomers have long been puzzled by the sand dunes on Mars, which
were first discovered in 1971. The dunes look very much like those on
Earth, which suggests they were created by the action of wind. The
problem is that the Martian atmosphere is so thin and still -- so how
could the wind have played a part?
Even more curious is the fact that successive missions to Mars have
not detected any change in the positions of the dunes, whereas the
dunes on Earth are shifting constantly. Some scientists have
therefore suggested that the dunes were created long ago, when the
Martian atmosphere could have been much denser than it is today.
Now, however, Eric Parteli at the University of Stuttgart and Hans
Hermann at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zürich reckon
the Martian dunes could indeed form and shift under the planet's
current atmospheric conditions. They have carried out a series of
computer simulations of the formation of two distinct types of dunes
seen on Mars -- arrowhead-shaped "barchan" dunes, which are formed
when the wind blows mainly in one direction, and elongated
"exotic" dunes that are formed when the wind alternates
between two directions (see figures).
Assuming that the sand was subject to just one 40-second gust of wind
every five years -- conditions experienced by Mars probes -- the
simulations suggested that the exotic dunes could have formed from
barchan dunes over a period of about 10,000 to 50,000 years. Parteli
told Physics Web that under the same conditions, it would take about
4000 years for a dune to shift by 1 m, which could explain why the
dunes have not appeared to move since they were first discovered.
According to Parteli, the key to modelling the dunes is a process
called "saltation", whereby a grain of sand is lifted by the wind,
and driven along above the sand until it falls back, creating a
splash of ejected grains. The ejected grains could then also be
picked up by the wind leading to a rapid multiplication of the amount
of sand that is being blown along.
Saltation has been successfully modelled for dunes on Earth using
parameters determined experimentally. But when Parteli and Herrmann
used the same parameters under Martian conditions, they found that
dunes would not form. Undeterred, they turned to research done nearly
30 years ago that established that the airborne grains should travel
10 times faster on Mars than on Earth thanks to the planet\u2019s
thinner atmosphere and lower gravity. As a result, each Martian grain
should eject about ten times more sand upon impact than does a grain
on Earth. Using these saltation parameters, Parteli and Herrmann were
able to reproduce both the barchan and exotic dunes.
According to Parteli, the simulations suggest that atmospheric
conditions on Mars have been relatively stable over the past 50,000
years and that the dunes are not necessarily evidence that the
Martian atmosphere had been more Earth-like in the past.
What does the evidence say? What made all those river channels and
flood planes in photographs of the surface? Where did that hematite
come from? Sedimentary rock?
Mars Odyssey (reached Mars Oct. 24, 2001)
http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/odyssey/
http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/spotlight/odyssey-mission-success.html
Mars: Dead or Alive - Nova 50- min
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/mars/program.html
When things go wrong!
Mars Exploration Rover Mission (reached Mars Jan 4 & 25, 2004)
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/home/index.html
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/apod/apod_search?Spirit
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/apod/apod_search?Opportunity
> http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/summary/305/5685/793
> http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/summary/306/5702/1697
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/newsroom/pressreleases/20060124a.html
Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (reached Mars Mar. 10, 2006)
http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/mro/
http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/mro/science/
http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/mro/mission/sc_instru.html 30 cm
Martian Cracks Show Signs of Once-Flowing Water
http://sciencenow.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/2007/215/1
Password Required
You are certainly ignorant about Mars, Herb... there's water water
everywhere, just not a drop to drink (so far).
Light Deposits Indicate Water Flowing on Mars
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap061212.html
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap061231.html
Water Ice in a Martian Crater
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap050720.html
Neutron Mars
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap040904.html
Evidence that Mars was Wet
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/summary/305/5685/793
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/summary/306/5702/1697
OK, Herb.... hmmm sand... hmmm electronic chips.... hmmm!