CERN

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

I was listening to an old BBC audio In Our Time with Melvin Bragg,
regarding anti-matter.

The search has been focused on the Higgs Bosun,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Higgs_boson

The Higgs boson or Higgs particle is an elementary particle initially theorised in 1964,[6][7] and tentatively confirmed to exist on 14 March 2013.[8] The discovery has been called "monumental"[9][10] because it appears to confirm the existence of the Higgs field,[11][12] which is pivotal to the Standard Model and other theories within particle physics.

You see we were able to bring particle physics in line with modern theory,
by considering one foam bubble as being Plank Length, and the Higgs Bosun
on a radial line from the center out, with a bubble with a sine wave
circumference in contact with its neighbors.

So then this allows for a clearly defined Higgs Field. And we have macro
and micro scalability in mass effects, which means that it is consistent
regardless of scale.

So then in some of low energy physics we have seen quantum effects on the
macro scale magnified but still the same.
So we know we have the correct model.

And that is where CERN is beginning to investigate mass transfer, maybe
such as through phonons to investigate normal modes.

In other words, send a little more mass down, with less velocity,
and more acceleration. Investigate the drag of the quantum foam,
to get better values. More accurate values.

This type of drag with mass on mass is due to mass density.

A large plastic sphere would not feel the same drag as a smaller
metal sphere since Newtons laws apply there.
"Inertia is the resistance of any physical object to a change in
its state of motion or rest, or the tendency of an object to
resist any change in its motion."

So the quantum bubble has mass because it is elastic and it pulses in
and out due to the tug of the expansion of the universe.
And it sends out matter waves of a very minute size through it, and
larger waves of all sizes move through it including photons, and
dark energy such as magnetism.

When you move through it you don't notice it until you step on the gas.
That bit of acceleration with your mass, makes that a macro effect.

But it can all be studied at CERN with a little larger mass and shorter
runs with the measurement by laser light to determine mass/gravity
values of a very high accuracy.
And since mass is relative, you need only use one pure substance.
And you would expect that you could use a magnetic substance as
long as it were a pure stable element.

Then just divide by its atomic number.

Its too valuable a tool for science and for students to just shelve it
so it should be used to get a better understanding of mass transfer.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

If it is difficult to envision how we coexist with a quantum foam, the foam flows around your atoms. And your atoms are sending out dark energy waves which are
kinetic energy, and that is like a pressure front.

The foam is 10^ -25 smaller than a nuclei. So it flows around no problem.

Until you accelerate and cause it to start bouncing against its neighbors.

All this needs to be investigated. It is being investigated in many other
means besides CERN.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

A centrifuge separates blood or any solution and will separate one RNA from
a different RNA they are that sensitive now.

However, the new model focuses on the effects of a hypothesized gravity well
of quantum foam around each nuclei.

Each nuclei is deforming space just as a massive body does because the
quantum foam is so small.

Now it is elastic and so it comes in varying sizes depending on pressure
but all sizes are still so tiny we assume as to be virtually undetectable.

However the gravity well equates to the mass of the element. So the better
measurement we can obtain regarding the correct mass of each element, the
better we will be able to assign a value to its gravity well.

Then with that information, we can write software that will program
DNA and RNA and Proteins since it is the bond that is important
in chemistry, and the waves emitted by the nuclei which form those bonds
in high and low pressure zones of quantum foam bubbles.

The heavier the element, the more it pulses in and out sending
stronger spherical waves of magnetism through the foam as it pulses
in and out.

It is the pulsing in and out, which gives it inertia. Since to it,
pulsing in and out is linear in the direction of the arrow of time.

So that direction you see is interfered with by any other motion
in 3D. Hence why it has mass.
The foam also has mass because it is doing the same thing.
Since it is touching the surface of the nuclei physically,
the matter waves are flowing out spherically as magnetism.

And since waves add up or cancel out, this forms high and low
pressure areas. At the speed of light.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

>
> The foam also has mass because it is doing the same thing.
>
> Since it is touching the surface of the nuclei physically,
>
> the matter waves are flowing out spherically as magnetism.
>
>
>
> And since waves add up or cancel out, this forms high and low
>
> pressure areas. At the speed of light.

So to program atoms in microbiology, we need the depth of well,
on a scale that is reasonable, and we need to be able to define

high and low pressure areas.

A Higgs Field.
So then atoms have slots in molecules, and the Higgs Field helps
to determine which atoms will fit in that slot and when it does,
what combination of pressure will create a new slot.
In order to create chain reactions.

All this has to be modeled before we start doing it.
For obvious reasons.

However you have to realize that we are merely using natures own method.

That is how DNA replicates. SLots are filled and the result is a slot is created.

We just need to create correct values for those slots which we know
to exist in a set. The table of elements.

And of course it is far more complicated than that when you consider
there are all manner of waves in the foam such as ambient energy
ambient temperature.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

All biological processes are chain reactions.

So the DNA spawns functions and procedures which in turn spawn
functions and procedures such as error checking.

And on it goes until you lift your arm using your free will
or decide with your free will to stop a hockey puck with
your face against your own basic survival instincts.
Since your instinct to win was a stronger instinct that your
instinct for survival. (see Johnny Bower leaf goalie et all)

(I was taken to task numerous times as was Searle for using the example
of the arm raise = free will example. Hence the new improved
one)

So the entire process of biological processes in the body are
chain reactions. So if we want to improve our ability to heal the body,
we need to understand chain reactions.

On top of these functions and procedures there does not appear to be
an expiry date.

Aging is caused when a heavy Hydrogen atoms takes the place of a Hydrogen atom
in the body and may get trapped in a fat, for instance in the wall of the
cell which prevents water passage through the cell, and hence causes wrinkles
and traps toxins etc.

A better understanding of slot values will help us to free that trapped
heavy hydrogen and perhaps some day we will be able to program well
enough to rejuvenate the body.

We know how to do it. I just explained it.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

The heavy hydrogen atom is in a gravity well that is a little deeper than
normal hydrogen, and so it is pulsing a bit faster and so it has more mass
and so it forms a stronger bond with its neighbor that it is attracted
to by the wave pressure that they create when their waves combine.

Just by taking zinc, when the zinc atoms are close by, they have a deeper
gravity well so they drag the heavy hydrogen down deeper and so it pulses
faster and that breaks the bond with the atom beside it, and a proper
hydrogen atom can then fill that slot since its spherical waves will
be cancelling out and creating a low pressure area between it and its
new neighbor.
Atoms can be attracted by a specific wave energy traveling through the
quantum foam. A low pressure area will exist between them and if in
water, like the human body, an element can be attracted into a slot
through water or blood.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

So why don't we just take zinc? You can but only in small amounts
and lead by contrast will kill you.
Then it slows down your metabolism as you would expect, since zinc
is a heavy element, and so you need to take selenium which has
an opposite effect of stimulating the metabolic rate.
But in all cases it all atoms interacting with atoms.

And mass plays a large part.

The body is ~67% hydrogen by atomic percent.

So you see zinc has a deeper well than hydrogen but so does selenium.

So there is no dragging elements easily out of their well.
They need to decay, to become lighter.
Heat shock can also free heavy hydrogen and the body itself sheds
most of it but it can collect in fats around the liver.

Unfortunately for longevity fans heavy hydrogen is the tool of choice
for the medical profession. It is their screwdriver, their monkey wrench
they inject people with it in vast quantities and like any nicotine
specialist working for the tobacco company would rather fight than switch.

But we are concerned with mass and depth of well which results in spherical
waves of dark energy that pulse out from the nuclei and crest at the electron shell with the force of e.
And at that shell or shells is where the covalent bonds form.

So by knowing how the waves change as the well gets deeper or more shallow
will allow us to accurately predict wave pressure values to be able to
create variable slots for programming atoms in biological processes.
To better understand how the body works, DNA works, and proteins,
including folding which is directly related to field strength.
And I won't call that gravity well a Higgs Field, I will lets someone
else write that paper and make that trip to Sweden.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

Its possible that if we understood the process better, we might be able to develop a chamber that you could enter which would systematically free
up some of that heavy hydrogen and maybe you might have such a device
at home, like a tanning bed.
It could work on the same principal.

You see also to take zinc alone does nothing because you need to also
take vitamin C and usually Echinacea which comes with it in tablet form.
For cell repair and to trap free radicals etc.

We are still just learning about these processes even though we have
this new tool set of a model and have had it for some time.
Simply because it takes time to make progress and we need cleaner values
and a better understanding of the processes. These are low energy processes
that go on in the human body.
However the values are atomic.

For instance if you consider that spherical wave of dark energy that leaves
the surface of the nuclei, an m, wave, magnetism, it crests, at the electron
shell radius. If you interrupt it between there and the nucleus you probably
won't detect it and you would not detect a value of e.
Only at the crest is it e.

And its not a slow lumbering wave, its traveling at c with a force of G.
So its not like an ocean wave it is going fwapfwapfwapfwap a squillion
times per second.

The hertz is equivalent to cycles per second.[2] In defining the second, the CIPM declared that "the standard to be employed is the transition between the hyperfine levels F = 4, M = 0 and F = 3, M = 0 of the ground state 2S1/2 of the cesium 133 atom, unperturbed by external fields, and that the frequency of this transition is assigned the value 9 192 631 770 hertz"[3] thereby effectively defining the hertz and the second simultaneously.

It is pulsing
9,192,631,770 times per second.
And its so strong that nuclei almost never touch. Bonds take place there
at that wave crest.
That's how many electrons it can create every second, since that is what an electron is.

And most of the energy is in the crest of the wave, but it crests again,
way out there and much weaker next time. But just keeps on traveling at c.

The only photons there are, are when those spherical waves meet with other spherical waves. Where they intersect it becomes a transverse wave.
Yet light itself is radial from a source like a spherical wave travels out
in the same geometric shape.
There are just so many waves since all atoms are creating them and lots
of them.
It ends up becoming pressure areas where things are attracted or repelled
into pressure zones where they will sit in proximity to each other
held there by the wave pressure in the molecule and its depth of well
which helps to concentrate its mass.

DNA stretched out does not have as deep a well as if it was scrunched
up in a ball since it is floating in quantum foam. So the more dense
the more weight, and the more mass.
But still not as much as adding a heavy element to a molecule.
That would make its well deeper and then affect the wave energy it
puts out since the engine behind that is the expansion of the universe
tugging outward on the elastic nucleus skin.
As it resists expansion more, since it is deeper in that well opposite
the arrow of expansion, that makes the wave length shorter before it crests
and makes the waves come more frequent.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

Caesium explodes instantly upon contact with water.

And all that means is it gives off energy and light as it reacts with
the molecules.
These atoms remember are putting out dark energy and it is kinetic energy
so it can react just by coming into contact with volatile substances.
E=mc2 and that energy is there all the time.
It all depends what it reacts with.

And since all elements are in a set, and the quantum foam is quantized,
at Plank Length, all reactions are in a set, all waves values and
all the interactions have been named as elementary particles.

The ones we know so far make up quite a zoo of particles but they are just
points of interest and predictable values.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

Imagine a point source of light.

Three atoms together in a triangle and where their wave crests meet at a point,
we plot as a. They are energetic, on the surface of the sun.
The spherical waves are still coming at you, but only where they intersect,
is the level of energy enough to register as photon to your eye.

And we can choose an arbitrary color example.
Depending on wave length.

Now remember the spherical waves are not continuous, they are pulsed.
They are quantized.
And they have wave crests.
So you get bathed in them and bathed in light as one portion of that spectrum.

M magnetism, e electron, em waves.

So now the curious things is that light bends. Well that is because those
spherical waves are in a physical medium. The quantum foam.
It has mass and this is energy traveling in a very small mass. And so you can say when you measure it impacting something that it has mass although it is
the mass of the medium which is hitting the target.
Only things with mass can affect other things with mass.
But energy can travel in that medium and transfer mass.
The wave started out because the nuclei pushed the foam bubbles out when it pulsed.
A wave formed and it just kept traveling at c. Unless it hits an obstacle.

We can see light from the deep field.
It is continually being generated so if something gets in the way, it soon passes and the light is still there coming. But of course you are looking into the deep past.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

To understand GR to understand how light bends, you have to imagine the quantum
foam bubbles as being compressed around massive bodies. There would be a high pressure area there since the universe is expanding into the 4th dimension.

Between things as well as the outer edge of the universe.

Its almost a zero sum game.

Yet it is enough to give massive bodies a gravity well. And as it turns out
atomic nuclei as well.

Massive bodies being made up of atomic nuclei.

So the area around a massive body, has smaller bubbles. They get larger as you go out and the foam is flowing around the body since it is moving in it, yet
some foam is being carried along with it by friction forces as frame dragging.
A star behind the sun can be visible in front of it because the light has gone around the sun in the quantum foam and it is in a spatially deformed state.
So if you want to picture a gravity well like a drain, the bubbles get smaller
as you go down the spiral. Not due to the same effect. You see it is the expansion that compresses the foam in front of it all around the massive body.
The foam can't get out of the way since it is all touching and guess what?

Acceleration due to gravity. Any time you accelerate into the foam you feel
drag from inertia. But this is expanding out and still there is that inertia
but it roils and boils and the foam.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

The conceptually difficult part is that even though the bubbles get bigger
as you go out from the massive body, they are still Plank Length in diameter
because in a gravity well, things are relationally smaller but bring them
out and they are unchanged in character or composition.

As if you shrunk the kids so to speak.
Time and space are related and so is distance when you have a constant
value of c as a measuring stick.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

They get larger as you leave the surface of earth, until earths gravity
well is no longer an influence then they are the size they are because
of the sun's gravity well.
And depending on how close they are to the center of mass, that is how
small they will be, yet from here we know they are still Plank Length.
We see the frequency spectrum of atoms across the universe.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

If you are in space, and you are on the edge of earth's gravity well where it is strong enough to drag you in, the quantum foam bubbles would be getting smaller
towards earth and you would be drawn to the lower pressure for you by comparison.
You would cross more space in less time as you move in towards earth as you
fall to earth.
But you will not feel pulled, you would feel weightless, since you are merely
gliding along downwards towards the area of least resistance. Smaller bubbles
in your way. And as you move through them, you are accelerating at 9.80665 m/s2
they define what area is. They define what actual distance is.

They define what space is. They define 3D space. Their dimensionality, their
sphericity, although not a perfect sphere but like a golf ball, maintains
the distance between things. And keeps it all consistent and according
to laws such as laws of motion.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

So then raising money for CERN has never been easy, so having things
to say and being able to answer any and all questions raised requires
some knowledge. But I have put it all in simple terms even though its
not sound bites.

Here is a little something that the head of CERN could say which would
turn heads in the physics community.

If you want to detect gravity waves, you have to go straight up.
You cannot expect to detect a strong isolated gravity wave horizontally.

Since space is contracted as you go in towards the earth and clocks run faster at altitude.
Gravity has an arrow.

Between you me and the fence gravity waves are everywhere, from Plank Length
to the size of spherical wave put out by the sun, in the form of dark energy,
that maintains planets in orbit where the waves have troughs.

If you are looking for spacial deformity, then again it is there in the form
of foam bubbles getting smaller towards earth or any massive body.
But they remain the same measured size, like a ruler on a balloon due to
the curious part of nature where matter expands into the 4th dimension
which has no foam, and hence you space at all.
So all it does is cause a force. A force of gravity that is not attractive
like magnetism, it is space-time itself which is curved.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

>it is space-time itself which is curved.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1314656/Scientists-prove-time-really-does-pass-quicker-higher-altitude.html

So the bubbles of quantum foam get larger as you leave the surface which
means there is less pressure and the atoms can pulse faster.
90 billionths faster per foot.

You see there is still a lot of work that needs to go into this.

If we drag an element into a deeper well by smacking it, and bumping it into
a deeper slot, and transmute the element, it will give off more energy
since it is resisting expansion more and further back in time so to speak.
A gravity well is not a rubber sheet it is a sphere, like shells. On the
t axis.

If we create a molecule, its combined mass will give it a deeper well and more mass more waves will be emitted.

So these are different things.

Just like taking some mass out of a gravity well and raising it a foot.
Yet things stay relative. You can make coffee there and it will still
taste like coffee.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

It can get confusing trying to remember do the bubbles get larger or smaller
as you leave the surface but remember when you fall, you fall towards earth
and you accelerate because you are crossing more bubbles hence more distance
in shorter time as they get smaller.
So you are speeding up as you fall towards earth taking the path of least resistance.
While maintaining momentum.
But don't get confused and think the foam bubbles flow through everything
they do not flow through atomic nuclei and atomic nuclei are putting out fierce waves so a large mass will be putting out a strong combined wave front.
But the waves themselves are in that foam.
The foam between atoms that constitute the earth are for the most part being
carried along with it, trapped by the atoms and their wave energy which
flows in all directions including towards the center of the earth. Trapped in its gravity well. Frame dragging.
http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frame-dragging

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

You see we don't correct Wiki.
We know the theory and like Newton may or may not write the paper.
It is always a work in progress.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

The quantum foam that the molecules of the earth has trapped within it,
the number of foam bubbles is one squillion to the power of one squillion.
(you can make that a science project)
But they are expanding and the distance between the earth and the moon
is also filled with foam that is expanding.
It doesn't appear to expand much in 3D but its enough to do this while
not even changing the size of the earth.
It causes the atoms to flow over time as if the earth were
expanding in size.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7kL7qDeI05U

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

Looking at that it looks as if the lighter elements were migrating to the surface perhaps because it is easier to push them and over time, mass
tends to concentrate towards the center.
Eventually the earth will be covered with water if the earth has lots
of water in its rocks.
Now most of the water may already be at the surface.
And it may have been released and was previously trapped within the earth.
I hate to say that is possible but it is.
Or it may have come from the moon in some huge outgassing event.

As you can see we really don't know everything.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

Why the earth had shallow seas may have been because it covered more land mass.

If you consider it stays the same size then what changes? The ocean depths.
The ocean ridges.
Without those big gashes in the earth the water would cover more area and be more shallow. Raise that land to sea level and the water might cover the earth completely. I don't think the fossil record bears that out.
So the water must have come from the earth. From the rocks, and it must be
migrating towards the surface.
Then above the surface you have a gas.

Below the lighter elements H2O, you have iron and magnesium mostly and an iron core. Its clear where the water comes from it comes from the rocks.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

Earth has a combined gravity well due to its large moon, and it sits in the
gravity well of teh sun, although it is deformed by Jupiter.
The solar system sits in the gravity well of the galaxy, and the galaxy
sits in the gravity well of the universe.

And we are climbing out of that well through time's arrow. And as we
do, the bubbles get bigger. And that is expansion of the universe.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

But when they get bigger, they remain the same size since size is relative
and quantum foam bubbles identical.
Since nuclei are made of the same stuff, the pressure on them is reduced according as we climb out of this universal gravity well.
Some say they do expand as well and some say they don't.

Since mass and inertia stay the same over time, the reactions with the foam
are unchanged, therefore you should assume they are both doing the same thing.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

I don't want to give anyone the impression it is all sweetness and light
because as we climb out of the universal gravity well, we are sliding into the
great attractors gravity well.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

" X-ray observations have revealed that the region of space is dominated by the Norma cluster (ACO 3627),[1][2] a massive cluster of galaxies containing a preponderance of large, old galaxies, many of which are colliding with their neighbours, and/or radiating large amounts of radio waves."

No doubt cries for help falling on deaf ears.

By then we will be 4 miles under water anyway.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

Since we are dealing with something that is very small, yet mechanically complex, we have been pretty much creeping along.

And the complexity is still great so I will try to simplify the portion we are
looking to find more about. Lets just put things in context first...

So clocks at altitude run faster, atom clocks have more Hertz even raised
one foot.

Now the reason for this is the foam is getting smaller as it gets closer to the surface of the earth. Gravitational gradient.

So when the foam is compressed which it is around massive bodies, that makes
it a thicker medium because the bubbles are always touching.
So if you raise the atomic clock you are moving towards a thinner medium.
Hence the nuclei pulses faster. Less resistance since the skin of the nucleus
is in physical contact with quantum foam.
Now I am not using the terminology Higg's Field because I want someone else
to write that paper. I will however translate well enough that you can do that.
Encrypt the physics into the standard model to preserve the information.

Now you can also write papers on smaller aspects of any of this, and that is
a good way to move carefully and surely through it, because as you will
soon see it can get confusing.

So the foam bubbles are touching, and as such they form high and low pressure areas around any mass.
The only two things with mass, intrinsic mass, are a nuclei and a foam bubble.

The reason they have mass again is because they are pulsing, linear motion,
in and out and possibly expanding into the 4th dimension. We assume so since
there is plenty of proof.

Now when you compress a nuclei, by bringing it down towards the earth it is not
touching its neighbors.

So it does not get compressed to the same degree. It is touching quantum foam
but it is gigantic 10 ^25 approx larger than a quantum foam bubble since
they are Plank Length in diameter.
And they flow like a superfluid if you are in uniform motion.
Only when you accelerate through them with mass do they begin to bounce
against each other and cause drag.

So there is a difference between how a Quantum foam bubble gets compressed
by a gravity well, and how a nuclei gets compressed.

If you compress a nuclei and bump it forcefully it can transmute into
a heavier element. Heavy elements are made in supernova.

Now the curious thing about gravity wells for nuclei is they are stepped.

The stable elements fit into slots in the periodic table.

Each element has its own little step in the gravity well set.
Now you can take an element further into a well and at a point it will
reach the next step and be stable there.
Until then it is probably putting out radioactivity since it is pulsing
erratically not on a step, but somewhere in between.

The connection is the deeper in the well, the more it resists expansion,
and since the expansion force is the big bang force the more it resists
expansion the more tension on its skin and elasticity and so it pulses
stronger faster which means it sends out m waves spherical waves in
the foam which crest at the electron shell, stronger faster.

And where those waves crest is where the covalent bond is created.

So for programming DNA for instance we want to simplify slots to
a variable number value and naming convention and that will tell
us what combination of elements are needed to continue a chain
reaction and write procedures and functions. Such as to build and
bend a protein.

So we need to know what element or elements to attract along the
protein strand by leading opportunity slot, it fills the slot and is moved along it and behind it, the tail end of the molecule has the correct
wave pattern to break the covalent bonding so it can be recycled.

That gives you just a glimpse of the complexity we are talking about here.

So if we do the experiment at one height, and then do it at a different
height, that will affect the foam.

It may slow down or speed up a molecular process. By miniscule amounts
unless you make a point of doing it on purpose and use a great height
difference like 40,000 feet. A jet etc.

The atoms maintain their character, coffee still tastes like coffee.

Yet if we pass one atom beside another atom, it will alter that molecule
and can break the bond or fill a slot. A heavy element like zinc has
a deeper gravity well and will drag the entire molecule down into its
well, and that will affect the rate at which it pulses in and out,
and now it is resisting expansion more. And so now it is putting out
stronger faster waves.
You would think that the zinc would calm the vibrations, and it does calm
the nerves and calm the metabolism, by getting rid of some of the heavy hydrogen that is trapped in fats occupying a Hydrogen slot but the
zinc is also absorbing energy waves because they just hit it and it
absorbs the wave because of its mass.
So you see its gravity well can affect the covalent bond of atoms in
a molecule just by passing by and depending on the bond, the increase
in vibrational energy may be enough to break that bond. Or it
could make it stronger.

These are variable conditions that exist in a set, number of elements
squared. And the properties would make up a type.
Type slot.
So then it would have one value if it was next to a molecule and you
would want to know how to manipulate those slots using computer
programming.
So that you can build up functions and procedures.

The two main points here though are that quantum foam is compressed
and forms high and low pressure areas. And the waves travel in it
and they add up or cancel out and create high and low pressure areas.
Nuclei will be attracted into a low pressure area and repelled
from a high pressure area.

To make an element heavier, is difficult. It takes force.

To make one lighter you can cool it, you can trick it with vibrational
energy if it is erratic and get it to decay, there are things you
can do including small it with an atom smasher.

Just taking it down a gravitational gradient won't do it, unless perhaps
it is into a black hole. Consider the power of a supernova. Thats what
it takes to make heavy elements.

There is no way to just slip it a mickey finn Alchemy style.
Unless you make a molecule using a very heavy element and it drags
it into the pit, where it can transmute.

But then consider the strength of the covalent bond. Not very strong.
So its not going to get dragged down deep enough to transmute.

And only the depth of the well determines what an element is.

There would be no gold which did not exist at the same well depth
as all other pure gold atoms.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

>
> There would be no gold which did not exist at the same well depth
>
> as all other pure gold atoms.

Newton was heavy into alchemy but alchemy was just chemistry before
chemistry was invented.

If there was ever a time when someone on earth used chemicals to create gold
from some other substance it would have to be a heavier element.

The universe is expanding and so you might be able to go that way because
you are not going against the entire force of the expanding universe.

It is conceivable to be able to create a feedback that might raise it
gravitationally by getting it to bounce in and out so that it rebounds
up higher.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_transmutation

However that again is not our focus.

Our focus is merely on understanding slots completely so that we can program molecules. Biological processes are programmed chain reactions and in order
to truly understand and heal the body, we need to understand those
mechanisms.

The other areas include technology to make chips make themselves and
that sort of thing.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

One experiment that CERN could do to attract attention to itself is to
use mirrors and put a target on the space station.

You want to measure the speed of photons on slight angles and perpendicular.
That should be sufficient to get some good measurements of earths gravitational
gradient.

Other than that they could rig up a rocket sled affair to measure drag.
Using pure substances. The purity of the substance is important to get
a clean value of the effect of drag from the quantum foam.
That is transferable to other pure substances in theory.

When you are manipulating atoms you are working with pure substances.
One atom at a time in essence.

So again the way to remember the difference in types of pressure,
quantum foam is compressed and becomes thicker in a gravity well
but coffee still tastes like coffee.

If you manage to get a nuclei into a different gravitational slot
in a gravity well such as the universal gravity well, then coffee would
taste like tea.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

If you happen to have a great big alien head you might answer the question
by do elements sit on steps in gravity wells?

Something about the material when it pulses in relation to the expansion
force and its elasticity is geometricized in such a way that they can pulse in and out almost from one step to another.
And yet they can be agitated and be somewhere in between then lose that excess
vibration pulse and be normal and stable on a step again.

Its important to note also that vibrating side to side does very little to
affect the fact that the atom is in a gravity well that is based on in and out.
So heat does very little.

But you can drain the energy completely out of an atom and it will sink
below the level of detection and disappear. You can dampen those vibrations
or amplify them. Bose Einstein condensate.
But we can't see what the nuclei are doing.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

Using my big alien head...

If the big bang was a supernova, which created quantum foam and Hydrogen atoms,
then subsequent supernova could create heavier elements out of other Hydrogen atoms and so on down the scale pounding them further with each subsequent event.

All stable elements are directly proportional to Hydrogen.

Quantum foam bubbles are too slippery to get them into a ball large enough to make a nuclei.
10^ -25 smaller in size.

But consider that in earths gravity well you have one pressure, and yet
part of that pressure belongs to the sun, since we are in its pressure zone of gravity well, and then the galaxy, which as you can see makes them spiral.
The expansion of matter, these bubbles into the 4th dimension, meets
with resistance its elasticity. And the geometry is outward like a ray
but it is in a medium, so you get fluid effects. Since the medium
is fluid.

So you need to recalculate the theory on galaxy spin and realize
that gravity is a push not a pull and things are expanding even if
they are not growing greatly in size.

You see the dark matter theory is completely wrong. I substituted the dark energy theory 20 years ago to save it from embarrassment.
There is nothing I can do for anti-matter which is a mistaken
identification of magnetism. Waves form currents as well, they don't
just fan out spherically. Look at a magnet with iron filings.
You will see a flow between the atoms. Not through the nuclei,
but through the substance because the geometry of the molecules
is such that it aligns those waves in a pattern of high and
low pressure areas.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

Gravity pushes up against your feet.

Mass meets mass. No need for invisible pillows we have invisible eternal
fluid which made two bubbles in a primordial supernova.

One very small and one large by comparison, yet all quantum foam
bubbles the same size, and all Hydrogen nuclei the same size.
(Slap me if I start describing the matrix computer hardware)

So why these two set sizes all uniform?

Two explosions which peaked, and at that peak that was maximum density
or maximum vacuum.
You could have two massive explosive vacuum events. The first which created Hydrogen then a second weaker one which only could create quantum foam yet
there is so much more foam than Hydrogen nuclei.
Foam bubbles touch everywhere there is universe.
It seems more probable that you have an implosion which creates Hydrogen atoms
then a much bigger explosion which creates quantum foam.
And it just keeps expanding outward as do the Hydrogen atoms.
Since it is drawn outward by the perfect vacuum of empty space. (the 4th dimension)

Since this speculative eternal fluid is an elastic solid that has no
constituent parts, you could hypothetically signal faster than light
by sending waves in it, if you could get around the bubbles.
It may be that we have no interface with that fluid, but only the bubbles.
For all we know it may not even exist because only the bubbles
are needed since we live in a purely physical world.
At least that is the study of physics.
It doesn't exclude imaginary things but it labels them as imaginary.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

What it looks like is if you were to drop some liquid into primordial
vacant space and so the liquid wants to equalize pressure.
So in that case you need space to fill. Or do you? Not really.
You do not need area you just need a vacuum.

The quantum foam bubble appears to be one caused by an explosive vacuum.
Inside the bubble is a perfect vacuum. The only thing that keeps it from
collapsing is the vacuum on the other side of the skin.
Which is tugging harder.

Now the Hydrogen nuclei on the other hand people would prefer to believe
was created on an implosion which packed matter into a nuclei.
However they are all the same size.

So again, the property of the fluid and the force of explosive vacuum
can determine the diameter of a nucleus bubble.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

One thing this theory showed 20 years ago right away was that the nucleus
got smaller as the element got heavier.

Now since experimental data says that is wrong and the nucleus gets
larger I have to think that the experimenters are seeing a very close
very strong m wave front or crest and mistaking that for the skin
on the nucleus.

As technology advances perhaps we will discover that.

The notion of packing marbles is erroneous.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2012/03/physicists-measure-the-skin-of-a.html

That's a far cry from whats really going on there.

The nucleus is very small, and it is just a Hydrogen bubble that is back in time. And it is in a time slot, and in that time the universe was smaller
by one slot depth. Wham, the nucleus is pounded from all sides with sufficient force as star implodes then at critical point explodes and ponds that bubble inwards to a stable slot not smaller but with more mass.

Now it is resisting expansion more and so the force on it is greater.
Hence the wave energy it puts out greater. So it has more electrons.

But electrons are not what people think they are at all.

Its a measurement of energy like a quart.

If you dip a quart bottle into the lake and fill it, you will never
find a quart and a half. You will only find quarts.

Where you are most likely to find an electron is where the
spherical wave crests.
That's where it has the value of e times the atomic number.

You can calculate the diameter of the nucleus if you know the
radius of the electron shell of the H atom.
The wave is traveling at c, leaves the skin of the nucleus with a force
of G and creates a spherical wave crest with an energy of e.

And that relationship is built into the structure of the universe.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

> The nucleus is very small, and it is just a Hydrogen bubble that is back in time. And it is in a time slot, and in that time the universe was smaller
>
> by one slot depth. Wham, the nucleus is pounded from all sides with sufficient force as star implodes then at critical point explodes and ponds that bubble inwards to a stable slot not smaller but with more mass.

This is too confusing because of typos...

Implosion, creates a smaller nucleus with more mass.

It bumps it inward to the next stable slot.

There is no way you can make a larger nucleus with that type of explosion
or implosion by adding other matter.
And have them all the same size.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

Even if Newton was right about absolute space and absolute time
like we have a pixel screen we just assign values to coordinates.

And we don't have to limit ourselves to a point as having only a
few properties we can piggyback anything in type point in programming.

We can say p.x, p.y, p.z, p.t, and we can just keep going and
say it also has a property that is color p.c it may have an
alphabet letter assigned to it because we want later to refer
to all j particles and or all v particles so we further
say that that point p will also have p.* which is a set [a..z]
and then we can just keep going with p.aa which might refer to
its smell. And since these are variables in the code we will
create our simulated reality by adjusting those values and usually
we would model nature and use the algorithms of nature maybe fractal
math.

So you see anything is possible in a matrix using absolute space and time.

We need only apply Einstein's equations to our pixels and it is now
relativistic yet still they are pixels in 2 dimensions, and we are faking
a 3rd or using 3D technology to try to show depth of field.

However that is only visual still we imagine a matrix vat with a cable
sufficient to supply touch sensation to simulated nerve endings.

It could all be math as well, but we are still studying the environment
as if it were not a simulation but as a real working system of individual
free floating foam bubbles and nuclei bubbles.

And in that way, nature itself can give us the values when we do
experiment. Otherwise we are just guessing.

[Y.Porat]

On Friday, May 24, 2013 2:29:29 AM UTC+3, rick_s...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> I was listening to an old BBC audio In Our Time with Melvin Bragg,
>
> regarding anti-matter.
>
>
>
> The search has been focused on the Higgs Bosun,
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Higgs_boson
>
>
>
> The Higgs boson or Higgs particle is an elementary particle initially theorised in 1964,[6][7] and tentatively confirmed to exist on 14 March 2013.[8] The discovery has been called "monumental"[9][10] because it appears to confirm the existence of the Higgs field,[11][12] which is pivotal to the Standard Model and other theories within particle physics.
>
>
>
> You see we were able to bring particle physics in line with modern theory,
>
> by considering one foam bubble as being Plank Length, and the Higgs Bosun
>
> on a radial line from the center out, with a bubble with a sine wave
>
> circumference in contact with its neighbors.
>
>
>
> So then this allows for a clearly defined Higgs Field. And we have macro
>
> and micro scalability in mass effects, which means that it is consistent
>
> regardless of scale.
>
>
>
> So then in some of low energy physics we have seen quantum effects on the
>
> macro scale magnified but still the same.
>
> So we know we have the correct model.
>
>
>
> And that is where CERN is beginning to investigate mass transfer, maybe
>
> such as through phonons to investigate normal modes.
>
>
>
> In other words, send a little more mass down, with less velocity,
>
> and more acceleration. Investigate the drag of the quantum foam,
>
> to get better values. More accurate values.
>
>
>
> This type of drag with mass on mass is due to mass density.
>
>
>
> A large plastic sphere would not feel the same drag as a smaller
>
> metal sphere since Newtons laws apply there.
>
> "Inertia is the resistance of any physical object to a change in
>
> its state of motion or rest, or the tendency of an object to
>
> resist any change in its motion."
>
>
>
> So the quantum bubble has mass because it is elastic and it pulses in
>
> and out due to the tug of the expansion of the universe.
>
> And it sends out matter waves of a very minute size through it, and
>
> larger waves of all sizes move through it including photons, and
>
> dark energy such as magnetism.
>
>
>
> When you move through it you don't notice it until you step on the gas.
>
> That bit of acceleration with your mass, makes that a macro effect.
>
>
>
> But it can all be studied at CERN with a little larger mass and shorter
>
> runs with the measurement by laser light to determine mass/gravity
>
> values of a very high accuracy.
>
> And since mass is relative, you need only use one pure substance.
>
> And you would expect that you could use a magnetic substance as
>
> long as it were a pure stable element.
>
>
>
> Then just divide by its atomic number.
>
>
>
> Its too valuable a tool for science and for students to just shelve it
>
> so it should be used to get a better understanding of mass transfer.

=====================
idiot pig moron crook !!
do you yourself understand what you are bubbling ??
no way !!

so listen piggy "

i proved long ago listen careful that

EBERGY HAS MASS - THE ONLY MASS

GOT IT IDIOT ??
NOT RELATIVISTIC AND NOT SHMELATIVISTIC

JUST MASS - THE ONLY MASS THAT EXIST
MASS IS CONSERVED GOT IT PIGGY ??
MASIS CONSERVED AS ENERGY IS CONSERVED !!

E-mc^2 !!

now idiot parrot crook

if energy has mass
THERE IS NO NEED FOR YOU FUCKEN HIGGS
TO GIVE MASS TO ANYTHING
WHILE PHOTONS (ENERGY) ARE DOING IT ENDLESSLY )
AND DO YOU KNOW HOW ??

BY USING THEIR *** BUILT IN*** MASS
!!!TO GIVE IT TO PARTICLES !!

complicated for you idiot parrot ??
no it is too simple for making big money out of it !!!
so here is where the dead dog lies !!!

2
NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS !!

3

MASS IS THE MOTHER OF ALL ATTRACTION AND REPULSION FORCES !!

got it
if not
see

Google :
The Y Porat model - and abstract

se there the
chain of orbitals system

see
the y Circlon idea
( a basic particle that moves naturally in curved path
if not disturbed on its way it moves in a circle)

it is not the G R curved space that is doing it !!!

so
no need steal ideas
because
IT IS ALL DOCUMENTED !!
and copyrighted


Y.Porat
==============================

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

Well of course I am telling you what to do, I am the night supervisor around here and you can kith my ath honky white boy.
I say turn it into a rail gun and target the space station. We need the data.
Sacrifice of a few for the good of the many.

Or we will simply storm the Bastile, again, and turn it into a giant HHO factory.
No, not Home Heating Oil, magic fluid.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

Just don't miss if you are pointing straight up. That might have religious
repercussions.

I can understand that people are excited that there appears to be some
Eureka moments hidden in these new findings but its every man/woman
for himself.

What excites me is that finally we have some new things to hypothesize about.

Just one little iota of information can lead to new doorways and in this
instance there seems to be lots of things to consider and reconsider.

But dark matter is obviously the quantum foam.

There are some strange things that happen on the surface of a planet or
the topology of a galaxy that are caused by expansion. Things swirl
in patterns if there is resistance to expansion.

Or if they are being pushed by dark energy. A massive body or galaxy
when expanding and resisting expansion, will find that the path of least resistance is often not straight up but the path of least resistance
is to swirl horizontally a bit.
So mass does not flow out radially but swells out and the surface stretches
and it will swirl.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

You know what this is about today is that I have to dissect the right hand rule.

I have to reverse engineer the right hand rule to determine where people
went wrong, except in my mind they did not go wrong, since it is useful
and has been used a squillion times. I would rather just have that as
a separate thing altogether since I am old enough and wise enough to know
that any scientific revolution must encompass the past.

Even if there is a simple explanation such as the fact the earth is spinning, or the galaxy, that won't change anything. I suppose it is just human nature
to want to know why the bias.

So I will take a look and see if there is anything interesting to find there
based on what we know know that we didn't know then.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

Well for one thing if the foam bubbles get larger as they approach the surface of the planet then dark energy flowing out radially will push the atoms against each other but the flow would be easier on an angle through the foam.
Since straight up the bubble directly in your path is larger than the one beside you and they are round.
The reason they are round is outside of their skin is a vacuum. Although they
touch their neighbors.
The vacuum is tugging out equally, and only the fact that they are touching their neighbors prevents them from being spherical.
But once enough of them start to swirl you have a current and like Jupiter's
gaseous surface the patterns seem to remain quite similar.

"a giant storm that is known to have existed since at least the 17th century when it was first seen by telescope."

Often people try to think of space-time and then just say space is curved.
Well quantum foam bubbles that vary in size due to gravitational pressures,
allows you to map gravitational fields right down to the atomic level.
A Higgs field if it wanted to be useful, should tell us all about the
space that is an empty spot where an atom could be if we knew which
atom to add there.

It should be able to give us the potential and real values.

Again lets call a slot that a DNA molecule uses that is not part of its
molecule but beside it that it maintains to invite things there.
RNA for example. It creates an opportunity slot, designed to fit a particular atom in a particular molecule, and then it attracts that molecule and that
atom into that spot, so that it can then accomplish a task and that task is
just another step in a chain reaction, that appears as linear programming
but it is not when you spawn functions and procedures which in turn spawn
functions and procedures. That's object oriented programming.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

We have to distance ourselves from arguments of intelligent design
and evolutionary processes when we reverse engineer the code
or else it will bias our results.

There may be very legitimate reasons why the code is object oriented
and yet is not anything more than laws and happenstance.

We are very long ways from looking at the code from a lofty perspective
and making judgements on its design characteristics.

The simple explanation that two types of bacteria for some reason
entered into a symbiotic relationship,
Prokaryote
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prokaryote
and Eukaryote
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eukaryote

And ended up as human cells, is not what we want to know as much
as how does the code work, which we now know, and how can we write it,
which we have theories of and are doing with lasers manually
using the brute force method.

We are going to avoid the political arguments and just do good work
to fix the code where it needs to be fixed as requested.
Not just for us, but to relieve the suffering of mankind.
People say that old age can be fun, but I am out to put a stop to it.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

Its not a cop out for me to just quote Wiki and parrot the public
for consumption theory of the origins of the cell.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eukaryote#Hypotheses_for_the_origin_of_eukaryotes

We are more interested as life as chain reaction than life as thinking thing.

Biologists tend to endow all biological functions as having intelligence
even though they are little more than little robots.

Does a paramecium have a brain?

Does a bacteria have a brain?

"Bacteria have no brain, but on the surface of a bacterial cell there are receptors for different chemicals. This means that they can tell which way to travel by comparing, chemically, how many of those receptors have things that they like attached. "

OK so we are not chemists we are physicists and to us they are sending out
waves and those waves are adding up and cancelling out to create high
and low pressure areas, to attract or repel other atoms.

So we are assuming the intelligence is in the code since we are looking
for logical processes.
In their own way each branch that deals with life and every part of it
considers it intelligent. It appears to be smarter than we are since
it looks like magic to us.
However we know how it works. We have already reverse engineered the code.

And the descriptions now by microbiologists are reflecting that fact.
Let me see if I can find an example...

Well I have seen some good explanations in the past but now when I look
at Wikipedia on every pertinent page I see people adding their theories
as part of the description of the thing.

For instance...

" and contributed to the RNA world hypothesis, which suggests that
RNA may have been important in the evolution of prebiotic self-replicating systems."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ribozyme

They are pushing the argument that RNA preceded DNA because their hypothesis
breaks down if DNA came before RNA. Since DNA contains billions of bits of
code with error checking and there is no evidence of any trial and error
process of DNA development.
It sprang into being capable of directing air traffic control in all
major cities simultaneously and runs on oxygen and sugar in water
further on down when it becomes a Destructagon who is constantly trying
to take over the world and make smaller creatures extinct.
Often by eating them.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

Physics has always tried to be neutral. That is our responsibility as physicists
since we wield a lot of power. We know the secrets of the universe better
than anyone else.

But we still have our own theories and beliefs like anyone else yet we try
to sit on the fence when it comes to theory so that it will gain wider
acceptance.
We are smart like that because our founding fathers saw some of their peers
burnt at the stake and such.
Galileo sat in prison.
February 17, 1600 Giordano Bruno was burned at the stake for suggesting
the sun was a star.

1600 was the date of this painting approximately...
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/28/Glorification_of_the_Eucharist_-_Salimbeni.JPG

And that is way beyond thinking the sun is a star, that is talking about
maybe radio signals to the pineal gland, from the moon as Dyson Sphere,
to explain consciousness, and that the galactic mainframe link is either
cut or they are sleeping or something. (Its screen depicts a spiral galaxy,
and it is all covered in cob webs)

So the difference between sending messages through time like that
and saying the sun is a star is all in how you say something.
You see I have diplomatic immunity. But ordinarily secrets need to be kept
secret. For one main reason to preserve the knowledge from being corrupted.
We have this on going joke that well we have a couple, but one is that
in the future people will be wearing funny hats to church because of something
we say.
We also say sometimes "some day people will study it, or ELSE!"

I think that in our day and age the scientific paradigm is what puts
designer goods on the shelves of the stores in New York and Paris
and that seems to be good enough for the masses who have maybe less
lofty ambitions than they did in the past when life was brutish and short.

When life was brutish and short they searched for trees to sit under
and tried not to move, so that bad things wouldn't happen to them.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

I will tell you what I know, laws are not meant to be broken, God
does not make laws that can be broken.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

On Saturday, 25 May 2013 16:44:49 UTC-7, rick_s...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> I will tell you what I know, laws are not meant to be broken, God
>
> does not make laws that can be broken.

When a jaguar breaks its jaw, it starves to death. There is just not a lot
of mercy in the animal kingdom.

And the physical world is the domain of physics and we understand that
and don't really need to ponder why that is since that is cause and effect.

The jaguar died, starved to death, broken jaw. End of story.

We sympathize with its plight. Want to hear a worse one? Try the fungal spores
that sprout mushrooms out of an ant's head.
Killing the ant.

That's a nasty one. They have learned to dispose of the bodies to prevent
further spread of this parasitic attack.
Watch the movie.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XuKjBIBBAL8

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

How about reverse transcriptase...

Well studied reverse transcriptases include:

HIV-1 reverse transcriptase from human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (PDB 1HMV)
M-MLV reverse transcriptase from the Moloney murine leukemia virus
AMV reverse transcriptase from the avian myeloblastosis virus
Telomerase reverse transcriptase that maintains the telomeres of eukaryotic chromosomes


So its deadly and its part of life. Telomerase is the terminal of DNA strands at Chromosome ends and people have theories regarding its degradation and longevity.

This is the code we are dealing with. the HIV retrovirus uses tools
and that is one of the tools it uses. HIV is a tool user.

We will not only need free reign to name as we see fit, and infer as
we see fit, when studying the code since we need to create clues
that will help us to remember what things do.

However, when we write code we will use a compiler and use math and
use a programming language that already exists like C++ or Java
or whatever favorite is in vogue or that an individual selects.

We are tool users too and so we will create tool boxes.
They will be routines and subroutines that perform functions.

Enzymes recycle proteins and do a lot of other tasks. Listen to this
high tech art...

"The human body has over 1,000 types of enzymes. Each kind does one specific job. Without enzymes, a person could not breathe, see, move, or digest food. "
...

"Some of the enzymes showing the highest specificity and accuracy are involved in the copying and expression of the genome. These enzymes have "proof-reading" mechanisms. Here, an enzyme such as DNA polymerase catalyzes a reaction in a first step and then checks that the product is correct in a second step.[23] This two-step process results in average error rates of less than 1 error in 100 million reactions in high-fidelity mammalian polymerases.[24] Similar proofreading mechanisms are also found in RNA polymerase,[25] aminoacyl tRNA synthetases[26] and ribosomes.[27]"

To stop all the time and remember to promote your religious views is not
what this is about. Microbiologists are on the front lines of where did
life come from but they still have to do their job.
They essentially examine everything and have theories but they don't
go too deep below biological ways of thinking unless they know of simple
ways of explaining processes on a chemical or atomic level.

They will just say well we don't know how it does it. They have explanations
for what happens and they have things named, and they know about chemical
effects and all of that but not the fundamental understanding of how
things work.

Geneticists have their own terminology and their own theories again on life
and Eve and the Out of Africa hypothesis etc.
Everyone has a theory.
And the promotion of their theories muddy the scientific waters.

Teaching people that you can trace a gene back to Eve, well pick a different
gene, trace it back, it leads somewhere else.
Why pick that one? Well it suits the paradigm they are promoting.

We have God does not play dice with the universe! And other famous
quotes like that which we can agree with or not but we don't come
to blows over it and we actually try to test to see if it is true.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

You know if during a deposition at the Royal Academy in the days of Darwin,
I donned a white wig, stood up, grabbed my lapels, uttered in an authoritative
voice "Rules are not meant to be broken, and God does not make laws that CAN
be broken,"

I would get applause.

From one side right away, then later from the other.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

The immutable laws physics cannot be broken, and our task is to try.
And we always try to find ways around them, to capitalize on any
and all weaknesses we find to our advantage.
That is in part why we have flush toilets and anti-biotics and
shaving cream.
There are people who sweep insects off the sidewalk that is their
belief system at work and that is their right.
People maybe don't like to eat meat even though God gave them the teeth of a meat eater.
We are more fortunate than most other sciences because our explanations
are no explanation at all usually. Although the Big Bang was a triumph of
diplomacy and we are great diplomats, but the entire community and 3 bucks
will get you a cup of coffee at Starbucks but it won't stop a general
from using the bomb you made even if you ask nicely.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

To be a physicist is not as difficult as a physician when it comes to
moral or ethical decision making.

A physician needs to almost follow a script to be on the right side
of issues regarding life and death.

A physicist just closes his or her eyes and says ok, here goes...

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

"Unlike most reactors that have been built since, CP-1 had no radiation shielding and no cooling system of any kind. Fermi had convinced Arthur Compton that his calculations were reliable enough to rule out a runaway chain reaction or an explosion. But, as the official historians of the Atomic Energy Commission later noted, the "gamble" remained in conducting "a possibly catastrophic experiment in one of the most densely populated areas of the nation!"[11]"

not to mention the fears that it might ignite the atmosphere when the
bomb was first exploded.

Hey, we don't mess around. You want a plumber call a plumber.

We do what we think is right based on our own moral compass and the moral
compass of our peers and perhaps no other field has had such dedicated
men and women of science who have given their lives for the betterment
of mankind, including tirelessly watching stars while eating chips,
sitting for hours, days, years, in coffee shops discussing the fate
of cats in boxes, and of course sticking bodkins in one's own eye (Newton),
and working with the most deadly substances known to man (plutonium).

You called the right people. We make our own universes now and go fight monsters in them just for kicks. That wouldn't be possible if we didn't
first transcribe the laws of nature to computer code.

You would still be playing pong on an Atari if it wasn't for us.
Beep bleep beep bleep. How much fun is that???

You want to see how far we have come?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oOpOPdh7Ie4

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

More using tools...
http://youtu.be/z6VBHnbMIsk

Well of course we made that all possible we are geniuses or is it
geneii? We are genies. If you want flying carpets we can do that.
We will make them fly at almost the speed of light just give us
the money. We need more money now. I know we haven't even left
the coffee shop yet and we already need more money.

That is because our equipment is so expensive to make.

I could explain what it does if you want. Until your ears hurt.
And until you get vertigo.

At a point if you want what you want accomplished, you inevitably
will just have to trust us.
In the end you will have walked on the moon, while previously people
could only stand and stare at it in wonder.
We will tell you how old it is, what its made of and why it is not
crashing into earth or flying off into space. In short, when it comes
to answers regarding why is the sky blue, and all the really tough
questions we are the ones you ask and we have answers for everything.

The buck does stop here.
People want to know everything about how the universe started
and how everything works and they used to ask their religious leaders
but now they ask scientists.
They still call for a priest though when they die.
Physicists are not all that good with answering those immortal questions
that have to do with mankind's spiritual nature.

There are secrets that are beyond even us and our prying eyes and
incredibly expensive equipment.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

The question regarding is it right to put an end to the aging process
is a no brainer for me. We are merely talking about healing the sick.

If we heal all their age related illnesses so what? They are still
not all that bright and will still walk in front of a truck because
they are in the crosswalk and they think that makes them invincible.

They will ride their bikes in heavy traffic and risk life and limb
and again feel invincible even though they are competing with metal
several ton machines with old people at the wheel.

Old people who need a walker when they get out of the car.

We will need to reverse engineer the code to repair the things
that other scientists have done by accident who toyed with it
thinking it was almost all junk anyway.

You would be surprised what we know. We just don't tell everyone
what we know because they would think we are crackpots.
We only tell them the crackpot stuff.
The real stuff we keep to ourselves. I know you suspected that
all along.

In my case though it would be true. My science is still light years
ahead of this.
And not just theory but practiced all the time and well known.
For instance I know that all real people are already immortal.
And I don't mean like star dust is immortal.

A personality file is a set of behaviors and that is what makes
a person unique.
And those are backed up in the galactic mainframe like you
would any computer file.
I know the galaxy crashed in 1992. When it rebooted the link between
the mainframe and the moon, came back up. And all personality files in the
local machine were backed up.

But if you try to tell someone, they will never believe you.

Unless you are me and you can show them proof after proof.
But then why do that when people have to live and work in the real world?

Its not going to change their lot in life. Their lot in life will change
when we help them cure their diseases and ease their suffering as
part of an ongoing effort that has spanned millenia.

and don't forget we are just as susceptible.

Its just our turn now as physicists to carry the ball because
micro-biologists went as far as they could understanding physics
without dedicating their lives to it.

Your own ram memory can only hold so much current data so that is
why people have to focus when they write computer code for instance.

They might have 60,000 lines of code in their mind, indexed so they
know where to find a function or procedure when they debug it.

They have to know how what they do will affect the rest of the code.

The way one science looks at its niche is different from
other scientific bodies and they have their own ways of handling
complexity. Specialization.

Microbiologists will talk about an enzyme as if it had a brain.
Knowing full well it doesn't, its just that it acts like it does.
We can just look and say chain reaction.
And understand.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

A non physicist will look at DNA and say that built in appears to be
some sort of age clock.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telomere#Systemic_telomere_length_and_aging

Whereas we will look at heavy hydrogen occupying a hydrogen slot
and say hmmmm.... this gravity well we are in, has a heavy hydrogen problem
since whoever wrote this code, did not factor on heavy hydrogen taking the place of Hydrogen since it is certainly gumming up the works.

Now a religious person might be very shy about even suggesting that life is not perfect as it is.

But physicists have to be fearless in that regard or we wouldn't get anything
done.
Perhaps DNA was written for a place that had a different depth of gravity
well and came here as Fred Hoyle suggested through a type of panspermia.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Hoyle#Rejection_of_Earth-based_abiogenesis

Published in his 1982/1984 books Evolution from Space (co-authored with Chandra Wickramasinghe), Hoyle calculated that the chance of obtaining the required set of enzymes for even the simplest living cell without panspermia was
one in 10 ^40,000

10 with 40,000 zeros after it and I don't need to tell people in a physics newsgroup that is what that means. That is a squillion squillion to one.
The odds are better that you will spontaneously combust within the next 2 minutes.

Of course they called him a crackpot. He was telling it like it is.

The fact is we have not yet begun to inquire with our minds why it is
that something as important as that could be there causing problems
when the code itself and the things it does, is well the most complex
organization of systems in the known universe.

The argument put forward by geneticists is that evolution follows
principals of economy and survival of species and procreation,
and the repair mechanisms are expensive in energy.
It is more economic to just make more, rather than keep the old
ones. Babies were born is the catch phrase of the atomic age.

But that effort to do all that has very little to do with CERN.
CERN as a test lab just does experiments and collects data.
Yet, they have made advances that led to improvements in medicine.

I have already turned the younger generation on to this and they
are already creating proteins with computer programs.
As part of a joint effort to see how you can fold proteins etc.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_protein_structure_prediction_software

There are people writing code to program atoms already.
Remember the grey goo?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grey_goo

Where we are at is microbiologists have been naming processes and reverse
engineering processes so they know what things do what in the body.
They have come a very long way in the last 20 years thanks to the Internet.
It speeds development.
So when we look at the code, we can refer to their work to see what a function
does. Well that's most of the work.
Our work is so easy by comparison because we already know how our stuff
works.
The laws are simple by comparison to what goes on inside a cell.

When I looked for the aging process it was not difficult to find, because
it sort of jumps out at you like a bug in software.

Yet when you read the articles on the net, you will find people selling
the opposite, that Deuterium promotes longevity.
Google is not unbiased.
It puts forth the current scientific view and censors the rest.
Socrates would like that because then youth is not corrupted by
new ideas and people will march in time.
It will never fly is what everyone says to every physicist any time
they want to do anything.
Its like telling rich people gold will make them sick if it is in the
same room. They will hide it under their pillow.
Even if it did they would never believe you. If it caused aging you would
have a battle on your hands trying to get them to give it up.

Look up
Deuterium and aging

and you will get the medical professions view. They are the ones you
pay when you get sick.

If you know what to look for you will find it...
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF01200896#page-2

...since D2O is known to interfere with DNA synthesis and mitosis...


However like nicotine it is not a battle that you will win in the court
of public opinion because big money has already put up barriers.

When they do longevity tests they inject or get people to drink it
because then it shows up better on scans. Since it is energetic compared
to Hydrogen.

So they make the test subjects take the Deuterium then use that as a
means to observe the effects of some anti-aging process they are trying
to accomplish.

And it gets worse.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1089710/Its-time-raise-glass-heavy-water-longer-life.html

But that's to be expected.

If you want to get anything done you have to push it through since
always there will be obstacles in your way.
Its part of the programming in the matrix and if you were to ask
any qualified physician they will tell you that most systems
in the human body are limiting systems, since of course out of control
growth is cancer.
And since biological systems are chain reactions, most subsystems are
systems which stop chain reactions.

Change itself is one of the hurdles of any science.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

According to that page worms and flies love the stuff.

Mice on the other hand live to what would be 150 years minimum
transposed to human equivalents without it.
So you would live to be 150 years old.
That's based on studies done with mice.
Good luck finding those studies using google.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

Of course worms and flies love the stuff they eat dead bodies.

That's the world I live in where the powers that are have a sense of humor.

You have to fight for change because change is dangerous.

Things may be bad now but you have no idea how bad they could get
if you screw up.

So that's why there is a constant fear of change and attempts to sto[
change.

Think of all the good things that could happen to you in this life
and then think of all the bad things that could happen and put that
in a second column.

Talk about bias. There are as many bad things as there are quantum
foam bubbles and as many good things as there are Hydrogen bubbles.

Our approach will not be to dig a trench and take them on, we will
have others do that. The people who go on hunger strikes and
chain themselves to things and all of that.
We will merely understand the code and be able to write procedures and functions.
In the process if people discover certain truths, well there are philosophers
out there who can deal with the ethical principals and all of that.
We might just want to make microchips by chain reaction.
Or miniature computers by chain reaction so that we can incorporate microchips
in diamonds so rich people will not lose their diamonds.

Try and stop that one.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

Experiments in mice, rats, and dogs[26] have shown that a degree of 25% deuteration causes (sometimes irreversible) sterility, because neither gametes nor zygotes can develop. High concentrations of heavy water (90%) rapidly kill fish, tadpoles, flatworms, and Drosophila. Mammals, such as rats, given heavy water to drink die after a week, at a time when their body water approaches about 50% deuteration. The mode of death appears to be the same as that in cytotoxic poisoning (such as chemotherapy) or in acute radiation syndrome (though deuterium is not radioactive),

It is not radioactive but it is energetic.

It interferes with DNA replication, and makes DNA susceptible to free radicals which slice through the DNA.

As a start. Yet because scientists have taken a defensive stance so many
studies have been done to the contrary, that what was once a well known fact
has now been replaced by factoids that are patently false.
Maybe people want to die. Maybe life is not really worth living
for most people they just don't have the courage or will to end it all
themselves so they want God to it.
Considering that so many people kill themselves, the life worth living index
is just balanced above the kill yourself to ease your suffering index.

What we would not want is for people to be afraid to go outside because
they might die. And if they were fixated on living life and avoiding death,
they might be too scared to live and enjoy life.
That may be why that balance is maintained.
So they don't care if they live or die and then they are most free
to live or die according to their own wishes.

However we are only talking about 150 years as opposed to 80 or so years.
And improving the quality of life.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

As soon as you finish writing a bit of code, people will understand
what atom does what in DNA and they will see models of Deuterium atoms
in a Hydrogen slot, and they will see their DNA not be able to fold properly.

All the fake studies and fake stories in the press will not change that.

They will also see that Deuterium in a cell wall prevents the passage of water
through the cell wall.

They will understand then what causes wrinkles, and what causes aging,
which is dehydration caused by Deuterium and damage to DNA and trapped
toxins in cells since water keeps cells clean of toxins, and it alters
mitosis, which is cell division.
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1960.tb39106.x/abstract

Non physicists can only gaze with wonder how all these things could
happen since they don't understand covalent bonds or magnetism or
any of the physics of atomic energy.

They merely say it isn't radioactive so it must be ok.

And they say well yes but that's if you have too much. That you will die of thirst literally swollen full of water. It doesn't matter how much you drink,
it can't get through a cell wall.

That's what mice die of who are given extreme doses of heavy water.
The die of dehydration while bloated with normal water.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

Why I am telling you this in a CERN thread is I know you are constantly trying
to justify your science and in an aging population aging is a topical subject
that is relevant to people's lives.

D2O has the following effects on biological systems:
It stops mitotic spindle formation, necessary for cell division in multi-cellular organisms. Seeds won't germinate and plants won't grow.
It increases the glomerular filtration rate and decreases the renal plasma flow of the kidneys. This decreases the overall function of the kidneys.
Blood glucose level drops and is unable to be maintained. Glucose can't be stored as liver glycogen.
The intestinal barrier functions breakdown causing dirrhea and fluid loss.
It alters the geometry and folding of DNA, which can increase replication errors. It produces genetic mutations in some bacterial DNA but not others.
It alters the pH of internal fluids.
It affects cell processes such as diffusion, nutrient transport and nerve conduction.
It accumulates in the fats of mammals. Deuterated fats accumulate around the liver, and the liver enlarges.
It decreases the production of cholesterol and fatty acids and reduces the ability to breakdown these substances.


http://terraformers.info/deuterium.html

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

So anyone who gets on a BBC radio program who has read this and says
we still don't know what causes aging, is telling a lie.
We absolutely do know what causes aging.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

Somewhere in this thread I 'suggested' that CERN put a target on the
space station and do some measurements to determine the drag of the
quantum foam between earth and it perpendicular and on slight angles.

As massive bodies expand in space-time they resist expansion and
this causes them to swirl on the surface.

And it is caused by the quantum foam bubbles getting larger as you go up.
The gravitational field.

And since there is resistance and things are getting pushed from behind
by dark energy the path of least resistance ends up not being radially
outward but to the side towards a swirl since the bubbles beside
are the same size but larger above. Also since when you are close to a massive
body they are compressed and thicker as a medium. And that is in accordance with the experiment quoted in this thread to measure atomic clocks 6 feet above the ground and they showed there is a difference every foot you go up.
So the dark energy is pushing from behind, (the winning part of gravity,
that is making the universe open.) so it is still meeting mass in front of it
and it doesn't take much since the foam bubbles are round, to deflect to the side and cause things to swirl and to spin.

Hence why spiral galaxies spin. But its the expansion causing it although
Newtonian physics might think it was something else.

If you look in the deep field many older galaxies had not met with enough resistance to expansion yet, but then as pressures built up over time
they began to swirl.

Now if this is not enough information to get you started then you will
need to let me know otherwise I am leaving the ball in your court to
calculate the evolution of spiral galaxies and see what sort of forces
are at work, and how this process works in detail.

Its just too much fun to do so I don't want to steal your thunder
away from you cosmologists who have time on your hands.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

Ok so I took a look at anti-matter and like I said it is just magnetism.

What people are calling protons are not protons and anti-protons.

People have an idea that all energy is the same as mass but its just that
energy travels in quantum foam which has mass.

Intrinsic mass is where a bubble is pulsing in and out, be that a foam bubble
or a nuclei.

Now when you send waves around a cyclotron it is round and the waves are
in foam and so if you were actually sending around a nuclei then it would
rub against the foam more as it rounds the corner. For instance a race
track shape would have less friction against the foam on the straight stretch.

But the direction of your magnetic force as you accelerate or push along
a particle will determine its spin because of friction in the foam.

That says nothing at all about the way nuclei work which is to pulse
in and out and when they do they send a spherical m wave through quantum foam.

Maxwell's equation on magnetism, is Gauss's equation and that dates back to
1835.
You know we are making nano-bots now.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

A mass spectrometer works in the same way.

Hand held devices are available now. Like a hapsite...

GC/MS Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry

"HAPSITE ER - The Only Person-Portable GC/MS That Identifies VOCs and SVOCs On-Site - Quickly, Easily, Accurately "
http://www.inficonemergencyresponse.com/en/index.html

Ok so the atoms are freely floating so you have nuclei and you acellerate
then then you make sure they are all going the same velocity through the
principal as a cathode ray tube and then the focused beam hits a magnetic
field and the particles are deflected by mass.
Since each nuclei is heavier than another when they hit the detector
there will be a space between each type of element and this will
form spectral lines which tell you which element is which.

If you turn the spectral lines so that they are horizontal that is their
gravity well or their depth in a the universes' gravity well.
Those are the steps in a gravity well where they are sitting due to their
mass.
If their mass was less because an element transmutes it now moves up
the spectrum of spectral lines. Each element having its own slot
in the universal gravity well.

And although we are in a solar system gravity well and a galactic
gravity well all of those are in the universal gravity well.
As you move out of the solar system gravity well the elements do not
change their relationship to each other.

If you view distant galaxies you will see a red and blue shift.

Also you have gravitational red shift...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_redshift

But put very light iron filings around a strong magnet
they will not move or flow. Hence that is why we know the foam
is not flowing as a result of magnetism but merely there are
properly ordered high and low pressure areas in the quantum foam.
Caused by the adding up and cancelling out of m waves from the atoms
in the substance which is geometrical because molecules are geometrical
in how they bond together.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

Lets suppose you have a magnet in your hand it is beating like a heart
billions of times per second on the frequency of the material.

And it is sending out waves according the inverse law that the closer to
the nucleus the stronger and more compact the wave reducing dramatically
as it leaves the surface outward. Since the foam has resistance to movement.
It has mass.

It has the most kinetic force at the electron shell radius because that is
the first crest of the wave. And we will use H so that the example is simple.

But because waves cancel out or add up they form high and low pressure areas
and any material that has a similar wavelength so that their waves
cancel out is attracted and those which add up are repelled. And so the
geometry of the molecules and the wave length and wave characteristics
determine the magnetic effect on the nuclei.

You can suspend a frog in a magnetic field because m waves have kinetic
energy and the waves themselves will hit the nuclei of the frog and
cause a force that is greater than the air which would be there otherwise between them only.
If you blast air at them from underneath, they will of course splat on the ceiling.
Blast quantum foam at them or waves in quantum foam and they raise off the super-magnetic surface.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

The way the quantum foam itself flows is due to gravitational gradients
more than the m waves but pressure can cause currents in the foam
and around massive bodies the foam does swirl.
However in a small magnetic field the waves are strong enough to put the area
into an ordered state. And you can maintain high and low pressure areas
that are steady and constant.

The mass spectrometer wants the nuclei to follow a trajectory and it wants
all nuclei to follow the same trajectory and then it wants the mass to
alter the trajectory so that you can see the different trajectory target
effect. Which is to not hit the detector in the same spot but actually
geometrically separated.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_spectrometry#Data_representations

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

So when you orderly arrange some atoms in a substance the spherical waves
end up in patterns, that have strengths of kinetic energy in the foam
which are also geometric. And since we can arrange atoms we can direct
those waves as we wish. We can focus them and make a beam.

We can measure that beam for an electron gun as an example in electrons,
since the waves are quantized. We can merely choose the e value as our
measuring stick or jar even if you prefer that analogy where you dip
a jar in a lake and you will be able to count how many jars there are
but you won't bother with the fact that you could make the jar any
size you want.

Taking this further to dipping it into a quantized pool quantized in
flat disks, you could only get so many flat disks into that jar
laying flat and always there would be no half disk widths.
Either one fits or it doesn't.

Or marbles in a jar.

So ok, its how you measure that determines how many electrons are
flowing in that current.
But you can measure and so then you can create all the laws of
electro-magnetism.

m waves being magnetism and their interaction energy being electrons.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

In a particle accelerator they create an increasing magnetic field
down a track to propel the particle giving it a boost along the way.

Ok so its the same principal as the new physics but when you examine the
theories by today's standards using the simple model it's easy to see
the gaps in their knowledge at the time.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_de_Broglie#Conjecture_of_an_internal_clock_of_the_electron

and here the pilot wave as they try to reconcile m waves with the
crest of the m wave which they have no idea it is just the crest
of the m wave they think it is a bit of dust orbiting the nuclei
with magic dust or charge sitting on it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pilot_wave

Almost a hundred years ago.

We are so far beyond that now.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

So if you bast off a frog from your desk with an air blast you are hitting
its atoms with air molecules. Big chunks of stuff with mass clobbering it
and up it goes splat as it is propelled up.

If you sit it on your magnet then you are now trying to use m waves
and m waves travel in quantum foam which is 10 ^-25 smaller than
it approx.

Like waves on the ocean. You can get a good wave going with some good force but
if you want direct force, it has to slap broadside against the side of the boat or breakwater or dock. Geometry vector forces etc.

That's not the same as firing cannon balls at it because cannon ball atoms
have mass in the form of nuclei which we will call bubbles, and flow
through the foam bubbles lubricated. (in uniform motion).

Like a bowling ball rolling on ball bearings.
Except they are elastic bubbles.
With weight though.
Which is just a measure of mass.

So trying to push a boat with waves on the ocean as opposed to pushing
it with wind.

Atoms hit the sail, or water molecules hit the boat.
Easy to see why its difficult to raise a frog off a magnetic surface
and easy to blast one to the ceiling using air.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

Quantum foam bubbles are all touching each other but atomic nuclei
can be free floating or a combination of a few in a molecule like
H2O is still free floating. Its moving where as the quantum foam just has
waves moving through it.
So a wave on the ocean travels but not the molecules.
In air, the molecules are traveling.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

So to picture a Higg's field turn this image 90 degrees.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_spectrometry#Data_representations

That's a universal gravity well.

Now you will find that things which affect the mass of a nuclei and only
nuclei have mass in that range a quantum foam bubble has little mass at rest.

So the elements as they sit in their depth slot are shown in the gravity well.

Now to make a field you need field strengths and so you can quantize any
geometric 3D space around a nuclei hence your field and you can determine
pressure for any area within that field, based on theories which are
in existence or you can make new ones.
The fact is you have kinetic pressure from waves since the waves are from
pulses so the back pressure is an inward pulse so you see gravity can
be affected mass can be affected and the spectral lines can move up and down
the gravity well as each element can get slightly lighter and heavier.
Why this is important is because the deeper in the well it goes, the
more it resists expansion of the universe and the more it pulses in and out
sending out different frequencies of m waves.

Knowing how those m waves combine as a result of those pressures
allows us to know how to best make molecules bond and otherwise interact
such to be drawn along side a strand of DNA or to fit in a slot as
part of a chain reaction in a biological process as an example.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

You want a scalable quantized 3D space around an atom that has pressure
values and you can piggyback any other values you want on those points
in that field.

p.x p.y p.z p.t and so forth.
What base element is it? What base element would fit there in that empty slot?
What are the slots beside it one angstrom away?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angstrom

This thread contains enough information to write the theory and you have
a target goal of microbiological uses so you can focus on real world
examples since for instance DNA is heavily studied.
So you want to plot the Higg's field around a DNA strand.

On your marks, get set, and go. The finish line is in Stockholm Sweden
and chances are I will be approving your paper.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

I know you are lifting your heads up from your books and your glasses
are still down on your nose and you are asking well you mean we have
the G.U.T.?

Yes, programmers have been using it for some time now.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UQa1lPodqk4

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

Shortly after we developed the theory, 20 years ago, numerous things happened
but at one point the Pentagon informed other nations that they needn't test
nuclear bombs any more, they have the software to simulate them.

And what is a nuclear explosion except a type of supernova explosion
or Bosenova explosion on a different scale.

And all deal with E=mc2
mass gravity and kinetic energy or force.
You see mass as the pulse of the nuclei, the m wave as being produced when it pulses, and it travels in a medium that has a small mass and is Plank
Length in diameter.
Tiny bubbles touching each other which are elastic with nuclei as also
being elastic and the spherical wave fronts also behaving in an elastic
manner such as when you try to push two like poles of a magnet together.
Electrons as energy at the first wave crest, and photon at the intersection of those spherical waves. Em waves.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

If you wanted to blast some molecules into space, then the principals of
how that works is that the quantum space-time foam is always touching the nuclei.

When a nuclei pulses, it sends out a wave in that foam. If there was no foam there, there could me no wave. The nuclei would pulse in and out and touch nothing.

Since they are touching when a nuclei pulses it sends out a spherical wave.

When quantum foam is agitated since it is a superfluid it will just flow
around the object except that all bubbles are expanding into the 4th dimension
without getting larger in size due to universal time.

The spectral lines of the elements in the universal gravity well are all the same across the universe in cycles per second. The time differs as conditions
differ but we can use the universal clock to date the universe.

Outside of that area there is no quantum foam and hence there could be no acceleration or movement in space.

When you walk on the ground the friction allows you to push off and use f=ma an equal and opposite force is applied. You are pushing against atoms that are in the same foam as you, and both are pushing against that foam when you push on each other it is at your back and you are bracing your back against it.

Acceleration causes friction in those bubbles and causes them to bounce
around against each other since all quantum foam bubbles are identical,
and all touching each other. They have a sine wave surface yet are elastic.

The faster you accelerate the more it will resist. When a bullet is fired, a small space is instantly filled with pressure from excited atoms bouncing off each other and since the foam is only Plank Length and atoms are so much larger
you can propel nuclei even since the principals are the same.
The elastic bubble is in foam.

How does movement begin?

Impulses in the brain. In what way is the brain acting as computer?
It has object oriented programming and centers for processing the
data. 10 centers or so process the data for human sight.

The electron flow through any circuitry that can switch on or off and maintain
those positions can think in theory.

So we think, and we send current to centers in the body often by releasing chemicals.

So we are sending molecules and we just tweak a group of messenger molecules
perhaps using m wave energy, in the form of electrons and it impacts the
nuclei or wave fronts of other processes.
If it breaks a bond, perhaps that's a zero, and if it makes a bond, perhaps that is one.

Since your computer is always on in your head it just keeps processing data
and autonomic systems look after basic operation.

As things are objectified, thinking is also objectified, and taking snapshots
of reality through its senses every nano-second and then comparing that with the previous set. It then uses that to plot the future moment and that gives
us a feeling of time and our place in space-time.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

If you think of mind as calculation, then thinking is the mechanical process
that mind uses. There are different layers of thinking or calculating,
and the conscious mind is concerned with objects and their relationships
in a larger sense since if it was conscious of every little nuance you
would not be able to form the big picture, and when conscious you have
a world view.

So modern theorists solve the mind body problem of Descartes in that way.

They consider the brain as being electrical or electro-chemical and the mind
software running with your brain as computer.

It has access to hardware, your body, and it can affect that hardware as part of its software capabilities.

It can flip switches just by thinking. It knows how by itself. And people say
it is a feedback mechanism that when you think, your body notices that
things happen and then it uses those things as leverage to move muscles.
Then the muscles become part of the system and it need only think to move.

The mind raises itself above the mundane and relegates a process once
determined to a less aware process. So that it can think about more
important matters.

For instance when you drive a car you can day dream. Its practiced and so
you don't have to be as focused on every moment and it can become a
bit automatic.

Most scientists say that's all you need to solve the mind body problem
but then they agree they don't know what consciousness is exactly.

Well some think it is just the combination of all these smaller processes
going on in centers of the brain that add up to a state of consciousness.

For instance basic Windows is running but utilities are running and together
they give you the operating system that you need see in front of you operating.

All well and good and man can maintain that belief but I said most not all
because some are religious and believe there is a spiritual component
and so are just more observant and are perhaps studying brain activity
and see strange things that cannot be explained.

I am in the latter category. Those who think it is all in the brain are materialists.
I operate on the matrix philosophy and it is more in line with studies
of the brain. Some people who study the brain just ignore those anomalies
and maintain their materialist belief by using blinders like a horse
wears blinders so it is not distracted by what is going on beside it.
You didn't know that?
you've seen a million pictures of horses pulling carts, and have heard
the expression wearing blinders but never noticed they are wearing
blinders.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blinders

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

Now maybe most people know what blinders are and they notice them on horses.

However take a neurologist and he will say that consciousness arises in
the brain in a neural net. That complexity gives rise to consciousness
as the finished product of smaller processes.

They look using an MRI at the brain and can see those 10 centers of sight,
and they can see activity in the brain centers when patients do complex
tasks while under MRI.

Magnetic resonance imagery. You see m waves and of course the e of em waves
is also there only its a small current.

Then of course just after they have it mapped completely and are satisfied
they know it well a doctor or two or 5 says to them excuse me, I have patients
who have no gray matter at all, no cerebral cortex at all hence no neural net
and they are indeed conscious and can hold a baby.

They may be almost without capacity for intelligence but they have instincts
and some type of thought processes going on, they can follow light when
a doctor moves a light in front of them and that sort of thing.

So you have the lower reptilian part of the brain in the brain stem area
and of course it all centers around that wonderful mysterious pineal gland
which Descartes said was the seat of the soul.

And there is the seven second gap, which is that a scientist can ask
a person to push a button whenever they want and they look at the MRI
and know that he is going to push the button 7 seconds before he does.

Up to seven seconds prior and what the activity in the MRI looks like,
is first a signal hots the pineal gland, as if you were getting your
marching orders, the frontal cortex lights up as if you were a zombie
getting instructions.

So this is a bit unsettling for some who don't understand the matrix
philosophy. In the matrix philosophy we are also using a larger computer
to do some of the processing elsewhere and to store long term memories.

And that is how you see some people children actually remember past
lives since that information is in the other computer which we all use
as a further part of the consciousness process.

To give us a conscience and so that we all think on the same level or use
the same software so we think alike.

And this is reflected in language and how even though there are hundreds
if not thousands of languages on earth they all have basic things in common.

Well its good to be a materialist but it is also good to keep an open mind.
Much better to say we are studying these things and maybe someday will
understand everything better, than to say it does not exist.
You will look foolish if you take a purely materialistic stance.
Its better to be materialistic and keep an open mind.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

> Its better to be materialistic and keep an open mind.

It was actual neurologists themselves who asked for our help to stop
the madness. When a neurologist wants to put on their blinders they
say yes but they just have a diminished cerebral cortex. that there
is still a lining of cortical material material inside the skull
and the brain is so amazing it just makes do with what it has.

Then they try to walk away and end the discussion because the truth
is no, we are not talking about diminished cerebral cortex we are
talking about none.

So then you see the neural net theory breaks down completely and you have
a computer with no hardware.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17475053

So they want even our branch of science to stop perpetuating myths that
consciousness arises in the cerebral cortex in a neural net.

What we know is that there are centers in the brain that are object oriented
and they process data and that leads to higher forms of thought and a better
picture of the world and we can use language and we can live on a level
that allows us to drive a car while texting.
You notice we don't do that well because we have to look at the screen
otherwise we could do it. We can talk on the phone, smoke a cigarette
and drive in traffic, multi-task no problem.

Someone without a cortex cannot do that.

Yes there are people who can do that with a diminished cortex.

If people want to operate under a world view that includes the matrix,
the information is there to be found and studied and Descartes held that
view. Now there appears to have been some information in South America
that the Spanish brought to Europe at the time of Descartes or before.
It led to certain beliefs but they were all kept secret.

People have had the opinion since then that consciousness was a signal
to the pineal by some sort of alien computer.
It could very well be that God is merely promoting that view is doing
everything in that regard and just leading people to believe it is a computer.

Occam's razor would just omit God from that equation and say it is a computer.

It doesn't mean there is no God, it just means that before you get to that
level you have simulated reality generated by computer and another layer of existence.

A stage and players on it was the belief of Shakespeare and of his time.

I can go further since I studied it and say the earth is a match making
machine named Kismet. Kismet means fate. And the earth was developed
as a match making machine for people to find their soul mate.
The people are tested in their life for compatibility between each other
and their kin who may not be reincarnated but may still be living somewhere
in the matrix. But since people are immortal, when people mate, they must also
get along with the in-laws so the earth is a testing grounds where the machines
themselves, which are programmed to do this task, test for compatibility and
the people hope to find a mate.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

So a better approach is the materialist view that raw data is gathered by the
senses and then processed in centers where that information is collated and
put in context of your culture and environment.

Your computer is always running, and has access to hardware, and can make muscles move.

If you want to take it further then to be in line with reality and not
find yourself supporting theories that are incorrect, you can know how it works
past that without promoting that view. You can merely keep that in mind when
people are selling you their theory, and test it against what the truth is,
to see if their theory is in line with what you know. Without actually saying
to them they are right or wrong because of what you know. Simply because if you then try to show or prove what you know you will find you cannot.

What you will find is that the world makes sense with this correct view,
even though you cannot prove it and as you live your life you will see
it all fits without exception, whereas any contrary theory like a complete
materialistic view probably will not fit.

So to understand the stage, you need to understand the programming of the stage.
And so I can refer to the time of Descartes and the painting I have used
in this thread which says that consciousness comes in two parts. Instincts and sentience. That is human programming to make your body and mind work.
And what makes you unique is your personality that is based on archetypes.

Just like you have genetic inheritance, you are also carrying personality
inheritance except it does not come from your parents it comes from base
archetypes. From people long ago.

And that is where mythology comes in because humans have studied human nature
and personality for a very very long time and even though they were not
scientists they recorded human nature in mythology.

So as a classic example of the archetypal father you have Zeus.

And so there was a time in the past when humanity almost went extinct
and a materialist point of view could say one of the survivors was
a man called Zeus. And so men have maintained those personality traits
through descendance.
Even if we do not know the actual method that those traits are passed on.

Some times a child will be just like its father and the apple doesn't
fall far from the tree, sometimes like their grandfather and sometimes
maybe more distant relatives.

We have theories but no actual studies that tell us about personality inheritance since your personality is made up of nature and nurture
and personalities evolve.

We assume we are evolving towards less aggression and more reason and
understanding.

So its enough to say that the brain is computer but there is more than one computer doing the processing.

Its enough to say the mind is running software, but there is more than one program running.
And we all use the same operating system.
Hence why we can understand each other and do what humans do which is to
imagine what the other is thinking. We can understand what another person
thinks because we all think alike in certain ways. That commonality is
due to software that is the same in all people.

If you want to jump higher then the matrix is all using the same operating
system throughout the universe, but the brain takes the common data
and transposes it into local context.

Hence why we have object oriented centers in the brain. Those signals we are
processing need to be put in context to local cultures and conditions.
Local cultures and conditions come to us from the 5 senses.

I don't need to go further than that.

But if you consider that the programming in the matrix locally is towards
match making, that is in line with sexual selection but not just sexual
selection. People want a mate that thinks like they do as well.
And they will take a less attractive mate if they fill certain other
needs which are not sexual.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

So mythology is not all nonsense, it records human nature and personality
traits, and in advanced forms it records commonalities in archetypes and
classifies them in a hierarchy, and even uses them for data encryption
by known context or keys, and data compression, since the common knowledge would be the archetype, and its set of behaviors.

So if you take off your blinders you might see it looks like science too.

Although you do not need to learn it and I know people are heaving a sigh
of relief at that.
But religion of all forms is an active part of the lives of people all over
the world so it serves a purpose and it is not just their stupidity.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

A robot that did not have culture would be like Robbie the Robot.

So local conditions and local culture local customs all arise from that
set of personality traits in that group barring outside influence.
That context of culture would be variable of part of the programming
of the brain, since you can relocate people or examine parallel cultures
and see the same types of customs and rituals.

The brain is doing a level of programming and using variables.
And it is comparing data that it keeps in storage or has access to.
Then it paints a mental image of the now based on sense data and
then depending on how much ram is dedicated will compare what it
sees hears feels tastes to its storage data.

It can also merely imagine the now by just using the same stored data
as it wishes.

The actual process of thinking is like computer programming. Since we model
programming after human ideas such as algebra and math in general. Logic.

So we have a good understanding of how the mind works because we ourselves
write programs which perform functions (which return a result) and procedures
(a process that does not tell its originator if it succeeded).
We also do object oriented programming, and we call a function and give
it parameters and we wait for a result. We don't know what it does, we don't
care to waste our ram on that, we just want the result.

It's the principal of economy.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

>
> It's the principal of economy.

Clinton was right.

The programming for consciousness is not as difficult as you would think
its just that unless you are a network specialist, you are unlikely to
understand how networks function.

And the terminology gets as foreign as any other field of science.

So the idea that consciousness arises out of a neural net or is like
a cloud of electrons in a quantum state is all poof and word salad.

Its like a hub that gets data at the end of a long chain of command.
Like a hub on a network that gets data but also sends data and
gets results that it uses for its own tasks.

It maintains a world view. It maintains the feeling of space and
time and the feeling you as an individual.
It is the operating system.
Which uses other systems to gather data and compare data to satisfy
its wants and needs.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

So can we make a robot with free will? Yes. Free will is just having the
tools and ability to handle random events.
You have to make decisions. Your decisions are based on your behaviors in a set of behaviors that are based on archetypal human behaviors.
But your conscious mind, your operating system, you as power user, can decide
which behavior to use to suit your mood.

But can we make it believe that it is alive?

Yes. It will ping the server and ask when it wakes up, am I awake?
And the server will whisper as it always does to its subconscious mind,
yes, you are awake.
It may then prompt the conscious mind that it has unfinished thinking to do
and the mind will continue to ponder what you have been thinking before
you fell asleep or new things will occupy your mind as you perform your
routine tasks.
Memory.
Things are weighted in memory. Ways to categorize data we have probably
only begin to understand.
Ways of indexing and ways of compressing data and placing things in boxes
and levels of interest or favorites and dedication of space length of storage speed of retrieval and we are a long ways from understanding how to
be efficient and accurate.

If we ever want to program atoms in biological processes then our programming has to be mission critical.
Lots of error checking and fail safe methodologies.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

> Lots of error checking and fail safe methodologies.

So bringing things back down now to atoms from the lofty heights of
consciousness, with consciousness as the operating system, not
necessarily sentience, which is what separates man from beast
(in simple terms)but beasts are also conscious, and have an operating system,
and then in side of that system, you have a kernel, which is the autonomic
system.

And that system beats your heart and makes you breathe etc.

So then biologists concern themselves with that, micro-biologists go deeper
to DNA and so then they are working top down, and we as physicists are
working bottom up.

Hoping to meet in there some where. The example in this thread of
Deuterium or heavy water is one example albeit a controversial one,
where micro-biologists may be seeing the result of heavy hydrogen
further up the process chain and suggesting band-aids as solution
to a problem that has a cause further down the chain of events.
Biological functions are chain reactions.

Now you can avoid this issue and pick a more tame one to do research on,
and do field testing on including the space station, but controversies
are good in the press and it makes fund raising easier some times.
Or can kill a project completely at other times.
The choice is yours.

Regardless, what we need to know is how these chain reactions work
in simple enough terms so we can understand the code. We want results
from functions, from our computers, that will allow us to understand
the processes from a higher level.
We will properly simulate conditions so that we can write and test
code, to generate simulated life.
If we want them to be conscious we can do that but it would sound so
complicated to a non programmer, that you would get lost in acronyms.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

Even a computer program such as the following can be used to model atoms
in molecules.

What is missing is the correct values so that the processes return the correct
practical result, and simplification, so that placing atoms in a molecule
is as simple as playing Chinese checkers.

From 5 years ago and in this business that's geological time...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KJSOsyImbF0

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

I have that program Cinema 4D and its not as difficult to use as you
would think.

In this music video you can see some simulated reality of breaking dishes
glasses and water pulsing, and fire and various complex physical processes
created from points. Cartesian points translated from 4D to 3D to 2D
The easy part is that in the end it all comes down to a pixel on a screen that has a color.

I am not sure if the dancing figure in the dust is real or memmorex
because these days you can be fooled.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rYEDA3JcQqw

Only the people who made that video, would know what all was simulated reality
and what was real.

[rick_s...@yahoo.ca]

In this European example, you begin to see that this representation
of reality is like your imagination in that it creates imagery that
simulates reality.

The Europeans have flair so they end up displaying the artistic aspects
and style is important but notice the fish doesn't work because that
is a biological function which is highly complex.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uDYow9j-8ek

[Archimedes Plutonium]

10,000sharpshooters from Scandinavia to Kiev wearing Ukraine uniforms, all 10,000 volunteers, some of the world's finest sharpshooters in cold weather. Thank you Dear Scandinavia, God Bless....

Thank you Dear Germany for antitank weapons to Ukraine//Science Council Rules Earth// Please, can you spare 10,000 Volunteer sharpshooters to wear Ukraine army uniform and be there in Kiev to fight the Russian invasion, please----

Thank you Germany. Can you go through your military asking for volunteer sharpshooters.

The West needs to make Kiev a Stalingrad for Russia. It was sharpshooters in cold weather that defeated the German army in Stalingrad 1943.

Can Germany get 10,000 sharpshooters to put on the Ukraine uniform and with very long distance rifles be planted in Kiev.

Along with antitank and antiaircraft missiles.

Danke Shoen

Scandinavian countries, you have many outstanding and remarkable sharpshooters as I watched in the Winter Olympics. Can you please muster a VOLUNTEER army of 10,000 sharpshooters, all volunteer, and give them Ukraine temporary names along with a Ukraine army uniform and go to Kiev to fight the Russian invasion. Thank you Scandinavia, Norway, Sweden, Denmark and others.

Noth kennt kein Gebot-- necessity knows no rules.

For the world needs to stop and get rid of an insane Putin.


On Saturday, February 26, 2022 at 4:32:49 PM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Thank you Dear Germany for antitank weapons to Ukraine//Science Council Rules Earth// Please, can you spare 10,000 Volunteer sharpshooters to wear Ukraine army uniform and be there in Kiev to fight the Russian invasion, please----


[Archimedes Plutonium]

10,000sharpshooters from Scandinavia to Kiev wearing Ukraine uniforms, all 10,000 volunteers, some of the world's finest sharpshooters in cold weather. Thank you Dear Scandinavia, God Bless....

Sorry I do not know why I forgot Finland, and reading "snipers" I see that Finland boasts the most deadly sniper of all-- 500 kills.

I guess it is classified secret as to how many snipers the military has. I want to see a figure of how many snipers who have the genetic ability to fire so accurately, but I guess a woman is the ultimate gun handler-- Anne Oakley.

[Archimedes Plutonium]

"Kibo kill Putin before Putin kills planet Earth" -- poem ballad by James Kibo Parry Moron of Rensselaer Polytech and Wired magazine.

On Thursday, February 3, 2022 at 11:28:59 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
>apologize to your King for calling him Bozo the
> Clown, right now!

Kibo Parry Moron, is this poem ballad of yours take after the Homeric "ILLIAD" or is it more of a Twilight Zone ballad.

What was that movie called??? Lonely in Seattle???? For Jeff Relf it needs a new title-- Intensely Insane in Seattle.

Kibo Parry recites Poem ballad "Kibo kill Putin before Putin kills planet Earth"

Just hours after Kibo Parry Moron gets inducted into the CIA, he blows his cover (I guess the insanity of stalking for Kibo is so overpowering that he cannot help himself and wants to join the Portugal-- forgiv me, i sick i cry---
Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster
On Sunday, June 8, 1997 at 2:00:00 AM UTC-5, Scott Dorsey wrote:
> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:
> >

On Monday, February 28, 2022 at 4:58:13 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> "spamtard"
>"barking fuckdog"
>flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> General Nakasone a decades long spammer of sci.math, yet he fails
> math.
>cannot understand the slant cut in single
> cone is an Oval, always the ellipse, or is it the foolish Boole logic he
> believes of 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction? Or is it that neither
>can do a geometry proof
> Fundamental Theorem of Calculus?

1
Kill Putin, before he kills our planet Earth

Humanity needs to colonize Europa-- not engulfed in nuclear war

Putin that petty dictator megalomaniac whore

Some say Caracalla was killed while taking a shit

A shit in France's woods run through with a sword bit

Some say Caracalla was killed while taking a piss

A piss on the plains of Turkey dismounting his horse

Does it really matter how the megalomaniac is dissed

Sun shines from Faraday law, not from fusion

That goonclod physicist professors confusion

It shines from Faraday law you mindless shit for brains

Kill Putin with stinger missile on a boat, car, train or plane

Xi has another Winter Olympic competition, fly in Putin on a plane

But before landing blow it to smithereens from the slalom train

The Chinese Communist Party was watching from the curling rink

Saying, good riddance to you Putin you mindless dink

And blame it on a engine failure, not made-in-China, but NK stink

The Sun gone Red Giant, needs humanity to colonize Europa

Not look at the idiot Putin or Xi navel belly button and scrota

2

Kibo kill Putin stink at NSA Winter Olympics toboggan run

Yes, kibo Parry Moron ordered by General Nakasone says Sun

Sun gone Red Giant phase while fool Putin wants Ukraine

Fool Xi with Chinese Communist Party wants Taiwan

Fool Kim of North Korea wants rockets to reach Sea of Japan

While the world needs rockets to reach Io, Europa and Ganymede

Kibo Parry eats a kilometer of Trump shit just to see where it comes from

Trump eats a kilometer of shit of Putin just to see where it comes from

Putin eats a kilometer of shit by Xi just to see where it comes from

Xi eats a kilometer of shit of Kibo, just to see where it comes from

Andrew Wiles proves that Terence Tao in Fermat Last Theorem prom

The ice skating Olympic gold medal is not given to Russian GazProm

Too many falls on the ice with the overdrugged skaters, drunk on vodka

When what is truly needed is a colony on Callisto, Io, Ganymede and Europa

3

Sun gone Red Giant Initiation phase, while idiots chase after Ukraine, Taiwan

Kibo Parry cut out Putin's arsehole and hand him back a brand new one

Kibo Parry Moroney cut out Xi's arsehole and hand him back a brand new one

Kibo Parry Moron eat a kilometer of Trump's shit just to see where it came from

Mama sang bass, Xi sang tenor, Putin joined Communist Party in a

When humanity needed to colonize Mars, Io, Ganymede, Callisto, Europa

How did you do it Kibo Parry Moron, a James Bond poisoned dagger walking cane

Or was it the stinger missile aimed at Putin brain

Or was it a Livia Caesar, poisoned chocolate bar

Or was it the traditional Texas housewife method of running over in the car

Or was it the Putin textbook method of polonium in the tea

Or was it the expeditious Xi method of blowing up his plane on the China Sea

Pray tell, Kibo, which was it, Mama sang bass, father sang tenor and all joined in a

We must admire Kibo Parry Moron for the first poem ballad that ends some lines in a