H a new form of radioactivity? Chapt15.62 Deriving Hund's rule from Maxwell Equations #1377 New Physics #1585 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed

[Archimedes Plutonium]

Alright, I am not going to be able to explain how the second electron
that fills a suborbital in the Hund's Rule is converted into a
positron and then the electron and positron combine to form a gamma
ray photon that provides those two electrons as perpetual motion
around the nucleus, until I derive Hund's rule out of the Maxwell
Equations. If I derive Hund's Rule then it should tell me how the
second electron is converted.

Well, I think the derivation answer is the combination of the Ampere/
Maxwell law with its displacement current and the Faraday law of
induction with its added term of magnetic current density. So the
Ampere law has this extra term of a displacement current and in Hund's
rule the electrons like to enter the p suborbitals singularly of 3
electrons so that they are parallel and attract (like iron in its 4
singular electrons in the d suborbitals). So the Ampere law with
displacement current is in fact part of Hund's rule where electrons
fill suborbitals singularly until they have to go to the next higher
energy level of the next subshell, and then the newer electrons
retrace back and fill the suborbitals with "paired electrons" of one
up electron and one down electron. So what Maxwell Equation is this up
electron matched with a down electron? And the answer is the magnetic
current density in the Faraday law with magnetic monopoles. Notice
that in the Ampere/Maxwell law the displacement current is of the same
sign, the same direction. But in the Faraday law, remember, we started
with a negative sign, so that when we have the magnetic density
current added to the Faraday law we have opposite directions involved.

So picture the oxygen atom of its p_x, p_y, p_z of its 3 suborbitals
and it has filled its 1s2 and 2s2 suborbitals and now has 4 electrons
to pack. Oxygen puts a singular electron into p_x another in p_y and a
third in p_z which is all the displacement current of Maxwell/Ampere
law of parallel currents attract and are less energy required of the
Minimum Path Principle. However, when oxygen gets to that fourth
electron of the p suborbitals, the least energy of packing is to
double up the p_x rather than throw that electron into the 3s. But as
the oxygen fills the p_x with the fourth electron, it runs into a
direction problem of the sign being negative in Faraday's law of
magnetic current density sign opposite to induction. So what happens
as the second electron fills the p_x is that the second electron is
converted from an electron of

E-
(137/2)M+

converted into a positron as such:

E+
(137/2)M-

And that conversion brings together the electron and positron to form
a gamma ray photon:

                E- 
(137/2)M+ (137/2)M- 
 
              E+

Now all of that makes very much sense, going back to Faraday in the
1830s where in one of his most famous lectures, he stated that "light
was a disturbance in the electromagnetic field". Light is essential to
electromagnetism because light is simply the combination of electrons
with positrons so that atoms can have perpetual motion.

In Nature, the singular hydrogen atom is unstable and does not exist
long by itself. It transmutes into a different particle if caught
alone. I do not know how long it survives nor what it transmutes into.
In Nature, hydrogen comes in H2 to be stable because in that form, the
electrons formed a gamma ray photon that has perpetual motion and thus
stable.

Only recently have astronomers found that the hydrogen seen in stars,
galaxies and Space are mostly H2, not H. What we need now, is
experiments designed to show us just how unstable H really is, and
what H transmutes into after a given specified time. H by itself
possibly becomes Cosmic rays, or Cosmic gamma ray bursts. It would be
interesting to find out the half-life of H, considering that its
singular electron has no perpetual motion. It looks like, to me, I
have opened up a whole brand new form of radioactivity, wherein all
atoms that have a singular electron in suborbitals are due to decay
unless they are chemically bonded. So here we may have a new
definition of chemistry bond as the seeking of an atom to not have a
isolated suborbital in the Hund's rule.

--

More than 90 percent of AP's posts are missing in the Google
newsgroups author search starting May 2012 until recently in May 2013.
Drexel University's Math Forum has many of those missing posts:

http://mathforum.org/kb/profile.jspa?userID=499986

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

[Archimedes Plutonium]

On May 18, 12:09 pm, Archimedes Plutonium
<plutonium.archime...@gmail.com> wrote:
(snipped)

>
> Only recently have astronomers found that the hydrogen seen in stars,
> galaxies and Space are mostly H2, not H. What we need now, is
> experiments designed to show us just how unstable H really is, and
> what H transmutes into after a given specified time. H by itself
> possibly becomes Cosmic rays, or Cosmic gamma ray bursts. It would be
> interesting to find out the half-life of H, considering that its
> singular electron has no perpetual motion. It looks like, to me, I
> have opened up a whole brand new form of radioactivity, wherein all
> atoms that have a singular electron in suborbitals are due to decay
> unless they are chemically bonded. So here we may have a new
> definition of chemistry bond as the seeking of an atom to not have a
> isolated suborbital in the Hund's rule.
>

Now a shocking thought came to me about this question of how long does
monatomic hydrogen survive since its lonely 1 electron is not
perpetual motion. And the idea here is that there is little difference
between a free neutron and a hydrogen atom H. There is a big
difference with molecular hydrogen of H2 since its electrons have
perpetual motion.

Now the mean lifetime of a free neutron is 15 minutes.

So the shocking thought to me is that perhaps H is just a neutron, or
vice versa, every neutron is just H.

So that H alone or a free neutron last until they decay in mean
lifetime of 15 minutes. That means they last until they find another
atom or molecule to bond with.

So the 15 minutes mean lifetime is the amount of time that a free
neutron or monatomic H atom finds another atom or molecule to bond
with.

Now there would be a nice experimental test for this idea. In that
free neutrons or monatomic H atoms confined in a vacuum should survive
longer than 15 minutes, much longer. Because their survival depends
only on how long they do not come into contact with other atoms or
molecules.

Now the easiest way of getting monatomic hydrogen is via free neutron
decay, or is it? I question this because if the neutron is really just
monatomic hydrogen, then they are one and the same particle.

--
More than 90 percent of AP's posts are missing in the Google

newsgroups author search from May 2012 to May 2013. 
Drexel
University's Math Forum has done a better job and many of those
missing posts can be seen here: