> >U.S. Naval Research Laboratory's Space Science Division in
Washington, described a new
> > method for quantifying increases in carbon dioxide in the hard-to-measure portion of the upper
> > atmosphere known as the thermosphere, which can't be reached by balloons and aircraft.
> > In that region, more than 50 miles above Earth's surface, carbon emissions cause cooling rather
> > than warming because carbon dioxide molecules collide with oxygen atoms and release heat
> > into space. Because such cooling makes the planet's atmosphere contract, it can reduce drag on
> > satellites and debris that orbit the earth, possibly having "adverse consequences for the orbital
> > debris environment that is already unstable," the researchers wrote.
What "new method" of "measuring" (quantifing increases) is being
The rest is silly conjecture.
"because carbon dioxide molecules collide with oxygen atoms and
release heat into space."
Are these collisions proven to be inelastic? This in a region where
the mean free path is
measured in yards rather than microns, each molecule is in its own
eliptical orbit around
the earth's COG, and each molecule has it own temperature that cannot
Just what "atmosphere" is "contracting"? Oh, what is there is no
What unbelievable fantasy will the Climate Clowns produce next?
Sam steals, not quotes from any source whatsoever!
No Heat effects from CO2! Never, ever been demonstrated!
No Greenhouse effect! Falsified in 1906, by Lord Kelvin!
No Greenhouse gasses! No gas prevents convection!
No Radiative forcing! Hansen weird buzzwords!
No Positive feedbacks! Hansen plural buzzwords!
No Net heat increase! 0.6 Watt/m^2 is Hansen's fakery!
No Climate science! Piss poor Political science mabe!
No Science! Ever from Sam Wormley!
I do deny that Climate Clowns use "any" science whatsoever!!
As Ben says, the Clowns deny science!