Top quark was an atom of tungsten, not lead? #34 Chemical Elements replacing Standard Model
Archimedes Plutonium
Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Call it the plastic model theory of particle physics.
>
> But I rather call it the Chemical Elements as Particles theory.
>
> The idea is very simple. In the Standard Model it never predicts mass
> of any particle, which thus tells us the
> Standard Model is not even science but just hand
> waving after the fact or postdiction, not what science
> is supposed to do-- prediction.
>
> I am using this site for reference:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orders_of_magnitude_(mass)
>
> Electron = 0.5 MeV or 9.11 x 10^-31 kg
>
> Muon = 106 MeV or 1.9 x 10^-28 kg
>
> Proton almost = Hydrogen atom almost = Neutron
>
> Silver atom = 1.79 x 10^-25 kg
>
> Z-boson = 1.6 x 10^-25 kg
>
> Top Quark = 3.1 x 10^-25 kg or 173 GeV
>
> Lead atom = 3.45 x 10^-25 kg
>
> (I hope the above listing is error free)
>
> Alright. Let us have a new theory for all of Particle Physics. A
> theory that for once predicts the mass of
> particles in advance.
>
> The name of this new theory is that Chemical Elements as Particles for
> obvious reasons.
>
> We start the theory with primary fundamental particles of Physics as
> these:
>
> electron
> muon
> proton
> neutron
>
> We also have primary-fundamental energy particles
>
> photon
> neutrino
>
> Now, we throw out all other particles or call them
> manufactured particles or secondary particles. Thus,
> all quarks are just prefabricated particles and those
> quarks are Chemical Elements.
>
> So that when the Top Quark was first noticed and announced as
> discovered in physics. Well, it was
> not a new fundamental particle but rather, the energy
> in the experiment came together to form a Chemical Element of Lead 208
> for a split second of time.
>
> When the Z boson was first discovered and announced
> from some Physics experiment, it was not a new particle discovered but
> merely the manufacturing of a atom of Silver.
>
> So in other words, the world of Physics has just a small and short
> list of fundamental particles and fundamental energy-particles as
> listed above. Quarks
> and all the other hobgoblin particles of the particle
> physics zoo are nothing but the plastic cut flower imitations of the
> Chemical Elements manufactured from the machines that focus alot of
> energy into one spot.
>
> So when the Physicists claimed that the Top Quark was found, they were
> mistaken. What they had done was manufacture and prefab a atom of lead
> for a split second of time.
>
> Now when LHC prefabs a atom of say Bismuth or an
> atom of Uranium and claims it to be a Higgs boson, they will be
> mistaken again as to what they found.
>
> Now one of the reasons the Higgs has never been discovered or claimed
> to have been found is because
> once you start making these plastic-chemical-elements
> like at LHC, the life-span of those plastic imitation elements is very
> brief.
>
> So for once a theory of Particle Physics that predicts
> not only the mass of these plastic particles but predicts the lifespan
> of observation.
>
> It may well be, that no machine can focus the energy,
> a machine like LHC, can focus the energy to produce a
> new plastic-imitation-element and mistakenly call it a
> new particle.
>
> This is where the Fusion Barrier Principle would come into the scene
> and say that there is a cutoff point for which no machine, even LHC
> can produce a new plastic-element. The Top-Quark, which is really an
> atom of lead or the Z-boson which is really an atom
> of silver, are pretty much at the limit or boundary of the
> Fusion Barrier Principle.
>
On several of Wikipedia's sites such as Top Quark and another site,
Wikipedia mentions an alleged fact. I cannot vouch for the truth or
falsity of this fact they mention. They mention that the energy of the
Top Quark is equivalent to an atom of Tungsten. I have listed an atom
of Lead Pb208 as the equivalent atom
in energy to the alleged Top Quark. Those scientists working in this
field of physics would know whether the
Top Quark is closer or more nearby to the energy equivalency of Pb208
or whether it is Tungsten atom.
The point I want to make is that the Fusion Barrier Principle steps
into the picture here. FBP would say that since Faradays Law for the
control and organization of new matter and energy as opposed by
the Coulomb Law of repulsion would place an upper bound or upper limit
as to what a machine can synthesize as a new chemical element. Before,
in the
history of Physics, we looked upon LHC as a particle
physics synthesizer, but in truth, LHC is a fusion tokamak machine
that is not trying to create fusion energy, but rather instead trying
to create a "quark particle fused together from protons, electrons and
neutrons.
So whereas ITER would try to create fusion energy, LHC is trying to
create a atom of tungsten or lead
or even uranium from fusing together protons.
So that FBP would enter the picture and say that no
machine can create or synthesize a Chemical Element
beyond tungsten atom. That the Maxwell law of Faraday's Law cannot be
violated by synthesizing an atom beyond tungsten because the Coulomb
law of
repulsion forbids it.
So that when Physicists drop their idiocy of the Standard Model of
Particle Physics and begin to apply
mathematics to the fusion of atoms by LHC, they will
begin to see, that they can predict how many atoms of
Tungsten that LHC can synthesize with their huge amount of focused
energy and for how long of a period of time their cross sections of
the events occurr.
In other words, with this Chemical Atom Synthesis theory, we can
predict beforehand the mass of a Tungsten atom (previously thought to
be a Top Quark) and for how long of a stretch of time it will be
observable.
So that Particle Physics will now be able to predict both mass and
time of event of particles created in these accelerators.
Now tungsten is wolfram element 74 if I remember
correctly with a mass of approx 184. Now element
109 is creatable or nucleosynthesizable. It has a mass
of approx 288. Now the Faraday Law is pictured as a
cylinder and the Coulomb Law is a sphere packed inside and the energy
of Faraday's Law is always 1/3
larger or that Coulomb is never more than 2/3 of Faraday's Energy. And
if we take 2/3 of 288 we come to about 190 which is rather close to
that of tungsten
at 184.
So based on that above short calculation, LHC or no
machine will ever produce a particle (which is really a
atom of a chemical element) that is what is commonly
bantered about as a Higgs boson.
Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
Autymn D. C.
http://google.com/groups?q=supergenium.
They can tell between the spectrum of quarks and nuclei. The former
are governt by color.
energy -> matter
period of time: A period is a period. -> time, while, stint, meal