Brian Cox: “Anyone who thinks the LHC will destroy the world is a
twat”. Source: THE BLACK HOLE CASE: THE INJUNCTION AGAINST THE END OF
THE WORLD. Eric E. Johnson. Page 858. http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0912/0912.5480.pdf
- - - -
I give 50% that in a several days CERN will create a “new quark-gluon
phase” of vacuum. This microscopic magnetized droplet of vacuum
(magnetic hole) will lead to chromomagnetic collapse (x-boson
condensation) of ordinary matter on it, and to explosion of Earth.
Take Brian Cox as a hostage. If CERN would not stop their LHC
experiment cut off the Brian's head.
- - - - - - -
Dozens of our appeals to presidents and prosecutors in order to forbid
the particle collisions with energy more than 0.1 TeV had failed.
There were even Nobel Prize winners, who had said about the dangers
from collider particle collisions. They were unable to stop the LHC
experiment.
We can see now that court cases are also failed.
So, we can wait only for some miracle forms of our salvation.
Here are some such forms, as I can see them:
1. Rebellion of citizens of Geneva with blocking the entrances to LHC.
2. Nuclear bombardment of LHC, Tevatron, RHIC, Dubna by terrorists.
3. Explosions of oil and gas pipes, leading to Europe.
4. Taking of some physicists as hostages and the threat to cut off
their heads if CERN would not stop the experiment leading to the
global extermination.
I would perform the third point, but I have no sufficient money and
time to buy explosives and to hire co-performers.
We all will be killed in a few days with probability of about 50%.
So, even the nuclear bombardment of LHC with killing of about of 10
000 of people, with 100% probability, is more humane, than explosion
of Earth by CERN and killing of 6 600 000 000 of people.
Copy this letter and send it to another forum; to physicists,
politicians, prosecutors, terrorists; to citizens of Geneva.
In several days? Chromomagnetic? Why don't you go on the
Art Bell show!
So "Magnetic" is a twat - a twat of the anonymous kind.
But I think we already knew that.
Dirk Vdm
One can appreciate why you find this to be threatening, queef.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz4.htm
Look at magnetic field on the video at this page.
http://blogs.physicstoday.org/newspicks/2010/02/rhic-finds-hints-to-why-we-exi.html
"RHIC finds hints to why we exist".
At RHIC there were achieved the value B=10^15 teslas. That was
unstable structure.
In a several days CERN physicists will create a stable microscopic
droplet of magnetized vacuum. This ferromagnetic structure will ruin
ordinary matter and will transform the Solar system into a new
“neutron star”. The critical magnetic field is 10^16 teslas. It does
not connected with rotation of a “neutron star” but is an inherent
property of x-bosons, constituent force-particles of a “neutron star”.
Read about magnetic properties of such stars, with magnetic holes
inside them, here http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0508219v1 "Color
Ferromagnetism of Quark Matter; a Possible Origin of Strong Magnetic
Field in Magnetars."
> At RHIC there were achieved the value B=10^15 teslas. That was
> unstable structure.
[snip rest of crap]
10^15 teslas? TESLAS? Ooooh - like... TWO bar magnets!
idiot
> The critical magnetic field is 10^16 teslas.
[snip rest of crap
idiot
--
Uncle Al
Ummm...sure you didn't change the sign of an exponent
somewhere along the way in your thinking?
(1 Tesla = 10,000 Gauss, by the way. A normal
bar magnet might get to the vicinty of, say, 0.1 T.)
Bob M.
Sarcasm.
Look up the mangetic field of a magnetar. 10X-100X more than that and
the vacuum goes dichroic, electron-positron pairs being ripped out of
the quantum vacuum. 10^5 teslas, 10^9 gauss, is sufficient to abolish
chemistry. Atomic electrons go into cyclotron resonance orbits about
the lines of force. Atoms stretch into elongated spindles. Chemical
bonding through spin anti-pairing is abolished.
The OP is a boring idiot.
1. Stable strangelets have never been observed in the universe.
2. White dwarfs prove that the kind of black holes that can be trapped
inside the collider do not exist and any other kind of black holes
would instantly evaporate.
Future colliders however, probably those beyond the theoretical Very
Large Hadron Collider which will be build in 2070 will probably have
to be built in space, far away from the earth. However I'm not sure if
it's possible to built a particle acclerator in space.
They do, of course, appear with alarming regularity in
Usenet newsgroups. Oh, wait - you said "stable," didn't
you?
Bob M.
They can't find 98% of their proton innards?
~ BG
Why would it not?
Read this arXiv:hep-ph/0508219v1 and you will find the value 10^18 G
(or 10^14 T) inside magnetars. (Color Ferromagnetism of Quark Matter;
a Possible Origin of Strong Magnetic Field in Magnetars)
Read this "Lattice QCD in strong magnetic fields"
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0909/0909.1808v2.pdf
and you will know what is "Magnetization of QCD vacuum".
It is easy to recive the value 10^15 T for RHIC.
But 10^16 T is critical! That is death!
----------
This droplet of vacuum has ferromagnetic properties. It is connected
by three forces: electric, magnetic, and color, oriented as vectors at
different planes. In can be created at 1-TeV collisions, where
magnetic field reaches the value about 10^16 T. Such abnormal quark-
gluon matter composes at least internal parts of some neutron stars,
named magnetars. 10^15 T quark gluon plasma (liquid) was achieved
already at RHIC. Look video at
http://blogs.physicstoday.org/newspicks/2010/02/rhic-finds-hints-to-why-we-exi.html
10^16 T quark gluon plasma (liquid) will not decay.
Fresh reading: "CERN on trial: could a lawsuit shut the LHC down?"
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20527485.700-cern-on-trial-could-a-lawsuit-shut-the-lhc-down.html
-----
Ivan Gorelik
http://darkenergy.narod.ru/
...and when ONCE AGAIN nothing happens, just with the last hundred dire
predictions from you, what will you do?
+
The new start of Planetary Guillotine is planned on the next Thursday,
February the 25-th. Physicists will start from 450-GeV energies per
proton. In a couple of weeks they will welcome journalists and will
show us the 7-TeV collisions (3.5 TeV per proton). Now they remind me
those young people, who tried to squeeze out from their car all what
it can give. Kids withdrew their exiting race on a camera, not
realizing yet that they had made the film about their last minutes of
life. Nothing had left from the car and kids, except the video-film.
Somebody had taken it and uploaded it into Internet. I’m curious,
where will journalists try to upload the film about the Last Minutes
of Earth’s Life?
You know, you have something wrong with you, really, badly wrong. Any
rational person who was as sure as you are that the world is about to end
would have something better to do than posting messages on USENET. Isn't
there _anything_ you want to do before you die other than see how obnoxious
you can be?
<plonk>
> The new start of Planetary Guillotine is planned on the next Thursday,
> February the 25-th. Physicists will start from 450-GeV energies per
> proton.
[snip rest of crap]
1) http://physics.aps.org/articles/v2/104
2) idiot
--
Uncle Al
Like posting it on "sci.physics" will prevent it. I wonder why he
didn't do something about it that is really meaningful. Like post it
on Twitter !-)
You, too, must know who is your potential killer.
Take action to prevent the possible global suicide.
> On Feb 20, 1:22 am, Darwin123 <drosen0...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> On Feb 19, 8:42 am, "J. Clarke" <jclarke.use...@cox.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > Magnetic wrote:
>> > > On Feb 18, 10:57 pm, Magnetic <magnetic.t...@yandex.ua> wrote:
>> > >> On Feb 18, 7:36 pm, Darwin123 <drosen0...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> > >>> On Feb 15, 6:26 am, Magnetic <magnetic.t...@yandex.ua> wrote:> Copy
>> > >>> this letter and send it to another forum; to physicists,
>> > >>>> politicians, prosecutors, terrorists; to citizens of Geneva and so
>> > >>>> on. - - - - -
>>
>> > >>>> Brian Cox: ?Anyone who thinks the LHC will destroy the world is a
>> > >>>> twat?. Source: THE BLACK HOLE CASE: THE INJUNCTION AGAINST THE END
>> > >>>> OF
>> > >>>> THE WORLD. Eric E. Johnson. Page
>> > >>>> 858.http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0912/0912.5480.pdf
>>
>> > >>>> - - - -
>> > >>>> I give 50% that in a several days CERN will create a ?new
>> > >>>> quark-gluon
>> > >>>> phase? of vacuum. This microscopic magnetized droplet of vacuum
>> > >>>> (magnetic hole) will lead to chromomagnetic collapse (x-boson
>> > >>>> condensation) of ordinary matter on it, and to explosion of Earth.
>>
>> > >>> I am going off my diet immediately!
>>
>> > > The new start of Planetary Guillotine is planned on the next
>> > > Thursday, February the 25-th. Physicists will start from 450-GeV
>> > > energies per proton. In a couple of weeks they will welcome
>> > > journalists and will show us the 7-TeV collisions (3.5 TeV per
>> > > proton). Now they remind me those young people, who tried to squeeze
>> > > out from their car all what it can give. Kids withdrew their exiting
>> > > race on a camera, not realizing yet that they had made the film about
>> > > their last minutes of life. Nothing had left from the car and kids,
>> > > except the video-film. Somebody had taken it and uploaded it into
>> > > Internet. I?m curious, where will journalists try to upload the film
>> > > about the Last Minutes of Earth?s Life?
>>
>> > >http://darkenergy.narod.ru/
>>
>> > You know, you have something wrong with you, really, badly wrong. Any
>> > rational person who was as sure as you are that the world is about to
>> > end would have something better to do than posting messages on USENET.
>> > Isn't there _anything_ you want to do before you die other than see how
>> > obnoxious you can be?
>>
>> Like posting it on "sci.physics" will prevent it. I wonder why he
>> didn't do something about it that is really meaningful. Like post it
>> on Twitter !-)
>
> You, too, must know who is your potential killer.
> Take action to prevent the possible global suicide.
...and when 6 months go by with nothing, will you still be doing this or
will you realize you are wrong and go away?
http://miniblackhole.achtphasen.net/Sancho/madolf_ct.pdf
Luis Sancho. A Quark Cannon in the Fractal Universe.
p.149
Mr. Wilczek, a Nobel prize, called the liquid with a more ominous
name, ice-9 and said it could blow the Earth.
…Instead of opening an investigation of the matter, CERN asked all
employees NOT to talk about Ice-9 and state there was no risk…
p. 153 Sheldon Glasgow, a Nobel Prize…
“…A new-born strangelet could engulf atomic nuclei, growing
relentlessly, and ultimately consuming the entire Earth..”
But after, Wilczek and Glasgow were hired by CERN to defend their
Global Guillotine.
Be ready to be killed, or take action to stop the global suicide.
http://darkenergy.narod.ru/
Scandal at CERN.
New article in German:
http://www.firmenpresse.de/pressinfo164449.html
-----------
Take action. Save yourself. Ban experiments at energies more than 0.1
TeV per particle at head-on colliders.
Dear Magnetic,
Very nice of you I suppose to help the effort to popularize and
spread publicity about LHC.
More reports in the press, regardless of content, will help get
funding I suppose.
Seeing as these high energy collisions happen on Earth every day,
it's kind of hard for me to see why the presence of millions of euros
worth of detectors around the collision will cause the sudden
destruction of the Earth, but I guess there must be something wrong
with my reasoning:
Cheers -
Cheers Cheers Cheers
-----------------
THE BLACK HOLE CASE: THE INJUNCTION
AGAINST THE END OF THE WORLD
ERIC E. JOHNSON
p. 858
In August 2008, with the public opening of the LHC coming within
weeks,
John Ellis gave a talk in the CERN auditorium in which he sought “to
provide
the ammunition” that CERN people could use to convince others that the
collider poses no danger.357
After reviewing the scientific arguments that the LHC is safe, Ellis
explained that a question that worried him more than whether humanity
was
safe from the LHC, was the opposite—whether the LHC was safe from
humanity.358
Ellis then briefed the audience on unfavorable press reports, the
various
lawsuits filed to stop the LHC, and a public opinion poll indicating
that most
people thought the LHC was not worth the risk.359 Ellis also
introduced the
audience to Richard Posner, whom Ellis said he found “really
worrying.”360
Wrapping up, Ellis came to what his presentations slides labeled “The
Best
Answer.”361
“So, to finish,” Ellis said, “the way to stop all this argument about
whether
the LHC is going to destroy the planet is to get the LHC working.”362
“Within a few weeks time, we will know that LSAG was right.”363
Of course, in making such a statement, Ellis either showed that he
misapprehends the relevant physics, which seems highly doubtful, or he
revealed himself to be disingenuous.
-------------
Police, stop John Ellis.
Courts, sentence him to death.
Otherwise J.Ellis, R.Heuer, I.Tkachov, B.Cox and other potential
killers of Earth will murder all of you.
----------
In some articles about neutron stars (pulsars, magnetars) and about
magnetized vacuum lattices, created at colliders, the authors use a
formula:
qB = 2*pi*k / L^2 (in ?atomic? units).
q- charge of a “down” quark; B – external magnetic field; L- parameter
of a vacuum lattice; k-integers.
Let’s rewrite this formula in SI and let k=1. Let forget about quark
and use this formula for proton.
qB = 2*pi*h / L^2
Let’s multiply both sides of the formula by cr, where c – speed of
light; r- Compton radius of a proton.
crqB = 2*pi*h*c*r / L^2.
Using p=crq (proper magnetic moment, which is more then orbital moment
by 2), and 2*pi*r =L, and h*c/L=mc^2:
pB = mc^2.
This is the formula of a “black hole”, connected by magnetic forces,
or simply “magnetic hole”, which are dipole.
Here is analogues formula for black hole, connected by gravity forces
GMm/R = mc^2/2.
Magnetic hole is 10^36 times stronger than gravity hole!
Magnetic hole created at LHC will have the radius about 10^-16 meters
(black hole – 10^-51 meters).
At the collider RHIC they already received the field 10^15 teslas.
They already computed that in the centers of magnetars is almost the
same field.
Tomorrow they are ready to start the LHC collider.
The critical field, 10^16 teslas, will be achieved at the LHC.
The embryo of neutron star (magnetic black hole) will be created at
LHC.
The Earth can be exploded in a 1000 seconds.
Are you happy?
Best regards, Ivan Gorelik.
-----------------
Some articles: where you can find the formula (qB), or (qH), or (eH)…
arXiv:0711.2845v1 Spontaneous creation of chromomagnetic field and A0-
condensate at high temperature on a lattice
arXiv:0710.1084v2 Axial anomaly and magnetism of nuclear and quark
matter
arXiv:hep-ph/0508219v1 Color Ferromagnetism of Quark Matter ; a
Possible Origin of
Strong Magnetic Field in Magnetars
arXiv:hep-lat/9210028v1 The Savvidy “ferromagnetic vacuum” in three-
dimensional lattice gauge theory
arXiv:0912.1413v1Chiral and Diquark condensates at large magnetic
field in two-flavor superconducting quark matter
arXiv:1002.0418v1 Chiral Magnetic Effect and Chiral Phase Transition
arXiv:0807.2917v1 QCD Vacuum Properties in a Magnetic Field from AdS/
CFT: Chiral Condensate and Goldstone Mass
arXiv:0909.1808v2 Lattice QCD in strong magnetic fields
arXiv:hep-ph/9703201v1 QUARK CONDENSATE IN A MAGNETIC FIELD.
arXiv:hep-ph/0205348v3 Magnetic catalysis and anisotropic confinement
in QCD
arXiv:0706.3208v3The chiral condensate in a constant electromagnetic
field
I'll bet you a million dollars that the Earth isn't destroyed
tomorrow. And fifty million that it isn't destroyed within this
calendar year.
You going to take that bet? If not, then shut the fuck up.
> Tomorrow they are ready to start the LHC collider. The Earth can be
> exploded in a 1000 seconds!
....and when it doesn't?
I think you should light yourself on fire in protest. That'll get you some
attention.
[snip rest of spew, unread]
Why should he take a bet which neither you nor him can ever pay up? He
doesn't have a million dollars, and I doubt he even has a hundred. So
he can't pay up. I don't know how much you have.
Even if you have a billion dollars, you would never pay up. The
reason is that if he is right, you will both be dead. Neither of you
dead people you will have beneficiaries or lawyers to handle your
estates. So the bet won't matter, anyway.
The thing to do is to bet against a Creationist that the world
doesn't end tomorrow. This way, you only have to pay in the afterlife.
Quite simple .. if he's so sure he is right, then he has nothing to
lose. It doesn't have to be a million .. a thousand would do .. half
his life savings would be fine. if he is right (and he is so certain
he is from post after post of how the world will be destroyed by the
LHC) then he won't need his life savings anyway .. so it is a zero
cost bet for him. And it would prove how sincere he is about his
beliefs..
Come on magnetic .. a million? ten thousand? one hundred? How
confident are you REALLY that the LHC is going to destroy the earth
tommorrow? or next week? or this year? Put your money where your
mouth is.
Am I wrong?
No.
Experiment at LHC will say us the truth.
A. If we all will die than dangerous condensate is possible.
B. If Geneva or whole Europe will be ruined then dangerous condensate
is possible and it can decay because of overheating.
C. If we all survive then dangerous condensate can not be created at
this energy or it is impossible.
I give the following probabilities for 3.5 TeV energies per particle
and if a billion of collisions would be performed.
A. 49%.
B. 2%.
C. 49%.
I give the following probabilities for 7 TeV energies per particle and
if a billion of collisions would be performed.
A. 69%.
B. 3%.
C. 28%.
7 TeV probabilities include 3.5 TeV probabilities. That means that if
we survive after billion of 3.5 TeV collisions then the probabilities
for 7 TeV will be:
A. 20%.
B. 1%.
C. 79%.
In any case (A, B, C) I am not wrong, because I give probabilities per
good final and per bad final.
I am not a terrorist.
Terrorists are those, who conduct this Experiment and those, who
promote it.
I think that the most dangerous terrorists are the authors of LSAG
report.
Here is a phrase, told by one of them, by John Ellis:
“So, to finish the way to stop all this argument about whether the LHC
is going to destroy the planet is to get the LHC working. Within a few
weeks time, we will know that LSAG was right.”
Source: THE BLACK HOLE CASE: THE INJUNCTION AGAINST THE END OF THE
WORLD. ERIC E. JOHNSON http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0912/0912.5480.pdf
p. 858
http://darkenergy.narod.ru/
So far, those wizards at LHC are only missing or having lost track of
90% proton mass, and if they keep going and going with this colliding
process should create either black holes or ice-9.
How paramagnetic or diamagnetic are these protons?
How paramagnetic or diamagnetic are those quarks?
With trillions upon trillions of spare quarks running lose, what could
possibly go wrong?
~ BG
.
Besides Sirius(B) going supernova and taking Sirius(A) out at the same
time, Can LHC create a local quark fueled nova?
http://blogs.physicstoday.org/newspicks/2010/02/rhic-finds-hints-to-why-we-exi.html
So far, those mostly public funded wizards at LHC are only missing or
having lost track of 98% proton mass, and if they keep going and going
with this colliding process should create either black holes, hot
quark soup or ice-9.
Why can’t they tell us about the 98% missing mass:
How paramagnetic or diamagnetic are these protons?
How paramagnetic or diamagnetic are those quarks?
With trillions upon trillions of spare/rogue quarks running lose, what
> LHC and probability of global death.
>
> Am I wrong?
Yes. Please STFU.
[snip rest]
We all will be killed in a few days with probability of about 50%. So,
even the nuclear bombardment of LHC with killing of about of 10 000 of
people, with 100% probability, is more humane, than explosion of Earth
by CERN and killing of 6 600 000 000 of people.
-----------
http://darkenergy.narod.ru/
> On Feb 27, 12:33 am, eric gisse <jowr.pi.nos...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Magnetic wrote:
>> > LHC and probability of global death.
>>
>> > Am I wrong?
>>
>> Yes. Please STFU.
>>
>> [snip rest]
>
> We all will be killed in a few days with probability of about 50%. So,
...so I would say that a week of operation should be sufficient to prove you
are wrong.
Wait, we already had that last year. Oh well.
>Magnetic wrote:
>> We all will be killed in a few days with probability of about 50%. So,
>...so I would say that a week of operation should be sufficient to prove you
>are wrong.
>Wait, we already had that last year. Oh well.
Nor has the operation of the Tevatron for years, no has the 4+ billion
years of bombardment by cosmic rays with 7 orders of magnitude more energy
than the LHC could ever produce.
Existence of high energy cosmic rays (protons or ions) does not give
any guarantee that the same particle collisions are safe at head-on
colliders.
Indeed dangerous particle condensate (Condensate) can be created at
both cases.
It is obvious that Condensate has its rest energy and binding energy.
It was proved that total binding energy of Condensate is smaller than
kinetic energy of atmospheric particles in the system of Condensate,
if it was created by collision of cosmic particle with atmospheric
one. Consequently, cosmo-atmospheric Condensate would be ruined
immediately. But collider Condensate will not be ruined and it can
grow, if this growth is permitted by physical laws.
Till now there were theoretically described several types of
Condensates: pion condensate, stranglet, magnetized vacuum, magnetic
vacuum domain, magnetic holes and so on. In fact, the mentioned types
of condensates are different approximations to one and the same
Condensate, which can be created in Nature or in a physical
experiment. These approximations were grounded on different types of
forces. I tried to investigate Condensate, which is connected
presumably by magnetic forces. Now I can see that my results coincide
quite good with the results, received in the investigations of
Condensate, connected by pions (pion condensate, Migdal), gluon
condensate (Savvidy), sea quark-antiquark pairs, strange quarks...
The main conclusion: Condensate can be created at particle collision
with energy of about 1-TeV per particle.
It is clear, at least for me, that microscopic droplet of Condensate
will be created very soon at LHC. This can lead to further rapid
explosion of Earth and extermination of our Civilization. Particle
physicists will not stop their experiments, because the stop of these
high-energy experiments will mean that they do recognize that these
collisions are really dangerous for the whole Earth. The recognition
of the danger will mean that most of particle physicists are already
criminals or global terrorists, - they did not stop their dangerous
experiments despite court cases and disputes, lasting nearly ten
years.
So, dear citizens, be ready to near death. You all will be murdered
soon by criminals, who name themselves as scientists.
---------------
Copy this letter and send it to another forum; to physicists,
politicians, prosecutors, terrorists; to citizens of Geneva and so on.
rolf.heuer(at)cern.ch, cern.reception(at)cern.ch,
visits.service(at)cern.ch, press.office(at)cern.ch,
john.ellis(at)cern.ch, jean-pierre.koutchouk(at)cern.ch
rudiger.voss(at)cern.ch, patricia.mage(at)cern.ch,
felicitas.pauss(at)cern.ch, external.relations(at)cern.ch, council-
president(at)cern.ch, fc-chairman(at)cern.ch, spc-chairman(at)cern.ch,
scientific-secretary(at)cern.ch, council-secretariat(at)cern.ch
----------
Brian Cox: “Anyone who thinks the LHC will destroy the world is a
twat”. Source: THE BLACK HOLE CASE: THE INJUNCTION AGAINST THE END OF
THE WORLD. Eric E. Johnson. Page 858. http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0912/0912.5480.pdf
I give 50% that in a several days CERN will create a “new quark-gluon
phase” of vacuum. This microscopic magnetized droplet of vacuum
(magnetic hole) will lead to chromomagnetic collapse (x-boson
condensation) of ordinary matter on it, and to explosion of Earth.
Take Brian Cox as a hostage. If CERN would not stop their LHC
experiment cut off the Brian's head.
Dozens of our appeals to presidents and prosecutors in order to forbid
the particle collisions with energy more than 0.1 TeV had failed.
There were even Nobel Prize winners, who had said about the dangers
from collider particle collisions. They were unable to stop the LHC
experiment.
We can see now that court cases are also failed.
So, we can wait only for some miracle forms of our salvation.
Here are some such forms, as I can see them:
1. Rebellion of citizens of Geneva with blocking the entrances to LHC.
2. Nuclear bombardment of LHC, Tevatron, RHIC, Dubna by terrorists.
3. Explosions of oil and gas pipes, leading to Europe.
4. Taking of some physicists as hostages and the threat to cut off
their heads if CERN would not stop the experiment leading to the
global extermination.
I would perform the third point, but I have no sufficient money and
time to buy explosives and to hire co-performers.
We all will be killed in a few days with probability of about 50%. So,
even the nuclear bombardment of LHC with killing of about of 10 000 of
people, with 100% probability, is more humane, than explosion of Earth
by CERN and killing of 6 600 000 000 of people.
Copy this letter and send it to another forum; to physicists,
politicians, prosecutors, terrorists; to citizens of Geneva.
rolf.heuer(at)cern.ch, cern.reception(at)cern.ch,
visits.service(at)cern.ch, press.office(at)cern.ch,
john.ellis(at)cern.ch, jean-pierre.koutchouk(at)cern.ch
rudiger.voss(at)cern.ch, patricia.mage(at)cern.ch,
felicitas.pauss(at)cern.ch, external.relations(at)cern.ch, council-
president(at)cern.ch, fc-chairman(at)cern.ch, spc-chairman(at)cern.ch,
scientific-secretary(at)cern.ch, council-secretariat(at)cern.ch
Will you still be doing this next year?
Magnetism of light is more importanat than its electric energy
oscillation level.
Mitch Raemsch
+++++++++++++++++++++++++
Copy and send, otherwiser: +++++++++++++++++!
[snip all]
We're still here. Maybe tomorrow?
As long as you like playing Russian roulette, let the good LHC times
roll.
So what if they can't account for 98% of their proton mass.
~ BG
I reread the LSAG report once more and found there another error. The
binding energy of constituent element of strangelet is not several
MeV, as they wrote there, but about 500 MeV. So, all their talks about
thermal bath are erroneous. Strange matter is very dangerous!
The value 500 TeV, as a binding energy of (uds) in a strangelet N(uds)
can easily be received from comparison with the rest energy of kaons K
+ and K0, which are correspondingly 493 MeV and 497 MeV.
Kaons (K+ = us~; K0 = ds~) can be side products, occurring at the time
of proton (p=uud) and neutron (n=udd) capture by strange matter
N(uds):
N(uds) + p = (N+1)(uds) + K+ = (N+1)(uds) + e+ + 500 MeV.
(N+1)(uds) + n = (N+2)(uds) + K0 = (N+2)(uds) + 500 MeV.
…
Extremely powerful explosion.
This explosion has specific energy output, which is hundred times
bigger than under the nuclear explosion.
By the way, at the time of November-December collisions there were
more Kaons output that it was theoretically predicted. That means that
we are very close to creation of this dead droplet which can transform
the whole Earth into 10-meterr lump of strange\dead matter.
Space observations says us that periods of pulsars are almost do not
change. That means that strange matter is very stable.
Read about strange matter, strangelets, and strange stars in
Wikipedia. I think that our civilization is crazy. From one hand, it
already knows about a deadly dangerous strange matter; from the other
hand, it tries to create that dead droplet at colliders. I do not
understand you, people.
I wish you to become mentally healthy and STOP all powerful colliders.
Thanks for addressing the relevant cosmic ray physics.
One could argue that any condensate weak enough to be easily destroyed
by another high energy particle won't be able to destroy the Earth.
However, for the sake of argument and discussion of relevant cosmic
ray physics, lets consider that the combined momentum of the colliding
particles in the Earth frame is important.
Remember that these high energy cosmic rays are nearly isotropic and
also collide with each other.
In the volume of the inner heliosphere, there are often such
collisions that have a combined momentum of almost anything you
choose.
For example, imagine two 10^18 eV cosmic rays colliding head on just
in front of the Earth as it swings around the sun at 30 km/s. Even
better, imagine them colliding almost nearly head-on, such that any
combined reaction product will have a speed of 29 km/s just in front
of the Earth. Any reaction product would slowly drift into the
Earth. These reaction products could drift into us from any
direction.
These ultra-high cosmic rays come at a frequency on the order of one
per square kilometer per year. That might not sound like much, but
the Earth gives us a cross section on the order of 100 million square
kilometers. So in the last billion years, we have had on there order
of 10^17 of these CRs hit us. Every one of these events had more
energy per nucleon than the LHC can provide.
When you consider the whole volume of the solar system, these
collisions are even more frequent. Consider for example how many
times two 10^16 eV cosmic rays (LHC energy?) have collided near the
sun, with momenta such that any reaction product would slowly drift
into the sun. Well I guess I'll leave that one as an exercise for the
reader :P
Cheers -
Probability of such collisions is very small. If it can occur less
than one time per billion years and if the stability of dangerous
condensate is “proportional” to the number of its constituent elements
then we can conclude that destruction of Earth by “cosmic-cosmic”
condensate is almost improbable.
Destruction of Earth by “cosmic-atmospheric” condensate is impossible
because of binding energy argument.
Destruction of Earth by collider-made condensate is very probable.
> In the volume of the inner heliosphere, there are often such
> collisions that have a combined momentum of almost anything you
> choose.
>
> For example, imagine two 10^18 eV cosmic rays colliding head on just
> in front of the Earth as it swings around the sun at 30 km/s. Even
> better, imagine them colliding almost nearly head-on, such that any
> combined reaction product will have a speed of 29 km/s just in front
> of the Earth. Any reaction product would slowly drift into the
> Earth. These reaction products could drift into us from any
> direction.
>
> These ultra-high cosmic rays come at a frequency on the order of one
> per square kilometer per year. That might not sound like much, but
> the Earth gives us a cross section on the order of 100 million square
> kilometers. So in the last billion years, we have had on there order
> of 10^17 of these CRs hit us. Every one of these events had more
> energy per nucleon than the LHC can provide.
>
> When you consider the whole volume of the solar system, these
> collisions are even more frequent. Consider for example how many
> times two 10^16 eV cosmic rays (LHC energy?) have collided near the
> sun, with momenta such that any reaction product would slowly drift
> into the sun. Well I guess I'll leave that one as an exercise for the
> reader :P
>
> Cheers –
Well, let’s solve this problem, if the life-time of dangerous droplet
with N about 100 is such as for neutrons. And if N about 1000,
t=infinity.
What a masterfull scam to weasel out of weeks of predicting doom.
You are entitled to "Master weasel troll"
Prove it, jackass. The spectrum of cosmic rays above 2TeV is known rather
well.
[snip rest, unread]