On 10/6/2012 1:32 AM, Painius wrote:
>
>>> Personally, I am still completely skeptical when it comes to FTLS of
>>> material objects; however
>>
>>
>> However what? You believe that NON-material objects can travel faster
>> than light? Are we talking ghosts here? What do you mean by a
>> 'non-material' object? Is that like your non-trivial' deity? (lol)
>
> I'm not yet convinced that there isn't a way to make entanglement work
> for us to send intelligent information long distances instantaneously.
> OMG - now I've done it! LMFBO !
Now I understand your point. Now I get it. You believe that the power of prayer reaches god instantaneously. Now it all makes sense.
You should assign Bert to make a 'theory' on it titled:
The Speed Of A 'Non-Material' Prayer To A 'Non-Material' God.
> On 10/6/2012 1:32 AM, Painius wrote:
> >
> >>> Personally, I am still completely skeptical when it comes to FTLS of
> >>> material objects; however
> >>
> >>
> >> However what? You believe that NON-material objects can travel faster
> >> than light? Are we talking ghosts here? What do you mean by a
> >> 'non-material' object? Is that like your non-trivial' deity? (lol)
> >
> > I'm not yet convinced that there isn't a way to make entanglement work
> > for us to send intelligent information long distances instantaneously.
> > OMG - now I've done it! LMFBO !
> Now I understand your point. Now I get it. You believe that the power of
> prayer reaches god instantaneously. Now it all makes sense.
> You should assign Bert to make a 'theory' on it titled:
> The Speed Of A 'Non-Material' Prayer To A 'Non-Material' God.
On Sun, 07 Oct 2012 06:56:05 -0400, HVAC <mr.h...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 10/6/2012 1:32 AM, Painius wrote:
> >>> Personally, I am still completely skeptical when it comes to FTLS of
> >>> material objects; however
> >> However what? You believe that NON-material objects can travel faster
> >> than light? Are we talking ghosts here? What do you mean by a
> >> 'non-material' object? Is that like your non-trivial' deity? (lol)
> > I'm not yet convinced that there isn't a way to make entanglement work
> > for us to send intelligent information long distances instantaneously.
> > OMG - now I've done it! LMFBO !
>Now I understand your point. Now I get it. You believe that the power of >prayer reaches god instantaneously. Now it all makes sense.
>You should assign Bert to make a 'theory' on it titled:
>The Speed Of A 'Non-Material' Prayer To A 'Non-Material' God.
>I see a Nobel in your future! (I'm psychic)
It's such a head rush to see one's name in a thread header!
You're a really good friend, Harlow, thank you very much!