Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

The form of atomic shells for electrons

0 views
Skip to first unread message

BURT

unread,
Nov 19, 2009, 4:42:43 PM11/19/09
to
I believe they are round. There are 4 fundamental sizes of the atom.
They can change when there is a quantum jump as in heating water or
light absorbtion for energy level transition. 4 electron shells mean 4
sizes of the atom. This is important.

Mitch Raemsch

Aleph

unread,
Nov 19, 2009, 5:27:20 PM11/19/09
to
In article <c74cb44e-7f11-43e0-99b5-ba1bca3b4465
@x25g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, macro...@yahoo.com says...

>
> I believe they are round. There are 4 fundamental sizes of the atom.

Wow. What are these sizes?

> They can change when there is a quantum jump as in heating water or
> light absorbtion for energy level transition. 4 electron shells mean 4
> sizes of the atom.

Amazing. Do you think that *every* atom has four electron shells? What
about subshells? How do you explain anything heavier than Krypton?

> This is important.

You conflate crazy with important.


Bill Snyder

unread,
Nov 19, 2009, 5:33:18 PM11/19/09
to
On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 22:27:20 -0000, Aleph
<Usene...@gishpuppy.com> wrote:

>In article <c74cb44e-7f11-43e0-99b5-ba1bca3b4465
>@x25g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, macro...@yahoo.com says...
>>
>> I believe they are round. There are 4 fundamental sizes of the atom.
>
>Wow. What are these sizes?

Not sizes, shapes. Fire is a tetrahedron, Earth is a cube, Air is
an octahedron, and Water is an icosahedron.

(Hey, ancient Greek atomic science makes as much sense as most of
what gets posted here.)

--
Bill Snyder [This space unintentionally left blank]

BURT

unread,
Nov 19, 2009, 5:37:53 PM11/19/09
to
On Nov 19, 2:27 pm, Aleph <Usenet....@gishpuppy.com> wrote:
> In article <c74cb44e-7f11-43e0-99b5-ba1bca3b4465
> @x25g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, macromi...@yahoo.com says...

>
>
>
> > I believe they are round. There are 4 fundamental sizes of the atom.
>
> Wow. What are these sizes?
>
> > They can change when there is a quantum jump as in heating water or
> > light absorbtion for energy level transition. 4 electron shells mean 4
> > sizes of the atom.
>
> Amazing. Do you think that *every* atom has four electron shells? What
> about subshells? How do you explain anything heavier than Krypton?

The shells increase in size for more electrons because they are no
slope spheres. That is the math.

Mitch Raemsch


>
> > This is important.
>
> You conflate crazy with important.

The atom is dark until it radiates.

Mitch raemsch

Aleph

unread,
Nov 19, 2009, 5:39:54 PM11/19/09
to
In article <iohbg51d9u56gvncv...@4ax.com>, sent to
sci.physics on Thu, 19 Nov 2009 16:33:18 -0600, Bill Snyder
<bsn...@airmail.net> imparted these words of wisdom:

>
> On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 22:27:20 -0000, Aleph
> <Usene...@gishpuppy.com> wrote:
>
> >In article <c74cb44e-7f11-43e0-99b5-ba1bca3b4465
> >@x25g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, macro...@yahoo.com says...
> >>
> >> I believe they are round. There are 4 fundamental sizes of the atom.
> >
> >Wow. What are these sizes?
>
> Not sizes, shapes. Fire is a tetrahedron, Earth is a cube, Air is
> an octahedron, and Water is an icosahedron.
>
> (Hey, ancient Greek atomic science makes as much sense as most of
> what gets posted here.)

That easily makes as much sense as Mitch's posting... Infact it is a lot
more elegant because it doesn't choke on Rubidium.

Hey, Mitch - are you reading this? You need to change your ideas to meet
the thinking of classical era Greeks. What does that tell you?

--
Aleph

This article was posted to USENET, please reply in that manner. Emails
to this account will be ignored.

Inertial

unread,
Nov 19, 2009, 5:43:19 PM11/19/09
to
"Aleph" <Usene...@gishpuppy.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.256fd66a7...@news.virginmedia.com...

That is part of being crazy

Aleph

unread,
Nov 19, 2009, 6:02:37 PM11/19/09
to
In article <c13de2b2-0f57-4c56-9687-fd3d81df8104
@f1g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, sent to sci.physics on Thu, 19 Nov 2009
14:37:53 -0800 (PST), BURT <macro...@yahoo.com> imparted these words
of wisdom:
>
> On Nov 19, 2:27 pm, Aleph <Usenet....@gishpuppy.com> wrote:
> > In article <c74cb44e-7f11-43e0-99b5-ba1bca3b4465
> > @x25g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, macromi...@yahoo.com says...
> >
> >
> >
> > > I believe they are round. There are 4 fundamental sizes of the atom.
> >
> > Wow. What are these sizes?
> >
> > > They can change when there is a quantum jump as in heating water or
> > > light absorbtion for energy level transition. 4 electron shells mean 4
> > > sizes of the atom.
> >
> > Amazing. Do you think that *every* atom has four electron shells? What
> > about subshells? How do you explain anything heavier than Krypton?
>
> The shells increase in size for more electrons because they are no
> slope spheres. That is the math.

Oh, dont you love your words. Can we try to make sense next time please?

It should be an easy to answer question: You have claimed that EVERY
atom has four electron shells, so how do you explain (for example)
Rubidium? How many shells does it have? How many electrons in each
shell?

> >
> > > This is important.
> >
> > You conflate crazy with important.
>
> The atom is dark until it radiates.

ROTFLMAO.

Do you autogenerate your crap or are you a real person? I am convinced
you are a bot, but it is entertaining to occasionaly taunt you.

Aleph

unread,
Nov 19, 2009, 6:08:31 PM11/19/09
to
In article <008f4e6b$0$26877$c3e...@news.astraweb.com>, sent to
sci.physics on Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:43:19 +1100, Inertial
<relat...@rest.com> imparted these words of wisdom:

>
> "Aleph" <Usene...@gishpuppy.com> wrote in message
> news:MPG.256fd66a7...@news.virginmedia.com...
> ><snip>

> >
> > You conflate crazy with important.
>
> That is part of being crazy

Very true. It was silly of me to overlook that blatant fact.

PD

unread,
Nov 19, 2009, 7:23:01 PM11/19/09
to

Chapter 8 of any introductory chemistry book.

BURT

unread,
Nov 19, 2009, 7:37:22 PM11/19/09
to

No. Chapter * is different in every book because they are written by
different people.

Mitch Raemsch

Y.Porat

unread,
Nov 20, 2009, 2:39:57 AM11/20/09
to
On Nov 20, 12:27 am, Aleph <Usenet....@gishpuppy.com> wrote:
> In article <c74cb44e-7f11-43e0-99b5-ba1bca3b4465
> @x25g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, macromi...@yahoo.com says...

>
>
>
> > I believe they are round. There are 4 fundamental sizes of the atom.
>
> Wow. What are these sizes?
>
> > They can change when there is a quantum jump as in heating water or
> > light absorbtion for energy level transition. 4 electron shells mean 4
> > sizes of the atom.
>
> Amazing. Do you think that *every* atom has four electron shells? What
> about subshells? How do you explain anything heavier than Krypton?
>
> > This is important.
>
> You conflate crazy with important.

--------------------
fucker idiot gangster Aleph - Varney

IS YOUR KNOWLEDGE BETTER THAN THAT??
moron piggy gangster !!
Y.P
-------------------

Y.Porat

unread,
Nov 20, 2009, 2:46:50 AM11/20/09
to

-----------------
a lot of fairy tales !!!
in aheavy Atom
there is no direct connection between
number of elctrons and Protons

some of the Protons lost their
electric charge
while making the inner nuc connections!!

in your fucking crippled models
there are no' inner' Protons and
peripheral -outer Protons
for you it is all one big mess
(of ignorance !!)
so you teach people your ignorance !!

Y.P
-------------------------

Gerard Westendorp

unread,
Nov 20, 2009, 4:21:09 AM11/20/09
to
Check out the Wikipedia article:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_orbital

Electrons arrange in shells called orbitals.
Their shape is known.

Gerard

Aleph

unread,
Nov 20, 2009, 4:34:30 AM11/20/09
to
In article <e5c9886a-6f71-4c72-934f-
089896...@u25g2000prh.googlegroups.com>, sent to sci.physics on Thu,
19 Nov 2009 16:37:22 -0800 (PST), BURT <macro...@yahoo.com> imparted
these words of wisdom:
>

How would you know? How many text books have you read in your life?

(based on your "four electron shells" idea, I'd suspect the answer is
indistinguishable from zero)

Aleph

unread,
Nov 20, 2009, 4:36:10 AM11/20/09
to
In article <1f4ecc1a-0ac1-4e22-918f-
3e5618...@a32g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>, sent to sci.physics on Thu,
19 Nov 2009 23:39:57 -0800 (PST), Y.Porat <y.y....@gmail.com> imparted
these words of wisdom:
>

Temper temper, stalkerboi. Have I upset your alter ego Burt? Are you
really Burt with a nymshift? Did you feel neglected because I wasnt
insulting you enough?

Dont spread your cluelessness any further than you need to.

Aleph

unread,
Nov 20, 2009, 4:48:14 AM11/20/09
to
In article <2645b2dd-cb12-49ff-8c06-416f7b5bc243
@j14g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>, sent to sci.physics on Thu, 19 Nov 2009
23:46:50 -0800 (PST), Y.Porat <y.y....@gmail.com> imparted these words
of wisdom:

>
> On Nov 20, 2:23 am, PD <thedraperfam...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Chapter 8 of any introductory chemistry book.
>
> -----------------
> a lot of fairy tales !!!
> in aheavy Atom
> there is no direct connection between
> number of elctrons and Protons

ROTFLMAO.

> some of the Protons lost their
> electric charge
> while making the inner nuc connections!!
>
> in your fucking crippled models
> there are no' inner' Protons and
> peripheral -outer Protons
> for you it is all one big mess
> (of ignorance !!)
> so you teach people your ignorance !!

You are priceless. You are so clueless you dont even come close to
realising how clueless you are.

Wonderful.

Inertial

unread,
Nov 20, 2009, 4:29:29 AM11/20/09
to
"Y.Porat" <y.y....@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:2645b2dd-cb12-49ff...@j14g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...

> On Nov 20, 2:23 am, PD <thedraperfam...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Nov 19, 3:42 pm, BURT <macromi...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> > I believe they are round. There are 4 fundamental sizes of the atom.
>> > They can change when there is a quantum jump as in heating water or
>> > light absorbtion for energy level transition. 4 electron shells mean 4
>> > sizes of the atom. This is important.
>>
>> > Mitch Raemsch
>>
>> Chapter 8 of any introductory chemistry book.
>
> -----------------
> a lot of fairy tales !!!
> in aheavy Atom
> there is no direct connection between
> number of elctrons and Protons

So they have a new charge

> some of the Protons lost their
> electric charge
> while making the inner nuc connections!!

Then they aren't protons any more

> in your fucking crippled models
> there are no' inner' Protons and
> peripheral -outer Protons
> for you it is all one big mess
> (of ignorance !!)
> so you teach people your ignorance !!

The ignorant one here is you .. not us

Uncle Al

unread,
Nov 20, 2009, 2:19:33 PM11/20/09
to
BURT wrote:
>
> I believe they are round.
[snip crap]

The atom is flat and only 6000 years old.

> Mitch Raemsch

Hey stooopid Raemsch - hypo-orchidism plus hypospadias? How greatly
empowered you are to piss into your own eyes.

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz4.htm

PD

unread,
Nov 20, 2009, 2:44:22 PM11/20/09
to

OK, then:
Chapter 5 in McMurry/Fay, Chemistry, 5e
Chapter 7 in Tro, Chemistry, 1e
Chapter 6 in Averill/Eldredge, Chemistry, 1e
Chapter 6 in Brown/LeMay/Bursten/Murphy/Woodward, Chemistry, 11e
Chapter 7 in Hill/Petrucci/McCreary/Perry, General Chemistry, 4e
Chapter 3 in McMurry/Fay, General Chemistry, 1e
Chapter 8 in Petrucci/Harwood/Herring/Madura, General Chemistry, 9e

BURT

unread,
Nov 20, 2009, 2:54:44 PM11/20/09
to
> Chapter 8 in Petrucci/Harwood/Herring/Madura, General Chemistry, 9e- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

The four sizes of the atom have not been properly recognised by
science.

Mitch Raemsch

PD

unread,
Nov 20, 2009, 3:34:02 PM11/20/09
to

Yes, of course. Then there's the problem that experimental
measurements agree with what science has recognized, not with what you
propose.
But heck, experimental measurements are just pesky details. Why worry
about them?

It's also not been properly recognized by geographers that there are
in fact four undiscovered continents.

It's also not been properly recognized by biologists that tables and
chairs are alive.

It's also not been properly recognized by mathematicians that there is
no such number as zero, because zero is nothing and therefore can't be
a number which is a something.

PD

iman way

unread,
Nov 20, 2009, 3:41:21 PM11/20/09
to
On 20 نوفمبر, 11:36, Aleph <Usenet....@gishpuppy.com> wrote:
> In article <1f4ecc1a-0ac1-4e22-918f-
> 3e56184ca...@a32g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>, sent to sci.physics on Thu,
> 19 Nov 2009 23:39:57 -0800 (PST), Y.Porat <y.y.po...@gmail.com> imparted
> to this account will be ignored.- إخفاء النص المقتبس -
>
> - عرض النص المقتبس -

I am happy to be a member of this group and I consider you my friends.
As a friend , I like to share with you some thoughts that I believe
will be useful for your life.

Merits of Islam in the Relationship Between Men &Women

1- Islam encourages marriage to prevent committing adultery, and
considers marriage to be one of the ways of the Messengers;The
Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said: “O
young people, whoever among you can afford to get married, let him do
so, for it helps one to lower the gaze and protect the private parts
(i.e., remain chaste). Whoever cannot afford it, let him fast, for it
is a protection for him.” 2- If a man wants to get married but is
unable to spend on a wife, then he should adhere to the words of Allah.
24:33 “And let those who find not the financial means for marriage
keep themselves chaste, until Allâh enriches them of His Bounty”
3- Islam urges people to get married, and prohibits celibacy and
castration. It is forbidden to forego getting married even if the
intention is to devote oneself to worship. “There is no monasticism in
Islam.” because they are against his nature, and against having
children.

4- Islam forbids adultery for the sake of reserving lineages, and to
prevent unlawful pregnancies and social problems.17: 32. And come not
near to the unlawful sexual intercourse. Verily, it is a Fâhishah
[i.e. anything that transgresses its limits (a great sin)], and an
evil way (that leads one to Hell unless Allâh forgives him).

5- Islam forbids accusing others of adultery and considers it a great
sin. 24: 15. When you were propagating it with your tongues, and
uttering with your mouths that whereof you had no knowledge, you
counted it a little thing, while with Allâh it was very great.

6- Islam prohibits a man to be alone with a woman who is not a
relative he can’t marry, because that causes temptation to do immoral
and evil actions. The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon
him) said: “No man is alone with a (non-mahram) woman but the Satan is
the third one present.”

7- Islam forbids unlawful sexual relationships and marrying a woman
not chaste.5: 5. Made lawful to you this day are AtTayyibât [all kinds
of Halâl (lawful) foods, which Allâh has made lawful (meat of
slaughtered eatable animals, etc., milk products, fats, vegetables and
fruits, etc.). The food (slaughtered cattle, eatable animals, etc.) of
the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians) is lawful to you and
yours is lawful to them. (Lawful to you in marriage) are chaste women
from the believers and chaste women from those who were given the
Scripture (Jews and Christians) before your time.

————————–
For more information about Islam

http://english.islamway.com/

http://www.islamhouse.com/

http://www.discoverislam.com/

http://www.islambasics.com/index.php

http://english.islamway.com/

http://www.islamtoday.net/english/

http://www.islamweb.net/ver2/MainPage/indexe.php

http://www.sultan.org/

http://www.islamonline.net/

Contact Us At

Imanwa...@gmail.com

BURT

unread,
Nov 20, 2009, 3:44:17 PM11/20/09
to
> PD- Hide quoted text -

>
> - Show quoted text -

Because chemistry's shell form is all wrong they could not determine
the four fundamnetal sizes of the atom.

Mitch Raemsch

PD

unread,
Nov 20, 2009, 3:45:52 PM11/20/09
to

Chemistry's shell form is what agrees with experimental data. It's a
little hard to announce that it's all wrong anyway, given that it does
so well with experiment.

PD

BURT

unread,
Nov 20, 2009, 3:48:10 PM11/20/09
to

The shell form is sphere. Spheres are universal form in the aether
even light.

Mitch Raemsch

Aleph

unread,
Nov 20, 2009, 4:30:33 PM11/20/09
to
In article <e4441719-97ab-460c-b670-cfd23c7fe5cc@
37g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>, sent to sci.physics on Fri, 20 Nov 2009
12:41:21 -0800 (PST), iman way <imanw...@gmail.com> imparted these
words of wisdom:
>
> I am happy to be a member of this group and I consider you my friends.
> As a friend , I like to share with you some thoughts that I believe
> will be useful for your life.

I dont think you are where you think you are. But then again, I think
your post was autogenerated to spam huge amounts of google groups.

Aleph

unread,
Nov 20, 2009, 4:32:44 PM11/20/09
to
In article <c881f1b1-ab5e-46e0-b7da-d9bb06552c85
@t11g2000prh.googlegroups.com>, sent to sci.physics on Fri, 20 Nov 2009
12:48:10 -0800 (PST), BURT <macro...@yahoo.com> imparted these words
of wisdom:

>

> The shell form is sphere. Spheres are universal form in the aether
> even light.
>

You must be a bot. A clueless bot at that.

PD

unread,
Nov 20, 2009, 4:41:14 PM11/20/09
to
On Nov 20, 3:32 pm, Aleph <Usenet....@gishpuppy.com> wrote:
> In article <c881f1b1-ab5e-46e0-b7da-d9bb06552c85
> @t11g2000prh.googlegroups.com>, sent to sci.physics on Fri, 20 Nov 2009
> 12:48:10 -0800 (PST), BURT <macromi...@yahoo.com> imparted these words

> of wisdom:
>
>
>
> > The shell form is sphere. Spheres are universal form in the aether
> > even light.
>
> You must be a bot. A clueless bot at that.
>

Mitch used to be coherent, but unfortunately he had deteriorated in
the last year or so.
Now it kind of bubbles out of him in a kind of compulsive, staccato
stream.

What's interesting is the interaction between Mitch and MPC. MPC wants
to just talk to hear himself talk (heaven knows why he does it here)
and doesn't really want interactions with other human beings.

But the two of them have this odd, perverse symbiosis going on in a
couple threads, feeding each other helplessly.

Aleph

unread,
Nov 20, 2009, 5:19:31 PM11/20/09
to
In article <37921d25-c716-427d-855c-
2a8a8d...@a21g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>, sent to sci.physics on Fri,
20 Nov 2009 13:41:14 -0800 (PST), PD <thedrap...@gmail.com>
imparted these words of wisdom:
>
> On Nov 20, 3:32 pm, Aleph <Usenet....@gishpuppy.com> wrote:
> > In article <c881f1b1-ab5e-46e0-b7da-d9bb06552c85
> > @t11g2000prh.googlegroups.com>, sent to sci.physics on Fri, 20 Nov 2009
> > 12:48:10 -0800 (PST), BURT <macromi...@yahoo.com> imparted these words
> > of wisdom:
> >
> >
> >
> > > The shell form is sphere. Spheres are universal form in the aether
> > > even light.
> >
> > You must be a bot. A clueless bot at that.
> >
>
> Mitch used to be coherent, but unfortunately he had deteriorated in
> the last year or so.
> Now it kind of bubbles out of him in a kind of compulsive, staccato
> stream.
>
> What's interesting is the interaction between Mitch and MPC. MPC wants
> to just talk to hear himself talk (heaven knows why he does it here)
> and doesn't really want interactions with other human beings.
>
> But the two of them have this odd, perverse symbiosis going on in a
> couple threads, feeding each other helplessly.

ROTFLMAO.

It will degenerate into a clueless event horizon.

BURT

unread,
Nov 20, 2009, 5:30:07 PM11/20/09
to
On Nov 20, 1:32 pm, Aleph <Usenet....@gishpuppy.com> wrote:
> In article <c881f1b1-ab5e-46e0-b7da-d9bb06552c85
> @t11g2000prh.googlegroups.com>, sent to sci.physics on Fri, 20 Nov 2009
> 12:48:10 -0800 (PST), BURT <macromi...@yahoo.com> imparted these words

> of wisdom:
>
>
>
> > The shell form is sphere. Spheres are universal form in the aether
> > even light.
>
> You must be a bot. A clueless bot at that.
>
> --
> Aleph
>
> This article was posted to USENET, please reply in that manner. Emails
> to this account will be ignored.

I believe in universal form. It is round.

Mitch Raemsch

socratus

unread,
Nov 20, 2009, 5:40:25 PM11/20/09
to
Can such heretical atom exist in the nature ?
Atom : Electron & Proton / new idea /

Pauli wrote in 1924
" Each quantum state in the atom is not limited
of two electrons, but only of one electron"

It means in the atom can be only one single electron
The electron manages the atom
If the atom contains more than one electron
(for example – two) this atom represents “ Siamese twins”
Save us God of having many electrons in one single atom
and one single cell.
=== .
Best wishes.
Israel Sadovnik. Socratus.

Aleph

unread,
Nov 20, 2009, 5:56:34 PM11/20/09
to
In article <27320ae0-9bb1-4de1-beab-49a44cc96d36
@y32g2000prd.googlegroups.com>, sent to sci.physics on Fri, 20 Nov 2009
14:30:07 -0800 (PST), BURT <macro...@yahoo.com> imparted these words
of wisdom:
>
> On Nov 20, 1:32 pm, Aleph <Usenet....@gishpuppy.com> wrote:
> > In article <c881f1b1-ab5e-46e0-b7da-d9bb06552c85
> > @t11g2000prh.googlegroups.com>, sent to sci.physics on Fri, 20 Nov 2009
> > 12:48:10 -0800 (PST), BURT <macromi...@yahoo.com> imparted these words
> > of wisdom:
> >
> >
> >
> > > The shell form is sphere. Spheres are universal form in the aether
> > > even light.
> >
> > You must be a bot. A clueless bot at that.
> >
>
> I believe in universal form. It is round.
>


So what? Show me you aren't a bot by responding to something I actually
said rather than just trotting out crap you think sounds "deep and
meaningful."

What you "believe" is neither here nor there.

BURT

unread,
Nov 20, 2009, 6:00:07 PM11/20/09
to

Shells are full of electrons. They are their aether.

Mitch Raemsch

Aleph

unread,
Nov 20, 2009, 6:10:36 PM11/20/09
to
In article <fc0bb9de-7018-414f-9ef4-7d9a2846dab9
@m7g2000prd.googlegroups.com>, sent to sci.physics on Fri, 20 Nov 2009
15:00:07 -0800 (PST), BURT <macro...@yahoo.com> imparted these words
of wisdom:

>

> Shells are full of electrons.

Burt is full of shit.

Y.Porat

unread,
Nov 21, 2009, 1:36:31 AM11/21/09
to

just forget about it as soon as possible -

in case you dont want to live in the
'modern physics medieval times''
including armis of 'priests'
that make their living from their
' crippled religion '

Y.Porat

unread,
Nov 21, 2009, 1:44:49 AM11/21/09
to
On Nov 20, 11:29 am, "Inertial" <relativ...@rest.com> wrote:
> "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...@gmail.com> wrote in message

-----------------
Hi Mr Feuerbacher from Heidelberg

i think we had an agreement
that i dont bother you
and you dont bother me
rigth Mr psychopath moron parrot??
that cant control lhis primitive instincts??
2
there are no 2 kinds of charge
there isonly one kind of stupid parrots!!
3
the Proton is not defined only by its electric charge
it has its inner structre of your silly quarkes as well
while in fact those quarks are only
10 percent of the whole story
4
dont you idiot moron crook
teach me physics
you have my book and you should understand better that i am talking
about
5
you are a Nazi pig **thief*** as well !!

Y.P
---------------------------

Aleph

unread,
Nov 21, 2009, 4:24:26 AM11/21/09
to
In article <02e72aad-aef8-456e-9a9b-
4e962c...@k17g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>, sent to sci.physics on Fri,
20 Nov 2009 22:44:49 -0800 (PST), Y.Porat <y.y....@gmail.com> imparted
these words of wisdom:

>

> i think we had an agreement

It seems fairly clear to me that what you *think* is rarely even close
to reality.

> that i dont bother you
> and you dont bother me

What makes you think you bother anyone else? You are a clown and, as a
result, poking fun at you is entertaining.

Keep it up Yogi Pootrat.

Robert Higgins

unread,
Nov 21, 2009, 10:10:46 AM11/21/09
to

Like Poor Rat has.

>
> in case you dont want to live

like Poor Rat, envious of people who actually bothered to learn
something.

> in the
> 'modern physics medieval times''

Hate to tell you, Mr. Rat, but this is the standard theory in
chemistry. It has been such a "failure" that we have synthesized
millions of compunds with it.

> including armis of 'priests'
> that make their living from their
> ' crippled   religion '

Yet strangly, sick people race to the pharmacy to buy the products of
this "crippled religion" whenever they get sick.

PD

unread,
Nov 23, 2009, 9:35:59 AM11/23/09
to
On Nov 20, 3:32 pm, Aleph <Usenet....@gishpuppy.com> wrote:
> In article <c881f1b1-ab5e-46e0-b7da-d9bb06552c85
> @t11g2000prh.googlegroups.com>, sent to sci.physics on Fri, 20 Nov 2009
> 12:48:10 -0800 (PST), BURT <macromi...@yahoo.com> imparted these words

> of wisdom:
>
>
>
> > The shell form is sphere. Spheres are universal form in the aether
> > even light.
>
> You must be a bot. A clueless bot at that.

Mitch used to make a little more sense, but something has gone slowly
wrong.
Now it seems like he just needs to vent these staccato remarks just to
stay on this side of completely losing it.

Aleph

unread,
Nov 23, 2009, 10:16:59 AM11/23/09
to
On Monday 23 November 2009 14:35, in <6e0b0675-
edf4-47c1-83b...@g23g2000vbr.googlegroups.com>, PD sat down and
wrote the following words of wisdom:

It is very, very charitable of you to say he is on this side of losing it
(depending on which side you think we are on...)

--
Aleph

This message was posted to usenet so please reply that way. Emails to
this account are very likely to be ignored.

Y.Porat

unread,
Nov 23, 2009, 10:47:51 AM11/23/09
to
On Nov 21, 5:10 pm, Robert Higgins <robert_higgins...@hotmail.com>
wrote:

---------------------
nothig to do with your fucken
many shell moddel
of one electron for one proton
you use only the outer 'shells'
2
pharmacy has very little to do with
**any* tetail of your fucken model
and besides
pharmacy as is now
is
(listen careful idiot parrot crook)

IT IS MOSTLY A TRIAL AND ERROR
PRACTICE !!
nasty fuckers lairs like you
are experts of decorating THEMSELVES

WITH THE FEATHERS OF OTHERS !!!

BYE
nasty pig


Aleph

unread,
Nov 23, 2009, 10:56:00 AM11/23/09
to
On Monday 23 November 2009 15:47, in <ccb90702-920b-48ac-9351-
bb438e...@31g2000vbf.googlegroups.com>, Y.Porat sat down and wrote the
following words of wisdom:

> BYE
> nasty pig

Are you leaving this newsgroup? (Please say yes)

tj Frazir

unread,
Nov 23, 2009, 2:25:18 PM11/23/09
to
I got you busted ABA ,,you went to jail because i sent your pages to
your sherriff and you got busted and went away for a year.
Now that you know its your big mouth that got you busted ,,leep it shut

http://community.webtv.net/GravityPhysics/WhaleSteamEngineA

Aleph

unread,
Nov 23, 2009, 2:49:55 PM11/23/09
to
In article <3426-4B0...@storefull-3111.bay.webtv.net>, sent to
sci.physics on Mon, 23 Nov 2009 14:25:18 -0500, tj Frazir
<Gravity...@webtv.net> imparted these words of wisdom:

>
> I got you busted ABA ,,you went to jail because i sent your pages to
> your sherriff and you got busted and went away for a year.
> Now that you know its your big mouth that got you busted ,,leep it shut
>

Liar, liar, pants on fire.

If you think you GOT ME BUSTED for anything, or that you can, then go
for it.

Just like your "promise" to pay the Relf, this is just part of your
fantasist lies.

Robert Higgins

unread,
Nov 23, 2009, 3:02:29 PM11/23/09
to

As you've been told a hundred times, shells are for high school. We
use ORBITALS.

> 2
> pharmacy has very little  to  do with
> **any*  tetail of your fucken model
> and  besides
> pharmacy as is now
> is
> (listen careful idiot parrot  crook)
>
>  IT IS MOSTLY A TRIAL AND ERROR
> PRACTICE !!

Yes, if the make an error in the dosage, there will be a trial!

You know something about medicinal chemistry? Hahaha...

>  nasty fuckers lairs  like you
> are experts of decorating THEMSELVES
>
> WITH     THE    FEATHERS OF OTHERS !!!
>
> BYE
> nasty pig

Nothing tastier than poor RAT-ON-A-STICK.

tj Frazir

unread,
Nov 23, 2009, 8:26:05 PM11/23/09
to
You cant read stupid .
It says ABA .
who are you dumbass ?
why wuld you answer for ABA unless your aba

http://community.webtv.net/GravityPhysics/WhaleSteamEngineA

Aleph

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 5:33:03 AM11/24/09
to
On Tuesday 24 November 2009 01:26, in
<3426-4B0...@storefull-3111.bay.webtv.net>, tj Frazir sat down and
wrote the following words of wisdom:

> You cant read stupid .

You cant write, spell or think, retard.

> It says ABA .

Your posts are always full of crap.

> who are you dumbass ?

I am Thaddedeus P Wildebeast, who the fuck are you fantasy boy?

> why wuld you answer for ABA unless your aba

Why would you answer for fucktards unless you were a fucktard?

Autymn D. C.

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 8:46:46 PM11/24/09
to
On Nov 23, 12:02 pm, Robert Higgins <robert_higgins...@hotmail.com>
wrote:

> On Nov 23, 10:47 am, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Yet strangly, sick people race to the pharmacy to buy the products of
> > > this "crippled religion" whenever they get sick.
>
> > ---------------------
> > nothig to do with your fucken
> > many shell moddel
> > of one electron for one proton
> > you use only the outer 'shells'
>
> As you've been told a hundred times, shells are for high school. We
> use ORBITALS.

You don't say subshell?

Why don't ye stick with English: trender, trendel.

jdawe

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 9:22:13 PM11/26/09
to
On Nov 20, 8:42 am, BURT <macromi...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I believe they are round

+

Linear

-Josh.


BURT

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 10:54:48 PM11/26/09
to
> On Nov 20, 8:42 am, BURT <macromi...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > I believe they are round
>
> +
>


Shells because they are sphere have no slope. And they are immaterial
aether.

Mitch Raemsch

jdawe

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 11:53:33 PM11/26/09
to

The shell ( path ) through aether is not physical.

However, it requires 2 opposing ways of movement to operate:

Circular

or

Linear

In other words:

Circular orbiting\circular spin

+

Linear vertical axis\linear horizontal axis

-Josh.

BURT

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 11:59:44 PM11/26/09
to

Josh the atom is not straight.

Mitch Raemsch

jdawe

unread,
Nov 27, 2009, 12:11:40 AM11/27/09
to
> Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

It's:

Circular

+

Linear

All shapes of energy\matter are formed through:

Circular

+

Linear

Want me to say it again?

-Josh.

BURT

unread,
Nov 27, 2009, 12:24:22 AM11/27/09
to
> -Josh.- Hide quoted text -

>
> - Show quoted text -

NO. But shells are not straight in any way they are round all of the
way.

jdawe

unread,
Nov 27, 2009, 12:33:43 AM11/27/09
to
> way.- Hide quoted text -

>
> - Show quoted text -

all of the way around a linear vertical axis and a linear horizontal
axis.

-Josh.

Y.Porat

unread,
Nov 28, 2009, 6:07:49 AM11/28/09
to
On Nov 23, 5:56 pm, Aleph <Usenet....@gishpuppy.com> wrote:
> On Monday 23 November 2009 15:47, in <ccb90702-920b-48ac-9351-
> bb438ea90...@31g2000vbf.googlegroups.com>, Y.Porat sat down and wrote the

> following words of wisdom:
>
> > BYE
> > nasty pig
>
> Are you leaving this newsgroup? (Please say yes)
>
> --
> Aleph
>
> This message was posted to usenet so please reply that way. Emails to
> this account are very likely to be ignored.

----------------
over your dead stinking body (:-)
nasy pig psychopath
Josef could be proud of you
------------------------

Aleph

unread,
Nov 28, 2009, 3:37:47 PM11/28/09
to
In article <5abc1854-6b88-4c03-8806-365dcd0f12c6
@f16g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>, sent to sci.physics on Sat, 28 Nov 2009
03:07:49 -0800 (PST), Y.Porat <y.y....@gmail.com> imparted these words
of wisdom:
>
> ----------------
> over your dead stinking body (:-)
> nasy pig psychopath
> Josef could be proud of you
> ------------------------

A shame, still, without you USENET would be one person closer to being a
place where rational, intelligent people can discuss sensible things. We
can't have that, can we?

Why didnt you call me a gangster? I am hurt.

BURT

unread,
Nov 28, 2009, 6:58:37 PM11/28/09
to

Electric force is radial flow pushing electrons away from one another
in the aether.

Y.Porat

unread,
Nov 28, 2009, 11:31:31 PM11/28/09
to
On Nov 28, 10:37 pm, Aleph <Usenet....@gishpuppy.com> wrote:
> In article <5abc1854-6b88-4c03-8806-365dcd0f12c6
> @f16g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>, sent to sci.physics on Sat, 28 Nov 2009
> 03:07:49 -0800 (PST), Y.Porat <y.y.po...@gmail.com> imparted these words

> of wisdom:
>
>
>
> > ----------------
> > over your dead stinking  body (:-)
> > nasy pig psychopath
> > Josef could be proud of you
> > ------------------------
>
> A shame, still, without you USENET would be one person closer to being a
> place where rational, intelligent people can discuss sensible things. We
> can't have that, can we?
>
> Why didnt you call me a gangster? I am hurt.
>
> --
> Aleph
>
> This article was posted to USENET, please reply in that manner. Emails
> to this account will be ignored.

-------------------
Josef Goebbels could be proud of you

you never spoke a single word of science
it is a fact that
anyone can see it
fucken homo gangster psychopath

i just wonder who is the idiot gangster who pay your salary !!
---------------------------------
----------------------

Aleph

unread,
Nov 29, 2009, 5:53:15 AM11/29/09
to
In article <2997d6bd-dbb1-41ee-83db-
36f538...@j19g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>, sent to sci.physics on Sat,
28 Nov 2009 20:31:31 -0800 (PST), Y.Porat <y.y....@gmail.com> imparted
these words of wisdom:

> Josef Goebbels could be proud of you

I doubt it, in fact I think we would disagree on pretty much everything.
You dont realise that though, because you are blinded to reality by the
mix of your senility and frothing hatred of everyone who disagrees with
you.



> you never spoke a single word of science

Neither have you. Your vague "predictions" are not science.

> it is a fact that
> anyone can see it

woooo... I am so hurt.

> fucken homo gangster psychopath

Since when did I become gay, or is this just you letting us know what
your fantasies are. Is your real name Bernie Maddoff?

> i just wonder who is the idiot gangster who pay your salary !!

Do you know how many times you have asked this? Do you know how many
times I have answered?

Y.Porat

unread,
Nov 29, 2009, 10:33:56 PM11/29/09
to
On Nov 29, 12:53 pm, Aleph <Usenet....@gishpuppy.com> wrote:
> In article <2997d6bd-dbb1-41ee-83db-
> 36f538a82...@j19g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>, sent to sci.physics on Sat,
> 28 Nov 2009 20:31:31 -0800 (PST), Y.Porat <y.y.po...@gmail.com> imparted

> these words of wisdom:
>
> > Josef Goebbels could be proud of you
>
> I doubt it, in fact I think we would disagree on pretty much everything.
> You dont realise that though, because you are blinded to reality by the
> mix of  your senility and frothing hatred of everyone who disagrees with
> you.
>
> > you never spoke  a single word of science
>
> Neither have you. Your vague "predictions" are not science.
>
> > it is a fact that
> > anyone can see it
>
> woooo... I am so hurt.
>
> >  fucken homo gangster psychopath
>
> Since when did I become gay, or is this just you letting us know what
> your fantasies are. Is your real name Bernie Maddoff?
>
> > i just wonder who is the idiot gangster who pay your salary    !!
>
> Do you know how many times you have asked this? Do you know how many
> times I have answered?
>
> --
> Aleph
>
> This article was posted to USENET, please reply in that manner. Emails
> to this account will be ignored.

----------------
psychopath
------------------------

Aleph

unread,
Nov 30, 2009, 2:20:29 PM11/30/09
to
In article <69c6db58-985c-427f-a804-
859c01...@m26g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>, sent to sci.physics on Sun,
29 Nov 2009 19:33:56 -0800 (PST), Y.Porat <y.y....@gmail.com> imparted
these words of wisdom:
>

>
> ----------------
> psychopath
> ------------------------

42 lines of text to say that pointlessness... Wow, you really do have a
strong anti-social urge, dont you poohrat?

Anyway, was that the best you could come up with? I would have expected
more fr0thing. Maybe I should insult you a bit....?

0 new messages