Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
sci.physics.research
+ new post
About this group
Subscribe to this group
This is a Usenet group - learn more
Message from discussion Joy Christian's Work on Bell's Inequality
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Daryl McCullough  
View profile  
 More options Feb 4 2012, 6:16 am
Newsgroups: sci.physics.research
From: Daryl McCullough <stevendaryl3...@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2012 11:16:07 +0000 (UTC)
Local: Sat, Feb 4 2012 6:16 am
Subject: Re: Joy Christian's Work on Bell's Inequality
Print | View thread | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author

On Thursday, February 2, 2012 5:18:04 AM UTC-5, Joy Christian wrote:
> script-A and script-B are statistically independent events,
> generated by different bivectorial scales of dispersion for each
> a and b (i.e., different standard deviations for each a and b).

How can you say that two variables are "statistically independent
events" if they are deterministic functions of the *same* variable
mu? Not only that, you have a *formula* for computing script-A
and script-B, and according to that formula, script-A is equal
to the negative of script-B.

> Therefore script-A = - script-B holds only for a = b.

You gave a *formula* for script-A in terms of a and mu,
and a formula for script-B in terms of b and mu. Those
formulas imply that it's *always* the case that
script-A = - script-B.

> For all other a and b this identification is statistically
> incorrect.

You are saying that for all other values of a and b,
the formulas for script-A and script-B are incorrect?

> It is also physically and mathematically incorrect, but that is
> harder to see because it requires understanding the topology
> of the 3-sphere.

Once again, what you have written is:

(1) script-A = +1 if mu = +I
(2) script-A = -1 if mu = -I
(3) script-B = -1 if mu = +I
(4) script-B = +1 if mu = -I
(5) mu is always equal to +I or -I

>From 1-5, it seems to me to follow that script-A = - script-B.

It seems that that conclusion is not affected by whether space
is the 3-sphere, or a 2-sphere, or a Klein bottle, or a Mobius
strip, or discrete. It follows from classical logic, and is
independent of the particular details of the topology of the
world.

--
Daryl McCullough
Ithaca, NY


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2013 Google