|
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 |
Newsgroups: sci.physics.research, sci.physics
From: Aaron Bergman <aberg...@princeton.edu>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 17:30:10 +0000 (UTC)
Local: Fri, Oct 25 2002 1:30 pm
Subject: Re: Physics bitten by reverse Alan Sokal hoax?
In article <ap7tq6$em...@glue.ucr.edu>, b...@galaxy.ucr.edu (John Baez)
wrote: > Grichka Bogdanov and Igor Bogdanov, I took a look at this one: > Topological field theory of the initial singularity of spacetime, > Classical and Quantum Gravity 18 (2001), 4341-4372. <http://www.iop.org/EJ/S/3/492/abstract/0264-9381/18/21/301/> and the referee clearly didn't even glance at it. I particularly like: > Definition 1.2: A theory if topological if (the Lagrangian L being I also like the part where they put a Tr(-1)^n in the path integral. > non-trivial) it does not depend on L. Given that a number of terms are used incorrectly on the first few pages, this seems to be quite an indictment of the refereeing process. I can't say I'm completely surprised that something like this could Aaron You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||