From: squ...@my-deja.com
Subject: Re: Hamiltonian Dynamics = Adiabatic Processes Only?
Date: 2000/06/28
Message-ID: <8jav4c$q5b$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 639872826
Approved: s...@rosencrantz.stcloudstate.edu (sci.physics.research)
References: <8ij34q$4sm$1@news.netvision.net.il> <395242FD.E94488E9@xs4all.nl> <8ivp57$vho$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <3954864A.1CBA1C4F@xs4all.nl> <3957EF3E.304513C7@xs4all.nl>
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.01; Windows NT)
X-Http-Proxy: 1.1 x72.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 192.118.28.70
Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy.
X-Article-Creation-Date: Tue Jun 27 19:26:27 2000 GMT
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDsquark
Newsgroups: sci.physics.research
Originator: s...@rosencrantz.stcloudstate.edu (sci.physics.research co-moderator)

In article <3957EF3E.30451...@xs4all.nl>,
  Gerard Westendorp <west...@xs4all.nl> wrote:
> Actually, the energy 1/2 (mx'^2+kx^2) decays with exp(-at).
> And H stays constant.

If you're right, this means the Noether theorem is still valid in this
case - simply it yields a quantaty with EXPLICIT time dependance.

Best regards, squark.


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.