<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
  <title>sci.physics.research Google Group</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.research</link>
  <description>Current physics research. (Moderated)</description>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
  <title>Interaction of Graphene with Light reading texts</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.research/browse_thread/thread/d0f4e59e9851209c/54e9021ec8233798?show_docid=54e9021ec8233798</link>
  <description>
  I&#39;m interested to learn how interaction of light with graphene is &lt;br&gt; modeled to derive its optical properties. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Please suggest some good reading materials. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Thanks.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.research/browse_thread/thread/d0f4e59e9851209c</guid>
  <author>
  shouvik.iit...@gmail.com
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 20:38:59 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Dirac&#39;s paper on QM of Electron</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.research/browse_thread/thread/b3dc1c6433f1e8a3/2bceecbed76cbdec?show_docid=2bceecbed76cbdec</link>
  <description>
  I&#39;m trying to read Dirac&#39;s paper &amp;quot;The Quantum Theory of the Electron.&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt; I am really struggling with the first displayed equation on 611. Is &lt;br&gt; there a sign error? Should it read something like: &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;F = -(W/c - eA_0/c)^2 + (p + eA/c)^2 + m^2c^2? &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;I googled the Klein-Gordon equation, which Dirac is motivating in this
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.research/browse_thread/thread/b3dc1c6433f1e8a3</guid>
  <author>
  step...@missouri.edu
  (Stephen Montgomery-Smith)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 12 May 2013 08:05:51 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: mass defect</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.research/browse_thread/thread/1cdb7f95464e255f/0f88dfa1fe275e42?show_docid=0f88dfa1fe275e42</link>
  <description>
  *** Jay Writes *** &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Hi Mercury: &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;I am going to refer you to my paper below, which was just published on &lt;br&gt; April 30, because it is exactly on point to your question: &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;J. Yablon, &amp;quot;Predicting the Binding Energies of the 1s Nuclides with High &lt;br&gt; Precision, Based on Baryons which Are Yang-Mills Magnetic Monopoles,&amp;quot;
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.research/browse_thread/thread/1cdb7f95464e255f</guid>
  <author>
  jyab...@nycap.rr.com
  (Jay R. Yablon)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 16:36:34 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Understanding Velocity - Time graphs</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.research/browse_thread/thread/4511041ab61046a7/0c2f7f4968359079?show_docid=0c2f7f4968359079</link>
  <description>
  What would the graphs of the following to cases look like? &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;1. The body is accelerated non uniformly along a line and then continues &lt;br&gt; moving with non constant acceleration along the opposite direction &lt;br&gt; i.e. back to where it started from. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;2. The body is accelerated non uniformly along a line and return to
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.research/browse_thread/thread/4511041ab61046a7</guid>
  <author>
  connect.iv...@gmail.com
  (Ivana Minz)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 07:39:46 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>My four recent peer-reviewed papers are now all published and online...</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.research/browse_thread/thread/2991cbd8a993ee52/1a6795286d9db484?show_docid=1a6795286d9db484</link>
  <description>
  Friends, &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;I wanted to let you know that my recent second, third and fourth peer-reviewed &lt;br&gt; papers were all published on April 30. These papers, in order of logical &lt;br&gt; development, are: &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;2) J. Yablon, &amp;quot;Predicting the Binding Energies of the 1s Nuclides with High &lt;br&gt; Precision, Based on Baryons which Are Yang-Mills Magnetic Monopoles,&amp;quot; Journal
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.research/browse_thread/thread/2991cbd8a993ee52</guid>
  <author>
  jyab...@nycap.rr.com
  (Jay R. Yablon)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 04:17:10 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Product rule for functional derivatives?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.research/browse_thread/thread/986264b2dae8d97a/0187cca869ca0363?show_docid=0187cca869ca0363</link>
  <description>
  Hi alltogether, &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Consider Lagrange formalism, e.g. Lagrangian mechanics. We have a &lt;br&gt; Lagrangian function L(q, dq/dt) where q is a generalized coordinate and &lt;br&gt; dq/dt its time derivative. Now, according to Hamiltonian principle, L &lt;br&gt; ist stationary with respect to variations \delta q of the trajectory q(t):
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.research/browse_thread/thread/986264b2dae8d97a</guid>
  <author>
  g.schol...@gmx.de
  (Gregor Scholten)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 15:31:26 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Reporting paper.</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.research/browse_thread/thread/50ff331355d9ef6a/a1403bc8e38b9976?show_docid=a1403bc8e38b9976</link>
  <description>
  [[Mod. note -- I have inserted blank lines between the author&#39;s &lt;br&gt; paragraphs. -- jt]] &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Hi, &lt;br&gt; my name is Roberto Bovolenta, and I?m an Italian physicist. In former &lt;br&gt; times I?ve worked in the fields of nanoscience and acoustic, and &lt;br&gt; recently I got interested, on my own, in quantum computation world.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.research/browse_thread/thread/50ff331355d9ef6a</guid>
  <author>
  bovolenta.robe...@gmail.com
  (Roberto Bovolenta)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 05:06:50 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Hi, How can I get started on reading research papers on mathematical</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.research/browse_thread/thread/7f778aaedc34647d/0d9371c2962030fc?show_docid=0d9371c2962030fc</link>
  <description>
  [[Mod. note -- Please limit your text to fit within 80 columns, &lt;br&gt; preferably around 70, so that readers don&#39;t have to scroll horizontally &lt;br&gt; to read each line. I have manually reformatted this article. -- jt]] &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Hi, How can I get started on reading research papers on mathematical &lt;br&gt; and theoretical physics? (math-ph and ph-th in ArXiv) I know
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.research/browse_thread/thread/7f778aaedc34647d</guid>
  <author>
  zahero_2...@yahoo.com
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 05:05:17 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>mass defect</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.research/browse_thread/thread/225f6a803748c918/a8f08088bd1989b1?show_docid=a8f08088bd1989b1</link>
  <description>
  [[Mod. note -- Please limit your text to fit within 80 columns, &lt;br&gt; preferably around 70, so that readers don&#39;t have to scroll horizontally &lt;br&gt; to read each line. I have manually reformatted this article. -- jt]] &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;I tought is there any explicit mechanism realizing the mass defect. &lt;br&gt; Something in terms of gravitons or virtual photon. Maybe it looks
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.research/browse_thread/thread/225f6a803748c918</guid>
  <author>
  il...@abv.bg
  (mercury)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 28 Apr 2013 16:39:07 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>one-way and two-way speed of light measurement.</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.research/browse_thread/thread/dad49d3a5baf051a/b6fdbe8dc8ebeaca?show_docid=b6fdbe8dc8ebeaca</link>
  <description>
  suppose, at the outset, that we revert the definition of the meter to &lt;br&gt; pre-1960, so that the speed of light is something to be measured, &lt;br&gt; rather than defined. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;i remember reading about Michaelson&#39;s original experiment that &lt;br&gt; measured the two-way speed of light using a reflector on a mountain 35 &lt;br&gt; km distant. i&#39;m pretty sure i understand the mechanics of that
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.research/browse_thread/thread/dad49d3a5baf051a</guid>
  <author>
  r...@audioimagination.com
  (robert bristow-johnson)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 05:28:31 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>spr postings not getting through.</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.research/browse_thread/thread/6b360010bd687505/a6b65a52c1f7c99a?show_docid=a6b65a52c1f7c99a</link>
  <description>
  Sorry, my posting was in the first place a test. &lt;br&gt; (hence the one-liner) &lt;br&gt; Server problems have made posting to spr imposible for me, &lt;br&gt; so I wanted to know if these problems have cured themselves. &lt;br&gt; (yes, apparently) &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;That&#39;s not how I read it. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;It is obviously possible in very special cases. (at modest velocities)
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.research/browse_thread/thread/6b360010bd687505</guid>
  <author>
  jjlx...@xs4all.nl
  (J. J. Lodder)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 21:15:50 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Gravity and Electromagnetism as spacetime structure disturbances</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.research/browse_thread/thread/0512d54b7eed7ac1/96169fbdb072e840?show_docid=96169fbdb072e840</link>
  <description>
  Hi everybody :-) &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;I have just put on arXiv 4th version of my article (after 2 reviews) &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/1301.2758&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;You my find there, that gravity and electromagnetism may be explained as two different consequences of one filed equation describing disturbances in spacetime structure. The field also produces valid quanta values (rest mass, photon energy, elementary charge).
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.research/browse_thread/thread/0512d54b7eed7ac1</guid>
  <author>
  piotrogonowski...@gmail.com
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 17:58:26 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: GUT Paper accepted by Journal of Modern Physics</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.research/browse_thread/thread/91bed76035579e2b/d4cc599348ccdf53?show_docid=d4cc599348ccdf53</link>
  <description>
  From the USENET archive (on Google): &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;https://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.research/browse_thread/thread/db1878974957acaf?hl=en#&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;This sounded good -- until the mention of the 6-day turnover. If you &lt;br&gt; look at most of the well-established journals you will see both a time &lt;br&gt; of receipt and a time the paper was accepted. There is usually several
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.research/browse_thread/thread/91bed76035579e2b</guid>
  <author>
  federation2...@netzero.com
  (Alfred Einstead)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 20 Apr 2013 11:14:41 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>x(4140) any new data</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.research/browse_thread/thread/214e40c384a9de5e/0035e317ab702ac8?show_docid=0035e317ab702ac8</link>
  <description>
  is there any new data on the x(4140) particle? &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;holog
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.research/browse_thread/thread/214e40c384a9de5e</guid>
  <author>
  ho...@bellsouth.net
  (holog)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 20 Apr 2013 11:12:33 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>ADM formalism: evolution of conjugate momentum</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.research/browse_thread/thread/d1a11a0e028f2baa/b79245dcc5a9e3ff?show_docid=b79245dcc5a9e3ff</link>
  <description>
  Hi alltogether, &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;There are numerous articles about ADM formalism, e.g. this one: &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.math.toronto.edu/mccann/assignments/426/Tong.pdf&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;where they indicate expressions for the Hamiltonian (equation 20 in &lt;br&gt; upper article) and the time-derivative of the momentum \p^ij conjugated &lt;br&gt; to three-metric h_ij (equation 25). However, I didn&#39;t find any article
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.research/browse_thread/thread/d1a11a0e028f2baa</guid>
  <author>
  g.schol...@gmx.de
  (Gregor Scholten)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 20:25:51 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
