Lorenzo Lodi
unread,Jun 13, 2013, 12:49:48 PM6/13/13You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to
I am trying to rationalise the behaviour of experimental atomic energy
levels of the potassium atom (Z=19) isoelectronic sequence. Ground-state
potassium has the expected [Ar] 4s^1 configuration (2S term symbol),
while the 4p and 3d configurations (2Po and 2D terms) have relative
energies approximately of 13000 and 21500 cm-1. (Atomic energy levels
for atoms and ions can be obtained from the NIST Atomic Spectra
Database.)
Given that there is only one valence electron, I would naively expect
that the low-energy spectrum of cations isoelectronic to K (ie, Ca+,
Sc++, Ti+++ etc) be somewhat similar, i.e.:
1) Ordering of configurations same as K: 4s < 4p < 3d
2) Increasing Z energy separations increase as Z^2, as this is the
behaviour of hydrogen-like atoms.
Both my suppositions are wrong:
1) The energy ordering of Sc++ are: 3d < 4s < 4p (ions more highly
ionized than Sc++ also show this ordering).
2) The energy separations between energy levels increase much faster
than Z^2, more like Z^8 (I've checked up to Mn^6+). For example, the
energy spacing E(4p)-E(3d) is ~128300cm-1 for Ti^3+ (Z=22) and
~395700cm-1 for Mn^6 (Z=25), implying a scaling Z^8.81.
I would be very grateful if anyone could rationalize these observations.
Fell free to point out any reference from the scientific literature.
L.