Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Five-dimensional quantum electrodynamics
23 views
Skip to first unread message
Andreas Moser
Jan 9, 2012, 5:04:06 AM1/9/12
to
On my website www.hurbl.com I've written up some new results regarding
Kaluza-Klein geometry. The first paper (2009) presents the theory in the
simplest case (classical charged particles). These results are not new,
see Klein (1927) and Lichnerowicz (1955), but serve as introduction for
the new paper (2011).
This paper considers the stationary five-dimensional space with torsion.
This solves two problems: 1) Klein's constraint (55-component of the
metric is constant) is no longer an obstacle to fully covariant
equations, and 2) the Dirac equation can be formulated in the
five-dimensional space.
The torsion for 2) was introduced by Schouten and van Dantzig in 1933,
and later Jordan dropped the Klein constraint, which led to the modern
version of Kaluza-Klein theory, in which a new field must be considered
which does not have an exact equivalent in four dimensions.
Andreas
Kaluza-Klein geometry. The first paper (2009) presents the theory in the
simplest case (classical charged particles). These results are not new,
see Klein (1927) and Lichnerowicz (1955), but serve as introduction for
the new paper (2011).
This paper considers the stationary five-dimensional space with torsion.
This solves two problems: 1) Klein's constraint (55-component of the
metric is constant) is no longer an obstacle to fully covariant
equations, and 2) the Dirac equation can be formulated in the
five-dimensional space.
The torsion for 2) was introduced by Schouten and van Dantzig in 1933,
and later Jordan dropped the Klein constraint, which led to the modern
version of Kaluza-Klein theory, in which a new field must be considered
which does not have an exact equivalent in four dimensions.
Andreas
andyeverett
Jan 16, 2012, 3:15:27 AM1/16/12
to
Your link does not work for me but a google came up with
http://www.hurbl.com/papers.html
Is this right?
http://www.hurbl.com/papers.html
Is this right?
Andreas Moser
Jan 16, 2012, 4:18:16 PM1/16/12
to
turn www.hurbl.com into a broken link.
Andreas
0 new messages