Re: Catching a big troll : Juan Alvarez Gonzalez

Dono

unread,

Dec 12, 2008, 11:58:54 AM12/12/08

to

On Dec 12, 8:53 am, "JuanShito R."
<juanrgonzal...@canonicalscience.com> wrote:
> snip imbecilities<

Juanshito,

No one reads your demented blog.
On the other hand anybody can see your idiocies exposed here, in this
very forum:

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/f5bee64f3b044249

Juan R.

unread,

Dec 12, 2008, 12:13:58 PM12/12/08

to

> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/f5bee64f3b0...

Quote:

When the troll started to look very very ravenous, for instance
replying twice to one of my posts, I applied the recommendation 5b :-)

http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2008/12/catching-big-troll.html

Dono

unread,

Dec 12, 2008, 12:24:32 PM12/12/08

to

On Dec 12, 9:13 am, "JuanShito R."

<juanrgonzal...@canonicalscience.com> wrote:
>
> When the troll started to look very very ravenous, for instance
> replying twice to one of my posts, I applied the recommendation 5b :-)
>
>

This is all you can answer, pathetic old fart.
Look at paragraph 1.5, Juanshito imbecile:

http://www-thphys.physics.ox.ac.uk/people/JamesBinney/cmech.pdf

Juan R.

unread,

Dec 12, 2008, 12:47:05 PM12/12/08

to

Pathetic old fart. It certifies you are an IGNORANT TROLL.

First the section 1.5 explain that of L = T - V. You and Eric both
were corrected about this in the past

http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2008/08/some-samples-of-usenet-fauna-ii.html

http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2008/08/some-samples-of-usenet-fauna-iii-nasty.html

and your repeated this mistake again in the trap :-)

here

http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2008/12/catching-big-troll.html

and here

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/f5bee64f3b044249

The expression 1.31 in cmech.pdf is only valid for low velocity.

The expression given for electric field is correct. The same
expression given in

http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2008/12/catching-big-troll.html

The expression you wrote is wrong

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/7c1b2697a4e73960

He does not obtain the Hamiltonian. The Hamiltonian is given in

http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2008/12/catching-big-troll.html

The Hamiltonian you wrote is completely wrong

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/7c1b2697a4e73960

You FELL into the trap :-)

After six month still you cannot obtain the Hamiltonian PRETENDER :-)

Dono

unread,

Dec 12, 2008, 12:58:30 PM12/12/08

to

On Dec 12, 9:47 am, "JuanShito R."
<juanrgonzal...@canonicalscience.com> wrote:
>snip pathetic whinning by old fart Juanshito<

Juan R.

unread,

Dec 12, 2008, 12:59:09 PM12/12/08

to

On 12 dic, 18:13, "Juan R." <juanrgonzal...@canonicalscience.com>
wrote:

About a minute ago I had 73 stars from you, now they are 81!

Last time you falsified Groups rating you were banned by
administrators Dono. Don't remember?

http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2008/08/some-samples-of-usenet-fauna-iii-nasty.html

Juan R.

unread,

Dec 12, 2008, 1:10:02 PM12/12/08

to

It explains that your L = T - V is wrong, your p is wrong, your E is
wrong and your H is wrong.

Moreover, The expression (1.31) in cmech.pdf is only valid for low
velocities. Learn some physics and after return.

I prepared a trap and you fell into it Dono :-)

http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2008/12/catching-big-troll.html

Everyone is now laughing at you :-)

Juan R.

unread,

Dec 12, 2008, 2:10:42 PM12/12/08

to

Dono fell into the trap :-)

http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2008/12/catching-big-troll.html

Dono

unread,

Dec 12, 2008, 4:10:13 PM12/12/08

to

On Dec 12, 11:10 am, "Juan R." <juanrgonzal...@canonicalscience.com>
wrote:

> Dono fell into the trap :-)
>
> http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2008/12/catching-big-troll.html

Squirm, weasel:

Juanshito, old fart

L=-m0c^2/gamma-e*phi+eAv

where:

B=curl A
E=-@A/@t-grad(phi)

p=gamma*m0*v

H=pv-L=pv+m0c^2/gamma+e*phi-eAv=gamma*m0*v^2+m0c^2/gamma+e*phi-eAv

Now, answer the question I asked you 6 months ago: derive L. Let's see
you do it, old nutter.

Juan R.

unread,

Dec 13, 2008, 8:38:47 AM12/13/08

to

And by *fifth* time, Dono, have showed to USENET audience that you
have no idea of elementary relativity or mechanics.

Yes, you have been exposed to be the biggest fraud on spr :-)

The blog article has been updated to contain your new nonsense :-)

http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2008/12/catching-big-troll.html

Many thanks troll!

Dono

unread,

Dec 13, 2008, 10:25:34 AM12/13/08

to

On Dec 13, 5:38 am, "Juan R." <juanrgonzal...@canonicalscience.com>

wrote:
> On 12 dic, 22:10, Dono <sa...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Dec 12, 11:10 am, "Juan R." <juanrgonzal...@canonicalscience.com>
> > wrote:
>
> > > Dono fell into the trap :-)
>
> > >http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2008/12/catching-big-troll.html
>
> > Squirm, weasel:
>
> > Juanshito, old fart
>
> > L=-m0c^2/gamma-e*phi+eAv
>
> > where:
>
> > B=curl A
> > E=-@A/@t-grad(phi)
>
> > p=gamma*m0*v
>
> > H=pv-L=pv+m0c^2/gamma+e*phi-eAv=gamma*m0*v^2+m0c^2/gamma+e*phi-eAv
>
> > Now, answer the question I asked you 6 months ago: derive L. Let's see
> > you do it, old nutter.
>
>

Exposing you , Juanshito, for the crackpot you are :

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/f5bee64f3b044249

Juan R.

unread,

Dec 13, 2008, 11:33:11 AM12/13/08

to

> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/f5bee64f3b0...

Thanks by that link but it was already included in the blog article as
example of your ignorance :-)

Dono what is a furum?

Dono

unread,

Dec 13, 2008, 11:38:02 AM12/13/08

to

On Dec 13, 8:33 am, "Juan R." <juanrgonzal...@canonicalscience.com>

Juan R.

unread,

Dec 13, 2008, 11:43:07 AM12/13/08

to

But I already thanks you by that link!

It was already included in the blog article as example of your
ignorance :-)

Dono

unread,

Dec 13, 2008, 11:52:19 AM12/13/08

to

On Dec 13, 8:43 am, "Juan R." <juanrgonzal...@canonicalscience.com>

No one reads your shitty blog, old fart

N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc)

unread,

Dec 13, 2008, 12:15:12 PM12/13/08

to

"Dono" <sa...@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:413e2edc-6c93-4a65...@v5g2000prm.googlegroups.com...

I was tickled pink when I saw you discussing physics with Jay Y.
When will you stop posting only "Here be Trolls" messages? This
can't be your entire enjoyment... and you can't believe you are
positively affecting Juan...

David A. Smith

Juan R.

unread,

Dec 13, 2008, 1:55:58 PM12/13/08

to

Everyone in this newsgroup knows that you are a troll who cannot give
the correct Hamiltonian after six months :-)

I am sorry to say that about 12 visitors a day read the blog.

They already know how to obtain the right Hamiltonian, Dono, you still
cannot after six months :-)

Those are localizations of last visitors:

Spain Cangas, Galicia
Italy Rome, Lazio
Italy Rome, Lazio
United Kingdom Buxton, Derbyshire
United States Bethesda, Maryland
United States Deerfield Beach, Florida
Spain Valladolid, Castilla y Leon
United States San Jose, California
Spain Alicante, Comunidad Valenciana
United States Sunnyvale, California
Spain Cocentaina, Comunidad Valenciana
Spain Cocentaina, Comunidad Valenciana
Germany Sankt Augustin, Nordrhein-Westfalen
Spain Cocentaina, Comunidad Valenciana
Italy Firenze, Toscana
Germany Kornwestheim, Baden-Wurttemberg
Australia Sydney, New South Wales
Canada Toronto, Ontario
Switzerland Untergeri, Zug
United States Boston, Massachusetts
France Gif-sur-Yvette, Centre
United States Fort Collins, Colorado
Unknown
United States Kalamazoo, Michigan
Unknown
United States Berkeley, California
United States North Branford, Connecticut
India New Delhi, Delhi
Greece Ionnina, Ioannina
United States Lawrence, Kansas
Unknown
India Bombay, Maharashtra
United States Fountain Valley, California
Korea, Republic of
United States Rock Hill, South Carolina
Indonesia Jakarta, Jawa Barat
United States Lawrence, Kansas
United States North Branford, Connecticut
United States
United States Toledo, Ohio

Do you imagine who is the guy from Canada Toronto, Ontario? Yes your
friend :-)

Regards.

Juan R.

unread,

Dec 13, 2008, 1:56:29 PM12/13/08

to

Everyone in this newsgroup knows that you are a troll who cannot give

Juan R.

unread,

Dec 13, 2008, 1:57:22 PM12/13/08

to

Everyone in this newsgroup knows that you are a troll who cannot give

Juan R.

unread,

Dec 13, 2008, 1:58:47 PM12/13/08

to

Everyone in this newsgroup knows that you are a troll who cannot give

Juan R.

unread,

Dec 13, 2008, 1:59:54 PM12/13/08

to

Everyone in this newsgroup knows that you are a troll who cannot give

Juan R.

unread,

Dec 13, 2008, 2:10:00 PM12/13/08

to

As stated before Dono has two options:

(i) He can learn some physics. For instance, he can learn from

http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2008/12/catching-big-troll.html

what is wrong with his 'derivation'

>>>> Juanshito, old fart
>>>> L=-m0c^2/gamma-e*phi+eAv
>>>> where:
>>>> B=curl A
>>>> E=-@A/@t-grad(phi)
>>>> p=gamma*m0*v
>>>> H=pv-L=pv+m0c^2/gamma+e*phi-eAv=gamma*m0*v^2+m0c^2/gamma+e*phi-eAv

He can also read the article and learn how to obtain the correct
Hamiltonian or

(ii) he can continue to insult and lie, whereas repeating the same
mistakes forever.

I desire you can convince Dono to change his attitude but doubt that
he will hear you.

Albertito

unread,

Dec 13, 2008, 2:55:44 PM12/13/08

to

On Dec 13, 6:56 pm, "Juan R." <juanrgonzal...@canonicalscience.com>

Even DonoShito visits your blog,
United States Mountain View, California
:-)

Dono

unread,

Dec 13, 2008, 6:25:17 PM12/13/08

to

On Dec 13, 10:55 am, "JuanShito R."
<juanrgonzal...@canonicalscience.com> wrote:
> snip lies<

Juanshito,

No one gives a shit about the deluded stuff you are wrting in your
blog, old deluded fart.

Dono

unread,

Dec 13, 2008, 7:11:45 PM12/13/08

to

On Dec 13, 9:15 am, "N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)" <dl...@cox.net>
wrote:

Unfortunately people like Jay are rare, this forum is suffocated by
fakers like Juanshito. So, exposing Juan Alvarez Gonzalez as a fraud
has its benefits. The more he posts, the more he gets exposed.
Eventually, he'll shut up. :-)

Juan R.

unread,

Dec 14, 2008, 7:43:33 AM12/14/08

to

Thanks!

Juan R.

unread,

Dec 14, 2008, 7:48:04 AM12/14/08

to

My readers already know how to obtain the relativistic Hamiltonian

http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2008/12/catching-big-troll.html

You, after six months, still cannot solve that elementary exercise :-)

My readers both in USENET and in my blog know you are a troll who fell
into a trap and now cannot exit :-)

Juan R.

unread,

Dec 14, 2008, 7:52:27 AM12/14/08

to

As stated in my reply to David,

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/3468525833ff4ece

you have two options after falling into the trap (i) to read

http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2008/12/catching-big-troll.html

and learn some elementary electrodynamics, relativity, and mechanics.

or (ii) Continue to insult whereas repeating your same mistakes.

As then said to David, he could not convince you to choose (i) and you
chose option (ii).

Ok, troll if that is your desire...

Juan R.

unread,

Dec 14, 2008, 8:24:05 AM12/14/08

to

On 13 dic, 20:55, Albertito <albertito1...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Even DonoShito visits your blog,
> United States Mountain View, California
> :-)

This is the list of 20 last visitors by domain

telefonica.net 2:06:41 pm 1 0:05
203.177.74.# 9:45:15 am 1 0:00
comcast.net 8:05:32 am 1 0:00
optonline.net 4:45:35 am 1 0:00
he-dsl.de 2:32:17 am 1 0:00
mounet.com 12:57:40 am 2 0:19
comcast.net 5:59:11 pm 1 0:00
telefonica.net 5:24:04 pm 7 27:11
telefonica.net 4:49:19 pm 1 0:00
comcast.net 4:19:48 pm 1 0:00
telefonica.net 1:45:39 pm 14 98:35
albacom.net 12:52:27 pm 1 0:00
albacom.net 12:51:56 pm 1 0:00
as9105.com 1:50:27 am 2 3:48
verizon.net 12:12:43 am 1 0:00
comcast.net 11:16:25 pm 1 0:00
ono.com 10:21:49 pm 1 0:00
xo.net 7:41:34 pm 2 0:19
orange.es 6:24:26 pm 3 26:58
comcast.net 5:55:46 pm 2 7:36

Dono is from comcast.net

Dono

unread,

Dec 14, 2008, 9:29:53 AM12/14/08

to

On Dec 14, 4:48 am, "JuanShito R."

<juanrgonzal...@canonicalscience.com> wrote:
> On 14 dic, 00:25, Dono <sa...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> > On Dec 13, 10:55 am, "JuanShito R."
>
> > <juanrgonzal...@canonicalscience.com> wrote:
> > > snip lies<
>
> > Juanshito,
>
> > No one gives a shit about the deluded stuff you are wrting in your
> > blog, old deluded fart.
>
> My readers already know how to obtain the relativistic Hamiltonian
>
> http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2008/12/catching-big-troll.html
>

Juanshito, old fart

Here it is again:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamiltonian_mechanics#Charged_particle_in_an_electromagnetic_field

Not that you will ever learn, stubborn imbecile :-)

Juan R.

unread,

Dec 15, 2008, 5:16:13 AM12/15/08

to

On 14 dic, 15:29, Dono <sa...@comcast.net> wrote:
> On Dec 14, 4:48 am, "JuanShito R."
>
>
>
> <juanrgonzal...@canonicalscience.com> wrote:
> > On 14 dic, 00:25, Dono <sa...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> > > On Dec 13, 10:55 am, "JuanShito R."
>
> > > <juanrgonzal...@canonicalscience.com> wrote:
> > > > snip lies<
>
> > > Juanshito,
>
> > > No one gives a shit about the deluded stuff you are wrting in your
> > > blog, old deluded fart.
>
> > My readers already know how to obtain the relativistic Hamiltonian
>
> >http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2008/12/catching-big-troll.html
>
> Juanshito, old fart
>
> Here it is again:
>

> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamiltonian_mechanics#Charged_particle_i...

>
> Not that you will ever learn, stubborn imbecile :-)

Only a big troll as you can repeat the same mistakes forever...

I already explained to you three or four times before that Hamiltonian
is *only* valid for particle velocities v << c.

What is your problem?

As anyone can see, you still cannot learn what is the relativistic

Hamiltonian after six months :-)

http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2008/12/catching-big-troll.html

What is your problem?

Cannot read?

Cannot learn?

Cannot accept you have been exposed as biggest fraud in SPR?

Dono

unread,

Dec 15, 2008, 10:53:15 AM12/15/08

to

On Dec 15, 2:16 am, "Juan R." <juanrgonzal...@canonicalscience.com>

Juan R.

unread,

Dec 15, 2008, 1:29:47 PM12/15/08

to

Only a big troll as you can repeat the same mistakes forever...

I already explained to you three or four times before that Hamiltonian
is *only* valid for particle velocities v << c.

As anyone can see, you still cannot learn what is the relativistic

Dono

unread,

Dec 15, 2008, 2:35:52 PM12/15/08

to

On Dec 15, 10:29 am, "JuanShito R."
<juanrgonzal...@canonicalscience.com> wrote:
> snip Juanshito's imbecilities<

Juanshito, old fart

Here it is again:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamiltonian_mechanics#Charged_particle_i...

Not that you will ever learn, stubborn imbecile :-)

Now, for the relativistic Lagrangian and Hamiltonian, read here, old

Juan R.

unread,

Dec 16, 2008, 4:39:04 AM12/16/08

to

And you show again your ignorance of electrodynamics, relativity and
mechanics :-)

http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2008/12/catching-big-troll.html

Dono

unread,

Dec 16, 2008, 10:18:19 AM12/16/08

to

On Dec 16, 1:39 am, "Juan R." <juanrgonzal...@canonicalscience.com>
wrote:

Juanshito,

Just because you are an autistic imbecile doesn't mean that you need
to prove it again and again on a daily basis, old fart:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamiltonian_mechanics#Charged_particle_in_an_electromagnetic_field

Juan R.

unread,

Dec 17, 2008, 7:45:54 AM12/17/08

to

> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamiltonian_mechanics#Charged_particle_i...

The original page was

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hamiltonian_mechanics&oldid=258431423

and contained the usual non-relativistic Hamiltonian. The recent
modification of the page is pure nonsense :-) PRETENDER

The correct Hamiltonian is given in

http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2008/12/catching-big-troll.html

Dono

unread,

Dec 17, 2008, 9:57:32 AM12/17/08

to

On Dec 17, 4:45 am, "Juan R." <juanrgonzal...@canonicalscience.com>

> http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hamiltonian_mechanics&oldid...

>
> and contained the usual non-relativistic Hamiltonian.

Juanshito, old fart

This is stuff that gets taught routnely, read and choke in your own
vomit:

http://academic.reed.edu/physics/courses/Physics411/html/411/page2/files/Lecture.10.pdf

Juan R.

unread,

Dec 18, 2008, 8:48:51 AM12/18/08

to

> http://academic.reed.edu/physics/courses/Physics411/html/411/page2/fi...

PRETENDER, Hamiltonian given is a special case of Hamiltonian given in

http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2008/12/catching-big-troll.html

Your nonsense was deleted from Wikipedia the days 16 and 18

and your recent nonsense will be deleted again :-)

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hamiltonian_mechanics&action=history

Dono

unread,

Dec 18, 2008, 10:07:46 AM12/18/08

to

On Dec 18, 5:48 am, "Juan R." <juanrgonzal...@canonicalscience.com>

> http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hamiltonian_mechanics&actio...

Juanshito, demented fart

You need to take your medication, you are foaming at the mouth again
and you might chocke in it.

Juan R.

unread,

Dec 19, 2008, 5:59:09 AM12/19/08

to

TROLL

http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2008/12/catching-big-troll.html

Do not submit more nonsense to wikipedia, will be deleted again :-)

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hamiltonian_mechanics&action=history

Juan R.

unread,

Dec 19, 2008, 5:59:48 AM12/19/08

to

TROLL

http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2008/12/catching-big-troll.html

Do not submit more nonsense to wikipedia, will be deleted again :-)

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hamiltonian_mechanics&action=history

Dono

unread,

Dec 19, 2008, 9:54:05 AM12/19/08

to

On Dec 19, 2:59 am, "JuanShito R."
<juanrgonzal...@canonicalscience.com> wrote:
> snip idiocies<

Juanshito, old fart

Stop foaming at the mouth , it looks disgusting. Besides, you are
chocking on your own saliva:-)

Juan R.

unread,

Dec 19, 2008, 2:08:23 PM12/19/08

to

TROLL

http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2008/12/catching-big-troll.html

Do not submit more nonsense to wikipedia, will be deleted again :-)

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hamiltonian_mechanics&action=history

P.S: Why do you continue voting by yourself? Tomorrow your fake votes

Dono

unread,

Dec 19, 2008, 2:16:58 PM12/19/08

to

On Dec 19, 11:08 am, "Juan R." <juanrgonzal...@canonicalscience.com>
wrote:

> On 19 dic, 15:54, Dono <sa...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> > On Dec 19, 2:59 am, "JuanShito R."
>
> > <juanrgonzal...@canonicalscience.com> wrote:
> > > snip idiocies<
>
> > Juanshito, old fart
>
> > Stop foaming at the mouth , it looks disgusting. Besides, you are
> > chocking on your own saliva:-)
>
> TROLL
>
> http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2008/12/catching-big-troll.html
>
> Do not submit more nonsense to wikipedia, will be deleted again :-)
>

> http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hamiltonian_mechanics&actio...
>

Are you learning new things, old fart?

Juan R.

unread,

Dec 19, 2008, 2:29:37 PM12/19/08

to

Yes I did learn you can write lot of nonsense

http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2008/12/catching-big-troll.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hamiltonian_mechanics&action=history

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/f33c74b77fedf615

P.S: Why do you continue voting by yourself? Tomorrow your fake votes

Dono

unread,

Dec 19, 2008, 2:58:19 PM12/19/08

to

On Dec 19, 11:29 am, "JuanShito R."
<juanrgonzal...@canonicalscience.com> wrote:
>
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hamiltonian_mechanics&actio...
>

So, you finally understand the stuff Eric and I tried in vain o teach
you:

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/f5bee64f3b044249

It took you only 3 months, not bad for an old fart like you,
Juanshito :-)

Juan R.

unread,

Dec 20, 2008, 9:11:22 AM12/20/08

to

On 19 dic, 20:58, Dono <sa...@comcast.net> wrote:
> On Dec 19, 11:29 am, "JuanShito R."
>
> <juanrgonzal...@canonicalscience.com> wrote:
>
> >http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hamiltonian_mechanics&actio...
>
> So, you finally understand the stuff Eric and I tried in vain o teach
> you:

Eric mistake L=T-V implies H=T+V for relativity was corrected before
by Pete, Daryl and me. It is all reproduced next

http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2008/08/some-samples-of-usenet-fauna-ii.html

You also did the same mistake but you deleted your messages for hiding
them.

http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2008/08/some-samples-of-usenet-fauna-iii-nasty.html

This is why I prepared a trap for you

http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2008/12/catching-big-troll.html

> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/f5bee64f3b0...

Thanks by the link, but this message is already cited in

http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2008/12/catching-big-troll.html

I do not need to explain again how you fell into the trap :-)

You have been exposed to be a BIGGEST FRAUD in:

- USENET

- BLOGGER

- WIKIPEDIA

Congrats Dono!

P.S: Where are the fake votes you added yesterday? Were deleted again
troll :-)

Dono

unread,

Dec 20, 2008, 9:40:48 AM12/20/08

to

On Dec 20, 6:11 am, "Juanshito R."
<juanrgonzal...@canonicalscience.com> wrote:
>snip rantings<

Juanshito,

You still don't get it , after 6 months of explanations:

H=E+V
H=Pv-L

where:

v=speed
V=potential
P=@L/@v

1. For V=0 , H=E
2. for v=0, H=-L(0)=mc^2+V

It is not that difficult, it has been explained to you for 6 months
and counting. You are slow in learning but you compensate by being
utterly dumb :-)

Juan R.

unread,

Dec 20, 2008, 10:44:47 AM12/20/08

to

On 20 dic, 15:40, Dono <sa...@comcast.net> wrote:
> On Dec 20, 6:11 am, "Juanshito R."
>
> <juanrgonzal...@canonicalscience.com> wrote:
> >snip rantings<
>
> Juanshito,
>
> You still don't get it , after 6 months of explanations:

Maybe you still don't get that nonsense you wrote, your insults, and
the corrections to your garbage are archived in USENET, BLOGGER, and
WIKIPEDIA forever :-)

http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2008/08/some-samples-of-usenet-fauna-iii-nasty.html

http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2008/12/catching-big-troll.html

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/f33c74b77fedf615

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Hamiltonian_mechanics#DS1000.27s_added_material

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hamiltonian_mechanics&action=history

Dono

unread,

Dec 20, 2008, 11:08:13 AM12/20/08

to

On Dec 20, 7:44 am, "Juan R." <juanrgonzal...@canonicalscience.com>
wrote:

> On 20 dic, 15:40, Dono <sa...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> > On Dec 20, 6:11 am, "Juanshito R."
>
> > <juanrgonzal...@canonicalscience.com> wrote:
> > >snip rantings<
>

You still don't get it , after 6 months of explanations:

H=E+V
H=Pv-L

where:

v=speed
V=potential
P=@L/@v

1. For V=0 , H=E
2. for v=0, H=-L(0)=mc^2+V

It is not that difficult, it has been explained to you for 6 months
and counting. You are slow in learning but you compensate by being
utterly dumb :-)

As for your "Center for Canonical Science" and "Journal", they are the
ultimate laughing stock when you look at the "professional" and
"ethical" level of your blogs attached to it. have you ever seen a
scientific journal having such shit attached to it? No!
Anyone looking at your sorry ass website concludes (correctly) that
you spend your time trolling (a true fact) instead of doing any
"research". No true scientist embarrasses himself as much as you do,
Juanshito :-)

Juan R.

unread,

Dec 20, 2008, 12:39:31 PM12/20/08

to

On 20 dic, 17:08, Dono <sa...@comcast.net> wrote:
> On Dec 20, 7:44 am, "Juan R." <juanrgonzal...@canonicalscience.com>
> wrote:> On 20 dic, 15:40, Dono <sa...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> > > On Dec 20, 6:11 am, "Juanshito R."
>
> > > <juanrgonzal...@canonicalscience.com> wrote:
> > > >snip rantings<
>
> You still don't get it , after 6 months of explanations:

Maybe you still don't get that nonsense you wrote, your insults, and
your inability to learn are archived in USENET, BLOGGER, and
WIKIPEDIA forever :-)

Blog article has been updated today to contain also your trolling in
Wikipedia, congrats dono :-)

http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2008/12/catching-big-troll.html

Dono

unread,

Dec 20, 2008, 12:48:09 PM12/20/08

to

On Dec 20, 9:39 am, "JuanShito R."

<juanrgonzal...@canonicalscience.com> wrote:
> On 20 dic, 17:08, Dono <sa...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> > On Dec 20, 7:44 am, "Juan R." <juanrgonzal...@canonicalscience.com>
> > wrote:> On 20 dic, 15:40, Dono <sa...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> > > > On Dec 20, 6:11 am, "Juanshito R."
>
> > > > <juanrgonzal...@canonicalscience.com> wrote:
> > > > >snip rantings<
>
> > You still don't get it , after 6 months of explanations:
>
> Maybe you still don't get that nonsense you wrote, your insults, and
> your inability to learn are archived in USENET, BLOGGER, and
> WIKIPEDIA forever :-)
>
> Blog article has been updated today to contain also your trolling in
> Wikipedia, congrats dono :-)
>
> http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2008/12/catching-big-troll.html

Very good, Juanshito !

Juan R.

unread,

Dec 20, 2008, 12:59:59 PM12/20/08

to

On 20 dic, 18:48, Dono <sa...@comcast.net> wrote:

(snip)

Dono

unread,

Dec 20, 2008, 1:02:30 PM12/20/08

to

On Dec 20, 9:59 am, "Juan R." <juanrgonzal...@canonicalscience.com>
wrote:

Thank you for making my point, Juanshito !

As for your "Center for Canonical Science" and "Journal", they are the
ultimate laughing stock when you look at the "professional" and

"ethical" level of your blogs attached to it. Have you ever seen a

scientific journal having such shit attached to it? No!
Anyone looking at your sorry ass website concludes (correctly) that

you spend all your time trolling (a true fact) instead of doing any

"research". No true scientist embarrasses himself as much as you do,

Juanshito. This is why you don't have any scientific publication,
Juanshito. Just your stooopid blogs. :-)

Juan R.

unread,

Dec 20, 2008, 1:09:22 PM12/20/08

to

Dono

unread,

Dec 20, 2008, 1:35:49 PM12/20/08

to

On Dec 20, 10:09 am, "Juan R." <juanrgonzal...@canonicalscience.com>
wrote:

Thank you for making my point, Juanshito !

As for your "Center for Canonical Science" and "Journal", they are the
ultimate laughing stock when you look at the "professional" and
"ethical" level of your blogs attached to it. Have you ever seen a
scientific journal having such shit attached to it? No!
Anyone looking at your sorry ass website concludes (correctly) that
you spend all your time trolling (a true fact) instead of doing any
"research". No true scientist embarrasses himself as much as you do,
Juanshito. This is why you don't have any scientific publication,
Juanshito. Just your stooopid blogs. :-)

You still don't get it , after 6 months of explanations:

H=E+V
H=Pv-L

where:

v=speed
V=potential
P=@L/@v

1. For V=0 , H=E
2. for v=0, H=-L(0)=mc^2+V

It is not that difficult, it has been explained to you for 6 months
and counting. You are slow in learning but you compensate by being

utterly dumb, or, should I say, a typical case of autistic
imbecile? :-)

Juan R.

unread,

Dec 20, 2008, 1:56:03 PM12/20/08

to

Dono

unread,

Dec 20, 2008, 1:59:29 PM12/20/08

to

On Dec 20, 10:56 am, "JuanShito R."

See, this is why you don't produce any science, you spend all your day
trolling and updating your shitty blog that only embarasees you and
your "Center for Canonical Studies" :-)

Juan R.

unread,

Dec 21, 2008, 6:31:20 AM12/21/08

to

On 20 dic, 19:59, Dono <sa...@comcast.net> wrote:

Dono (aka DS1000 aka Karandash2 aka…), the history of your trolling in
USENET, BLOGGER, and WIKIPEDIA is archived forever :-)

http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2008/12/catching-big-troll.html

The book "Dono, How I became a nasty troll", based in the history,
coming soon.

The movie "The dono menace", based in the book, later.

Dono

unread,

Dec 21, 2008, 10:12:48 AM12/21/08

to

On Dec 21, 3:31 am, "JuanShito R."

<juanrgonzal...@canonicalscience.com> wrote:
> On 20 dic, 19:59, Dono <sa...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> Dono (aka DS1000 aka Karandash2 aka…), the history of your trolling in
> USENET, BLOGGER, and WIKIPEDIA is archived forever :-)
>
> http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2008/12/catching-big-troll.html
>

Juanshito,

See, this is why you and your "center" don't produce any science, you
spend all your available time

trolling and updating your shitty blog that only embarasees you and

your "Center for Canonical Studies" . Neither you, nor the "center",
nor your "journal" has any publications. Just your shit-eating
trolling and your misunderstandangs about simple physics. Fact is,
that you can't write physics, all you write is demented trolling. This
is why, you can't publish, you will never get published, old fart. :-)

Juan R.

unread,

Dec 21, 2008, 10:22:11 AM12/21/08

to

On 21 dic, 16:12, Dono <sa...@comcast.net> wrote:

Dono (aka DS1000 aka Karandash2 aka Donkey Rambus aka Adrian Sfarti),

the history of your trolling in USENET, BLOGGER, and WIKIPEDIA is
archived forever :-)

http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2008/12/catching-big-troll.html

The book "Dono, How I became a nasty troll", based in the history,
coming soon.

The movie "The dono menace", based in the book, later.

Dono

unread,

Dec 21, 2008, 10:27:05 AM12/21/08

to

On Dec 21, 7:22 am, "JuanShito R."
<juanrgonzal...@canonicalscience.com> wrote:

Juanshito,

You waste all your time trolling. This is why, you can't publish, you
will never get published, old fart.NEVER. :-)

Juan R.

unread,

Dec 21, 2008, 10:38:41 AM12/21/08

to

On 21 dic, 16:27, Dono <sa...@comcast.net> wrote:

Dono (aka DS1000 aka Karandash2 aka Donkey Rambus aka Adrian Sfarti),
the history of your trolling in USENET, BLOGGER, and WIKIPEDIA is
archived forever :-)

http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2008/12/catching-big-troll.html

The book "Dono, How I became a nasty troll", based in the history,
coming soon.

The movie "The dono menace", based in the book, later.

> On Dec 21, 7:22 am, "JuanShito R."

P.S: Why do you continue voting for yourself Adrian, nobody supports
you. Tomorrow your fake votes will vanish from Groups :-)

Dono

unread,

Dec 21, 2008, 10:49:46 AM12/21/08

to

On Dec 21, 7:38 am, "Juan R." <juanrgonzal...@canonicalscience.com>
wrote:
>

> The book "Dono, How I became a nasty troll", based in the history,
> coming soon.
>
> The movie "The dono menace", based in the book, later.
>

Juanshito, old fart

Since you can't write any physics you are reduced to trolling. This is
the only thing you can do and you spend all your time at it.
The most amusing thing is that you post your trolling on your alleged
"scientific" site, the pompous "Center for Canonical Studies". This
makes you a laughing stock, Juanshito.

Juan R.

unread,

Dec 21, 2008, 10:56:55 AM12/21/08

to

On 21 dic, 16:49, Dono <sa...@comcast.net> wrote:

Dono (aka DS1000 aka Karandash2 aka Donkey Rambus aka Adrian Sfarti),
the history of your trolling in USENET, BLOGGER, and WIKIPEDIA is
archived forever :-)

http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2008/12/catching-big-troll.html

The book "Dono, How I became a nasty troll", based in the history,
coming soon.

The movie "The dono menace", based in the book, later.

P.S: Why do you continue voting for yourself Adrian, nobody supports

you. Tomorrow your fake votes will vanish from Groups :-)

Dono

unread,

Dec 21, 2008, 11:01:52 AM12/21/08

to

On Dec 21, 7:56 am, "JuanShito R."

<juanrgonzal...@canonicalscience.com> wrote:
>
>
> > > The book "Dono, How I became a nasty troll", based in the history,
> > > coming soon.
>
> > > The movie "The dono menace", based in the book, later.
>

Juanshito, old fart

The only "book" that you'll ever publish is your accounts of
trolling.Good, put it on the pompous-ass "Center for Canonical
Studies" so people can laugh at you. :-)
Since you are UNABLE to write ANY physics you are reduced to
trolling. Trolling is

Juan R.

unread,

Dec 21, 2008, 11:08:18 AM12/21/08

to

On 21 dic, 17:01, Dono <sa...@comcast.net> wrote:

Dono (aka DS1000 aka Karandash2 aka Donkey Rambus aka Adrian Sfarti),
the history of your trolling in USENET, BLOGGER, and WIKIPEDIA is
archived forever :-)

http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2008/12/catching-big-troll.html

P.S: Why do you continue voting for yourself Adrian, nobody supports

you. Tomorrow your fake votes will vanish from Groups :-)

> The only "book" that you'll ever publish is your accounts of

Juan R.

unread,

Dec 21, 2008, 11:08:52 AM12/21/08

to

On 21 dic, 17:01, Dono <sa...@comcast.net> wrote:

Dono (aka DS1000 aka Karandash2 aka Donkey Rambus aka Adrian Sfarti),
the history of your trolling in USENET, BLOGGER, and WIKIPEDIA is
archived forever :-)

http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2008/12/catching-big-troll.html

P.S: Why do you continue voting for yourself Adrian, nobody supports

you. Tomorrow your fake votes will vanish from Groups :-)

> The only "book" that you'll ever publish is your accounts of

Dono

unread,

Dec 21, 2008, 11:19:11 AM12/21/08

to

On Dec 21, 8:08 am, "JuanShito R."

<juanrgonzal...@canonicalscience.com> wrote:
> USENET, BLOGGER, and WIKIPEDIA is
> archived forever :-)
>
> http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2008/12/catching-big-troll.html
>

Excellent, Juanshito

It is archived on the pompous-ass "Center for Canonical Studies" and
the "Journal for Canonical Science" whose "Ediror in Chief" is the
pompous ass, demented troll, Juan Alvarez Gonzalez. There is no
science, no papers, just the demented Juan Alvarez Gonzalez blogs.
Congratulations, autistic imbecile.
Maybe I will write an account of your trolling and put it on the
internet, Juanshit. Cuts both ways, what do you say? :-)

Juan R.

unread,

Dec 21, 2008, 11:30:18 AM12/21/08

to

On 21 dic, 17:19, Dono <sa...@comcast.net> wrote:

Dono (aka DS1000 aka Karandash2 aka Donkey Rambus aka Adrian Sfarti),

the history of your trolling in USENET, BLOGGER, and WIKIPEDIA is
archived forever :-)

http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2008/12/catching-big-troll.html

The book "Dono, How I became a nasty troll", based in the history,
coming soon.

The movie "The dono menace", based in the book, later.

> Excellent, Juanshito

I knew you would like it, but wait for the movie!

Dono

unread,

Dec 21, 2008, 11:40:45 AM12/21/08

to

On Dec 21, 8:30 am, "JuanShito R."
<juanrgonzal...@canonicalscience.com> wrote:
>snip trolling<

Juanshito,

Wait until I put up on the internet a short account of your trolling
exploits, you pompous-ass "Editor in Chief" of the "Journal for
Canonical Studies" and chief abbot of the "Center for Canonical
Studies". It is going to be really funny, I promise. The internet cuts
both ways, "Editor" :-)

> > Excellent, Juanshito

pmb

unread,

Dec 21, 2008, 8:44:54 PM12/21/08

to

On Dec 20, 9:11 am, "Juan R." <juanrgonzal...@canonicalscience.com>
wrote:

> On 19 dic, 20:58, Dono <sa...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> > On Dec 19, 11:29 am, "JuanShito R."
>
> > <juanrgonzal...@canonicalscience.com> wrote:
>
> > >http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hamiltonian_mechanics&actio...
>
> > So, you finally understand the stuff Eric and I tried in vain o teach
> > you:
>
> Eric mistake L=T-V implies H=T+V for relativity was corrected before
> byPete,

I see you're still reminding them of that which everyone knows so
well. I hope you understand that its both their goal and their
pleasure when they see you repeat that which they know so well?

Dono

unread,

Dec 21, 2008, 9:15:39 PM12/21/08

to

Juanshito is simply trolling, he has received several explanations but
he's too dumb to understand:

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/097aa1d25286d4bf

Juan R.

unread,

Dec 22, 2008, 9:59:56 AM12/22/08

to

On 21 dic, 17:40, Dono <sa...@comcast.net> wrote:

You are very very very slow to understand that the history of your
vast trolling in USENET, BLOGGER, and WIKIPEDIA is archived
forever :-)

http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2008/12/catching-big-troll.html

The book "Dono, How I became a nasty troll", based in the history,
coming soon.

The movie "The dono menace", based in the book, later. Some suggestion
for main character dono?

P.S: Why do you continue voting for yourself?

Juan R.

unread,

Dec 22, 2008, 10:28:16 AM12/22/08

to

Hi Pete, now we know a lot of: dono trolling, his identity as crackpot
Adrian Sfarti, his account in wikipedia, his trolling and vandalism in
wikipedia, his own webpage (which continues 'deleted' after Albertito
noticed here).

Do you remember that in the past Dono deleted his messages for hidding
his ignorance about relativistic Lagrangians? Well, I prepared a trap
for dono, using a troll FAQ, and dono caught into it :-)

http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2008/12/catching-big-troll.html

During months, Dono failed to solve the elementary exercise of
obtaining the relativistic Hamiltonian from the given Lagrangian. He
gave us up to six nonsensical Hamiltonians (see the list in above
link).

After dono was showed to be a complete ignorant in electrodynamics,
mechanics, and relativity, I give to him the correct answer in above
blog the day 12.

Do you think he did learn something? No, he decided to edit the
Wikipedia and then cite the article he had modified with another
nonsensical Hamiltonian against me!!!

Dono claimed that the non-relativistic Hamiltonian

H = ((p-ea)^2)/2m + e phi

was the real relativistic Hamiltonian when doing (p = m gamma v). Yes,
he wrote *that nonsense* in a Wikipedia article!!!

There is a special talk in wikipedia related to Dono nonsensical
'contributions' (aka vandalism). Of course, Dono nonsense was deleted
many times by other users, Dono resubmitted and was deleted again. He
gave up to 45 editings of Wikipedia article in last four days!!!!

I explained all his mistakes in Wikipedia and other users modified
Dono nonsense. The final version I checked yesterday still contain
some incorrect claims by Dono.

I also invited people to submit art about the troll dono and received
several pictures (see the blog) and also a funny talk that simulates a
talk with dono

http://www.geocities.com/albertzotkin/usenet_talk.html

It is all for fun. Visit next links and enjoy:

http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2008/12/catching-big-troll.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Hamiltonian_mechanics#DS1000.27s_added_material

Juan R.

unread,

Dec 22, 2008, 10:31:54 AM12/22/08

to

> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/097aa1d2528...

It seems you still do not understand Dono (aka DS1000 aka Karandash2
aka...), that the history of your trolling in USENET, BLOGGER, and

Dono

unread,

Dec 22, 2008, 10:33:40 AM12/22/08

to

On Dec 22, 7:28 am, "JuanShito R."

<juanrgonzal...@canonicalscience.com> wrote:
>
> I also invited people to submit art about the troll dono and received
> several pictures (see the blog) and also a funny talk that simulates a
> talk with dono

Yep, this is the level of your pompous-ass "Center of Canonical
Studies" . Main "study" : trolling :-)

>
> It is all for fun. Visit next links and enjoy:
>
> http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2008/12/catching-big-troll.html
>

> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Hamiltonian_mechanics#DS1000.27s_ad...

Hey Juanshit,

Doesn't it rile you that you are being ignored? No one gives a shit
about the pretentious stuff you are writing. Including wiki. You are
still the same old goat :-)

Juan R.

unread,

Dec 22, 2008, 10:41:06 AM12/22/08

to

On 22 dic, 16:33, Dono <sa...@comcast.net> wrote:

Dono (aka DS1000 aka Karandash2 aka...) you are very slow to
understand that the history of your trolling in USENET, BLOGGER, and

WIKIPEDIA is archived forever :-)

http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2008/12/catching-big-troll.html

> On Dec 22, 7:28 am, "JuanShito R."

Why do you add me 72 votes above? Tomorrow your fake votes will vanish
from Groups :-)

Juan R.

unread,

Dec 22, 2008, 10:41:51 AM12/22/08

to

On 22 dic, 16:33, Dono <sa...@comcast.net> wrote:

Dono (aka DS1000 aka Karandash2 aka...) you are very slow to
understand that the history of your trolling in USENET, BLOGGER, and
WIKIPEDIA is archived forever :-)

http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2008/12/catching-big-troll.html

> On Dec 22, 7:28 am, "JuanShito R."

Why do you add me 72 votes above? Tomorrow your fake votes will vanish
from Groups :-)

pmb

unread,

Dec 25, 2008, 9:39:56 AM12/25/08

to

On Dec 22, 10:28 am, "Juan R." <juanrgonzal...@canonicalscience.com>
wrote:

> Do you remember that in the past Dono deleted his messages for hidding

> his ignorance about relativistic Lagrangians?

Yes. I found that to be a very childish action. It showed his true
nature.

> During months, Dono failed to solve the elementary exercise of
> obtaining the relativistic Hamiltonian from the given Lagrangian. He
> gave us up to six nonsensical Hamiltonians (see the list in above
> link).

He's not going to solve a problem like that since in doing it
coirrectly will show that he made a mistake in the past and you know
how some people can be about admitting to their mistakes. Another
childish attribute!

> After dono was showed to be a complete ignorant in electrodynamics,
> mechanics, and relativity, I give to him the correct answer in above
> blog the day 12.

Is he the one that didn't understand the derivation I provided for the
cyclotron? The one that confused it with Newtonian physics because the
equations looked the same? LOL!

> Do you think he did learn something?

We can't say what they learn. We can only speak of what they display
and they will never display the fact that they made an error in the
past and therefore cannot display learning from their mistakes.

> No, he decided to edit the
> Wikipedia and then cite the article he had modified with another
> nonsensical Hamiltonian against me!!!

I hope you didn't expect anything less, did you?

>
> There is a special talk in wikipedia related to Dono nonsensical
> 'contributions' (aka vandalism). Of course, Dono nonsense was deleted
> many times by other users, Dono resubmitted and was deleted again. He
> gave up to 45 editings of Wikipedia article in last four days!!!!

I'm glad that some knowledgebale and intelligent people are there to
correct his many mistakes

> I also invited people to submit art about the troll dono and received
> several pictures (see the blog) and also a funny talk that simulates a
> talk with dono
>
> http://www.geocities.com/albertzotkin/usenet_talk.html
>
> It is all for fun. Visit next links and enjoy:
>
> http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2008/12/catching-big-troll.html

No thanks. I'm trying not to get down in the mud anymore. I don't want
to be like dono and others.

Best wishes

Pete

Juan R.

unread,

Dec 26, 2008, 5:58:16 AM12/26/08

to

On 25 dic, 15:39, pmb <pm...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 22, 10:28 am, "Juan R." <juanrgonzal...@canonicalscience.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Do you remember that in the past Dono deleted his messages for hidding
> > his ignorance about relativistic Lagrangians?
>
> Yes. I found that to be a very childish action. It showed his true
> nature.

Agree.

> > During months, Dono failed to solve the elementary exercise of
> > obtaining the relativistic Hamiltonian from the given Lagrangian. > > He
> > gave us up to six nonsensical Hamiltonians (see the list in above
> > link).
>
> He's not going to solve a problem like that since in doing it
> coirrectly will show that he made a mistake in the past and you know
> how some people can be about admitting to their mistakes. Another
> childish attribute!
>
> > After dono was showed to be a complete ignorant in
> > electrodynamics,
> > mechanics, and relativity, I give to him the correct answer in
> > above
> > blog the day 12.
>
> Is he the one that didn't understand the derivation I provided for > the
> cyclotron? The one that confused it with Newtonian physics because > the
> equations looked the same? LOL!

In my opinion, the more interesting aspect of those individuals is not
their obvious ignorance of most elementary aspects of electrodynamics,
mechanics, relativity... but their *arrogance*.

They write nonsense but still present themselves as knowledgeable
people :-)

> > Do you think he did learn something?
>
> We can't say what they learn. We can only speak of what they display
> and they will never display the fact that they made an error in the
> past and therefore cannot display learning from their mistakes.
>
> > No, he decided to edit the
> > Wikipedia and then cite the article he had modified with another
> > nonsensical Hamiltonian against me!!!
>
> I hope you didn't expect anything less, did you?

I waited all kind of nonsense and childish behavior in this newsgroup.
But, sincerely, I never imagined that dono could write such nonsense
in Wikipedia

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hamiltonian_mechanics&oldid=258225623

and believe that nobody would delete it. Of course, dono evident
nonsense was deleted by wikipedia user JRSpriggs the day 16

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hamiltonian_mechanics&oldid=258431423

but dono resubmitted the same nonsense again!

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hamiltonian_mechanics&oldid=258471322

Finally that kind of nonsense has been definitively eliminated from
Wikipedia but still he wrote some wrong stuff in the last editing.

> > There is a special talk in wikipedia related to Dono nonsensical
> > 'contributions' (aka vandalism). Of course, Dono nonsense was
> > deleted
> > many times by other users, Dono resubmitted and was deleted
> > again. He
> > gave up to 45 editings of Wikipedia article in last four days!!!!
>
> I'm glad that some knowledgebale and intelligent people are there to
> correct his many mistakes

Indeed, also dono unfounded accusations in other wikipedia articles
have been deleted by other users!

> > I also invited people to submit art about the troll dono and
> > received
> > several pictures (see the blog) and also a funny talk that
> > simulates a
> > talk with dono
>
> > http://www.geocities.com/albertzotkin/usenet_talk.html
>
> > It is all for fun. Visit next links and enjoy:
>
> > http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2008/12/catching-big-troll.html
>
> No thanks. I'm trying not to get down in the mud anymore. I don't
> want to be like dono and others.

Of course, my only interest in people as dono was sociological. Once
exposed as the true ignorant troll he is I have started to ignore his
usual nonsensical messages showing the little he knows about physics.

> Best wishes

And Happy Holidays Pete!

Dono

unread,

Dec 26, 2008, 11:54:22 PM12/26/08

to

On Dec 26, 2:58 am, "JuanShito R."
<juanrgonzal...@canonicalscience.com> wrote:
>
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hamiltonian_mechanics&oldid...

>
> Finally that kind of nonsense has been definitively eliminated from
>

You are lying again , Juanshito.
No wonder you never manage to produce any publishable paper, you spent
all your time trolling. ZERO publications, Juanshito :-)

RustyJames

unread,

Dec 27, 2008, 2:29:57 AM12/27/08

to

whats a troll in respect to your meanning

Juan R.

unread,

Dec 27, 2008, 6:17:32 AM12/27/08

to

On 27 dic, 05:54, Dono <sa...@comcast.net> wrote:

Dono (aka DS1000 aka Karandash2 aka...) you are very slow to
understand that the history of your trolling in USENET, BLOGGER, and
WIKIPEDIA is archived forever :-)

http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2008/12/catching-big-troll.html

> You are lying again , Juanshito.