Tom Roberts <tjrobe...@Lucent.com> wrote in messagenews:3EFAEDED.9000105@Lucent.com...
> On 6/25/2003 4:53 PM, Laurent wrote:It's not "strange." Fashion is enforced.
> > The aether, consists of basic, changeless, motionless fixed values
> > (laws), from which everything else, including meaningful information,
> > is being created as spacetime.
> Hmmm. If your claims were correct, don't you think it strange that no
> Don't you think itThe bold-faced lie, again.
> stranger still that nobody has presented a sensible theory that both
> includes an aether and agrees with the experimental record?
> Those of usWhen you start by assuming a deliberate lie, your conclusions are of
> that do physics have concluded that this latter point indicates that
> there most likely is no such thing as an aether....
Deliberate lie, again.
> The primary argument against the aether, IMHO, is that nobody has ever
> For instance, EVERYTHING we have ever observed isThis, from a die-hard relativist. SR and GR are pure continuum theories!
> quantized -- no continuous substance or object has EVER been observed
> (when examined closely enough). How can you reconcile this with yourHis notion of "aether" is a space-time continuum. And here I claimed only
> notion of aether above?
a day or two ago that only relativists believed in a continuous aether. :(
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.