Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion The extraordinary genius of Albert Einstein (DOC) | ScienceDump
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Paul B. Andersen  
View profile  
 More options Jun 7 2012, 4:10 am
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
From: "Paul B. Andersen" <someth...@somewhere.no>
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 10:10:30 +0200
Local: Thurs, Jun 7 2012 4:10 am
Subject: Re: The extraordinary genius of Albert Einstein (DOC) | ScienceDump
On 06.06.2012 00:51, Henry Wilson DSc. wrote:

> On Tue, 05 Jun 2012 20:34:48 +0200, "Paul B. Andersen"<some...@somwhere.no>
> wrote:

>> On 05.06.2012 01:08, Henry Wilson DSc. wrote:
>>> On Mon, 04 Jun 2012 14:07:26 +0200, "Paul B. Andersen"
>>> <someth...@somewhere.no>   wrote:

>>> The signal waveform is created by photon density variations plus a
>>> likelihood that they all interact over time to form some kind of coherent EM
>>> structure.

>> http://tinyurl.com/cqfycnt

>>> Since you can apparently contribute no scientific opinion at all on this
>>> subject, I gather that you, like Androcles, believe that a radio signal
>>> consists of one large photon moving at c in an aether..

>> I couldn't have gotten a clearer answer:
>>   "No, I, Henry Wilson, can't explain why QED doesn't
>>    throw any light on the role of photons in radio transmission,
>>    because I know nothing about QED".

> If the creator of curved light rays had read Feynman's book, he would
> clearly see that my statements about the limitations of his magic QED are
> reinforced.

> Do you really think you can win an argument by endlessly repeating the word
> 'QED'?

> You are clearly a loser...and a bad one...

Thanks for the confirmation.

Case closed.

--
Paul

http://www.gethome.no/paulba/


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.