Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
sci.physics.relativity
+ new post
About this group
Subscribe to this group
This is a Usenet group - learn more
Message from discussion Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Pentcho Valev  
View profile  
 More options Sep 8 2007, 6:29 am
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics, sci.physics.particle
From: Pentcho Valev <pva...@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2007 03:29:56 -0700
Local: Sat, Sep 8 2007 6:29 am
Subject: Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
Print | View thread | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
On 8 Sept, 13:21, "Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoor...@ThankS-NO-

SperM.hotmail.com> wrote:
> "Christian Schröder" <mailfuerchrist...@gmx.de> wrote in messagenews:fbtrdq$t9o$1@registered.motzarella.org...
> > Okay, I'm sorry. I just noticed that you actually did define your m (and the frame of reference) by the sentence: "[...] the
> > projectiles fly apart with equal and opposite momenta mv and -vm, each with KE = ½mv2. [...]"

> > But therewith the relativistic energy-momentum equation (in usual notation) is _not_ E² = m²c² + p²c² in general. (This equation
> > holds only for p = 0.)

> > And then I don't get your message.

> > Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.

> Perhaps have a look at Androcles contributions and MO at
>    http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/ImmortalFumbles.html
> Enjoy!

> Dirk Vdm

Moortel Moortel does the following discovery of Master Tom Roberts's
deserve a place among your fumbles?

http://groups.google.ca/group/sci.physics.relativity/browse_frm/threa...
Tom Roberts: "If it is ultimately discovered that the photon has a
nonzero mass (i.e. light in vacuum does not travel at the invariant
speed of the Lorentz transform), SR would be unaffected but both
Maxwell's equations and QED would be refuted (or rather, their domains
of applicability would be reduced)."

Pentcho Valev


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2013 Google