Message from discussion Tom Roberts Does not Appear to Understand Relativity at All.
Received: by 10.180.91.231 with SMTP id ch7mr1178632wib.1.1349533026972;
Sat, 06 Oct 2012 07:17:06 -0700 (PDT)
From: Big Dog <big.fing....@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Tom Roberts Does not Appear to Understand Relativity at All.
Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2012 09:17:13 -0500
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
References: <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120907 Thunderbird/15.0.1
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
On 10/6/2012 12:27 AM, Koobee Wublee wrote:
> On Oct 5, 6:30 pm, Henry Wilson <hnrwl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> In a recent message Tom Roberts wrote, quote:
>> "A TIME interval must be measured by a single clock...”
> The issue here is not whether Tom Roberts and other self-styled
> physicists understand relativity or not. It is about why they BELIEVE
> IN relativity. <shrug>
> We are constantly reminded that relativity has not been falsified by
> any experiments. Over time, that concept even if false will sink in.
> That is how lies can become truths through repeated same lies.
> In experimental verifications of relativity, there is some truth to
> that since no experiments have shown relativity to be false.
You are right up to here.
> these same experimental verifications have shown the antitheses to
> relativity to be also valid, and no experiments have shown the
> antitheses to relativity to be false.
And here you are wrong.