Received: by 10.180.91.231 with SMTP id ch7mr1178632wib.1.1349533026972;
        Sat, 06 Oct 2012 07:17:06 -0700 (PDT)
Path: q11ni134176630wiw.1!nntp.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!gegeweb.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Big Dog <big.fing....@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics
Subject: Re: Tom Roberts Does not Appear to Understand Relativity at All.
Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2012 09:17:13 -0500
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines: 29
Message-ID: <k4pegv$a7$2@speranza.aioe.org>
References: <72637367-5e5b-4e31-a952-ebfa6ef4a85d@googlegroups.com> <2affb489-6e32-41c2-9509-77c6712f963a@vy11g2000pbb.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: Vl+oIzdesXAYXIsN11JUPA.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120907 Thunderbird/15.0.1
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

On 10/6/2012 12:27 AM, Koobee Wublee wrote:
> On Oct 5, 6:30 pm, Henry Wilson <hnrwl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>   In a recent message Tom Roberts wrote, quote:
>>
>> "A TIME interval must be measured by a single clock...”
>
> The issue here is not whether Tom Roberts and other self-styled
> physicists understand relativity or not.  It is about why they BELIEVE
> IN relativity.  <shrug>
>
> We are constantly reminded that relativity has not been falsified by
> any experiments.  Over time, that concept even if false will sink in.
> That is how lies can become truths through repeated same lies.
> <shrug>
>
> In experimental verifications of relativity, there is some truth to
> that since no experiments have shown relativity to be false.

You are right up to here.

> However,
> these same experimental verifications have shown the antitheses to
> relativity to be also valid, and no experiments have shown the
> antitheses to relativity to be false.

And here you are wrong.