Paul Andersen's article showed Eric Gisse is IGNORANT on Temperature and Lorentz scalars.
gu...@hotmail.com
On July 11th, above Paul B. Andesen gave a link to a "PDF" file which
says that Temperature is a Lorentz scalar.
Eric Gisse will NOT BE ABLE to recognize what it says, which is why he
is continuously too IGNORANT and a throlling heckler.
Eric Gisse
> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/2464285e22f...
>
> On July 11th, above Paul B. Andesen gave a link to a "PDF" file which
> says that Temperature is a Lorentz scalar.
>
> Eric Gisse will NOT BE ABLE to recognize what it says, which is why he
> is continuously too IGNORANT and a throlling heckler.
One invariant was traded for another. He assumed temperature was
invariant and found that entropy had to transform. It isn't that
interesting.
I don't really see why you continue whining about the topic. It isn't
as if you know anything about thermodynamics anyway. You turned a
quick little academic argument into a months-long bitchfest because
you can't shut the fuck up when beaten.
gu...@hotmail.com
> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/2464285e22f...
>
> says that Temperature is a Lorentz scalar.
>
> Eric Gisse will NOT BE ABLE to recognize what it says, which is why he
> is continuously too IGNORANT and a throlling heckler.
Actually the above is just to amuse the N.O.V.I.C.E for the answer
everyone "else" knows is much more evident.
Eric Gisse doesn't know the definition of a lorentz scalar. He accepts
t' = gamma t but too "ignorant" to "understand" that means invariant t
is a Lorent scalar.
Idiot writes that it become relativistic t' which means it's not a
Lorentz scalar since it must remain invariant, what a buffoon.
Duhhhh.