Received: by 10.224.70.131 with SMTP id d3mr10406480qaj.0.1349589212022;
        Sat, 06 Oct 2012 22:53:32 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.91.168 with SMTP id cf8mr2209871vdb.6.1349589211946; Sat,
 06 Oct 2012 22:53:31 -0700 (PDT)
Path: e10ni211270746qan.0!nntp.google.com!l8no29112781qao.0!postnews.google.com!x18g2000vby.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2012 22:53:31 -0700 (PDT)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: x18g2000vby.googlegroups.com; posting-host=83.252.235.97; posting-account=kxPkPAoAAACjJi8w0gL9bnyznPzdw9HW
NNTP-Posting-Host: 83.252.235.97
References: <47f95693-4d8b-401c-ad2f-6ea3268b177c@lo4g2000pbb.googlegroups.com>
 <k44dcl$ocn$1@speranza.aioe.org> <k44tb2$1n6$3@speranza.aioe.org>
 <0058ca03-0372-4512-a5c1-06a898ea930c@c6g2000pba.googlegroups.com>
 <k46n7t$o8l$3@speranza.aioe.org> <42b54a12-b2f0-4486-bf99-56c08a42faaa@ph9g2000pbb.googlegroups.com>
 <k4cb1u$rj2$1@speranza.aioe.org> <432068c5-32c6-4eeb-81c1-253d7771f6ba@s9g2000pbh.googlegroups.com>
 <k4ekdm$6kq$1@speranza.aioe.org> <85cdd953-a098-4cb6-9ae3-b4ca2f86b27b@m5g2000pbv.googlegroups.com>
 <38386f3c-02c4-4d3c-a9f9-08ce75ee8e75@b19g2000vbt.googlegroups.com> <784270a5-b93e-4604-8119-01e397505b14@ph9g2000pbb.googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.4
 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/22.0.1229.79 Safari/537.4,gzip(gfe)
Message-ID: <3ba04bb1-7776-4b86-bdc6-b11abce1602b@x18g2000vby.googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Motion vs Momentum and time
From: JT <jonas.thornv...@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2012 05:53:32 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On 4 Okt, 14:19, Y <yanar...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On 3 Oct, 17:21, JT <jonas.thornv...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On 3 Okt, 00:27, Y <yanar...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > An event with start and end manifest time and is proof of time
> > existence, of course time is motion at some metalevel time can not
> > exist outside motion and causal logic, no more then matter can exist
> > without energy.
>
> Not necessarily. An event can be defined as having a beginning and an
> end, sure.. The question is, what is this stuff between a beginning
> and an end ? In a purely natural sense, I think that there is motion
> from the beginning to the end of an event.

The stuff between is oscillation and motion, on either the observer
side or on the event side.

> In terms of measurement, I
> could arbitrarily call this duration a 'time', but this would not be
> talking with reference to any natural thing. If anything I have said
> to date regarding time best alludes to my point of view, it is in this
> paragraph.

There possibly could be a type of oscillation that is not affected by
either inertial or gravitation, that could be used for universal time.
>
> -y