Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
sci.physics.relativity
+ new post
About this group
Subscribe to this group
This is a Usenet group - learn more
Message from discussion Why are the 'Fixed Stars' so FIXED?
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Henri Wilson  
View profile  
 More options Apr 26 2007, 8:40 pm
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity, sci.astro
From: HW@....(Henri Wilson)
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:40:08 GMT
Local: Thurs, Apr 26 2007 8:40 pm
Subject: Re: Why are the 'Fixed Stars' so FIXED?
Reply to author | Forward | Print | View thread | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
On 26 Apr 2007 04:55:29 -0700, George Dishman <geo...@briar.demon.co.uk> wrote:

>On 25 Apr, 23:59, HW@....(Henri Wilson) wrote:
>> On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:10:54 +0100, "George Dishman" <geo...@briar.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>> >"Henri Wilson" <HW@....> wrote in message
>> >> I'm saying that utill the phase is definitely known, it is impossible to
>> >> distinguish between BaTh effects and genuine eclipsing.

>> >Yes it is, large variations only come from the ADoppler contribution
>> >but the curve for an eclipser is always 90 degrees out from ADoppler
>> >and in phase with VDoppler.

>> Generally that will not be true with the rubber photon theory...

>The theory makes no difference, acceleration and velocity come
>from the Keplerian orbit.
>> except for very
>> short periods... but since most ADoppler would take place in light emitted
>> behind the eclipse, it might hardly be important anyway.

>What is observed is that the maximum shift is between
>conjunctions, hence is due to VDoppler and the phase
>is not displaced so ADoppler << VDoppler.

Why isn't the brightness curve of EF Dra flat on top, ie., while the two stars
are in full view for a major part of the orbit?
I presume it currently explained by glowing material transferring between the
two bodies.
I don't believe that. I say it is a BaTh effect.

Here is my interpretation of EF Dra....and other 'contact  binaries'.
http://www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/efdrag.jpg

This show ONE star being orbited and partially eclipsed by a large cool body.
The second spectrum is just a reflection.
Note, the BaTh phasing now agrees with the brightness/velocity curves.

......Just another example of how astronomy has been completely derailed by
Einsteiniana.

>> >> Many brightness curve feature such a dip....but that doesn't mean the
>> >> stars are eclipsing.

>> >It does if it is 90 degrees out, and if you check the binaries that
>> >are supposed to be eclipsing, you will find that is always the case.

>> Often there is only a single eclipse per orbit.
>> If there are no spectral curves available, nobody could tell the difference.
>> However, generally, the brightness and ADoppler shift curves will be in phase.

>That is the ballistic prediction but as observed they are always
>90 degrees out, hence the only evidence is for VDoppler, there
>is none to support the existence of ADoppler. You stll haven't
>met my challenge.

http://www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/efdrag.jpg

>George

www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm

Einstein's Relativity - the greatest HOAX since jesus christ's virgin mother.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google