Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Science vs religion
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Androcles  
View profile  
 More options Apr 26 2004, 8:24 pm
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics
From: "Androcles" <jp006f9...@spamnotblueyonder.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 01:24:45 +0100
Local: Mon, Apr 26 2004 8:24 pm
Subject: Re: Science vs religion

"Capitol" <capit...@freedomuk.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in
message news:c6jpj1$idv$1@news6.svr.pol.co.uk...
|

| Androcles wrote in message

<2zYic.4870$TK6.2...@dentist.cableinet.net>...
|
|
| >If it had any validity, the transformer would not require
an
| >iron core.
|
|
| Transformers do not require per se, an iron core. It is
the proximity of the
| two wires magnetic field coupling which allows power
transfer.

Now you are being absurdly idiotic. I thought at first you
had some genuine
knowledge, but clearly you have no idea what you are talking
about.
I can (and have) placed windings on opposite sides of a
ferrite ring.

| Many uhf  transformers are coreless.
|
| Regards
| Capitol

Phooey! Many rowboats have oars, too. Try crossing the
ocean.
You obviously know nothing of efficiency or power transfer.
Androcles


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.