<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
  <title>sci.physics.relativity Google Group</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity</link>
  <description>The theory of relativity.</description>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
  <title>Re: LHC restarts and you&#39;re still here to read about it.</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/browse_thread/thread/6c66590a94a87841/08dc5971c4d8b33b?show_docid=08dc5971c4d8b33b</link>
  <description>
  if you build it, they will come . . .
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/browse_thread/thread/6c66590a94a87841/08dc5971c4d8b33b?show_docid=08dc5971c4d8b33b</guid>
  <author>
  b...@birdband.net
  (Raymond Yohros)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:59:12 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: LHC restarts and you&#39;re still here to read about it.</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/browse_thread/thread/6c66590a94a87841/e24331ea942bcfef?show_docid=e24331ea942bcfef</link>
  <description>
  let me try as a start: &lt;br&gt; since i guess that the most basic Circlon &lt;br&gt; might be one of the tiniest mass possible &lt;br&gt; and it moves in a magnetic field ( right ??) &lt;br&gt; i would start to look on cases &lt;br&gt; in which the radius of curvature &lt;br&gt; **is very big ** &lt;br&gt; ie quite close to a straight line &lt;br&gt; but still not a straight straight !!
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/browse_thread/thread/6c66590a94a87841/e24331ea942bcfef?show_docid=e24331ea942bcfef</guid>
  <author>
  y.y.po...@gmail.com
  (Y.Porat)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:50:40 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: CERN, LHC. The End is soon.</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/browse_thread/thread/7e292b42c079aa35/ef6b9817dbcd9984?show_docid=ef6b9817dbcd9984</link>
  <description>
  the End, yes, end for stupidity and flat travel. &lt;br&gt; end for lies, wrong views, selfishness and boycuttings &lt;br&gt; the beginning of unification and the first light &lt;br&gt; for spacetime travel &lt;br&gt; r.y
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/browse_thread/thread/7e292b42c079aa35/ef6b9817dbcd9984?show_docid=ef6b9817dbcd9984</guid>
  <author>
  b...@birdband.net
  (Raymond Yohros)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:47:19 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: A call to reasonable people all over the world.</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/browse_thread/thread/f89cc6b4641066aa/09867d16e8f86605?show_docid=09867d16e8f86605</link>
  <description>
  it&#39;s -&amp;gt; its &lt;br&gt; enourmous -&amp;gt; enormose &lt;br&gt; Coke &amp;lt; Pepsi
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/browse_thread/thread/f89cc6b4641066aa/09867d16e8f86605?show_docid=09867d16e8f86605</guid>
  <author>
  lysde...@sbcglobal.net
  (Autymn D. C.)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:43:06 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: The universe is, or the local universe is in, a jet stream</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/browse_thread/thread/8056dba3740ba76c/3d1c7b6090aadacc?show_docid=3d1c7b6090aadacc</link>
  <description>
  What in the following image could not be a jet stream? &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://aether.lbl.gov/image_all.html&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/browse_thread/thread/8056dba3740ba76c/3d1c7b6090aadacc?show_docid=3d1c7b6090aadacc</guid>
  <author>
  mpc...@gmail.com
  (mpc755)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:39:49 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: The universe is, or the local universe is in, a jet stream</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/browse_thread/thread/8056dba3740ba76c/83dceb554292a296?show_docid=83dceb554292a296</link>
  <description>
  Sorry, but an observer at any point in your image with the red lines &lt;br&gt; will not see the expansion as isotropic.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/browse_thread/thread/8056dba3740ba76c/83dceb554292a296?show_docid=83dceb554292a296</guid>
  <author>
  thedraperfam...@gmail.com
  (PD)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:33:29 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: The universe is, or the local universe is in, a jet stream</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/browse_thread/thread/8056dba3740ba76c/1695e78773db92e6?show_docid=1695e78773db92e6</link>
  <description>
  Yes, the expansion is measurably isotropic because we are in the &lt;br&gt; expansion. The image you skipped over is more likely a jet stream and &lt;br&gt; an ongoing process than a single event: &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://aether.lbl.gov/image_all.html&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/browse_thread/thread/8056dba3740ba76c/1695e78773db92e6?show_docid=1695e78773db92e6</guid>
  <author>
  mpc...@gmail.com
  (mpc755)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:32:05 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: The universe is, or the local universe is in, a jet stream</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/browse_thread/thread/8056dba3740ba76c/017b821df7ed3c93?show_docid=017b821df7ed3c93</link>
  <description>
  Sorry, but the red lines in the image are not isotropic. The expansion &lt;br&gt; is measurably isotropic.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/browse_thread/thread/8056dba3740ba76c/017b821df7ed3c93?show_docid=017b821df7ed3c93</guid>
  <author>
  thedraperfam...@gmail.com
  (PD)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:30:01 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: LHC restarts and you&#39;re still here to read about it.</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/browse_thread/thread/6c66590a94a87841/8593d95b39ba2ee5?show_docid=8593d95b39ba2ee5</link>
  <description>
  Circular movement with no radius. &lt;br&gt; Hmmm... &lt;br&gt; How do you look for it if you have no idea what radius of motion to &lt;br&gt; look for?
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/browse_thread/thread/6c66590a94a87841/8593d95b39ba2ee5?show_docid=8593d95b39ba2ee5</guid>
  <author>
  thedraperfam...@gmail.com
  (PD)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:28:25 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Is physics a science?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/browse_thread/thread/a42521f65c68a0ce/7e23fd7ffa8fb9dd?show_docid=7e23fd7ffa8fb9dd</link>
  <description>
  On Nov 24, 6:26 am, John Kennaugh &amp;lt;J...@notworking.freeserve.co. uk&amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; wrote: &lt;br&gt; This comes as great news to the physics community. &lt;br&gt; Just want to make it clear that this is a statement that YOU are &lt;br&gt; positing, on your own. &lt;br&gt; You are free to develop this new mechanics into a full-scale &lt;br&gt; theoretical treatment. &lt;br&gt; The absence of absolute speed does NOT mean that the single object
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/browse_thread/thread/a42521f65c68a0ce/7e23fd7ffa8fb9dd?show_docid=7e23fd7ffa8fb9dd</guid>
  <author>
  thedraperfam...@gmail.com
  (PD)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:26:40 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Is physics a science?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/browse_thread/thread/a42521f65c68a0ce/7529971fe337a8fa?show_docid=7529971fe337a8fa</link>
  <description>
  On Nov 24, 6:52 am, John Kennaugh &amp;lt;J...@notworking.freeserve.co. uk&amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; wrote: &lt;br&gt; Yes, thank you for making my point.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/browse_thread/thread/a42521f65c68a0ce/7529971fe337a8fa?show_docid=7529971fe337a8fa</guid>
  <author>
  thedraperfam...@gmail.com
  (PD)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:15:59 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Is physics a science?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/browse_thread/thread/a42521f65c68a0ce/c5bf4f2530185267?show_docid=c5bf4f2530185267</link>
  <description>
  In every known interaction, there is no direct-contact particle-on- &lt;br&gt; particle bouncing. Yet they do interact. It is therefore plausible to &lt;br&gt; suggest that the interaction is mediated by fields. Yet you would have &lt;br&gt; us believe that underneath this, there are direct-contact, particle-on- &lt;br&gt; particle bounces, even though there is no evidence anywhere of this
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/browse_thread/thread/a42521f65c68a0ce/c5bf4f2530185267?show_docid=c5bf4f2530185267</guid>
  <author>
  thedraperfam...@gmail.com
  (PD)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:14:53 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: The universe is, or the local universe is in, a jet stream</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/browse_thread/thread/8056dba3740ba76c/2cef06dc601fa664?show_docid=2cef06dc601fa664</link>
  <description>
  Most, if not all, paths lead back to the emission point. That is why &lt;br&gt; it appears as though the cosmic background radiation surrounds us.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/browse_thread/thread/8056dba3740ba76c/2cef06dc601fa664?show_docid=2cef06dc601fa664</guid>
  <author>
  mpc...@gmail.com
  (mpc755)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:09:10 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: LHC restarts and you&#39;re still here to read about it.</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/browse_thread/thread/6c66590a94a87841/3091bcd02607ee08?show_docid=3091bcd02607ee08</link>
  <description>
  no mass no radius as a first step!! &lt;br&gt; just some circular movement &lt;br&gt; as a beginning !!! &lt;br&gt; so it is the simplest and cheapest thing to do !! &lt;br&gt; ie &lt;br&gt; just to notice it qualitatively !! &lt;br&gt; later we (they) can go on in investigating &lt;br&gt; if it can be explained or not by the current &lt;br&gt; theory &lt;br&gt; ATB &lt;br&gt; Y.Porat &lt;br&gt; --------------------------
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/browse_thread/thread/6c66590a94a87841/3091bcd02607ee08?show_docid=3091bcd02607ee08</guid>
  <author>
  y.y.po...@gmail.com
  (Y.Porat)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:08:42 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: A call to reasonable people all over the world.</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/browse_thread/thread/f89cc6b4641066aa/57bb047eeab70595?show_docid=57bb047eeab70595</link>
  <description>
  Now I ask you a simple question: What happens when they ramp up the &lt;br&gt; energy and nothing bad happens?
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/browse_thread/thread/f89cc6b4641066aa/57bb047eeab70595?show_docid=57bb047eeab70595</guid>
  <author>
  thedraperfam...@gmail.com
  (PD)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:00:11 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
