sci.physics.relativity Google Group

Re: Pentcho Valev - why not peer reviewed publication?

h...@.... (Dr. Henri Wilson) — Fri, 25 Jul 2008 09:41:23 UT

All right, I could have included another term u, denoting the speed of the
binary barycentre wrt earth. I usually leave that out because it is obvious and
doesn't affect brightness curves..
Do you still find this amusing, Wormey?...or do you think that all starlight is
magically adjusted by the fairies to travel towards little planet Earth at

Re: Curious about the emission theory of light

h...@.... (Dr. Henri Wilson) — Fri, 25 Jul 2008 09:30:48 UT

Like I said, we see the willusion. The problem remains to deduce the real
facts.
Relativists don't understand that what they see in distant is not necessarily
just as it happened.

Not so. There is overwhelming evidence supporting it. All arguments against are
now known to be flawed.

Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T)

Re: Curious about the emission theory of light

h...@.... (Dr. Henri Wilson) — Fri, 25 Jul 2008 09:32:19 UT

On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 17:23:21 -0700 (PDT), Jerry
Uncle Ben is just another relativist troll who has recently changed his posting
name.
Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T)
[link]
All religion involves selling a nonexistant product to gullible fools. Einstein cleverly exploited this principle with his second postulate.

Re: Curious about the emission theory of light

h...@.... (Dr. Henri Wilson) — Fri, 25 Jul 2008 09:25:56 UT

There is nothing like a pure vacuum in a TV tube.
Where, In fairyland?
Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T)
[link]
All religion involves selling a nonexistant product to gullible fools. Einstein cleverly exploited this principle with his second postulate.

Re: SR Makes Contradictory Claims

harald.vanlintelbutnott...@epfl.ch (harry) — Fri, 25 Jul 2008 09:22:19 UT

Wrong. Instead, light is merely *defined* to be (or better, to *look*)
isotropic when the clock synchronization procedure is applied which thus
"makes" it isotropic, at least on paper and *only for the observers who use
that calibration*. For all other observers, as Einstein put it (I copy-paste

Re: THE WORLD NEEDS COLD FUSION.

schu...@mail.biu.ack.il (Richard Schultz) — Fri, 25 Jul 2008 08:28:52 UT

Isn't it amazing? When a reported discovery violates fundamental
principles of physics, it suddenly seems to disappear into a black hole,
and anyone who suggests a connection between the two is accused (by people
who don't know anything about physics) of being part of some huge
secret conspiracy that only the accuser knows about.

Re: Time dilation pre-Einstein

dirkvandemoor...@thanks-no-sperm.hotmail.com (Dirk Van de moortel) — Fri, 25 Jul 2008 08:11:37 UT

affce594-0c1b-4713-b8b6-d0b8ed 526...@r66g2000hsg.googlegroup s.com
[snip]
afaic Harry is some kind of technician - at CERN or something.
His hobby - trying to convince the world, in a polite way, that
The Aether Can Explain It All.
Dirk Vdm

Re: True Value of the Fine Structure Constant Revealed

4vec...@gmail.com (kp) — Fri, 25 Jul 2008 07:42:54 UT

LOL!

Re: Time dilation pre-Einstein

harald.vanlintelbutnott...@epfl.ch (harry) — Fri, 25 Jul 2008 07:32:11 UT

On Jul 24, 11:38 am, "harry" <harald.vanlintelButNotT...@ep fl.ch>
wrote:
At least we agree on the above points. :-)
Cheers,
Harald

Re: Time dilation pre-Einstein

harald.vanlintelbutnott...@epfl.ch (harry) — Fri, 25 Jul 2008 07:29:31 UT

On Jul 24, 3:10 pm, "harry" <harald.vanlintelButNotT...@ep fl.ch>
wrote:
In fact we agree on that one. :-)
Either there is a mistake in the above argument (and I sure would like to
know what the mistake is!) or I'm right about that. Thus I still think that
you were not right about your assertion that "magnetism is just the

Re: Einstein's Rigid Body

headmas...@hogwarts.physics (Androcles) — Fri, 25 Jul 2008 07:13:14 UT

Reading Troll Smiffy's reply:
Troll Smiffy's brain atrophied in 1955. It is dead.

Re: VARIABLE SPEED OF LIGHT IN A GRAVITATIONAL FIELD

pva...@yahoo.com (Pentcho Valev) — Fri, 25 Jul 2008 06:43:05 UT

You must be writing a book or something (Einsteinians always fiercely
teach the world) and since the author of
[link]
has not explained how gravitational time dilation relates to the
Doppler effect, you expect ME to fill the gap. I will not. I wish
Einsteinians would stop teaching the world so fiercely. Just for non-

Re: SR Makes Contradictory Claims

glbra...@insightbb.com (G. L. Bradford) — Fri, 25 Jul 2008 06:39:21 UT

(never mind)
===================
Relativity: The Special and the General Theory, by Albert Einstein, chapter
nine, The Relativity of Simultaneity, third paragraph:
"When we say that the lightning strokes [A] and [B] are simultaneous with
respect to the embankment, we mean: the rays of light emitted at the places

Re: new straw man by David

headmas...@hogwarts.physics (Androcles) — Fri, 25 Jul 2008 06:24:04 UT

If the 50 kg weakling who has gotten mad at this mental athlete wishes
to be thrown off the mat let him first answer hanson's question.
Why did Einstein say
the speed of light from A to B is c-v,
the speed of light from B to A is c+v,
the "time" each way is the same?
"Counterfactual assumptions yield nonsense.

True Value of the Fine Structure Constant Revealed

jleecfo...@aol.com (Jeff) — Fri, 25 Jul 2008 06:18:03 UT

By using an entirely new way of combining fundamental Quantum
Mechanics with Time Dilation, YES - Time Dilation, we are now able to
reveal the CORRECT value of the Fine Structure Constant to be:
7.29907563x10^-3.
We also reveal direct, absolute proof illustrating how this recently
discovered value is totally correct, plus we also prove, beyond any