sci.physics.relativity Google Group

Re: CERN, LHC. The End is soon.

2009-11-24T16:17:23Z

Can anyone explain why cretin God-believers/botherers always misspell
"its"?

Re: LHC restarts and you're still here to read about it.

2009-11-24T15:59:12Z

if you build it, they will come . . .

Re: LHC restarts and you're still here to read about it.

2009-11-24T15:50:40Z

let me try as a start:
since i guess that the most basic Circlon
might be one of the tiniest mass possible
and it moves in a magnetic field ( right ??)
i would start to look on cases
in which the radius of curvature
**is very big **
ie quite close to a straight line
but still not a straight straight !!

Re: CERN, LHC. The End is soon.

2009-11-24T15:47:19Z

the End, yes, end for stupidity and flat travel.
end for lies, wrong views, selfishness and boycuttings
the beginning of unification and the first light
for spacetime travel
r.y

Re: A call to reasonable people all over the world.

2009-11-24T15:43:06Z

it's -> its
enourmous -> enormose
Coke < Pepsi

Re: The universe is, or the local universe is in, a jet stream

2009-11-24T15:39:49Z

What in the following image could not be a jet stream?
[link]

Re: The universe is, or the local universe is in, a jet stream

2009-11-24T15:33:29Z

Sorry, but an observer at any point in your image with the red lines
will not see the expansion as isotropic.

Re: The universe is, or the local universe is in, a jet stream

2009-11-24T15:32:05Z

Yes, the expansion is measurably isotropic because we are in the
expansion. The image you skipped over is more likely a jet stream and
an ongoing process than a single event:
[link]

Re: The universe is, or the local universe is in, a jet stream

2009-11-24T15:30:01Z

Sorry, but the red lines in the image are not isotropic. The expansion
is measurably isotropic.

Re: LHC restarts and you're still here to read about it.

2009-11-24T15:28:25Z

Circular movement with no radius.
Hmmm...
How do you look for it if you have no idea what radius of motion to
look for?

Re: Is physics a science?

2009-11-24T15:26:40Z

On Nov 24, 6:26 am, John Kennaugh <J...@notworking.freeserve.co. uk>
wrote:
This comes as great news to the physics community.
Just want to make it clear that this is a statement that YOU are
positing, on your own.
You are free to develop this new mechanics into a full-scale
theoretical treatment.
The absence of absolute speed does NOT mean that the single object

Re: Is physics a science?

2009-11-24T15:15:59Z

On Nov 24, 6:52 am, John Kennaugh <J...@notworking.freeserve.co. uk>
wrote:
Yes, thank you for making my point.

Re: Is physics a science?

2009-11-24T15:14:53Z

In every known interaction, there is no direct-contact particle-on-
particle bouncing. Yet they do interact. It is therefore plausible to
suggest that the interaction is mediated by fields. Yet you would have
us believe that underneath this, there are direct-contact, particle-on-
particle bounces, even though there is no evidence anywhere of this

Re: The universe is, or the local universe is in, a jet stream

2009-11-24T15:09:10Z

Most, if not all, paths lead back to the emission point. That is why
it appears as though the cosmic background radiation surrounds us.

Re: LHC restarts and you're still here to read about it.

2009-11-24T15:08:42Z

no mass no radius as a first step!!
just some circular movement
as a beginning !!!
so it is the simplest and cheapest thing to do !!
ie
just to notice it qualitatively !!
later we (they) can go on in investigating
if it can be explained or not by the current
theory
ATB
Y.Porat
--------------------------