you must maintain the formal equality in your relativity

[dedanoe]

relativity is wrong even starting
with Galileo and Newton:
K <-- K': x=x'+Vt' and t=t'
K --> K': x'=x-Vt and t'=t
because Galileo and Newton
formulated kinetics all wrong.

the right way of putting it is: x-x'=Vt-V't'.
if x is Vt then x' must be V't' and so
relativity becums senseless. they can't
make the starting moment zero i.e. t'=0
and conclude x=x'+Vt with x'=any
cause then x'=V't' equals zero as well
and what remains is x=Vt again.

--
FIRST DON OF ARMAGEDDON,
Excellency Dedanoe Unlishnidaos.
http://dedanoe.googlepages.com

[Jens Stueckelberger]

On Fri, 03 Oct 2008 17:54:14 -0700, dedanoe wrote:

> the right way of putting it is: x-x'=Vt-V't'. if x is Vt then x' must be
> V't' and so relativity becums senseless.

Don't you think it would be better for you master basic writing
and spelling before attempting to overthrow the relativity principle?

[Uncle Al]

dedanoe wrote:
>
> relativity is wrong even starting
> with Galileo and Newton:

[snip crap]

Hey fucking stooopid - it's the other way around by trivial
observation.

http://cc3d.free.fr/Relativity/Relat1.html
Special Relativity for yard apes

<http://www.edu-observatory.org/physics-faq/Relativity/SR/experiments.html>
Experimental constraints on Special Relativity

<http://relativity.livingreviews.org/Articles/lrr-2006-3/>
http://arXiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0311039
Experimental constraints on General Relativity

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2

[dedanoe]

On Oct 4, 4:55 am, Jens Stueckelberger <JStueckelber...@nowhere.org>
wrote:

zborot mi beshe: tvojta ravenka koja se odnesuva na nekoja fizicka
pojava mora da go zapazuva oblikot na ist nacin vrz sekoja grupa od
promenlivi so ist index t.e. ako za index 1 imash x1 = v1 t1 togash
mora i za index 2 da e x2 = v2 t2. so drugi zborovi ravenkite mora da
se razbivaat po indexi do celini so ist oblik.

[extremesou...@yahoo.com]

its senseless becuse there is no central point starting at zero i.e.

t'=0
and conclude x=x'+Vt with x'=any
cause then x'=V't' equals zero as well
and what remains is x=Vt again.

but if space time fabric or dark flow is expanding infanitely within a
closed manifold on any point of that the manifold can never have a
zero point any where in your equation. so this only works on The
Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker (FLRW) metric veiw homogeneous,
isotropic expanding and contracting universe.

[PD]

On Oct 3, 9:55 pm, Jens Stueckelberger <JStueckelber...@nowhere.org>
wrote:

Dedanoe is unfortunately certifiably insane and occasionally undergoes
treatment for it. In between, he dabbles on the internet. His
caretakers see no harm.

PD

[dedanoe]

kurvo prestani da se grizish za toa kako me proglasuvaat mentalno.
mene mentalno me tretiraat po baranje na mentalni idioti a ne po moe
baranje. ovde stanuva zbor za padot na vashata fizika. ako imash
argumenti da mi se sprotistavish poveli ako ne odjebi.

formalnata ednakvost mora da se zapazi: ako x=vt togash e i x'=v't'
tochka. nemoze da e x=x'+vt i x'=x-vt' oti prvo v pripaga na (x,t,v)
trioto sho znachi v' od (x',t',v') trioto ne e spomenato a i plusot i
minusot pred v ja narushuvaat formalnata ednakvost. vie pogreshno ja
percepirate brzinata kako golemina koja ja odreduva ratata na
pomestuvanje. toa go pravite oti postavuvate x=f(t) namesto
x=f(v,t)=vt. cicajte go kurov sea