Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Light is spread out energy in fast motion

0 views
Skip to first unread message

BURT

unread,
Oct 5, 2008, 6:01:33 PM10/5/08
to
Matter can move through light without absorbing it. An example is
radio waves and other EM frequencies. Matter and light can move
through each other.

Mitch Raemsch; Moving through the light

Richard Schultz

unread,
Oct 6, 2008, 7:57:50 AM10/6/08
to
In sci.physics.particle BURT <macro...@yahoo.com> wrote:

: Mitch Raemsch; Moving through the light

It looks like "Medicine or Physiology" is not among the Nobel Prizes
you're going to win this year.

-----
Richard Schultz sch...@mail.biu.ac.il
Department of Chemistry, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel
Opinions expressed are mine alone, and not those of Bar-Ilan University
-----
"Gentlemen, Ciccolini here may look like an idiot, and talk like an idiot,
but don't let that fool you -- he really is an idiot."

extremesou...@yahoo.com

unread,
Oct 7, 2008, 11:11:36 AM10/7/08
to
On Oct 6, 4:57 am, schu...@mail.biu.ack.il (Richard Schultz) wrote:

> In sci.physics.particle BURT <macromi...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> : Mitch Raemsch; Moving through the light
>
> It looks like "Medicine or Physiology" is not among the Nobel Prizes
> you're going to win this year.
>
> -----
> Richard Schultz                              schu...@mail.biu.ac.il

> Department of Chemistry, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel
> Opinions expressed are mine alone, and not those of Bar-Ilan University
> -----
> "Gentlemen, Ciccolini here may look like an idiot, and talk like an idiot,
> but don't let that fool you -- he really is an idiot."

nothing can ever become nothing - so the atomists proposed a strict
principle of conservation of matter

what about light's inertia. Scientists think that light (photons) can
push a mirror when bouncing from it, but that's not the case. After
all, if photons of light pounce as they bounce between parallel
mirrors, the scientist could build the perpetual work machine, which
scientists also claim is impossible. Photons, you realize, do not
impart momentum to a mirror at reflection. so prove scientists wrong
and show that light carries no inertia and photons cannot push a
mirror so Matter can't move through light without some form of
absorbtion occurring.

BURT

unread,
Oct 7, 2008, 2:51:48 PM10/7/08
to
On Oct 7, 7:11 am, "rustyjames...@gmail.com"

Matter can move through radio waves.

Mitch Raemsch

Richard Schultz

unread,
Oct 7, 2008, 3:17:46 PM10/7/08
to
In sci.physics.particle BURT <macro...@yahoo.com> wrote:

: Matter can move through radio waves.

Yes, but what about those two Nobel prizes?

-----
Richard Schultz sch...@mail.biu.ac.il


Department of Chemistry, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel
Opinions expressed are mine alone, and not those of Bar-Ilan University
-----

"Logic is a wreath of pretty flowers which smell bad."

extremesou...@yahoo.com

unread,
Oct 7, 2008, 3:31:31 PM10/7/08
to
On Oct 7, 12:17 pm, schu...@mail.biu.ack.il (Richard Schultz) wrote:

> In sci.physics.particle BURT <macromi...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> : Matter can move through radio waves.
>
> Yes, but what about those two Nobel prizes?
>
> -----
> Richard Schultz                              schu...@mail.biu.ac.il

> Department of Chemistry, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel
> Opinions expressed are mine alone, and not those of Bar-Ilan University
> -----
> "Logic is a wreath of pretty flowers which smell bad."

yes if I through a baseball by a radio station atenna the wave passe
through the base ball an some waves are if the ball was rapped in
aluminum foil would be reflected.

Sanforized

unread,
Oct 7, 2008, 6:11:38 PM10/7/08
to
Richard Schultz wrote:

> In sci.physics.particle BURT <macro...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> : Matter can move through radio waves.
>
> Yes, but what about those two Nobel prizes?

You mean the ones sitting right next to Uncle Al's diamonds?

john180908

unread,
Oct 7, 2008, 6:22:21 PM10/7/08
to
On Oct 7, 4:11 pm, Sanforized <sanfori...@naol.com> wrote:
> Richard Schultz wrote:
> > In sci.physics.particle BURT <macromi...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > : Matter can move through radio waves.
>
> > Yes, but what about those two Nobel prizes?
>
> You mean the ones sitting right next to Uncle Al's diamonds?


yeah, yeah
al's diamonds!!

Androcles

unread,
Oct 7, 2008, 6:59:42 PM10/7/08
to

"Sanforized" <sanfo...@naol.com> wrote in message
news:c8776$48ebde93$cdd08531$16...@DIALUPUSA.NET...

Schwartz diamonds ARE the prize.
I recall he promised to go away with his great "river of shit" speech...
No integrity, just more [snip crap].


BURT

unread,
Oct 7, 2008, 7:01:29 PM10/7/08
to
On Oct 7, 11:31 am, "rustyjames...@gmail.com"

<extremesoundandli...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Oct 7, 12:17 pm, schu...@mail.biu.ack.il (Richard Schultz) wrote:
>
> > In sci.physics.particle BURT <macromi...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > : Matter can move through radio waves.
>
> > Yes, but what about those two Nobel prizes?

Evidently not.

>
> > -----
> > Richard Schultz                              schu...@mail.biu.ac.il
> > Department of Chemistry, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel
> > Opinions expressed are mine alone, and not those of Bar-Ilan University
> > -----
> > "Logic is a wreath of pretty flowers which smell bad."
>
> yes if I through a baseball by a radio station atenna the wave passe
> through the base ball an some waves are if the ball was rapped in
> aluminum foil would be reflected.

Light and matter can move through each other.


Richard Schultz

unread,
Oct 8, 2008, 6:06:44 AM10/8/08
to
In sci.physics.particle BURT <macro...@yahoo.com> wrote:
: On Oct 7, 11:31?am, "rustyjames...@gmail.com"
: <extremesoundandli...@yahoo.com> wrote:

:> On Oct 7, 12:17?pm, schu...@mail.biu.ack.il (Richard Schultz) wrote:

:> > In sci.physics.particle BURT <macromi...@yahoo.com> wrote:
:>
:> > : Matter can move through radio waves.
:>
:> > Yes, but what about those two Nobel prizes?
:
: Evidently not.

Does the large gap between your claim (2 Nobel Prizes in 2008) and the reality
(Chemistry was announced today, making you 0 for 3) make you pause for even
a second and consider the possibility of your fallibility?

-----
Richard Schultz sch...@mail.biu.ac.il


Department of Chemistry, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel
Opinions expressed are mine alone, and not those of Bar-Ilan University
-----

"an optimist is a guy/ that has never had/ much experience"

Richard Schultz

unread,
Oct 8, 2008, 6:08:17 AM10/8/08
to
In sci.physics.particle Sanforized <sanfo...@naol.com> wrote:
I don't think that Uncle Al ever claimed that the kg-sized gem-quality
diamonds would get him a Nobel prize, only lots of money. The experiment
that he claimed would get him the Nobel prize is the one that would refute
General Relativity. As I recall, that experiment was supposed to have
given its results in April, and yet Uncle Al is strangely silent when ask
to divulge those results.

-----
Richard Schultz sch...@mail.biu.ac.il
Department of Chemistry, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel
Opinions expressed are mine alone, and not those of Bar-Ilan University
-----

"French bread makes very good skis"

Sanforized

unread,
Oct 8, 2008, 6:40:31 AM10/8/08
to
Richard Schultz wrote:

> In sci.physics.particle Sanforized <sanfo...@naol.com> wrote:
> : Richard Schultz wrote:
> :> In sci.physics.particle BURT <macro...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> :>
> :> : Matter can move through radio waves.
> :>
> :> Yes, but what about those two Nobel prizes?
> :
> : You mean the ones sitting right next to Uncle Al's diamonds?
>
> I don't think that Uncle Al ever claimed that the kg-sized gem-quality
> diamonds would get him a Nobel prize, only lots of money. The experiment
> that he claimed would get him the Nobel prize is the one that would refute
> General Relativity. As I recall, that experiment was supposed to have
> given its results in April, and yet Uncle Al is strangely silent when ask
> to divulge those results.

common factor: vaporware

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaporware

BURT

unread,
Oct 8, 2008, 5:34:37 PM10/8/08
to
On Oct 8, 2:06 am, schu...@mail.biu.ack.il (Richard Schultz) wrote:
> In sci.physics.particle BURT <macromi...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> : On Oct 7, 11:31?am, "rustyjames...@gmail.com": <extremesoundandli...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> :> On Oct 7, 12:17?pm, schu...@mail.biu.ack.il (Richard Schultz) wrote:
>
> :> > In sci.physics.particle BURT <macromi...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> :>
> :> > : Matter can move through radio waves.
> :>
> :> > Yes, but what about those two Nobel prizes?
> :
> : Evidently not.
>
> Does the large gap between your claim (2 Nobel Prizes in 2008) and the reality
> (Chemistry was announced today, making you 0 for 3) make you pause for even
> a second and consider the possibility of your fallibility?

Not at all.

>
> -----
> Richard Schultz                              schu...@mail.biu.ac.il

Richard Schultz

unread,
Oct 12, 2008, 11:19:46 AM10/12/08
to
In sci.physics.particle BURT <macro...@yahoo.com> wrote:
: On Oct 8, 2:06?am, schu...@mail.biu.ack.il (Richard Schultz) wrote:

:> Does the large gap between your claim (2 Nobel Prizes in 2008) and the

:> reality (Chemistry was announced today, making you 0 for 3) make you pause
:> for even a second and consider the possibility of your fallibility?

: Not at all.

Is that because you cannot tell the difference between fantasy and reality,
or because you do not care about the difference between fantasy and reality?

-----
Richard Schultz sch...@mail.biu.ac.il


Department of Chemistry, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel
Opinions expressed are mine alone, and not those of Bar-Ilan University
-----

"He comforted himself for having said this by the thought that at least
he knew it didn't mean anything."

Richard Schultz

unread,
Oct 12, 2008, 11:31:43 AM10/12/08
to
In sci.physics.particle Sanforized <sanfo...@naol.com> wrote:

:> I don't think that Uncle Al ever claimed that the kg-sized gem-quality


:> diamonds would get him a Nobel prize, only lots of money. The experiment
:> that he claimed would get him the Nobel prize is the one that would refute
:> General Relativity. As I recall, that experiment was supposed to have
:> given its results in April, and yet Uncle Al is strangely silent when ask
:> to divulge those results.

: common factor: vaporware
:
: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaporware

You can also add his magic roach repellent (U.S. Pat. No. 5859057) that he
supposedly sold to S.C. Johnson to the list of Uncle Al's Homestyle
Vaporware [tm].

-----
Richard Schultz sch...@mail.biu.ac.il
Department of Chemistry, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel
Opinions expressed are mine alone, and not those of Bar-Ilan University
-----

0 new messages