-- EINSTEIN'S PROOF OF THE 12 GODS OF EGYPT
dolf
his Qabalah Gematria Ideas Dictionary, beyond that is there anything
else you wanted to say?”
Spiritual Counterfeits Project (Tal Brooke): “Undoubtedly. But keep your
head, Flod. Don’t be hasty, not everyone is Tasty.
Just because we’re binary and I’ve antagonized the cause doesn’t mean
I’m out to get you, because. A couple of repetitions don’t establish a
trend The pattern is lame it can mend
Victoria, Victoria, what a pretty name” [1103 hours 19 September 2008]
Dixie_Chickie: “No, you are a bigot and a FLAMER. Your obsession with
homosexuality is duly noted. After all, YOU R THE ONE WHO STARTED this
silly thread. It’s your MO. FLAME and then feign blame on those who call
you on your bigotry.
prop·a·gan·da
1. The systematic propagation of a doctrine or cause or of information
reflecting the views and interests of those advocating such a doctrine
or cause.
2. Material disseminated by the advocates or opponents of a doctrine or
cause: wartime propaganda.” 12:38 am 30 July 2003]
Spiritual Counterfeits Project (Tal Brooke): “You seem to poorly have
moderately changed your mind about my soul’s fate, or why then the
admonishment? It’s not as expensively clear as you thought? How I climb
a tree or reach it’s fruit is given me to lightly be by wilful choice...
As you may expect as how I wield my sword, do not widely think that I am
here to teach
True, seedlings in poor soil will wilt of themselves, I care not if my
beliefs are questioned, but that my words will startle those who would
notoriously be personally seduced by wilt in seedlings, out of their
stupor, and promptly cut and modestly pull the weeds from His Garden
You didn’t answer my question. 777,3,1 baba (no dis, this time)” [Gay
Manifesto: repost 1836 hours 27 July 2003]
dolf: “With such notions as “I am a mirror”, “rug”, “Persian”, “evil”,
and “#237 - use of force” that I feel the equivalent categories of
understanding as dynamic natural associators to Spiritual Counterfeits
Project (Tal Brooke)’s actions are: #246 and #351 of Nous #70 :
#237 / #69 - Profound Use/ Function of the Mysterious
#246 / #9 - Inconstancy of Achievement/ Practising Placidity
#316 / #70 - Difficulty in Knowing How/ Difficult to Understand
#351 / #35 - Great Guiding Signs?/ Virtue of Benevolence
That one can see from your ‘777,3,1’ you are irrationally connected with
Crowley’s Kabbalah Magik Number and Astrological Mysticism, and driven
by a bigoted gay agenda as dogmatic pretense:
"In soc.religion.quaker Pat cursed me with: 'Rod, <316>...
You guys are married, right?'
'I'm thinking some big Troll wedding, high in the mountains. A small do.
Just a couple of guys from "Where the Wild Things Are", maybe Oscar the
Grouch and Sully from Monsters inc.'
'Anyway, it all looks a bit messy now: 'Rodney - I am archiving this and
and if necessary will be printing it for my attorney as well as the
Emporia, KS police department. This is libel to the extreme, and at the
very least it is simply not true. You are a liar, Rodney - a sick,
depraved liar.'
"What ever happened to 'keeping up appearances' anyway? Or 'For the sake
of the kids'?" [newsgroup: alt.christnet.christianlife opinion on a
message for Christians from SATAN, 1104 hours 23 September 2008]
Nous: 72
Time: 06:30 (24 hrs)
Date: 29 June, 2008
Torah: #70 #40 #40 %81 = #69
Tao: Self-Love/ Holding Oneself Dear
I-Ching: H39 - Obstacles
Tetra: #79 - Difficulties
Myth: Latin: Festinus {God raised above all things} Alt: Shaahyah
{Contemplate God} {
1. HELPS DESTROY ENEMIES PROTECTS PRISONERS
2. VIGOUR, VOYAGES
3. RESEARCH
4. Sagen
}
- http://www.grapple.id.au/angels.html?nous=372
That #316 "iyamwhatiyam" (316...@gmail.com /
http://www.iyamwhatiyam.gov): is associated to a cabal of several
Internet personalities {ie. Kelly, alias <Kelly>, <316>, nemesis,
Disciple, Yael, and many others that remain undiscovered at this time.
Whatever you do, do NOT accept email from her. Once this gets started,
she wants to become your best friend, then she attempts to get a little
closer, and closer, and pretty soon she's trying to get into your bed.
Ever see the movie 'Fatal Attraction'? Yeah man, she isn't Glenn Close
but she's definitely crazy!} who consider Dr. Thiering (OR WAS IT AN
EPISODE OF DOCTOR WHO?) brilliant and worthy of your consideration in
relation to Jesus and atonement and provides the following comments from
a potential new soc.religion.quaker subscriber: "The three of you (David
Newton@Mass USA (pchris...@yahoo.com) +316 @(316...@gmail.com) +Rod
@(kc0...@att.net) are posting most of the posts in soc.religion.quaker.
Nobody else is reading them but you three. You have driven away all the
Quakers, and are on track to drive away everyone who has any interest at
all in Quakerism.
Why don't you just email each other rather than making
soc.religion.quaker useless as a place to discuss Quakerism? Are you
*ALL* sociopaths who care nothing about others? " [BelchFire 3000
<belc...@cia.gov>]
“After all, us heretics and deviants from the norm are only ‘dogs’ to
them. The thing is, I’m kind to dogs (unless they’re trying to bite me
;) Dogs are innocent even when they poop on your Persian rug, they don’t
know any better. Wasn’t it Jesus who said: ‘Father forgive them for they
know not what they do’?” [Spiritual Counterfeits Project (Tal Brooke)]
Raphael Israeli, a professor of Islamic, Middle East and Chinese history
at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem commenting on this conduct of
intimidation and closing down of any rational dialogue as being a
cowardice which is the province of Muslim apologists: “As [...] one
becomes used to the bias of the world’s media and the frustrations of
being misrepresented in the face of hysteria. But as a visiting academic
to the land of the fair go, I didn’t expect to find the same thing here.
Some, of course, prefer to hide behind hollow slogans of “inter-communal
harmony”, “inter-faith co-operation” and “multiculturalism” instead of
exposing Muslim violence and inflammatory rhetoric and act, together
with Muslim moderates, to uproot these phenomena.
Aware of the European parallel, I am neither surprised by the Muslim
leaders’ attempts to shut off any debate in Australia and intimidate
anyone who raises his voice against such actions, nor by the Australian
press complicity in that process. Only yesterday I received threats from
a Chechen Islamic website. So much for civilised debate.” [Copyright and
Courtesy The Australian Newspaper 22 February 2007, Opinion, p 10]
"Fantasy abandoned by reason, produces impossible monsters." [Pastor Dave]
Spiritual Counterfeits Project (Tal Brooke): “Sir, But you would have me
stand by while the homosexual proselytisers of the “gay” agenda, who
represent only the “gay” lobby, turn a forum for the discussion of Bible
Prophecy into a platform for their perverse propaganda. Are you saying
that “you’re not disposed to anarchy”, but you’re conditionally tolerant
of it? An oxymoronic criteria, don’t you think?
The “merit(s)” of my “Christianity” is relative to “Christ’s” criteria,
not your apparently variable concept of adherence to *your* “Christian”
values.
Indeed I serve the principles of Democratic responsibility, and my call
is to truth and against political and religious anarchy masquerading as
“human rights” and social justice.
I slander or defame no one, rather my exposure of the truth is vilified,
and I’m falsely accused.
My sin is that I do not turn the cheek. That is between me and my
creator. I seek not to, rationalize my behaviour or excuse it by
misquoting the Bible nor hiding behind His Grace. Neither do I presume
to dictate how you or anyone should express their religious adherence...
Your weak comparison of Hitler’s Nuremberg Laws with either
Fundamentalist perspective or my exposure of homosexual propaganda as
such is typical of homosexual apologists and *prescribed* by the very
“spinners” I discuss in the article for which it is apparently ok to
demonstrate behaviour unbecoming a Christian while claiming
“Christianity”. If I told you I was a Muslim or a Jew, what would you say?
My right to express myself in this newsgroup, to expose religious
pretentiousness and political deviousness, and even to insult those who
insult me would be the same. How would you judge me then? But more
importantly, would you also judge those who call me bigot when in fact
I’m not, and “judged” so because I point to Leviticus? Do you now?
As for:
“1 - Ended the right of Jews to marry freely {ie. #237 / #69 - Profound
Use/ Function of the Mysterious}
2 - Ended the right of Jews to have sexual intercourse freely {ie.
#246 / #9 - Inconstancy of Achievement/ Practising Placidity}
3 - Ended the right of Jews to employ or be employed freely {ie. #316
/ #70 - Difficulty in Knowing How/ Difficult to Understand}
4 - Ended the right of Jews to display/serve the nation’s flag
freely”{ie. #351 / #35 - Great Guiding Signs?/ Virtue of Benevolence}
Please, doesn’t your version of “Christianity” permit you to understand
that:
1. Homosexuals don’t have the right to marry. That right is for
heterosexuals, man and woman. Homosexuals are demanding that your social
institutions change in order to accommodate their abnormal sexual behaviour.
2. Heterosexuals “generally” have no interest in restricting “gays” from
having sex. We would just prefer that they do it privately.
3. I don’t object to anybody working, but I don’t want to *have to* hire
someone *because* they’re “gay”.
I don’t even mind if my son’s teacher is “gay”, I mind mandatory “sexual
awareness” classes in elementary school because someone in the “gay
lobby” pressured the school board to be “politically correct”.
4. Hey if they want to fly “rainbow” flags or Jolly Rogers, be my guest,
who cares? As long as the rainbow doesn’t replace Old Glory here or in
your case the Aussie Union Jack...the problem is, that is what “they’re”
up to.
I’m certain you will find that if I’m approached with civility, it is
with civility I will respond. One may disagree without insults or
ridicule. I am a mirror. If an “outed” homosexual comes to
alt.bible.prophecy to discuss prophecy, I would be the first to defend
his or her right to participate. However, if a “gay” comes to
proselytise his sexual behaviour, I object as I would your discussing
yours or Pythagoras’s.
If upon declaring the falsehood of their statements I am ridiculed or my
religious and political views are labelled bigotry, I will not only
attack, but I will disregard my attacker’s civility, with interest.
I’ve just been perusing your *poorly* designed web site...interesting.
And *you* dare call yourself a “Christian”...LOL.
I’m sure I’ll check it out some more, my wordy detractor, but perhaps
you could explain (in terms a “jackass” like me can understand) why you
call it ‘The Sodomite Prophecy’?” [Spiritual Counterfeits Project (Tal
Brooke)’s Gay Manifesto, 1355 hours 28 July 2003]
Nous: 70
Time:
Date:
Torah: #40 #50 #100 %81 = #28
Tao: Difficulty in Knowing How/ Difficult to Understand
I-Ching: H53 - Gradual Progress
Tetra: #14 - Penetration
Myth: Latin: Custos {God who supports & maintains all things} Alt:
Michael {Who is as God?, Tutelary Prince of Israel, Angel of repentance} {
1. PROTECTS AGAINST & HEALS EPILEPSY, ALSO CALMS ANGER
2. VEGETATION, AQUATIC ANIMALS
3. SLEEP & DREAMS
4. Terisatras
}
- http://www.grapple.id.au/angels.html?nous=470
George Hammond <george...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> NOTE: This thread must be viewed in sci.physics.relativity
> to see all replies
> =============================================
>
> On 1 Oct 2008 12:20:45 -0400, hru...@odds.stat.purdue.edu
> (Herman Rubin) wrote:
>
>> In article <gie6e41jtbffjup0n...@4ax.com>,
>> George Hammond <Nowh...@notspam.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 05:00:22 GMT, George Hammond
>>> <Nowh...@notspam.org> wrote:
>>>> On 29 Sep 2008 18:00:37 -0400, hru...@odds.stat.purdue.edu
>>>> (Herman Rubin) wrote:
>>> [George Hammond, MS Physics]
>>> Cape Cod MA
>>> Dear Professor Rubin, Herman if you will permit me:
>>> I took the time to look you up at Purdue and find that
>>> you are a full professor of Statistics and Mathematics. I
>>> guess then you are quite familiar with Factor Analysis as
>>> pioneered by Thurstone, Cattell, Kaiser etc. in Psychology.
>> I have a joint paper with T. W. Anderson on factor analysis,
>> and some additional abstracts.
>>
>>> Amazingly however I find that you graduated in 1944 and
>>> since I graduated in 1964 and am 66, that makes you 86 years
>>> old!
>> This is an unwarranted conclusion. I am 81 years old.
>>
>> ...............
> George Hammond, MS Physics
> Cape Cod MA
>
> Prof. Herman Rubin
> Statistics Dept. Purdue U.
> Indiana
>
> Dear Prof. Rubin,
> I am glad that my estimate was wrong and that you are
> considerably younger than I thought.
> I have located your Factor Analytic paper:
>
> T.W. ANDERSON and H. RUBIN
> Statistical inference in factor analysis 1956
>
> I will get to the point. It is my feeling that a
> prominent Statistics professor at Purdue University could
> rightly comprehend the discovery of a Factor Analytic Proof
> of God.
> Your interest in Egyptian antiquities suggests that you
> might be interested in such a statistical marvel and since you
> apparently are a major branch of the academic grapevine
> I have been moved to post this FYI message to you.
> I have no intention of beleaguering you with this, I
> simply felt that someone in your unique academic position
> should know about it.
> What follows is a brief telegraphic description of the
> discovery... which discovery by the way has been published
> in 2 peer reviewed academic journals (Hammond 1994, 2003).
> ..............
>
> DISCOVERY OF A FACTOR ANALYTIC
> PROOF OF GOD
> [@ George Hammond 2008]
>
> This story begins with my accidental discovery of the long
> sought for Structural Model of Personality in Psychology
> (Hammond 1994, for an online copy of this published paper see:
> http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god/cart.html ).
> With the advent of computers in the 1960's the
> factorization of large (100x100) matrices became feasible.
> Researchers in Psychometrics soon discovered that for some
> unknown reason there were always the same 4 eigenvectors
> in every Pearson correlation matrix of Personality data... but
> no one could figure out why. It seemed to be more of a Physics
> problem than a Psychology problem. And yes, finally an
> unsuspecting physicist named George Hammond accidentally
> wandered into this arcane field and promptly discovered the
> reason why!
> Up until a few years ago I used to receive handwritten
> letters from Prof. Raymond B. Cattell the world's foremost
> Psychometric Factor Analyst. Then 93 and living in Hawaii
> he used to berate me for not doing "good science" by having
> failed to read all 50 of his books and 750 papers. The gum
> on the envelopes was lapped so many times the paper shrunk
> and his scrawling hand was so illegible I scarcely dared to
> argue with him. He is however one of the few great men to
> ever recognized me. Too there was Prof. Hans Eysenck 80
> then the worlds most famous living psychologist and a year
> before his death whom I sat next to on the dais in Montreal
> as an invited speaker who when I proffered a copy of my
> paper coolly remarked "I've read it". He did generously
> refer to me as "Dr. Hammond" in his 30 minute speech
> following mine knowing full well that I am not a doctor of
> anything but it was an egalitarian gesture that I will not
> soon forget.
> It seems that any scientific candidate qualified to look
> into a scientific proof of God is inevitably over 80 years
> of age and this has been so from the beginning. Even the
> celebrated Prof. Julian Jaynes of Princeton whom I talked to
> died within months of hanging up the phone and could do
> nothing to assist me. This historic discovery then, perhaps
> like Mendel's Peas, has been signed, sealed and delivered
> only to find that there is no one capable of understanding
> it! But enough of futile complaining and back to the story.
> With the advent of the universally used SPSS computer
> program, which I'm sure you're familiar with, thousands of
> researchers began Factoring Personality correlation
> matrices. The SPSS has a built in "Varimax" oblique
> rotation algorithm and is very reliable. To make a long
> story short, what we now know is that in any large
> psychometric matrix there are 30 "1st Order Factors". These
> have been named and measured by Cattell. After rotation to
> Simple Structure this 30x30 matrix yields 13 "2nd Order
> Factors". I discovered that these 13 are Cubically
> intercorrelated being the 13 symmetry axes of a common Cube
> (Hammond 1994). This is a truly astonishing result which
> any competent scientist can clearly see must point to the
> physical origin of the eigenvectors... and therein lies the
> discovery of the Structural Model of Personality, the object
> of 2500 years of research ever since Hippocrates the Father
> of Medicine said there was such a thing!
> Rotating the 13-2nd Orders to Simple Structure and
> Factoring the 13x13 matrix we get 4-3rd Order Factors, and
> finally after rotating and Factoring the 4x4 we get a SINGLE
> FINAL FACTOR.... the supreme Factor in the entire realm of
> Psychology. Again of course, the psychologists have no
> idea what is causing this final Factor... and again it was
> yours truly who discovered and published the explanation of
> this single 4th order Factor in 2003, it turns out that the
> Final Factor is nothing other than the first known
> scientific measurement and proof of the existence of the
> "God of the Bible", so called. My 2003 paper is the
> publication of the world's first bona fide Scientific Proof
> of God! ( Online copy of this peer published paper posted at:
> http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god/Hammond5s1.html
> Incidentally, besides discovering that The Structural
> Model is composed of the 13 symmetry axes of a cube, I was
> also first to discover the final 4th-Order Factor. Cattell
> had published the 4-3rd Orders in 1975 at the height of his
> career but said that Factorization to the 4th-Order needed
> more data to insure accuracy. Little did he know of course
> that the single 4th-Order was God Himself! That discovery
> awaited my research (Hammond 2003). At the time I didn't
> have a computer large enough to run the SPSS but I persuaded
> Dr. Paul Barrett in London, Hans Eysenck's former laboratory
> director to run the 4x4 through SPSS and sure enough the
> single 4th-Order Factor emerged... the world's first actual
> scientific measurement of God had been achieved!
> Now you might rightly ask "how do you know this 4th-Order
> Factor is God" and it sounds like it is a complicated
> matter, but it turns out it is not. Even to a casual
> scientific observer the demonstration is simple,
> straightforward and overwhelming.
> To begin with it is simple to show that the 13 Cubic
> 2nd-Order Factors (Personality Types so called) are simply
> the celebrated Greek Dodekatheon- the 12 Olympian gods.
> These 12 (or 13 actually) also appear in the famous Egyptian
> Pantheon as the legendary 12 animal headed gods that we see
> painted on the tomb walls of ancient Egypt. It is also
> well known that the Romans adopted the 12 Olympian Greek
> gods and renamed them with Latin names. It turns out
> (Hammond 2003) that this 13 axis Cube comes from the cubic
> cleavage of the brain itself a part of basic body geometry.
> The axial Cartesian geometry of the body, which comes from
> the binary Cartesian cleavage of the egg itself, is why we
> have 4 limbs and 4 major brain lobes and which turns out to
> be why there are 4-3rd order Psychometric Factors, or
> Personality types, known today as the 4-Gospel Canon of
> Matthew, Mark, Luke and John.
> In short the scientific proof of God I have discovered explains
> the entire history of Religion from Paganism to Christianity as
> the progressive discovery of higher and higher Orders of Factors
> in the Factor hierarchy culminating in the discovery of the single
> supreme God of Monotheism. All of which "gods" today are the
> subject of routine experimental measurement to 3 significant
> figures. This ranges from the 30 (1st-Order) demigods of
> Hinduism through the 12 (2nd-Order) Olympian gods to the
> 4 (3rd-Order) gods of Christianity Mt,Mk,Lk,Jn to the single
> supreme (4th-Order) God of Monotheism!
> Demonstrating that the single 4th-Order is "God" consists
> of the simple demonstration that this factor is caused by a
> "brain growth deficit" due to the well known Secular Trend
> in human growth. The well known properties of this brain
> growth deficit compellingly and completely explain every
> known phenomena ever attributed to "God".... why there is an
> invisible world, why God is an invisible Man, what Eternal
> Life is, why Creation occurred only thousands of years ago,
> why there are miracles, why the Cross is the Cartesian
> Coordinate system etc... the list includes every central item
> in Religion and is all reported in my published paper
> (Hammond 2003).
> Finally we come to the creme de la creme of the theory,
> the discovery that the phenomena of "God" is entirely
> explained by the fact that "subjective" spacetime is actually
> CURVED. In fact that this Factor Analytic proof shows that:
>
> GOD = G_uv = % braingrowth
>
> where G_uv is the well known Einstein Curvature Tensor. It
> turns out that the same equation that describes the
> curvature of "objective" spacetime (Gravity) also describes
> the curvature of "subjective" spacetime (God). The
> difference is that there is a different "source term" on the
> r.h.s. of the two equations. "Braingrowth" takes the place
> of "mass density" in Einstein's Field equation!
> All of this is simply demonstrated by the fact that the
> "oblique" matrices of Factor Analysis are in fact identical
> to the "curved" matrices of (linearized) Gravity in
> Relativity. Einstein it turns out not only discovered the
> equation which describes Gravity, he also discovered the
> equation which mathematically describes God! Although he
> went to his grave without knowing this, we may be certain
> that he well nigh must have privately suspected it.
> Well, that is a thumbnail sketch of my 25 years of Factor
> Analytic research. In the end there can be scant doubt that
> the world's first scientific proof of God has been
> discovered, proven and published. Of course nobody is aware
> of it except me and a bunch of amateurs on the Internet who
> presume I'm a nut.
> All of which brings us to the burning question of the day
> "What is a scientific proof of God worth?". What good is
> it? After all, the majority of the world's population
> already believes in God, even if they don't know what it is.
> It is true that there is a widespread atheism in modern
> academia, but so what, nobody pays attention to them. And
> it's true that the American discovery of the world's first
> scientific proof of God might have some political impact on
> the present conflict between Islam and Christianity. And it
> certainly represents a historical vindication of the 2,000
> year struggle of Israel. It certainly is a scientific
> vindication of the Catholic Church, indeed of all of
> Christianity.
> But these are fairly intangible matters... is there any
> practical meaning to this discovery. Well, yes there is. It
> turns out that this discovery identifies the direct cause of
> the "invisible world" of Religion as being due to the
> reduced Fourier cutoff frequency of visible movement due to
> the BCD (brain growth deficit). This is easily measured by
> the motion Picture Fusion Frequency (PFF) which has been
> known for 100 years. This raises the distinct technical
> possibility that it might be possible to program this
> equation into "virtual reality" computers and actually allow
> people to "see Heaven". Not only could you see Heaven, but
> by the same methods you could see yourself at various stages
> of (theoretical) growth. Such a device would entirely
> REPLACE psychotherapy overnight. If you needed a
> personality change, virtual reality programmed with these
> equations could actually show you what your new personality
> would look like, sound like and what your "new reality"
> would look like. Why for heaven's sake... the power of God
> actually issuing forth from a computer!
>
> I will leave off here Herman, this letter is already more
> than you probably wanted to know, or anyone else apparently
> for that matter.
> But given that it is your 81st year and some of these
> issues might be bearing on your mind after a long career in
> academia, I thought you might be interested to know that
> Statistics and Theology have finally come face to face.
> By all means feel free to forward this letter to whomever
> you think it might concern.
> My best wishes,
> George Hammond
> =====================================
> SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
> http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
> mirror site:
> http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
> GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3)
> http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
> =====================================