Its always in the now since the beginning

BURT

unread,

Nov 21, 2009, 11:07:58 PM11/21/09

to

Have you ever went somewhere and it wasn't now when you got there?

The New Now Instant is in the Aether. The aether is in it.

Mitch Raemsch

Inertial

unread,

Nov 21, 2009, 11:15:28 PM11/21/09

to

"BURT" <macro...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1aeb0c77-27b4-4296...@v15g2000prn.googlegroups.com...

> Have you ever went somewhere and it wasn't now when you got there?

That's what I asked you in response to some of your earlier nonsense.

> The New Now Instant is in the Aether. The aether is in it.

New nonsense

Geopelia

unread,

Nov 29, 2009, 4:31:13 PM11/29/09

to

"Inertial" <relat...@rest.com> wrote in message
news:00923f48$0$26858$c3e...@news.astraweb.com...

Hubby has just remarked "It's like Tomorrow never Comes".

But isn't America still in Yesterday just now? Or is it New Zealand that is
in Tomorrow?
The Dateline is a wonderful invention.

BURT

unread,

Nov 29, 2009, 4:34:45 PM11/29/09

to

On Nov 29, 1:31 pm, "Geopelia" <phildo...@xtra.co.nz> wrote:
> "Inertial" <relativ...@rest.com> wrote in message
>
> news:00923f48$0$26858$c3e...@news.astraweb.com...> "BURT" <macromi...@yahoo.com> wrote in message

> >news:1aeb0c77-27b4-4296...@v15g2000prn.googlegroups.com...
> >> Have you ever went somewhere and it wasn't now when you got there?
>
> > That's what I asked you in response to some of your earlier nonsense.
>
> >> The New Now Instant is in the Aether. The aether is in it.
>
> > New nonsense
>
> Hubby has just remarked "It's like Tomorrow never Comes".
>
> But isn't America still in Yesterday just now? Or is it New Zealand that is
> in Tomorrow?
> The Dateline is a wonderful invention.

There is a now instant everywhere as time is everywhere passing.
The Now Instant is universal.

Mitch Raemsch

Geopelia

unread,

Nov 29, 2009, 6:53:25 PM11/29/09

to

"BURT" <macro...@yahoo.com> wrote in message

news:8af0e0f7-e707-475d...@y28g2000prd.googlegroups.com...

Mitch Raemsch

Do you ever feel stuck in Now? I do. Whatever I'm going to do tomorrow or in
five minutes from now doesn't seem to exist and I'm stuck. It's a weird
feeling. Is it only me, or does everyone feel like this?

jdawe

unread,

Nov 29, 2009, 7:59:15 PM11/29/09

to

> Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Within:

Time

There can only be 2 opposing states:

Future

or

Past

Therefore,

'now' cannot exist.

-Josh.

BURT

unread,

Nov 29, 2009, 8:52:02 PM11/29/09

to

> -Josh.- Hide quoted text -

>
> - Show quoted text -

Josh is a moron. Show me a time where it hasn't been in the now.

Mitch Raemsch

jdawe

unread,

Nov 30, 2009, 11:10:51 PM11/30/09

to

When 'future' reaches what you may call 'now' it has already inverted
into 'past'.

-Josh.

BURT

unread,

Nov 30, 2009, 11:28:29 PM11/30/09

to

Time aether fills space and is not a dimension of space.

Mitch Raemsch

jdawe

unread,

Nov 30, 2009, 11:52:49 PM11/30/09

to

If you say aether fills space then what is space to you?

If you say there are 3 physical things in this universe:

energy

or

matter

or

aether

Then what is space?

-Josh.

BURT

unread,

Dec 1, 2009, 1:02:34 AM12/1/09

to

The 3 dimensions of space are curved in round geometry of gravity. The
substance of space as you have asked is geometry. At the border of the
range of gravity space is 3 dimensionally flat in geometry. But 3
dimensional space is round in the hypersphere surface of the 4th
dimension.

Mitch Raemsch

jdawe

unread,

Dec 1, 2009, 5:59:30 PM12/1/09

to

I see, so space is geometry and it is only one thing:

'Curved round'

This one thing, curved round 'substance', as you call it, fills up
space.

So we now have 4 physical 'substances':

energy

or

matter

or

aether

or

geometry

that fill up 'space'.

That is very bad science, Mitch.

-Josh.

PS: You have posted before that your friend Einstein brought back the
science of a physical substance in space called 'aether'. Einstein was
actually the one that got rid of the silly notion of a 'aether' with
his relativity.

jdawe

unread,

Dec 1, 2009, 6:28:46 PM12/1/09

to

Oh, I forgot to ask.

Does this new substance 'geometry' that also fills up space have its
own 'flows' too like you say 'aether' has its own 'flows'?

-Josh.

PS: You still haven't answered what space is. All you have done is
added is a new substance 'geometry' that fills up 'space'.

So I'll ask again what is space to you, Mitch? Not the various
arbitrary amount of substances you believe fill up 'space'. But what
is 'space' itself?

BURT

unread,

Dec 1, 2009, 8:24:45 PM12/1/09

to

> is 'space' itself?- Hide quoted text -

>
> - Show quoted text -

The substance of space is geometry and flow. Gravity flows through
itself. You can have the gravity strength of the Moon simultaneously
in space with the gravity strength of the Earth and Sun together.
There can be more than one strength of gravity at any given point.

Mitch Raemsch

Geopelia

unread,

Dec 1, 2009, 11:20:59 PM12/1/09

to

"BURT" <macro...@yahoo.com> wrote in message

news:a476c09e-86d0-4e41...@v25g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...

Mitch Raemsch

Every particle of matter in the universe attracts every other particle with
a force that is directly proportional to the product of the masses of the
particles and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between
them.

Newton

But the distances in space are so great that the effects of gravity wouldn't
be noticeable between a particle here and a particle in a distant galaxy.

BURT

unread,

Dec 1, 2009, 11:35:27 PM12/1/09

to

> be noticeable between a particle here and a particle in a distant galaxy.- Hide quoted text -

>
> - Show quoted text -

All forces have a range. Science has this wrong at the moment.

Mitch Raemsch