Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

The true name of rambus (KGB)

16 views
Skip to first unread message

val...@planck.reduaz.mx

unread,
Sep 30, 2006, 11:10:25 PM9/30/06
to
The true name of the spammer "rambus" is Mr. Adrian Sfarti. He tries
to convince
anyone that he is affilaiated with the University of California,
Berkeley.

I rejected several his papers.

val...@planck.reduaz.mx

unread,
Sep 30, 2006, 11:48:01 PM9/30/06
to
Adrian Sfarti
Vice President of Systems and Network Engineering

Sfarti joins THX with a successful engineering track record that
includes developing computer graphics and digital content delivery
products and technologies. Previously, he was the vice president of
engineering at Kwill, a developer of encryption and watermarking IP for

the DVD industry. Before Kwill, Sfarti was the director of engineering
of HDMI products at Silicon Image, a developer of semiconductor
technology and IP for digital content delivery. While there, he helped
successfully create and implement the world¹s first HDMI transmitter
and receiver, and worked closely with the company¹s CE customers, and
foundry and packaging partners. Sfarti has also held senior-level
engineering positions at ATI, Silicon Graphics and several other 3D
graphics start-ups. A published author, Sfarti has been awarded 23
patents. He holds a PhD in relativistic electrodynamics from the
Politechnical Institute in Bucharest, Romania. Additionally, he has
earned both a master¹s and bachelor¹s degree in electrical
engineering.


http://www.audioholics.com/news/pressreleases/THXexecutiveteam.php


+++++++


I suggest to write to his employer informing him how is this man
spending his worktime.


>From my side I shall also write to the Rector of the Bucharest
Politechnical Institute.
Of course, american residents may think about the legal actions

Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

val...@planck.reduaz.mx

unread,
Oct 1, 2006, 2:59:11 PM10/1/06
to
Dear google group Administration

I just received a letter from rambu...@yahoo.com which write
deffamatory statements on your web-site. He insulted and threaten me.
This is obvious breaking the US Law.

I consulted with my lawers. I officially request you
the information about deffamations of rambu...@yahoo.com .
I consider that the best way to solve this problem is in the US Court.

Please provide us the IP under which the rambu...@yahoo.com
entered in your site, and all his activity information on your site. We
would be very grateful.

Thank you in advance.

Yours Sincerely,
Valeri Dvoeglazov

http://planck.reduaz.mx/~valeri/

Eric Gisse

unread,
Oct 1, 2006, 3:37:33 PM10/1/06
to

val...@planck.reduaz.mx wrote:
> Dear google group Administration
>
> I just received a letter from rambu...@yahoo.com which write
> deffamatory statements on your web-site. He insulted and threaten me.
> This is obvious breaking the US Law.
>
> I consulted with my lawers. I officially request you
> the information about deffamations of rambu...@yahoo.com .
> I consider that the best way to solve this problem is in the US Court.

What is your lawery's name, telephone number, and state which he is
licensed to practice?

val...@planck.reduaz.mx

unread,
Oct 1, 2006, 3:45:47 PM10/1/06
to
Why do you want this information?
The court tactics is up to involved persons. Are you from the google
group Administration?
Can I consider this message as an official answer. Of course, I can.

Sorcerer

unread,
Oct 1, 2006, 4:08:20 PM10/1/06
to

<val...@planck.reduaz.mx> wrote in message
news:1159729017.0...@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
| Dear google group Administration,
|
| I just received a letter from rambu...@yahoo.com who writes

| deffamatory statements on your web-site. He insulted and threaten me.
| This is obvious breaking the US Law.
| I consulted with my lawers.
|
| I officially request you the information about deffamations of
| rambu...@yahoo.com .
| I consider that the best way to solve this problem is in the US Court.
|
| Please provide us the IP under which the rambu...@yahoo.com
| entered in your site, and all his activity information on your site. We
| would be very grateful.
|
| Thank you in advance.
|
| Yours Sincerely,
| Valeri Dvoeglazov
|
| http://planck.reduaz.mx/~valeri/

67.170.224.36


|


val...@planck.reduaz.mx

unread,
Oct 1, 2006, 4:19:42 PM10/1/06
to
Thank you. We need more information and the OFFICIAL answer, as
indicated in the OFFICIAL letter sent by e-mail to the google group
Administration address. We also would be grateful for the hard-copy
letter sent to Dr. V. Dvoeglazov Universidad de Zacatecas, Ap.Postal
636, Suc. UAZ
Zacatecas 98062 Zac.
MEXICO

Eric Gisse

unread,
Oct 1, 2006, 4:59:15 PM10/1/06
to

val...@planck.reduaz.mx wrote:
> Why do you want this information?

Because I don't believe you have it.

> The court tactics is up to involved persons. Are you from the google
> group Administration?

You are whining on a public group. The court system is a public process
in the united states. You are doing nothing privately, deal with it.

> Can I consider this message as an official answer. Of course, I can.

Can I consider you a rude idiot for top posting and thinking google
reads this newsgroup? Of course, I can.

[...]

val...@planck.reduaz.mx

unread,
Oct 1, 2006, 5:10:42 PM10/1/06
to
Ok. Thank you for "an idiot"
I expect the Administration hard-copy answer to the address I gave.
I repeat it.

Dr. V. Dvoeglazov
Universidad de Zacatecas

Ap. Postal 636, Suc. UAZ
Zacatecas 98062 Zac.
Mexico

http://planck.reduaz.mx/~valeri/

val...@planck.reduaz.mx

unread,
Oct 1, 2006, 7:06:21 PM10/1/06
to
Yes, sure!!!!!!!!!

Of course, if we charge the THX Inc. for the conduct of his worker
(during his worktime) for 100 mln USD each and every
(obviously they can pay) we would be VERY rich people!!!!!!!!!


Dirk Van de moortel wrote:
> <val...@planck.reduaz.mx> wrote in message news:1159734908....@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> > See on alt.morons and sci.physics.relativity for show.


> >
> > Dr. V. Dvoeglazov
> > Universidad de Zacatecas
> > Ap. Postal 636, Suc. UAZ
> > Zacatecas 98062 Zac.

> > MEXICO
> >
> > http://planck.reduaz.mx/~valeri/
> >
> > ++++++++++++++
> >
> > OPEN LETTER
> >
> > Dear google group Administration
> >
> > I just received a letter from rambu...@yahoo.com who writes
> > deffamatory statements on your web-site. He insulted and threaten me in
> > both personal e-mails and on your web-site. This is obvious breaking


> > the US Law.
> >
> > I consulted with my lawers. I officially request you the information
> > about deffamations of rambu...@yahoo.com . I consider that the best
> > way to solve this problem is in the US Court.
> >

> > Please provide us the IP under which the rambu...@yahoo.com
> > entered in your site, and all his activity information on your site. We
> > would be very grateful.
> >
> > Thank you in advance.
> >
> > Yours Sincerely,
> > Valeri Dvoeglazov
>

> Rambus' real name is Ian P. Freely. He is a professor at the
> University of Scunthorpe.
>
> Dirk Vdm

Eric Gisse

unread,
Oct 1, 2006, 8:42:15 PM10/1/06
to

val...@planck.reduaz.mx wrote:
> Ok. Thank you for "an idiot"

Still an idiot, still top posting.

> I expect the Administration hard-copy answer to the address I gave.
> I repeat it.

So have you actually retained a laywer yet?

>
> Dr. V. Dvoeglazov
> Universidad de Zacatecas
> Ap. Postal 636, Suc. UAZ
> Zacatecas 98062 Zac.
> Mexico
>
> http://planck.reduaz.mx/~valeri/
>

[...]

val...@planck.reduaz.mx

unread,
Oct 1, 2006, 9:33:18 PM10/1/06
to
So have you actually retained a laywer yet?
++++++++
Do you think that I am so stupid to lost 100 mln dollars?

Again, I experct the official answer from the group administrators.This
is their legal obligation. Unless I receive it tomorrow I will post
more , and I should say to my lawer in the US to go ahead.

Eric Gisse

unread,
Oct 1, 2006, 9:37:24 PM10/1/06
to

val...@planck.reduaz.mx wrote:
> So have you actually retained a laywer yet?
> ++++++++
> Do you think that I am so stupid to lost 100 mln dollars?

You cannot lose what you do not have and will never obtain.

val...@planck.reduaz.mx

unread,
Oct 1, 2006, 9:41:57 PM10/1/06
to
Thank you.

val...@planck.reduaz.mx

unread,
Oct 9, 2006, 5:02:09 PM10/9/06
to
I apologise before THX Ltd. I did not know that they fired this person
long ago. Ther US charges against this person is in due course.

Yours Sincerely,
Valeri Dvoeglazov

Dono

unread,
Oct 10, 2006, 12:02:59 AM10/10/06
to

So a couple of your students played a clever prank and made a fool of
you by exposing you for the vengeful idiot you are.

Eric Gisse

unread,
Oct 10, 2006, 1:28:26 AM10/10/06
to

Dono wrote:

[...]

>
> So a couple of your students played a clever prank and made a fool of
> you by exposing you for the vengeful idiot you are.

Fill the rest of us in...?

val...@planck.reduaz.mx

unread,
Oct 10, 2006, 8:53:07 PM10/10/06
to
I am sorry to say that "it is hard to believe to you" (C) -- Suhov...

badd...@yahoo.com

unread,
Oct 11, 2006, 7:51:27 AM10/11/06
to

val...@planck.reduaz.mx wrote:

Hey nitwit: Stop posting this crap. It only makes you appear kookier
than you already appear.

> Dear google group Administration
>
> I just received a letter from rambu...@yahoo.com which write
> deffamatory statements on your web-site. He insulted and threaten me.
> This is obvious breaking the US Law.

> I consulted with my lawers.

Then I take it that your lawyers threw you out. If they thought you
had a valid cause of action, they would have instructed you not to post
articles on this
topic in order to avoid damaging your case. The only question, is did
your lawyers laugh at you and charge you for the office visit?

> I officially request you the information about deffamations of
> rambu...@yahoo.com . I consider that the best way to solve this
> problem is in the US Court.

That will really get their attention... The U.S. is probably the
least
favorable venue you could choose for your chances at prevailing in
defamation
suit as a plaintiff. Read the Supreme Court decision for Hustler
Magazine
v. Falwell and see just how much you can be insulted without being
legally
defamed. Would you really want to sit on the witness stand and state
under
oath that your professional reputation suffered real damages (assuming
you
could quantify them) from statements posted to Usenet (which is
probably
even less credible than Hustler Magazine as an unbiased conduit of
information)?

> > I suggest to write to his employer informing him how is this man
> > spending his worktime.

R. U. Serious? If he is a vice president of the company and holds 23
patents as you have stated in your diatribe, no one who has enough
authority to reprimand him is going to care. You need a reality check,
although that was already evident for other reasons. I think the 23
patents trumps posting deraugatory remarks about crackpots to Usenet
from the company's point of view.

> >From my side I shall also write to the Rector of the Bucharest
> > Politechnical Institute.

Do you really think the BPI is going to be dismayed to learn that
one of their former students recognizes crackpots?

> > Of course, american residents may think about the legal actions

I would, but I can't use the court system to eliminate crackpots like
you from Usenet, for the same reason you won't prevail in a defamation
suit.

val...@planck.reduaz.mx

unread,
Oct 13, 2006, 4:49:39 PM10/13/06
to
Thank you so much for your service!


Yours Sincerely,
Valeri Dvoeglazov

0 new messages