>>> Physicists deny the physical evidence of the particle always being
>>> detected entering, traveling through and exiting a single slit in a
>>> double slit experiment.
>> No, they don't. It's INCLUDED in their explanations.
> Many worlds? Particles which don't exist until they are detected?
> Particles which travel an infinite number of paths simultaneously?
> Why don't you explain what occurs in a double slit experiment.
Because this is not the venue to get those explanations.
Physicists have explanations for what physically occurs in nature, and they are in readily available venues. Go to those venues for the explanations.
> You don't because you can't.
Sure, I can. This is not the venue.
Why don't you go to the venues where the explanations are available? Why do you whine incessantly about your own refusal to fetch the explanations?
>> No doubt the aether is real, and it may even represent the infinite
>> quantum velocity of gravity that forever radiates the existence of
>> everything in all directions simultaneously.
>Nice gobbledygook. What the fuck does "quantum velocity of gravity" even >MEAN?
That the Guthball is batshit insane, of course.
-- Bill Snyder [This space unintentionally left blank]
"Voyager is showing that what is outside is pushing back. ... Like cars piling up at a clogged freeway off-ramp, the increased intensity of the magnetic field shows that inward pressure from interstellar space is compacting it."
It is the aether which is displaced by the matter the solar system consists of which is pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward the solar system.
"Our data strongly support the idea that the gravitational potential in clusters is mainly due to a non-baryonic fluid, and any exotic field in gravitational theory must resemble that of CDM fields very closely."
The offset is due to the galaxy clusters moving through the aether. The analogy is a submarine moving through the water. You are under water. Two miles away from you are many lights. Moving between you and the lights one mile away is a submarine. The submarine displaces the water. The state of displacement of the water causes the center of the lensing of the light propagating through the water to be offset from the center of the submarine itself. The offset between the center of the lensing of the light propagating through the water displaced by the submarine and the center of the submarine itself is going to remain the same as the submarine moves through the water. The submarine continually displaces different regions of the water. The state of the water connected to and neighboring the submarine remains the same as the submarine moves through the water even though it is not the same water the submarine continually displaces. This is what is occurring physically in nature as the galaxy clusters move through the aether.
'�While bow shocks certainly exist ahead of many other stars, we�re finding that our Sun�s interaction doesn�t reach the critical threshold to form a shock,� said Dr. David McComas, principal investigator of the IBEX mission, �so a wave is a more accurate depiction of what�s happening ahead of our heliosphere � much like the wave made by the bow of a boat as it glides through the water.�'
The wave ahead of our heliosphere is an aether displacement wave. This is evidence of a moving 'particle', the solar system, having an associated aether wave.
"Astronomers using NASA's Hubble Space Telescope got a first-hand view of how dark matter behaves during a titanic collision between two galaxy clusters. The wreck created a ripple of dark mater, which is somewhat similar to a ripple formed in a pond when a rock hits the water."
The 'pond' consists of aether. The moving 'particles' are the galaxy clusters. The ripple is an aether displacement wave. The ripple is a gravitational wave. This is also evidence of a moving 'particle', the galaxy clusters, having an associated aether wave.
"This technique revealed the dark matter in Abell 520 had collected into a "dark core," containing far fewer galaxies than would be expected if the dark matter and galaxies were anchored together. Most of the galaxies apparently have sailed far away from the collision. "This result is a puzzle," said astronomer James Jee of the University of California in Davis, lead author of paper about the results available online in The Astrophysical Journal. "Dark matter is not behaving as predicted, and it's not obviously clear what is going on. It is difficult to explain this Hubble observation with the current theories of galaxy formation and dark matter.""
The dark matter core does not defy explanation. The dark matter core is not a puzzle. The dark matter core is not difficult to explain. It is obviously clear what is going on.
Dark matter and galaxies are not anchored together. Matter moves through and displaces the aether.
"But these new data support the idea that gravitational waves ďż˝ ripples in the fabric of space first predicted by Albert Einstein but never detected directly ďż˝ can exert an extremely powerful force."
The fabric of space is the aether.
Gravitational waves are ripples in the aether.
What ripples when galaxy clusters collide is what waves in a double slit experiment; the aether.
Einstein's gravitational wave is de Broglie's pilot-wave.
Big Dog wrote:
> On 7/31/2012 9:42 AM, mpc755 wrote:
>> Big Dog wrote:
>>>> Physicists deny the physical evidence of the particle always being
>>>> detected entering, traveling through and exiting a single slit in a
>>>> double slit experiment.
>>> No, they don't. It's INCLUDED in their explanations.
>> Many worlds? Particles which don't exist until they are detected?
>> Particles which travel an infinite number of paths simultaneously?
>> Why don't you explain what occurs in a double slit experiment.
> Because this is not the venue to get those explanations.
> Physicists have explanations for what physically occurs in nature, and
> they are in readily available venues. Go to those venues for the
> explanations.
>> You don't because you can't.
> Sure, I can. This is not the venue.
> Why don't you go to the venues where the explanations are available? Why
> do you whine incessantly about your own refusal to fetch the explanations?
I am able to explain it right here.
Aether has mass and physically occupies three dimensional space.
A moving particle has an associated aether displacement wave.
In a double slit experiment the particle travels through a single slit and the associated aether wave passes through both.
> Big Dog wrote:
>> On 7/31/2012 9:42 AM, mpc755 wrote:
>>> Big Dog wrote:
>>>>> Physicists deny the physical evidence of the particle always being
>>>>> detected entering, traveling through and exiting a single slit in a
>>>>> double slit experiment.
>>>> No, they don't. It's INCLUDED in their explanations.
>>> Many worlds? Particles which don't exist until they are detected?
>>> Particles which travel an infinite number of paths simultaneously?
>>> Why don't you explain what occurs in a double slit experiment.
>> Because this is not the venue to get those explanations.
>> Physicists have explanations for what physically occurs in nature, and
>> they are in readily available venues. Go to those venues for the
>> explanations.
>>> You don't because you can't.
>> Sure, I can. This is not the venue.
>> Why don't you go to the venues where the explanations are available? Why
>> do you whine incessantly about your own refusal to fetch the
>> explanations?
> I am able to explain it right here.
Who the fuck cares?
The explanation of those things by physicists are in different venues than here.
Nobody cares that you post your explanations in one venue, which is completely unrelated to and unconnected with the venues where the REAL explanations are.
If you posted your explanations on flyers stapled to telephone poles, would it be of interest to physicists that you could do that? Would your actions then be tantamount to a challenge to physicists to also staple their explanations to telephone poles, just because you chose a stupid venue?
Big Dog wrote:
> On 7/31/2012 9:53 AM, mpc755 wrote:
>> Big Dog wrote:
>>> On 7/31/2012 9:42 AM, mpc755 wrote:
>>>> Big Dog wrote:
>>>>>> Physicists deny the physical evidence of the particle always being
>>>>>> detected entering, traveling through and exiting a single slit in a
>>>>>> double slit experiment.
>>>>> No, they don't. It's INCLUDED in their explanations.
>>>> Many worlds? Particles which don't exist until they are detected?
>>>> Particles which travel an infinite number of paths simultaneously?
>>>> Why don't you explain what occurs in a double slit experiment.
>>> Because this is not the venue to get those explanations.
>>> Physicists have explanations for what physically occurs in nature, and
>>> they are in readily available venues. Go to those venues for the
>>> explanations.
>>>> You don't because you can't.
>>> Sure, I can. This is not the venue.
>>> Why don't you go to the venues where the explanations are available? Why
>>> do you whine incessantly about your own refusal to fetch the
>>> explanations?
>> I am able to explain it right here.
> Who the fuck cares?
> The explanation of those things by physicists are in different venues
> than here.
> Nobody cares that you post your explanations in one venue, which is
> completely unrelated to and unconnected with the venues where the REAL
> explanations are.
> If you posted your explanations on flyers stapled to telephone poles,
> would it be of interest to physicists that you could do that? Would your
> actions then be tantamount to a challenge to physicists to also staple
> their explanations to telephone poles, just because you chose a stupid
> venue?
If you could explain it here you would.
You don't because you can't.
I can, so I will.
Aether has mass and physically occupies three dimensional space.
A moving particle has an associated aether displacement wave.
In a double slit experiment the particle travels through a single slit and the associated aether wave passes through both.
> "Voyager is showing that what is outside is pushing back. ... Like cars
> piling up at a clogged freeway off-ramp, the increased intensity of the
> magnetic field shows that inward pressure from interstellar space is
> compacting it."
> It is the aether which is displaced by the matter the solar system
> consists of which is pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward
> the solar system.
That's YOUR claim. The VAST majority of astrophysicists disagree.
>> "Voyager is showing that what is outside is pushing back. ... Like cars
>> piling up at a clogged freeway off-ramp, the increased intensity of the
>> magnetic field shows that inward pressure from interstellar space is
>> compacting it."
>> It is the aether which is displaced by the matter the solar system
>> consists of which is pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward
>> the solar system.
> That's YOUR claim. The VAST majority of astrophysicists disagree.
As far as I understand, the VAST majority of astrophysicists believe particles of matter which exist in quantities less than in any vacuum artificially created on Earth which exist where Voyager is are able to push back and exert inward pressure toward matter.
So, just like gravity and what occurs physically in nature in a double slit experiment, mainstream physicists are clueless in terms of understanding what occurs physically in nature to cause interstellar space to be able to push back and exert inward pressure toward matter.
All because mainstream physics denies understanding aether has mass.
> > On Jul 31, 12:33 am, Olrik <olrik...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> Le 2012-07-31 00:03, mpc755 a crit :
> >>> I'll stick with the Nobel Laureates and a Director at Fermilab.
> >> You do that.
> >> Meanwhile, I'll stick with everything, and everyone else in physics: the
> >> aether is non-existent.
> > You mean the ones who can't explain simple things like gravity and
> > what occurs physically in nature in a double slit experiment.
> Sure they can. Have you asked them? No.
> You've asked selected people ON THIS NEWSGROUP, who have told you this
> is not the right place to get those answers.
Read the following in order to understand what occurs physically in
nature to cause gravity and the observed behaviors in a double slit
experiment.
Displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward
matter is gravity.
A moving particle has an associated aether displacement wave. In a
double slit experiment the particle travels through a single slit and
the associated aether wave passes through both.
> > > > > Laughlin, Einstein, de Broglie all state there is an aether.
> > > > > Hogan states the Higg's field has mass.
> > > > > You can remain ignorant of understanding what occurs physically in
> > > > > nature to cause gravity and the observed behaviors in a double slit
> > > > > experiment if you choose to.
> > > > > Aether has mass and physically occupies three dimensional space.
> > > > > Aether is physically displaced by matter.
> > > > > Displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward
> > > > > matter is gravity.
> > > > > A moving particle has an associated aether displacement wave. In a
> > > > > double slit experiment the particle travels through a single slit and
> > > > > the associated aether wave passes through both.
> > > > Ether in physics can be treated exactly the way we treat god and other
> > > > supernatural claims...As if they did not exist at all.
> > > Not according to Nobel Laureates Laughlin, Einstein and de Broglie.
> > > Hogan states the Higg's field has mass.
> > > You can remain ignorant of understanding what occurs physically in
> > > nature to cause gravity and the observed behaviors in a double slit
> > > experiment if you choose to.
> > > Aether has mass and physically occupies three dimensional space.
> > > Aether is physically displaced by matter.
> > > Displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward
> > > matter is gravity.
> > > A moving particle has an associated aether displacement wave. In a
> > > double slit experiment the particle travels through a single slit and
> > > the associated aether wave passes through both.
> > Slit experiment proves my theory "Particles move in pairs with
> > attached wave" TreBert
> The fact a single particle is always detected exiting a single slit in
> a double slit experiment disproves your "particles move in pairs with
> attached wave".
> A moving particle has an associated aether displacement wave. In a
> double slit experiment the particle travels through a single slit and
> the associated aether wave passes through both.
That is the kicker. What we are saying we see a "single particle" is
in reality "Two particles" Yes the share a wave between them. The
partition making the two slits cuts the wave in half,and this shows
the interference(wave picture of light) My idea is reality. It is
simple. It is easy to understand. Ok you like Feynman's "Some over
all paths" That is tricky stuff. TreBert
> > > > > > Laughlin, Einstein, de Broglie all state there is an aether.
> > > > > > Hogan states the Higg's field has mass.
> > > > > > You can remain ignorant of understanding what occurs physically in
> > > > > > nature to cause gravity and the observed behaviors in a double slit
> > > > > > experiment if you choose to.
> > > > > > Aether has mass and physically occupies three dimensional space.
> > > > > > Aether is physically displaced by matter.
> > > > > > Displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward
> > > > > > matter is gravity.
> > > > > > A moving particle has an associated aether displacement wave. In a
> > > > > > double slit experiment the particle travels through a single slit and
> > > > > > the associated aether wave passes through both.
> > > > > Ether in physics can be treated exactly the way we treat god and other
> > > > > supernatural claims...As if they did not exist at all.
> > > > Not according to Nobel Laureates Laughlin, Einstein and de Broglie.
> > > > Hogan states the Higg's field has mass.
> > > > You can remain ignorant of understanding what occurs physically in
> > > > nature to cause gravity and the observed behaviors in a double slit
> > > > experiment if you choose to.
> > > > Aether has mass and physically occupies three dimensional space.
> > > > Aether is physically displaced by matter.
> > > > Displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward
> > > > matter is gravity.
> > > > A moving particle has an associated aether displacement wave. In a
> > > > double slit experiment the particle travels through a single slit and
> > > > the associated aether wave passes through both.
> > > Slit experiment proves my theory "Particles move in pairs with
> > > attached wave" TreBert
> > The fact a single particle is always detected exiting a single slit in
> > a double slit experiment disproves your "particles move in pairs with
> > attached wave".
> > A moving particle has an associated aether displacement wave. In a
> > double slit experiment the particle travels through a single slit and
> > the associated aether wave passes through both.
> That is the kicker. What we are saying we see a "single particle" is
> in reality "Two particles" Yes the share a wave between them. The
> partition making the two slits cuts the wave in half,and this shows
> the interference(wave picture of light) My idea is reality. It is
> simple. It is easy to understand. Ok you like Feynman's "Some over
> all paths" That is tricky stuff. TreBert
> In macro realm we relate aether to a 100% vacuum. In the micro realm
> the aether is a dynamic medium. It all come down to location,location
> location TreBert
The aether real estate theory! That is Nobel material FOR SURE!
> Slit experiment proves my theory "Particles move in pairs with
> attached wave" TreBert
TreeBert, you may be self-taught with a grade school education but you sure know SCIENCE!
I get it, when you have a double slit experiment you get interfence because particles move in pairs. One goes through one slit, the other particle goes through the other slit and the attached waves give you the pattern! GENIUS!
Oh wait, TreeBert. What if I have THREE slits? Maybe you need a new theory.
G=EMC^2 wrote:
> On Jul 31, 10:07 am, mpc755<mpc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Jul 31, 9:23 am, "G=EMC^2"<herbertglazi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Jul 30, 6:21 pm, mpc755<mpc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Jul 30, 6:06 pm, HVAC<mr.h...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 7/30/2012 5:21 PM, mpc755 wrote:
>>>>>> Laughlin, Einstein, de Broglie all state there is an aether.
>>>>>> Hogan states the Higg's field has mass.
>>>>>> You can remain ignorant of understanding what occurs physically in
>>>>>> nature to cause gravity and the observed behaviors in a double slit
>>>>>> experiment if you choose to.
>>>>>> Aether has mass and physically occupies three dimensional space.
>>>>>> Aether is physically displaced by matter.
>>>>>> Displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward
>>>>>> matter is gravity.
>>>>>> A moving particle has an associated aether displacement wave. In a
>>>>>> double slit experiment the particle travels through a single slit and
>>>>>> the associated aether wave passes through both.
>>>>> Ether in physics can be treated exactly the way we treat god and other
>>>>> supernatural claims...As if they did not exist at all.
>>>> Not according to Nobel Laureates Laughlin, Einstein and de Broglie.
>>>> Hogan states the Higg's field has mass.
>>>> You can remain ignorant of understanding what occurs physically in
>>>> nature to cause gravity and the observed behaviors in a double slit
>>>> experiment if you choose to.
>>>> Aether has mass and physically occupies three dimensional space.
>>>> Aether is physically displaced by matter.
>>>> Displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward
>>>> matter is gravity.
>>>> A moving particle has an associated aether displacement wave. In a
>>>> double slit experiment the particle travels through a single slit and
>>>> the associated aether wave passes through both.
>>> Slit experiment proves my theory "Particles move in pairs with
>>> attached wave" TreBert
>> The fact a single particle is always detected exiting a single slit in
>> a double slit experiment disproves your "particles move in pairs with
>> attached wave".
>> A moving particle has an associated aether displacement wave. In a
>> double slit experiment the particle travels through a single slit and
>> the associated aether wave passes through both.
> That is the kicker. What we are saying we see a "single particle" is
> in reality "Two particles" Yes the share a wave between them. The
> partition making the two slits cuts the wave in half,and this shows
> the interference(wave picture of light) My idea is reality. It is
> simple. It is easy to understand. Ok you like Feynman's "Some over
> all paths" That is tricky stuff. TreBert
The analogy is a boat and its bow wave. In a double slit experiment performed with a boat the boat travels through a single slit and the bow wave passes through both.
The boat is analogous to the particle and the bow wave is analogous to the aether wave.
In a double slit experiment the particle travels through a single slit and the associated aether wave passes through both.
>> In macro realm we relate aether to a 100% vacuum. In the micro realm
>> the aether is a dynamic medium. It all come down to location,location
>> location TreBert
> The aether real estate theory! That is Nobel material FOR SURE!
On Jul 31, 1:43 pm, bjacoby <bjac...@iwaynet.net> wrote:
> On 7/31/2012 9:23 AM, G=EMC^2 wrote:
> > Slit experiment proves my theory "Particles move in pairs with
> > attached wave" TreBert
> TreeBert, you may be self-taught with a grade school education but you
> sure know SCIENCE!
> I get it, when you have a double slit experiment you get interfence
> because particles move in pairs. One goes through one slit, the other
> particle goes through the other slit and the attached waves give you the
> pattern! GENIUS!
> Oh wait, TreeBert. What if I have THREE slits? Maybe you need a new
> theory.
A third slit could fit but not all the time.reason it comes under the
uncertainty principle. For a photon it can go through half million
holes at once. That is in the books. TreBert PS my theory works for
buckballs and virus. All proven. Yes I am clever. I know my
science.
>> TreeBert, you may be self-taught with a grade school education but you
>> sure know SCIENCE!
>> I get it, when you have a double slit experiment you get interfence
>> because particles move in pairs. One goes through one slit, the other
>> particle goes through the other slit and the attached waves give you the
>> pattern! GENIUS!
>> Oh wait, TreeBert. What if I have THREE slits? Maybe you need a new
>> theory.
> A third slit could fit but not all the time.reason it comes under the
> uncertainty principle. For a photon it can go through half million
> holes at once. That is in the books.
Does anyone here believe that Bert has ever read a book?
(Cue the crickets)
> PS my theory works for
> buckballs and virus. All proven. Yes I am clever. I know my
> science.
> >>> On Jul 30, 6:21 pm, mpc755<mpc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> On Jul 30, 6:06 pm, HVAC<mr.h...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>> On 7/30/2012 5:21 PM, mpc755 wrote:
> >>>>>> Laughlin, Einstein, de Broglie all state there is an aether.
> >>>>>> Hogan states the Higg's field has mass.
> >>>>>> You can remain ignorant of understanding what occurs physically in
> >>>>>> nature to cause gravity and the observed behaviors in a double slit
> >>>>>> experiment if you choose to.
> >>>>>> Aether has mass and physically occupies three dimensional space.
> >>>>>> Aether is physically displaced by matter.
> >>>>>> Displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward
> >>>>>> matter is gravity.
> >>>>>> A moving particle has an associated aether displacement wave. In a
> >>>>>> double slit experiment the particle travels through a single slit and
> >>>>>> the associated aether wave passes through both.
> >>>>> Ether in physics can be treated exactly the way we treat god and other
> >>>>> supernatural claims...As if they did not exist at all.
> >>>> Not according to Nobel Laureates Laughlin, Einstein and de Broglie.
> >>>> Hogan states the Higg's field has mass.
> >>>> You can remain ignorant of understanding what occurs physically in
> >>>> nature to cause gravity and the observed behaviors in a double slit
> >>>> experiment if you choose to.
> >>>> Aether has mass and physically occupies three dimensional space.
> >>>> Aether is physically displaced by matter.
> >>>> Displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward
> >>>> matter is gravity.
> >>>> A moving particle has an associated aether displacement wave. In a
> >>>> double slit experiment the particle travels through a single slit and
> >>>> the associated aether wave passes through both.
> >>> Slit experiment proves my theory "Particles move in pairs with
> >>> attached wave" TreBert
> >> The fact a single particle is always detected exiting a single slit in
> >> a double slit experiment disproves your "particles move in pairs with
> >> attached wave".
> >> A moving particle has an associated aether displacement wave. In a
> >> double slit experiment the particle travels through a single slit and
> >> the associated aether wave passes through both.
> > That is the kicker. What we are saying we see a "single particle" is
> > in reality "Two particles" Yes the share a wave between them. The
> > partition making the two slits cuts the wave in half,and this shows
> > the interference(wave picture of light) My idea is reality. It is
> > simple. It is easy to understand. Ok you like Feynman's "Some over
> > all paths" That is tricky stuff. TreBert
> The analogy is a boat and its bow wave. In a double slit experiment
> performed with a boat the boat travels through a single slit and the bow
> wave passes through both.
> The boat is analogous to the particle and the bow wave is analogous to
> the aether wave.
> In a double slit experiment the particle travels through a single slit
> and the associated aether wave passes through both.
Double-A wrote:
> On Jul 31, 10:46 am, mpc755<mpc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> G=EMC^2 wrote:
>>> On Jul 31, 10:07 am, mpc755<mpc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Jul 31, 9:23 am, "G=EMC^2"<herbertglazi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Jul 30, 6:21 pm, mpc755<mpc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Jul 30, 6:06 pm, HVAC<mr.h...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 7/30/2012 5:21 PM, mpc755 wrote:
>>>>>>>> Laughlin, Einstein, de Broglie all state there is an aether.
>>>>>>>> Hogan states the Higg's field has mass.
>>>>>>>> You can remain ignorant of understanding what occurs physically in
>>>>>>>> nature to cause gravity and the observed behaviors in a double slit
>>>>>>>> experiment if you choose to.
>>>>>>>> Aether has mass and physically occupies three dimensional space.
>>>>>>>> Aether is physically displaced by matter.
>>>>>>>> Displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward
>>>>>>>> matter is gravity.
>>>>>>>> A moving particle has an associated aether displacement wave. In a
>>>>>>>> double slit experiment the particle travels through a single slit and
>>>>>>>> the associated aether wave passes through both.
>>>>>>> Ether in physics can be treated exactly the way we treat god and other
>>>>>>> supernatural claims...As if they did not exist at all.
>>>>>> Not according to Nobel Laureates Laughlin, Einstein and de Broglie.
>>>>>> Hogan states the Higg's field has mass.
>>>>>> You can remain ignorant of understanding what occurs physically in
>>>>>> nature to cause gravity and the observed behaviors in a double slit
>>>>>> experiment if you choose to.
>>>>>> Aether has mass and physically occupies three dimensional space.
>>>>>> Aether is physically displaced by matter.
>>>>>> Displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward
>>>>>> matter is gravity.
>>>>>> A moving particle has an associated aether displacement wave. In a
>>>>>> double slit experiment the particle travels through a single slit and
>>>>>> the associated aether wave passes through both.
>>>>> Slit experiment proves my theory "Particles move in pairs with
>>>>> attached wave" TreBert
>>>> The fact a single particle is always detected exiting a single slit in
>>>> a double slit experiment disproves your "particles move in pairs with
>>>> attached wave".
>>>> A moving particle has an associated aether displacement wave. In a
>>>> double slit experiment the particle travels through a single slit and
>>>> the associated aether wave passes through both.
>>> That is the kicker. What we are saying we see a "single particle" is
>>> in reality "Two particles" Yes the share a wave between them. The
>>> partition making the two slits cuts the wave in half,and this shows
>>> the interference(wave picture of light) My idea is reality. It is
>>> simple. It is easy to understand. Ok you like Feynman's "Some over
>>> all paths" That is tricky stuff. TreBert
>> The analogy is a boat and its bow wave. In a double slit experiment
>> performed with a boat the boat travels through a single slit and the bow
>> wave passes through both.
>> The boat is analogous to the particle and the bow wave is analogous to
>> the aether wave.
>> In a double slit experiment the particle travels through a single slit
>> and the associated aether wave passes through both.
> Hey, that's my theory!
> Double-A
In aether displacement, aether has mass and physically occupies three dimensional space. Aether is physically displaced by matter. Displaced aether pushes back and exerts inward pressure toward matter.
Displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter is gravity.
A moving particle has an associated aether displacement wave. In a double slit experiment the particle travels through a single slit and the associated aether wave passes through both.
>> "According to the general theory of relativity space without ether is
>> unthinkable"
>> "the state of the [ether] is at every place determined by connections
>> with the matter and the state of the ether in neighbouring places, ...
>> disregarding the causes which condition its state."
>> The state of the aether at every place determined by connections with
>> the matter and the state of the aether in neighboring places is the
>> state of displacement of the aether.
> Has everyone figured this out yet? When "waves" exist they MUST exist
> in a medium BY DEFINITION. The "modern physics" "idea" that waves can
> exist and propagate in "nothing at all" is patent nonsense and anyone
> saying so should be immediately fired, tenure or no.
> So how do EM waves (or possibility waves, or probability waves, yada
> yada yada) propagate. As Maxwell pointed out LONG ago energy can ONLY be
> transferred from one place to another TWO ways: One is kinetically by
> particles (which do NOT require an medium to move in) and the other is
> by WAVES which DO require a medium to move in. There are NO other
> possibilities.
> So if one thinks for a minute of HOW a medium transmits waves, you
> understand that this occurs because there is a CONNECTION between one
> point in the medium and the NEXT point. That connection point to point
> is what gives wave propagation. This is mathematical certainty.
> Read the above quotes again. It is the CONNECTION of one point in aether
> with neighboring points that PERMITS waves (and energy) to be propagated
> to a distance. (And today we understand that propagating energy is
> identical with propagating information) Hence Aether is the Medium as
> defined above. Without it there are only particles.
> So you say, well why not "only particles"? One strong reason is that so
> much in electro-magnetics and quantum mechanics obeys solutions to the
> wave equation! Usually why this is, is not understood at all. But the
> big hint is: if there are waves and wave propagation, there MUST be a
> medium. So for now we can use the word "aether" to describe that medium
> which is so necessary.
On Jul 31, 7:15 am, Big Dog <big.fing....@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 7/31/2012 8:24 AM, Brad Guth wrote:
> > No doubt the aether is real, and it may even represent the infinite
> > quantum velocity of gravity that forever radiates the existence of
> > everything in all directions simultaneously.
> Nice gobbledygook. What the fuck does "quantum velocity of gravity" even
> MEAN?
Just pick your own FUD, and go for it.
Those that do not believe in aether, are fee to do so.
Can you objectively prove the velocity of gravity isn't faster than c?
> On Jul 31, 7:15 am, Big Dog <big.fing....@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 7/31/2012 8:24 AM, Brad Guth wrote:
> > > No doubt the aether is real, and it may even represent the infinite
> > > quantum velocity of gravity that forever radiates the existence of
> > > everything in all directions simultaneously.
> > Nice gobbledygook. What the fuck does "quantum velocity of gravity" even
> > MEAN?
> Just pick your own FUD, and go for it.
> Those that do not believe in aether, are fee to do so.
> Can you objectively prove the velocity of gravity isn't faster than c?
The aether changes state at 'c'. Therefore, gravitational changes
occur at 'c'.
