The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Why does light and gravity obey the inverse square law?
 There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic. There was an error processing your request. Please try again. Standard view   View as tree
 18 messages

From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Subject:
 Validation: For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon.

More options Jun 17 2012, 9:40 am
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
From: "ken...@att.net" <seto...@att.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 06:40:53 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sun, Jun 17 2012 9:40 am
Subject: Why does light and gravity obey the inverse square law?
What is space?
Space is a structured aether called the E-Matrix. The E-Matrix is
composed of flexible and elastic E-Strings.
The length of an E-String is not defined. Away from matter, the E-
Strings are oriented randomly in all directions.  This means that a
slice of the E-Matrix in any direction will look the same.  Near
matter, the E-Strings are more organized: some emanate from the
matter, and the number of these passing through a unit area at a
distant r from the matter followed the well-known inverse square law
of physics.

What is light?
Light is wave-packets (photons) in neighboring E-Strings....these wave-
packets follows the geometries of the E-Strings at speed c on its way
to the target. Since the geometries of the E-String obey the inverse
square law, it follows that the intensity of light also obeys the
inverse square law.

What is gravity?
Interacting objects moving in the same direction in the E-Matrix
follow converging paths toward each other (an attractive force).
However, the interacting objects are confined to follow the diverging
structure of the E-Strings (a repulsive effect between the interacting
objects). Gravity is the combination of these two opposing forces and
that's why gravity is so weak compare to the other forces of nature.

The above concept of light and gravity give rise to a new theory of
relativity called IRT and a new theory of gravity called DTG. A paper
on IRT and DTG is availble in the following link:
http://www.modelmechanics.org/2011irt.dtg.pdf

Ken Seto

To post a message you must first join this group.
You do not have the permission required to post.
More options Jun 17 2012, 11:23 am
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
From: mpc755 <mpc...@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 08:23:03 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sun, Jun 17 2012 11:23 am
Subject: Re: Why does light and gravity obey the inverse square law?
On Jun 17, 9:40 am, "ken...@att.net" <seto...@att.net> wrote:

> What is gravity?

Aether has mass and physically occupies three dimensional space.
Aether is physically displaced by matter. There is no such thing as
non-baryonic dark matter traveling with matter. Matter moves through
and displaces the aether.

Einstein’s definition of the state of the aether:

“the state of the [ether] is at every place determined by connections
with the matter and the state of the ether in neighbouring places”

The state of the aether at every place determined by connections with
the matter and the state of the aether in neighboring places is the
state of displacement of the aether.

Displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward
matter is gravity.

To post a message you must first join this group.
You do not have the permission required to post.
More options Jun 17 2012, 12:18 pm
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
From: "Androcles" <An...@June.2012>
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 17:18:03 +0100
Local: Sun, Jun 17 2012 12:18 pm
Subject: Re: Why does light and gravity obey the inverse square law?

"ken...@att.net" <seto...@att.net> wrote in message

> What is space?
> Space is a structured aether called the E-Matrix.

What is a fucking idiot?
A fucking idiot is structured bullshit called Ken Seto.

To post a message you must first join this group.
You do not have the permission required to post.
More options Jun 17 2012, 3:00 pm
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
From: "ken...@att.net" <seto...@att.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 12:00:33 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sun, Jun 17 2012 3:00 pm
Subject: Re: Why does light and gravity obey the inverse square law?
On Jun 17, 12:18 pm, "Androcles" <An...@June.2012> wrote:

> "ken...@att.net" <seto...@att.net> wrote in message

> > What is space?
> > Space is a structured aether called the E-Matrix.

> What is a fucking idiot?
> A fucking idiot is structured bullshit called Ken Seto.

Androcles is a fucking idiot.

To post a message you must first join this group.
You do not have the permission required to post.
More options Jun 17 2012, 3:19 pm
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
From: "Androcles" <An...@June.2012>
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 20:19:04 +0100
Local: Sun, Jun 17 2012 3:19 pm
Subject: Re: Why does light and gravity obey the inverse square law?

"ken...@att.net" <seto...@att.net> wrote in message

On Jun 17, 12:18 pm, "Androcles" <An...@June.2012> wrote:

> "ken...@att.net" <seto...@att.net> wrote in message

> > What is space?
> > Space is a structured aether called the E-Matrix.

> What is a fucking idiot?
> A fucking idiot is structured bullshit called Ken Seto.

Androcles is a fucking idiot.
========================
Wow... what an original comeback!
Tell us about the Seto-Matrix of structured fucking idiots, Ken.

To post a message you must first join this group.
You do not have the permission required to post.
More options Jun 17 2012, 3:24 pm
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
From: "microm2...@hotmail.com" <microm2...@hotmail.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 12:24:36 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sun, Jun 17 2012 3:24 pm
Subject: Re: Why does light and gravity obey the inverse square law?
On Jun 17, 6:40 am, "ken...@att.net" <seto...@att.net> wrote:

Gravity is inward. Light can be but it can also be an outward light
bubble...

Mitchell Raemsch

To post a message you must first join this group.
You do not have the permission required to post.
More options Jun 17 2012, 10:19 pm
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
From: Tyler Dresden <tiler.dres...@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 19:19:00 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: Why does light and gravity obey the inverse square law?
On Jun 17, 8:40 am, "ken...@att.net" <seto...@att.net> wrote:

light and gravity obey the inverse square law because (distance /
space) is illusory.
In one second light travels 300,000,000 meters and falls back
300,000,000 meters.

one squared = one = c squared - we are inside a "HYPER
SPHERE" !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
space and time are squaring them selves because we are at the event
horizon an time and space are orthogonal or SQUARE.

1.0178760197630930092618964561826e+35  Total Pixels on the surface of
the Hypersphere

To post a message you must first join this group.
You do not have the permission required to post.
More options Jun 18 2012, 5:43 am
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
From: Tyler Dresden <tiler.dres...@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 02:43:04 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Mon, Jun 18 2012 5:43 am
Subject: Re: Why does light and gravity obey the inverse square law?
On Jun 17, 8:40 am, "ken...@att.net" <seto...@att.net> wrote:

light and gravity obey the inverse square law because they are both a
"SYMPTOM OF"
space time re-balancing itself and not three separate things.
space time is balanced not flat

To post a message you must first join this group.
You do not have the permission required to post.
More options Jun 18 2012, 8:48 am
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
From: "ken...@att.net" <seto...@att.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 05:48:59 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Mon, Jun 18 2012 8:48 am
Subject: Re: Why does light and gravity obey the inverse square law?
On Jun 17, 3:19 pm, "Androcles" <An...@June.2012> wrote:

Hey moron.....read the paper provided in my post that started this

To post a message you must first join this group.
You do not have the permission required to post.
More options Jun 18 2012, 9:49 am
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
From: "Androcles" <An...@June.2012>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 14:49:12 +0100
Local: Mon, Jun 18 2012 9:49 am
Subject: Re: Why does light and gravity obey the inverse square law?

"ken...@att.net" <seto...@att.net> wrote in message

On Jun 17, 3:19 pm, "Androcles" <An...@June.2012> wrote:

Hey moron.....read the paper provided in my post that started this
===========================

To post a message you must first join this group.
You do not have the permission required to post.
More options Jun 18 2012, 2:51 pm
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
From: "ken...@att.net" <seto...@att.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 11:51:01 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Mon, Jun 18 2012 2:51 pm
Subject: Re: Why does light and gravity obey the inverse square law?
On Jun 18, 9:49 am, "Androcles" <An...@June.2012> wrote:

Hey fuck-head....then why did you want me to tell you about Seto-
Matrix of structured?

To post a message you must first join this group.
You do not have the permission required to post.
More options Jun 18 2012, 3:42 pm
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
From: "Androcles" <An...@June.2012>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 20:42:44 +0100
Local: Mon, Jun 18 2012 3:42 pm
Subject: Re: Why does light and gravity obey the inverse square law?

"ken...@att.net" <seto...@att.net> wrote in message

On Jun 18, 9:49 am, "Androcles" <An...@June.2012> wrote:

Hey fuck-head....then why did you want me to tell you about Seto-
Matrix of structured?

====================================
Because nobody is interested in any mythical E-Matrix, fuckwitted

To post a message you must first join this group.
You do not have the permission required to post.
More options Jun 18 2012, 9:07 pm
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
From: "ken...@att.net" <seto...@att.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 18:07:59 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Mon, Jun 18 2012 9:07 pm
Subject: Re: Why does light and gravity obey the inverse square law?
On Jun 18, 3:42 pm, "Androcles" <An...@June.2012> wrote:

You are a worhtless sack of shit.....go back to your bottle.

To post a message you must first join this group.
You do not have the permission required to post.
More options Jun 18 2012, 9:52 pm
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
From: "microm2...@hotmail.com" <microm2...@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 18:52:04 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Mon, Jun 18 2012 9:52 pm
Subject: Re: Why does light and gravity obey the inverse square law?
On Jun 18, 6:07 pm, "ken...@att.net" <seto...@att.net> wrote:

To post a message you must first join this group.
You do not have the permission required to post.
More options Jun 19 2012, 2:04 am
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
From: "Androcles" <An...@June.2012>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 07:04:50 +0100
Local: Tues, Jun 19 2012 2:04 am
Subject: Re: Why does light and gravity obey the inverse square law?

"ken...@att.net" <seto...@att.net> wrote in message

On Jun 18, 3:42 pm, "Androcles" <An...@June.2012> wrote:

You are a worhtless sack of shit.....go back to your bottle.
=========================================
Let's see... you can't spell "worthless", you write incomplete
sentences: "Seto-Matrix of structured?", you add "- Hide quoted text -"
to the explanation you asked for, you write pages of ignorant
tripe without any evidence and you need a course in anger
management. That adds up to you being the worthless
sack of idiotic shit with the two digit IQ.
Sold many books, Seto?  ROFLMAO!

To post a message you must first join this group.
You do not have the permission required to post.
More options Jun 19 2012, 8:14 am
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
From: "ken...@att.net" <seto...@att.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 05:14:34 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues, Jun 19 2012 8:14 am
Subject: Re: Why does light and gravity obey the inverse square law?
On Jun 19, 2:04 am, "Androcles" <An...@June.2012> wrote:

Fucking idiot....it was you who came up with the phrase "Seto-Matrix
of structured?" You are a worhtless sack of shit. Go back to your
bottle.

To post a message you must first join this group.
You do not have the permission required to post.
More options Jun 19 2012, 8:17 am
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
From: "ken...@att.net" <seto...@att.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 05:17:29 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues, Jun 19 2012 8:17 am
Subject: Re: Why does light and gravity obey the inverse square law?
On Jun 18, 9:52 pm, "microm2...@hotmail.com" <microm2...@hotmail.com>
wrote:

Yes that's why the inverse square law of light....I gave a physical
explanation why light and gravity obey the inverse square law.

To post a message you must first join this group.
You do not have the permission required to post.
More options Jun 19 2012, 8:49 am
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
From: "Androcles" <An...@June.2012>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 13:49:08 +0100
Local: Tues, Jun 19 2012 8:49 am
Subject: Re: Why does light and gravity obey the inverse square law?

"ken...@att.net" <seto...@att.net> wrote in message

On Jun 19, 2:04 am, "Androcles" <An...@June.2012> wrote:

Fucking idiot....it was you who came up with the phrase "Seto-Matrix
of structured?" You are a worhtless sack of shit. Go back to your
bottle.
===========================================
"A fucking idiot is structured bullshit called Ken Seto." is a
complete and grammatically correct sentence, still there for all
to see. I'll leave it to the lurkers to decide who the worthless
sack of shit really is.
Tell us about the Seto-Matrix of structured fucking idiots, Ken.