Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
The Spiraling Frame Confusion of the Andersen/Androcles Team.
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  Messages 51 - 53 of 53 - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals) < Older 
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Henry Wilson  
View profile  
 More options Oct 6 2012, 4:14 pm
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
From: Henry Wilson <hnrwl...@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2012 13:14:26 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sat, Oct 6 2012 4:14 pm
Subject: Re: The Spiraling Frame Confusion of the Andersen/Androcles Team.

Do YOU know what you are talking about? I'm sure nobody else does.

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Henry Wilson  
View profile  
 More options Oct 6 2012, 4:29 pm
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
From: Henry Wilson <hnrwl...@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2012 13:29:46 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sat, Oct 6 2012 4:29 pm
Subject: Re: The Spiraling Frame Confusion of the Andersen/Androcles Team.
On Friday, 5 October 2012 19:16:45 UTC-7, Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway  wrote:

don't be difficult.
Classical theory describes reflection and transmission quite well in terms of wavelength...It merely stops right there, however, and doesn't attempt to link this with the particulate model of light.

Gawd! Even YOU must know that's silly.

> You’ll be able to see in your bedroom with the
> curtain drawn as soon
> as the sun is above the horizon from scattered light alone, none of
> which gets through walls.

> I can see my cat’s eyes looking back at me from
> 100 yards with

> moonlight alone, but I can’t see the cat, he’s black.

> You can see what’s on the ground when it is in
> shadow, but by
> scattered light, the sunlight doesn’t pass through
> walls and neither
> does your router’s radiation.

Of course it does. STRAIGHT THROUGH THE BRICK WALLS.

I'M NOT SURPRISED THEY NEVER PUT YOU IN CHARGE OF submarine communication.

> Gamma
> particles and cosmic ray photons can penetrate half the Earth.

> =====================

> Bullshit.

...utters the pommie engineer....
  

> Nothing
> seems to be able to stop neutrinos.

> =========================

> Neutrinos are a different animal.

How do you know?

> Eleven were
> detected from SN 1987A,
> just below the Earth’s surface.

Did they have the sender's address written on them?

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway  
View profile  
 More options Oct 6 2012, 5:50 pm
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
From: "Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway" <LordAndroc...@October2012.org>
Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2012 22:49:43 +0100
Local: Sat, Oct 6 2012 5:49 pm
Subject: Re: The Spiraling Frame Confusion of the Andersen/Androcles Team.

"Henry Wilson" <hnrwl...@gmail.com> wrote in message news:9308ab9c-141b-4fcf-8def-17f4766cbe10@googlegroups.com...

On Friday, 5 October 2012 19:16:45 UTC-7, Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway  wrote:

don't be difficult.
Classical theory describes reflection and transmission quite well in terms of wavelength...It merely stops right there, however, and doesn't attempt to link this with the particulate model of light.
==============================================
You are logically challenged again.
One has only to throw tennis balls at a net or grid to understand
particle reflection and transmission. Slightly more difficult for you
is the water drip transmitting through the coffee filter paper and
reforming a drip on the other side.
As long as you continue to imagine photons are in some strange
sense solid and tiny you will never grasp polarisation. Water
droplets are much bigger than the holes in the filter paper and
photons are wider than the spacing of the diffraction grating.
They pass through two or more slits at once because they are
alternating magnetic fields, not little balls.

Gawd! Even YOU must know that's silly.
==========================================
Logical deduction from observation is only silly to the anti-scientist, Daisy the anti.
Where in the room do you put your printer and it does NOT receive
from the router? I can point my TV remote control directly away from
the TV, the IR bounces off the wall and ceiling and still changes channels
from a tiny fraction of the LED emission of digital pulses.
But you are not just silly, you are a fucking STUPID cunt.
.

> You’ll be able to see in your bedroom with the
> curtain drawn as soon
> as the sun is above the horizon from scattered light alone, none of
> which gets through walls.

> I can see my cat’s eyes looking back at me from
> 100 yards with

> moonlight alone, but I can’t see the cat, he’s black.

> You can see what’s on the ground when it is in
> shadow, but by
> scattered light, the sunlight doesn’t pass through
> walls and neither
> does your router’s radiation.

Of course it does. STRAIGHT THROUGH THE BRICK WALLS.
==============================================
Beam it, then, and prove your case, you stupid cunt. The rest of
us will use x-rays. I offered to let you measure the speed of IR
while I did the x-rays but you are too incompetent for even that.
Ever lost an FM radio transmission in a tunnel, you moron?
Hmm... you probably don’t have tunnels in flat Oz.

I'M NOT SURPRISED THEY NEVER PUT YOU IN CHARGE OF submarine communication.
=================================
Radio underwater is very long wave. When Moscow wanted to reach
a Russian boomer in the cold war it sent a ping and the boomer had to
surface to get the real message. Improvements have been made with
satellites since.  I’m not surprised you know fuck all about radio.

> Gamma
> particles and cosmic ray photons can penetrate half the Earth.

> =====================

> Bullshit.

...utters the pommie engineer....

> Nothing
> seems to be able to stop neutrinos.

> =========================

> Neutrinos are a different animal.

How do you know?

> Eleven were
> detected from SN 1987A,
> just below the Earth’s surface.

Did they have the sender's address written on them?

==================================
Nope, it was all assumption. A few very rare neutrinos
were detected in a burst and then SN 1987A was seen
shortly after. Someone figured out 2+2 = 11.

2.4 GHz from a router goes though brick walls!
Bwahahahahaha!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wi-Fi
A device that can use Wi-Fi (such as a personal computer, video game console, smartphone, tablet, or digital audio player) can connect to a network resource such as the Internet via a wireless network access point. Such an access point (or hotspot) has a range of about 20 meters (65 feet) indoors and a greater range outdoors. Hotspot coverage can comprise an area as small as a single room with walls that block radio waves or as large as many square miles — this is achieved by using multiple overlapping access points.

Fuck off, you clueless ozzie wanker.
-- This message is brought to you from the keyboard of
Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages < Older 
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »