A little change in G. Relativity explains the non existence og the black holes.
mario rossise
This book exposes a new Field Wave Theory that discovers a
deterministic
behaviour of the energy emission in the atom and it gives us a causal
derivation of the mysterious, until now Fine Structure Constant,
finally derived as the integer 137.
An inevitable harmless small change in General Relativity is
conclusive
uniting it with the world of quantum phenomena, realizing the dream
pursued for a long time by Einstein in the last thirty years of his
life.
This new unified theory give us a complete understanding of
Quantum Gravity in terms of only waves.
The substitution of the base hypothesis of space-time continuity
with the existence of a discontinuous space-time is now embodied.
It allows us to understand all the field's structures which have been
until now called: masses and radiations.
A new wave-like physical solution of the Singularity problem of
auto-energy allows the construction of an electron model, entirely
wave structured.
The new model explains the structure of particles in-depth, whereas
it discovers new wave laws in terms of the Field Wave Theory
and contains in itself the physical reasons for a complete
justification,
finally deterministic, of the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle.
With the extension of the new wave laws, it discovers the
inevitability of the existence of a Fifth Anti Gravity Force,
previously seen in new theory since 1984, that is been
"now" considered responsible for the recession
of the galaxies, following the observation of the
accelerated expansion of the Universe.
The recent observation of 28 stars, apparently in orbit around
the void in the galaxy centre, up to now interpreted as evidence
of a big Black Hole existence in the same orbit centre,
proves, on the contrary, the non-existence of the Black Hole
and the real consistence of the Fifth Anti Gravity Force.
Walter E. R. Cassani
Juan R.
> http://www.albertwasright.com
>
> This book exposes a new Field Wave Theory
Field theory are not good enough by today standards.
> that discovers a deterministic
> behaviour of the energy emission in the atom and it gives us a causal
> derivation of the mysterious, until now Fine Structure Constant, finally
> derived as the integer 137.
>
>
> An inevitable harmless small change in General Relativity is conclusive
> uniting it with the world of quantum phenomena, realizing the dream
> pursued for a long time by Einstein in the last thirty years of his
> life.
Evidently he failed because he followed a wrong way. And he was blamed
for that :-D
> This new unified theory give us a complete understanding of Quantum
> Gravity in terms of only waves.
No it does not.
> The substitution of the base hypothesis of space-time continuity with
> the existence of a discontinuous space-time is now embodied. It allows
> us to understand all the field's structures which have been until now
> called: masses and radiations. A new wave-like physical solution of the
> Singularity problem of auto-energy allows the construction of an
> electron model, entirely wave structured.
Nonsense.
> The new model explains the structure of particles in-depth, whereas it
> discovers new wave laws in terms of the Field Wave Theory and contains
> in itself the physical reasons for a complete justification,
> finally deterministic, of the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle.
Nonsense.
> With the extension of the new wave laws, it discovers the inevitability
> of the existence of a Fifth Anti Gravity Force, previously seen in new
> theory since 1984, that is been "now" considered responsible for the
> recession of the galaxies, following the observation of the accelerated
> expansion of the Universe.
Nonsense.
> The recent observation of 28 stars, apparently in orbit around the void
> in the galaxy centre, up to now interpreted as evidence of a big Black
> Hole existence in the same orbit centre, proves, on the contrary, the
> non-existence of the Black Hole and the real consistence of the Fifth
> Anti Gravity Force.
Hum. i) There is not black holes in nature. ii) That indirect evidence
is compatible with models without black holes. This is why rigorous
people continue to use the term "candidate to black hole". iii) It is true
that a correct modelling of graviton field stops the formation of singularity
but I would not call that "Fifth Anti Gravity Force"
> Walter E. R. Cassani
>
> waltercass...@virgilio.it
>
> http://www.albertwasright.com
--
http://www.canonicalscience.org/
BLOG:
http://www.canonicalscience.org/en/publicationzone/canonicalsciencetoday/canonicalsciencetoday.html
dlzc
On Nov 7, 5:11 am, mario rossise <marioross...@gmail.com> wrote:
...
> This book exposes a new Field Wave Theory
> that discovers a deterministic behaviour of
> the energy emission in the atom and it
> gives us a causal derivation of the
> mysterious, until now Fine Structure Constant,
> finally derived as the integer 137.
It's been measured, and its not exactly 1/137. So you have
invalidated your theory.
...
> With the extension of the new wave laws,
> it discovers the inevitability of the
> existence of a Fifth Anti Gravity Force,
> previously seen in new theory since 1984,
... and described much sooner than this as the cosmological constant.
> that is been "now" considered responsible
> for the recession of the galaxies,
Expansion occurred without the cosmological constant, it didn't arrive
at the right *value* without the cosmological constant.
> following the observation of the
> accelerated expansion of the Universe.
>
> The recent observation of 28 stars,
> apparently in orbit around the void
Not a void. There is mass there. It is spraying matter and anti-
matter jets into space too.
> in the galaxy centre, up to now interpreted
> as evidence of a big Black Hole existence
> in the same orbit centre, proves, on the
> contrary, the non-existence of the Black Hole
> and the real consistence of the Fifth Anti
> Gravity Force.
You are aware that some of those objects are moving back in towards
the galaxy's center too, right?
There are no proofs in this Universe. There are tests and disproof.
Please tell us ways to disprove your theory. Other than you get the
wrong value for the fine structure constant, you propose a classically
based theory that we already know does not work, and you know nothing
of Science. Please let us know how we can disprove your theory.
David A. Smith
BURT
General Relativity violates the special theories universal motion
laws. By fall reaching light speed and going higher in the stronger
gravity inside a black hole is the violation bewteen GR and SR.
Mitch Raemsch
dlzc
On Nov 7, 7:16 pm, BURT <macromi...@yahoo.com> wrote:
...
> General Relativity violates the special
> theories universal motion laws.
The General theory is more general the the special.
> By fall reaching light speed and going
> higher in the stronger gravity inside a
> black hole is the violation bewteen GR
> and SR.
Look around you. You are in a black hole, falling towards the future.
I can't help it that you feel violated. Blame it on your teachers.
David A. Smith
Simple Simon
> Dear BURT:
>
> On Nov 7, 7:16 pm, BURT <macromi...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> ...
>> General Relativity violates the special
>> theories universal motion laws.
>
> The General theory is more general the the special.
>
>> By fall reaching light speed and going
>> higher in the stronger gravity inside a
>> black hole is the violation bewteen GR
>> and SR.
>
> Look around you. You are in a black hole, falling towards the future.
>
Could be. What do you think of this posting:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/4ee8992768b3a9be?hl=en
also: http://tinyurl.com/yj22hbx
within this thread:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/browse_thread/thread/1eb75eaa708b80d3/234fca317871a67a?hl=en&lnk=gst&q=levaing+black+holes#234fca317871a67a
also: http://tinyurl.com/ykhukee
Thanks
BURT
Then there is center of the universe and Einstein was wrong. Looks
like we fell all the way.
Mitch Raemsch