Re: SR Ignored the Significance of the = Sign
Eleaticus
<dirkvandemoor...@nospAm.hotmail.com> wrote:
> NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
>
> 61848e7a-b393-4681-bca6-43f3c22bd...@e27g2000yqm.googlegroups.com
>
> > On Jul 29, 5:58 am, "Dirk Van de moortel"
> > <dirkvandemoor...@nospAm.hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Dear Dirk: I detect a certain fatalism regarding whether or not you
> > believe Einstein will ever be dethroned as a... genius (ha, ha, HA!).
> > I'm not fatalistic, but I know that 95% of those on these groups who
> > comment about SR and GR do so because they wish to be associated with
> > "a genius" so that they themselves will "seem" smart.
>
> I know that 100% of the crackpots on these groups who
> comment about SR and GR do so because they are really
> truly honestly convinced that they are infinitely smarter than
> one particular person who is more or less universally
> considered to have been a genius.
>
> Dirk Vdm
SR ignores symmetry:
E E
= =
E = MCCM = E
= =
E E
Uncle Al
[snip]
> SR ignores symmetry:
> E E
> = =
> E = MCCM = E
> = =
> E E
idiot
It also ignores the "New York Times" crossword puzzle, sidoku,
tamaguchis, and little boys in short pants who foul themselves when
startled by soft sighs.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2
NoEinstein
>
> - Show quoted text -
Dear Eleaticus: You sir are a RARE thinker! The Law of the
Conservation of energy demands that: E sub OUT = E sub IN. All
mathematicians worth their salt should realize that E = (mc^2) / (1 -
v^2/c^2)^1/2 has the energy OUT being a variable exponent greater than
unity, while the energy IN, 'v' is increasing LINEARLY. The latter——
as you say——"isn't symmetrical", and thus violates the LCE, as well as
disproves SR as a "correct" (Ha, ha, HA!) theory. Congratulations for
finally allowing the TRUTHFUL 'tail' to wag the ERRANT 'dog' that is
Einstein's notions about anything! — NoEinstein —
NoEinstein
> Eleaticus wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > SR ignores symmetry:
> > E E
> > = =
> > E = MCCM = E
> > = =
> > E E
>
> idiot
>
> It also ignores the "New York Times" crossword puzzle, sidoku,
> tamaguchis, and little boys in short pants who foul themselves when
> startled by soft sighs.
>
> --
> (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2
Dear Uncle Al: You, Sir, are one of the dunces who have defended
Einstein's errant theories. In one fell swoop, Eleaticus has
confirmed that SR violates the Law of the Conservation of Energy.
It's not fun being found out to be dumb, like you. Your taking pot
shots at Eleaticus only shows your futile defensiveness in the face of
simple truths. Folks, be it known: Uncle Al is a non thinking arm-
chair scientist whose ideas don’t now hold, nor never have held, any
water. Pity him and his ilk. — NoEinstein —
PD
Oh, dear.
doug
NoEinstein wrote:
You are right--he rarely thinks.
The Law of the
> Conservation of energy demands that: E sub OUT = E sub IN. All
> mathematicians worth their salt should realize that E = (mc^2) / (1 -
> v^2/c^2)^1/2 has the energy OUT being a variable exponent greater than
> unity, while the energy IN, 'v' is increasing LINEARLY. The latter��
> as you say��"isn't symmetrical", and thus violates the LCE, as well as
> disproves SR as a "correct" (Ha, ha, HA!) theory. Congratulations for
> finally allowing the TRUTHFUL 'tail' to wag the ERRANT 'dog' that is
> Einstein's notions about anything! � NoEinstein �
However, you continue to prove that you never think.