Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Light and motion through space

0 views
Skip to first unread message

BURT

unread,
Aug 31, 2010, 8:19:24 PM8/31/10
to
Matter moves along with light but slower. Light can move ahead of
matter frame's motion in space. But matter can reach near light speed
and move behind light as it moves very slowly ahead of its frame.

The space frame is for light and matter relativity.

Mitch Raemsch

whoever

unread,
Aug 31, 2010, 11:09:15 PM8/31/10
to
"BURT" wrote in message
news:f952ee46-95ec-4060...@a4g2000prm.googlegroups.com...

>Matter moves along with light but slower.

If something 'moves along with' something else .. they must be going at the
same speed as each other, moron.

--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: ne...@netfront.net ---

BURT

unread,
Aug 31, 2010, 11:11:09 PM8/31/10
to
> --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: n...@netfront.net ---

No it only requires moving in the same direction together.

Mitch Raemsch

whoever

unread,
Sep 1, 2010, 12:43:12 AM9/1/10
to
"BURT" wrote in message
news:a06ed45e-2151-45bb...@f20g2000pro.googlegroups.com...

>
>On Aug 31, 8:09 pm, "whoever" <whoe...@whereever.com> wrote:
>> "BURT" wrote in message
>>
>> news:f952ee46-95ec-4060...@a4g2000prm.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> >Matter moves along with light but slower.
>>
>> If something 'moves along with' something else .. they must be going at
>> the
>> same speed as each other, moron.
>>
>>No it only requires moving in the same direction together.

If they are together, then must be going at the same speed, moron.


--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: ne...@netfront.net ---

BURT

unread,
Sep 1, 2010, 12:51:37 AM9/1/10
to
On Aug 31, 9:43 pm, "whoever" <whoe...@whereever.com> wrote:
> "BURT"  wrote in message
>
> news:a06ed45e-2151-45bb...@f20g2000pro.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> >On Aug 31, 8:09 pm, "whoever" <whoe...@whereever.com> wrote:
> >> "BURT"  wrote in message
>
> >>news:f952ee46-95ec-4060...@a4g2000prm.googlegroups.com...
>
> >> >Matter moves along with light but slower.
>
> >> If something 'moves along with' something else .. they must be going at
> >> the
> >> same speed as each other, moron.
>
> >>No it only requires moving in the same direction together.
>
> If they are together, then must be going at the same speed, moron.
>
> --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: n...@netfront.net ---

They can be together for long enough time to make the point that both
have
different speeds through space but same direction. Just like matter;
light's
motion will be at a less seperation rate when moving in the same
direction
temporarily together.

Mitch Raemsch

Inertial

unread,
Sep 1, 2010, 1:08:31 AM9/1/10
to
"BURT" wrote in message
news:efcd6b8a-0dc6-4aba...@u4g2000prn.googlegroups.com...

>They can be together for long enough time to make the point that both
>have
>different speeds through space but same direction. Just like matter;
>light's
>motion will be at a less seperation rate when moving in the same
>direction
>temporarily together.

If they are together for any finite length of time then they have the same
speed and direction, moron. You fail

BURT

unread,
Sep 1, 2010, 1:15:49 AM9/1/10
to

No they can be and drift apart over time.

Mitch Raemsch

Inertial

unread,
Sep 1, 2010, 2:50:09 AM9/1/10
to
"BURT" wrote in message
news:bcb54366-9e6b-4d69...@h40g2000pro.googlegroups.com...

If they drift apart, they are not together, moron. You fail

BURT

unread,
Sep 1, 2010, 3:44:13 AM9/1/10
to
On Aug 31, 11:50 pm, "Inertial" <relativ...@rest.com> wrote:
> "BURT"  wrote in message
>
> news:bcb54366-9e6b-4d69...@h40g2000pro.googlegroups.com...
>
> >On Aug 31, 10:08 pm, "Inertial" <relativ...@rest.com> wrote:
> >> "BURT"  wrote in message
> >>news:efcd6b8a-0dc6-4aba...@u4g2000prn.googlegroups.com...
> >> >They can be together for long enough time to make the point that both
> >> >have
> >> >different speeds through space but same direction. Just like matter;
> >> >light's
> >> >motion will be at a less seperation rate when moving in the same
> >> >direction
> >> >temporarily together.
> >> If they are together for any finite length of time then they have the
> >> same
> >> speed and direction, moron.  You fail
> >No they can be and drift apart over time.
>
> If they drift apart, they are not together, moron.  You fail

You mean when they seperate but not before.

Mitch Raemsch

bert

unread,
Sep 1, 2010, 10:50:50 AM9/1/10
to

Electron charge goes at c,but an electron can't Figure that one out
Mitch TreBert

Sam Wormley

unread,
Sep 1, 2010, 10:59:45 AM9/1/10
to
On 9/1/10 9:50 AM, bert wrote:
> Electron charge goes at c

Do you mean that "changes in the field" propagate at c?

Androcles

unread,
Sep 1, 2010, 11:21:32 AM9/1/10
to

"Sam Wormley" <swor...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:tPWdnZi8Nez89-PR...@mchsi.com...

| On 9/1/10 9:50 AM, bert wrote:
| > Electron charge goes at c
|
| Do you mean that "changes in the field" propagate at c?
|
Relative to the field source, sure, why not?


BURT

unread,
Sep 2, 2010, 6:14:30 PM9/2/10
to

Electric light energy is a static radial field that oscillates with
frequency.

Light is electric but of course has no charge or strength as a force.

Mitch Raemsch

0 new messages