Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re: A constant speed of light in all reference frames? Surely you can't be serious.
0 views
Skip to first unread message
glird
Mar 11, 2010, 10:58:28 AM3/11/10
to
On Feb 27, 10:38 pm, glird <gl...@aol.com> wrote:
>
<< If physicists understood the equations in segment 3 of Einstein's
1905 STR paper, they would KNOW the following things:
1. Einstein never did accurately derive the LTE.
2. He neither understood his own OR Poincare's equations.
3. Neither has any physicist then or now. (If they did, they would
know _and publicize_ the fact that the value of
(delta tau)/(delta t)
imposed by his EQUATIONS disagrees with that required by the LTE!)
Lest you think I am being too critical of physicists, thus
indirectly of physics as well, I will now tell you WHY they don't
understand the equations:
... CALCULUS IS A BLINDFOLD over the eyes of physicists and
mathematicians.
Therefore, dear physicists, it isn't your fault that you don't
understand E's high-school-level mathematics. ...
Since it is obvious that no physicist would agree with me on this,
here is a challenge for you:
In the next sentence, answer the first two questions and then
answer, if you can, the third and most significant one.
In his equation tau = a(t - vx'/{c^2 - v^2}), where did the "a" come
from and what does it signify; and IF it IS "a
function phi{v) at present unknown" WHAT is its value if, as he later
said, "phi(v) = 1"? >
>
<< If physicists understood the equations in segment 3 of Einstein's
1905 STR paper, they would KNOW the following things:
1. Einstein never did accurately derive the LTE.
2. He neither understood his own OR Poincare's equations.
3. Neither has any physicist then or now. (If they did, they would
know _and publicize_ the fact that the value of
(delta tau)/(delta t)
imposed by his EQUATIONS disagrees with that required by the LTE!)
Lest you think I am being too critical of physicists, thus
indirectly of physics as well, I will now tell you WHY they don't
understand the equations:
... CALCULUS IS A BLINDFOLD over the eyes of physicists and
mathematicians.
Therefore, dear physicists, it isn't your fault that you don't
understand E's high-school-level mathematics. ...
Since it is obvious that no physicist would agree with me on this,
here is a challenge for you:
In the next sentence, answer the first two questions and then
answer, if you can, the third and most significant one.
In his equation tau = a(t - vx'/{c^2 - v^2}), where did the "a" come
from and what does it signify; and IF it IS "a
function phi{v) at present unknown" WHAT is its value if, as he later
said, "phi(v) = 1"? >
Although there were another 300 postings on this thread, NOBODY has
answered this challenge. The reason is obvious:
It's because I was right.
glird
Dono.
Mar 11, 2010, 11:02:06 AM3/11/10
to
0 new messages