They tell the blind Aunty-Als, relax sweety it's done before through
cosmic rays.
Then further discretely away say NEVER before since the Big Bang.
And even further discretely, no not like cosmic rays which like LHC's
Alice generate kinetic Energy, LHC's Atlas will be converting it to
100% potential energy.
And even further discretely, no not like cosmic rays, Alice will be
generating heat 100,000 times greater then the Sun's core.
And even further discretely, no not like cosmic rays, cosmic rays
don't generate the Big Bang's quarks soup (quark-gluon plasma state)
where as Alice and Aunty-Al will.
How many lies until Aunty-Al & others stop trusting LHC?
When a Bullet is made Its purpose is to kill, Still it is made.
LHC is a Bullet, Lets see when it will be fired.
It may start a Black Hole.
It may ignite the Earth
It may destroy ...
Bye
Sanny
I love to Chat at: .......... http://www.GetClub.com
Why? Its funny. I like reading other peoples intersting Chats.
100s of funny Chat by many people. All Chats are recorded.
What? No. Where did you read such nonsense?
>
> And even further discretely, no not like cosmic rays, Alice will be
> generating heat 100,000 times greater then the Sun's core.
So do cosmic rays, at the point of collision.
>
> And even further discretely, no not like cosmic rays, cosmic rays
> don't generate the Big Bang's quarks soup (quark-gluon plasma state)
> where as Alice and Aunty-Al will.
Cosmic rays do the same thing.
False, LHC repeats how Earth's been bombarded by cosmic rays billions
of times, never specifying this is the very ***1st time*** at such
high concentration. Critical mass and sufficient solar mass produces
detonations.
Anything less, simply fizzles away.
You do even know the difference between Alice and Atlas experiments,
get educated.
Oh and I know your answer, "Alice is a static collision".
What high concentration? At LHC, each of the collisions is distinct,
and the products dissipate into the detector long before the next
collision occurs.
Yes, I do. Where did you read such nonsense?
Get educated, perhaps you'll know why LHC says never before since the
big bang.
Otherwise you'll want to correct them.
The only nonsense is your education. Get educated about the difference
when total collision momentum = zero and when it is not.
You mean correct their little press blurbs designed to excite the lay
public?
Is this what you're worried about?
What do you think is different about the two, in terms of physical
impact.
After all, ANY collision can be observed in two different frames, even
the head-on impact of cars.
Wrong dildo, you and santa are each in a car beside each other,
another car hits only you, there's only one frame of reference from
both yours and the car that hits you, unless your an drunken imbecile
of course.
Yes dildo, they lied just for the press.
More likely your brain's been pressed.
They certainly don't tell a comprehensive or carefully self-consistent
story for the press. That's not the purpose of a press release.
Oh dear. What business do you have talking about physics if you don't
get even the basics right?
Double idiot, you really think santa will be the one moving forward
and not you backward.
Your intelligence is insufficient for further discussion, go get
educated.