Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

THE DE-CARTE CODE

16 views
Skip to first unread message

George Hammond

unread,
Oct 1, 2006, 6:42:27 PM10/1/06
to
"Jim Black" <tram...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1159732686.4...@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...

> [Jim Black]
> BTW, while we're not talking, could you check the facts in this little
> biography of yourself? Thanks!
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> George Hammond
>>From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.
> http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/George_Hammond
>

[HAMMOND]
Dear Jim Black,
Thanks for bringing this "DE-CARTE CODE" website to my
attention.
It has been reported that Dan Brown ("Da Vinci Code") is
the author of this ("De Carte Code") Uncyclopedia article.
It seems that Dan Brown has not only made millions
writing fictional accounts of Jesus' historical proof of
God... but now Brown intends to make MORE MILLIONS writing a
fictional account of Hammond's discovery of the Scientific
Proof of God (the SPOG)!
I did get a real laugh out of the "SPOG SYMBOL" which he
claims is printed on every ONE DOLLAR BILL (see his
Unicyclopedia article, URL above). As author of the SPOG,
yes, I will credit Brown with an element of factual truth in
that one!
The author of this thing REALLY KNOWS where the big money
lies... right under Hammond's chair!
========================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
========================================

T Wake

unread,
Oct 1, 2006, 7:42:53 PM10/1/06
to

"George Hammond" <nowh...@notspam.org> wrote in message
news:b8f0i21hb31v4j3l4...@4ax.com...

> "Jim Black" <tram...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1159732686.4...@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
>
>> [Jim Black]
>> BTW, while we're not talking, could you check the facts in this little
>> biography of yourself? Thanks!
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> George Hammond
>>>From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.
>> http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/George_Hammond
>>
>
> [HAMMOND]
> Dear Jim Black,
> Thanks for bringing this "DE-CARTE CODE" website to my
> attention.
> It has been reported that Dan Brown ("Da Vinci Code") is
> the author of this ("De Carte Code") Uncyclopedia article.

I bet you he isnt.

> It seems that Dan Brown has not only made millions
> writing fictional accounts of Jesus' historical proof of
> God... but now Brown intends to make MORE MILLIONS writing a
> fictional account of Hammond's discovery of the Scientific
> Proof of God (the SPOG)!

And the fictional one makes more sense than your ramblings.

> I did get a real laugh out of the "SPOG SYMBOL" which he
> claims is printed on every ONE DOLLAR BILL (see his
> Unicyclopedia article, URL above). As author of the SPOG,
> yes, I will credit Brown with an element of factual truth in
> that one!
> The author of this thing REALLY KNOWS where the big money
> lies... right under Hammond's chair!

Like you even own a chair...


Bill Snyder

unread,
Oct 1, 2006, 7:50:18 PM10/1/06
to
On Mon, 2 Oct 2006 00:42:53 +0100, "T Wake"
<usenet...@gishpuppy.com> wrote:

>
>"George Hammond" <nowh...@notspam.org> wrote in message
>news:b8f0i21hb31v4j3l4...@4ax.com...

>> I did get a real laugh out of the "SPOG SYMBOL" which he


>> claims is printed on every ONE DOLLAR BILL (see his
>> Unicyclopedia article, URL above). As author of the SPOG,
>> yes, I will credit Brown with an element of factual truth in
>> that one!
>> The author of this thing REALLY KNOWS where the big money
>> lies... right under Hammond's chair!
>
>Like you even own a chair...

He's gotten all of his ideas while sitting on the Ceramic Throne.
Which probably accounts for the smell.

--
Bill Snyder [This space unintentionally left blank.]

TMG

unread,
Oct 1, 2006, 8:59:37 PM10/1/06
to
T Wake wrote:
> "George Hammond" <nowh...@notspam.org> wrote in message
> news:b8f0i21hb31v4j3l4...@4ax.com...
>
>>"Jim Black" <tram...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>news:1159732686.4...@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
>>
>>
>>>[Jim Black]
>>>BTW, while we're not talking, could you check the facts in this little
>>>biography of yourself? Thanks!
>>>
>>>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>George Hammond
>>>>From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.
>>>http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/George_Hammond
>>>
>>
>>[HAMMOND]
>> Dear Jim Black,
>> Thanks for bringing this "DE-CARTE CODE" website to my
>>attention.
>> It has been reported that Dan Brown ("Da Vinci Code") is
>>the author of this ("De Carte Code") Uncyclopedia article.
>
>
> I bet you he isnt.

I guarantee he isn't.

George Hammond

unread,
Oct 2, 2006, 12:52:44 AM10/2/06
to
On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 20:59:37 -0400, TMG <T...@Nowhere.org>
wrote:

[Hammond]
We know enough about the author to know YOU didn't
write it cocksuck... that's for sure.
Moreover no one working at the WOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC
INSTITUTE is intelligent enough to write something as
powerful, creative, productive and influential as that....
particularly a snivelling coward and stalker/heckler like
you.

FRANKLY, I'M FLATTERED BY THE ARTICLE AND
CONSIDER IT A HISTORICALLY IMPORTANT
WORK OF RARE GENIUS!
THE AUTHOR OF IT MAY BE ONE OF THE
FEW PEOPLE WHO ACTUALLY KNOWS WHO
GEORGE HAMMOND REALLY IS!

T Wake

unread,
Oct 2, 2006, 10:59:54 AM10/2/06
to

"George Hammond" <nowh...@notspam.org>, replying to some one in his kill
file, wrote in message news:2251i2hfj8o7l5g6m...@4ax.com...

> On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 20:59:37 -0400, TMG <T...@Nowhere.org>
> wrote:
>
>>T Wake wrote:
>>> "George Hammond" <nowh...@notspam.org> wrote in message
>>> news:b8f0i21hb31v4j3l4...@4ax.com...
>>>
>>>>
>>>>[HAMMOND]
>>>> Dear Jim Black,
>>>> Thanks for bringing this "DE-CARTE CODE" website to my
>>>>attention.
>>>> It has been reported that Dan Brown ("Da Vinci Code") is
>>>>the author of this ("De Carte Code") Uncyclopedia article.
>>>
>>>
>>> I bet you he isnt.
>>
>>I guarantee he isn't.
>
> [Hammond]
> We know enough about the author to know YOU didn't
> write it cocksuck... that's for sure.

Hey fruitcake, who is this "we" you refer to?

> Moreover no one working at the WOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC
> INSTITUTE is intelligent enough to write something as
> powerful, creative, productive and influential as that....
> particularly a snivelling coward and stalker/heckler like
> you.
>
> FRANKLY, I'M FLATTERED BY THE ARTICLE AND
> CONSIDER IT A HISTORICALLY IMPORTANT
> WORK OF RARE GENIUS!
> THE AUTHOR OF IT MAY BE ONE OF THE
> FEW PEOPLE WHO ACTUALLY KNOWS WHO
> GEORGE HAMMOND REALLY IS!

Hahahahaha. You really are insaner by the day.


Fwd: from "TMG"

unread,
Oct 2, 2006, 5:30:11 PM10/2/06
to
On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 16:20:02 -0400, TMG <T...@Nowhere.org>
wrote:

>Jim Black wrote:
>
>> BTW, while we're not talking, could you check the facts in this little
>> biography of yourself? Thanks!
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------

>> http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/George_Hammond
>
> [TMG]
>Masterfully done.

[Hammond]
TMG got that one right despite being a snivelling
"WHO-EE" celebrity stalker and science harasser... DAN BROWN
himself couldn't have written a better publiciy piece for
Hammond! In fact, one person even remarked that Dan Brown
probably wrote it!

TMG

unread,
Oct 2, 2006, 9:07:08 PM10/2/06
to

George Hammond wrote:
<a nice little foaming at the mouth rant> and..

>
> FRANKLY, I'M FLATTERED BY THE ARTICLE AND
> CONSIDER IT A HISTORICALLY IMPORTANT
> WORK OF RARE GENIUS!
> THE AUTHOR OF IT MAY BE ONE OF THE
> FEW PEOPLE WHO ACTUALLY KNOWS WHO
> GEORGE HAMMOND REALLY IS!

You sick, sad putz. Did you even read the "article"? Do you know this is
a site where you (and the rest of the "subjects") are being mocked? It's
a humor site - and you're providing the humor!

"FRANKLY, I'M FLATTERED BY THE ARTICLE" - [HAMMOND]

Of course you are, you can't parse mocking from science. You're
flattered by the Noetic Press! This site is mocking you, and making fun
of your entire being, AND YOU JUST CAN'T SEE IT.

<caps added for the [HAMMOND] effect>

By G_uv, you're dense.

George Hammond

unread,
Oct 2, 2006, 10:23:25 PM10/2/06
to
On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 21:07:08 -0400, TMG <T...@Nowhere.org>
wrote:


[Hammond]
Oh sure... and Dan Brown's Da Vinci Code is intended to MOCK
THE CATHOLIC CHURCH too I suppose. You sick fuck!

You sick Sniveling little puke...! The Da Vinci Code has
bought more publicity for the Vatican, the Pope, and the
Catholic Church and Religion in general than 1,000
theologians writing a million sermons.... you groveling,
halfwit, simpleton piece of filth.
How in the FUCK the (formerly) prestigeous WOODS HOLE
OCEANOGRAPHIC INST ever saw fit to ramrod you thru an MIT
"work-study PhD" and appoint you a "staff scientist" is
BEYOND MY IMAGINATION. I knew WHOI stopped doing serious
science years ago.... but I never imagined they had sunk so
low as to hire the likes of you! You sick fuck....
simpleton low brow boor. Fuckin psycho anonymous heckler
and stalker... what a fuckin disgrace to Science you are!

The guy who wrote than "Dan Brown" review of Hammond's
SPOG (see: http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/George_Hammond )
is a TOWERING GENIUS AND INTELLECTUAL HERO compared to a
sniveling, back stabbing, cowardly heckler and stalker like
you. The author even MENTIONS YOU and calls you a
"celebrity staker" and mentions that the FBI has noticed
your "excessive computer activities" being a reference to
the FBI interviewing you regarding your security clearance.
And by the way puke.... if the Security Officer in charge
of monitoring Security Clearances at WHOI ever finds out
about you intenet stalking and harassing activities I'M SURE
HE WILL BE TAKING A MUCH CLOSER LOOK AS YOU AS A "SECURITY
RISK"... especially since the FBI has apparently already
decided you are a "person of interest", puke!

George Hammond

unread,
Oct 2, 2006, 10:32:07 PM10/2/06
to

TMG

unread,
Oct 3, 2006, 12:01:38 AM10/3/06
to
George Hammond wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 21:07:08 -0400, TMG <T...@Nowhere.org>
> wrote:
>
>
>>George Hammond wrote:
>><a nice little foaming at the mouth rant> and..
>>
>>
>>> FRANKLY, I'M FLATTERED BY THE ARTICLE AND
>>> CONSIDER IT A HISTORICALLY IMPORTANT
>>> WORK OF RARE GENIUS!
>>> THE AUTHOR OF IT MAY BE ONE OF THE
>>> FEW PEOPLE WHO ACTUALLY KNOWS WHO
>>> GEORGE HAMMOND REALLY IS!
>>
>>You sick, sad putz. Did you even read the "article"? Do you know this is
>>a site where you (and the rest of the "subjects") are being mocked? It's
>>a humor site - and you're providing the humor!
>>
>>"FRANKLY, I'M FLATTERED BY THE ARTICLE" - [HAMMOND]
>>
>>Of course you are, you can't parse mocking from science. You're
>>flattered by the Noetic Press! This site is mocking you, and making fun
>>of your entire being, AND YOU JUST CAN'T SEE IT.
>>
>
>
>
> [Hammond]
> Oh sure... and Dan Brown's Da Vinci Code is intended to MOCK
> THE CATHOLIC CHURCH too I suppose. You sick fuck!

Reread the article George. Read the rest of the articles. Look at the
site. If you can't see it's a parody, and mocking you, you are way too
gone to be walking the streets. George, you're happy about something in
"uncyclopedia". Look at that word and read the site.


>
> You sick Sniveling little puke...! The Da Vinci Code has
> bought more publicity for the Vatican, the Pope, and the
> Catholic Church and Religion in general than 1,000
> theologians writing a million sermons.... you groveling,
> halfwit, simpleton piece of filth.

And now, you've latched onto the "DaVinci Code". This is all made up in
your mind - completely. This is pure figment. George, you're happy about
something in "uncyclopedia". Look at that word and read the site.

> How in the FUCK the (formerly) prestigeous WOODS HOLE
> OCEANOGRAPHIC INST ever saw fit to ramrod you thru an MIT
> "work-study PhD" and appoint you a "staff scientist" is
> BEYOND MY IMAGINATION.

So many things are beyond your imagination. Your railing and ranting
about WHOI is "odd", but seems to be a theme in your delusion.

> I knew WHOI stopped doing serious
> science years ago.... but I never imagined they had sunk so
> low as to hire the likes of you! You sick fuck....
> simpleton low brow boor. Fuckin psycho anonymous heckler
> and stalker... what a fuckin disgrace to Science you are!

It's still a joke site mocking you George. Your ravings don't change
that. George, you're happy about something in "uncyclopedia". Look at
that word and read the site.

>
> The guy who wrote than "Dan Brown" review of Hammond's
> SPOG (see: http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/George_Hammond )
> is a TOWERING GENIUS AND INTELLECTUAL HERO compared to a
> sniveling, back stabbing, cowardly heckler and stalker like
> you. The author even MENTIONS YOU and calls you a
> "celebrity staker" and mentions that the FBI has noticed
> your "excessive computer activities" being a reference to
> the FBI interviewing you regarding your security clearance.

You stupid fool - that's a parody of your ravings. Look at the rest of
the site. George, you're happy about something in "uncyclopedia". Look
at that word and read the site. Your current rants and raves ARE THE
POINT OF THE PARODY. Read the other "articles" - you're being mocked!.
It's a parody - just like your "science".

> And by the way puke.... if the Security Officer in charge
> of monitoring Security Clearances at WHOI ever finds out
> about you intenet stalking and harassing activities I'M SURE
> HE WILL BE TAKING A MUCH CLOSER LOOK AS YOU AS A "SECURITY
> RISK"... especially since the FBI has apparently already
> decided you are a "person of interest", puke!

Jeeze George - you're replaying the mocking parody in the "article".
You're happy about something in "uncyclopedia". Look at that word and
read the site.

You are, by far, the most delusional writer on USENET. I know that's a
bold statement, but I challenge any reader to nominate a more qualified
candidate.

Panama Floyd

unread,
Oct 3, 2006, 2:18:40 AM10/3/06
to

George Hammond wrote:

Who the fuck loosened the straps on your straitjacket, Hammond?

http://home.pacifier.com/~dkossy/hammond.html
http://www.insolitology.com/topten/georgehammond.htm
http://makeashorterlink.com/?J1D6324ED

-Panama Floyd, Atl.
aa#2015, Member Knights of BAAWA!
EAC Martian Commander
Plonked by Kadaitcha Man Sept 06
"..the prayer cloth of one aeon is the doormat of the next."
-Mark Twain

Religious societies are *less* moral than secular ones:
http://moses.creighton.edu/JRS/2005/2005-11.html

Ahmed Ouahi, Architect

unread,
Oct 3, 2006, 4:46:21 AM10/3/06
to

To every man is given the key to the gates of heaven, the same key opens the
gates of hell.

-- Buddhism

--
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
Best Regards!


"George Hammond" <nowh...@notspam.org> wrote in message

news:1ah3i21b75p4v4n5k...@4ax.com...

Will Brittland

unread,
Oct 3, 2006, 9:46:18 AM10/3/06
to

"George Hammond" <nowh...@notspam.org> wrote in message
news:1ah3i21b75p4v4n5k...@4ax.com...

> On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 21:07:08 -0400, TMG <T...@Nowhere.org>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>George Hammond wrote:
>><a nice little foaming at the mouth rant> and..
>>
>>>
>>> FRANKLY, I'M FLATTERED BY THE ARTICLE AND
>>> CONSIDER IT A HISTORICALLY IMPORTANT
>>> WORK OF RARE GENIUS!
>>> THE AUTHOR OF IT MAY BE ONE OF THE
>>> FEW PEOPLE WHO ACTUALLY KNOWS WHO
>>> GEORGE HAMMOND REALLY IS!
>>
>>You sick, sad putz. Did you even read the "article"? Do you know this is
>>a site where you (and the rest of the "subjects") are being mocked? It's
>>a humor site - and you're providing the humor!
>>
>>"FRANKLY, I'M FLATTERED BY THE ARTICLE" - [HAMMOND]
>>
>>Of course you are, you can't parse mocking from science. You're
>>flattered by the Noetic Press! This site is mocking you, and making fun
>>of your entire being, AND YOU JUST CAN'T SEE IT.
>>
>
>
> [Hammond]
> Oh sure... and Dan Brown's Da Vinci Code is intended to MOCK
> THE CATHOLIC CHURCH too I suppose. You sick fuck!
>
<etc....>

George! George! Stop. Please. The article is a parody and you praised
it. You have made a fool of yourself again...just like that guy I wrote
about slamming himself into the door. I mean, do you actually believe the
following, from the article?...
-----------------
" In 2004, President Bush, under pressure from the SPOG Freak movement, and
in desperate need of a means to win the oil war on Islam, nullified the
Consitution and granted [Hammond] supreme power over the United States
government. [Hammond] used his newfound power to announce the Scientific
Proof of God to the entire world. Terrorist leaders such as Osama bin Laden
instantly recognized the inexorability of [Hammond]'s proof, and jihadists
everywhere threw down their weapons and declared in one voice that Allah
lives in Washington, not in Mecca. Religious leaders who had previously been
damning each other to Hell joined together to create the Church of the
Scientific Advent, the world's largest and most powerful church ever. "
--------------------
And this?...
---------------------
"Enraged at their insolence, [Hammond] published a list of prominent
critics, known as the "Killfile," and ordered them hunted down and executed.
The Killfile has included such members as:
a.. Bob Hope
b.. Ronald Reagan
c.. Pope John Paul II
d.. James van Allen
e.. Steve Irwin
Those who would harass or contradict [Hammond] are warned -- you could be
next."

----------

Jesus, man, learn when to hide!

Will B.

***Down with gravity!
Vacuum sucks!
Reality is a crock!***

Will Brittland

unread,
Oct 3, 2006, 9:48:26 AM10/3/06
to

"Fwd: from "TMG"" <fro...@Nowhere.org> wrote in message
news:km03i2tko5mmhektd...@4ax.com...

> On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 16:20:02 -0400, TMG <T...@Nowhere.org>
> wrote:
>
>>Jim Black wrote:
>>
>>> BTW, while we're not talking, could you check the facts in this little
>>> biography of yourself? Thanks!
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/George_Hammond
>>
>> [TMG]
>>Masterfully done.
>
> [Hammond]
> TMG got that one right despite being a snivelling
> "WHO-EE" celebrity stalker and science harasser... DAN BROWN
> himself couldn't have written a better publiciy piece for
> Hammond! In fact, one person even remarked that Dan Brown
> probably wrote it!

Sad.


Clive

unread,
Oct 3, 2006, 3:12:30 PM10/3/06
to
"George Hammond" <nowh...@notspam.org> wrote in message
news:1ah3i21b75p4v4n5k...@4ax.com...

> On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 21:07:08 -0400, TMG <T...@Nowhere.org>
> wrote:
>
>>
> Oh sure... and Dan Brown's Da Vinci Code is intended to MOCK
> THE CATHOLIC CHURCH too I suppose. You sick fuck!
>
> You sick Sniveling little puke...! The Da Vinci Code has
> bought more publicity for the Vatican, the Pope, and the
> Catholic Church and Religion in general than 1,000
> theologians writing a million sermons.... you groveling,
> halfwit, simpleton piece of filth.
> How in the FUCK the (formerly) prestigeous WOODS HOLE
> OCEANOGRAPHIC INST ever saw fit to ramrod you thru an MIT
> "work-study PhD" and appoint you a "staff scientist" is
> BEYOND MY IMAGINATION. I knew WHOI stopped doing serious
> science years ago.... but I never imagined they had sunk so
> low as to hire the likes of you! You sick fuck....
> simpleton low brow boor. Fuckin psycho anonymous heckler
> and stalker... what a fuckin disgrace to Science you are!
>

For a person of such religiosity...after all you *have* mathematically
proved the existence of god (which one by the way?) your
language is disgusting.
Funny thing brain chemistry.
Evil R Cronis


George Hammond

unread,
Oct 3, 2006, 4:14:05 PM10/3/06
to
On Tue, 3 Oct 2006 09:46:18 -0400, "Will Brittland"
<jwb...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>
>"George Hammond" <nowh...@notspam.org> wrote in message
>news:1ah3i21b75p4v4n5k...@4ax.com...
>> On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 21:07:08 -0400, TMG <T...@Nowhere.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>George Hammond wrote:
>>><a nice little foaming at the mouth rant> and..
>>>
>>>>
>>>> FRANKLY, I'M FLATTERED BY THE ARTICLE AND
>>>> CONSIDER IT A HISTORICALLY IMPORTANT
>>>> WORK OF RARE GENIUS!
>>>> THE AUTHOR OF IT MAY BE ONE OF THE
>>>> FEW PEOPLE WHO ACTUALLY KNOWS WHO
>>>> GEORGE HAMMOND REALLY IS!
>>>

>>> [TMG]


>>>You sick, sad putz. Did you even read the "article"?

>>> ( http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/George_Hammond )


>>> Do you know this is
>>>a site where you (and the rest of the "subjects") are being mocked? It's
>>>a humor site - and you're providing the humor!
>>>
>>>"FRANKLY, I'M FLATTERED BY THE ARTICLE" - [HAMMOND]

>>>( http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/George_Hammond )


>>>Of course you are, you can't parse mocking from science. You're
>>>flattered by the Noetic Press! This site is mocking you, and making fun
>>>of your entire being, AND YOU JUST CAN'T SEE IT.
>>>
>>
>>
>> [Hammond]
>> Oh sure... and Dan Brown's Da Vinci Code is intended to MOCK
>> THE CATHOLIC CHURCH too I suppose. You sick fuck!
>>
><etc....>
>

> [Brittland]


[Hammond]
You've got your head up your ass. Do you think the DA VINCI
CODE is a "parody"..... I don't think so....

THE DA VINCI CODE IS A
PUBLICITY STUNT
(a backhanded compliment)
WHICH BENEFITS RELIGION
AND LIKEWISE:
THE "DE CARTE CODE"
( http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/George_Hammond )
IS A PUBLICITY STUNT
(a backhanded compliment)
WHICH BENEFITS HAMMOND'S
SPOG (Scentific Proof Of God).


And am I GRATEFUL to the author (whoever he might be)... it
is sure nice to see some other competent person kicking you
halfass hecklers in the nuts for a change...... just like it
is refreshing to listen to Dan Brown make a fool out of the
enemies of Christianity by attracting WORLDWIDE PUBLICITY to
the Church!
Remember.... the object of the hecklers is to SUPPRESS
HAMMOND AND SHUT HIM UP...... so the DE-CARTE website:
( http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/George_Hammond )
is a POWERFUL WEAPON aginst the enimies of Hammond
publicitywise..... just like the Da Vinci Code is a weapon
against the enimies of Christianity.
Baah hah hah hah haaaaa....!
Baah hah hah hah haaaaa....!

George Hammond

unread,
Oct 3, 2006, 4:17:38 PM10/3/06
to

[Hammond]
St. Paul's language was disgusting too... every fighter's
language is. It comes from dealing with tons of filth...
and there sure is tons of filth on Usenet... most of it card
carring PhD's in academia by the way.

George Hammond

unread,
Oct 3, 2006, 4:20:20 PM10/3/06
to

[Hammond]
Sad for you harasser..... wait til they start showing up by
the thousands... millions.... you'll be running thru the
forest with a shovel looking for a place to dig a hole and
hide, wiseguy.

rip...@azonic.co.nz

unread,
Oct 3, 2006, 5:17:50 PM10/3/06
to

Will Brittland wrote:

> George! George! Stop. Please. The article is a parody and you praised
> it. You have made a fool of yourself again...just like that guy I wrote
> about slamming himself into the door. I mean, do you actually believe the
> following, from the article?...

Well, actually, yes he does.

Not so much that it has happened, but that it should have happend, will
happen, and would have happened if it wasn't for all these heckers
getting in the way by 'drowning out' his message or suppressing it, and
all those scientists who completely ignored him, and Google for not
redirecting every search directly to his website (regardless of subject
requested), and book publishers for not writing the book he promised
and publishing it.

No, for George, the UNcyclopedia is reality as it _should_ have
happened, and is thus recognition of his 'genius'. Now the world should
bow before him because the President of the WORLD is following the
great [Hammond], or would have.

Parody ? No of course it isn't parody to George, it is fullfillment.
Now all that is required is to align everyone else's reality with
George's and the Uncyclopedia's.

Yes, he is completely insane.

T Wake

unread,
Oct 3, 2006, 5:21:19 PM10/3/06
to

"George Hammond" <nowh...@notspam.org> wrote in message
news:1ah3i21b75p4v4n5k...@4ax.com...

> On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 21:07:08 -0400, TMG <T...@Nowhere.org>
> wrote:

Hey George, your kill file is broken.

>>George Hammond wrote:
>><a nice little foaming at the mouth rant> and..
>>
>>>
>>> FRANKLY, I'M FLATTERED BY THE ARTICLE AND
>>> CONSIDER IT A HISTORICALLY IMPORTANT
>>> WORK OF RARE GENIUS!
>>> THE AUTHOR OF IT MAY BE ONE OF THE
>>> FEW PEOPLE WHO ACTUALLY KNOWS WHO
>>> GEORGE HAMMOND REALLY IS!
>>
>>You sick, sad putz. Did you even read the "article"? Do you know this is
>>a site where you (and the rest of the "subjects") are being mocked? It's
>>a humor site - and you're providing the humor!
>>
>>"FRANKLY, I'M FLATTERED BY THE ARTICLE" - [HAMMOND]
>>
>>Of course you are, you can't parse mocking from science. You're
>>flattered by the Noetic Press! This site is mocking you, and making fun
>>of your entire being, AND YOU JUST CAN'T SEE IT.
>>
>
>
> [Hammond]
> Oh sure... and Dan Brown's Da Vinci Code is intended to MOCK
> THE CATHOLIC CHURCH too I suppose. You sick fuck!

Wow. You really are stupid.

> You sick Sniveling little puke...! The Da Vinci Code has
> bought more publicity for the Vatican, the Pope, and the
> Catholic Church and Religion in general than 1,000
> theologians writing a million sermons.... you groveling,
> halfwit, simpleton piece of filth.
> How in the FUCK the (formerly) prestigeous WOODS HOLE
> OCEANOGRAPHIC INST ever saw fit to ramrod you thru an MIT
> "work-study PhD" and appoint you a "staff scientist" is
> BEYOND MY IMAGINATION. I knew WHOI stopped doing serious
> science years ago.... but I never imagined they had sunk so
> low as to hire the likes of you! You sick fuck....
> simpleton low brow boor. Fuckin psycho anonymous heckler
> and stalker... what a fuckin disgrace to Science you are!
>
> The guy who wrote than "Dan Brown" review of Hammond's
> SPOG (see: http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/George_Hammond )
> is a TOWERING GENIUS AND INTELLECTUAL HERO

Oh, that is priceless.

> compared to a
> sniveling, back stabbing, cowardly heckler and stalker like
> you. The author even MENTIONS YOU and calls you a
> "celebrity staker" and mentions that the FBI has noticed
> your "excessive computer activities" being a reference to
> the FBI interviewing you regarding your security clearance.
> And by the way puke.... if the Security Officer in charge
> of monitoring Security Clearances at WHOI ever finds out
> about you intenet stalking and harassing activities I'M SURE
> HE WILL BE TAKING A MUCH CLOSER LOOK AS YOU AS A "SECURITY
> RISK"... especially since the FBI has apparently already
> decided you are a "person of interest", puke!

Yeah yeah. So you keep saying.


T Wake

unread,
Oct 3, 2006, 5:22:36 PM10/3/06
to

"TMG" <T...@Nowhere.org> wrote in message
news:brOdnTl1N9xeQ7zY...@comcast.com...

Nah, he fits the bill as far as I can see.


T Wake

unread,
Oct 3, 2006, 5:24:35 PM10/3/06
to

"Fwd: from "TMG"" <fro...@Nowhere.org> wrote in message
news:km03i2tko5mmhektd...@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 16:20:02 -0400, TMG <T...@Nowhere.org>
> wrote:
>
>>Jim Black wrote:
>>
>>> BTW, while we're not talking, could you check the facts in this little
>>> biography of yourself? Thanks!
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/George_Hammond
>>
>> [TMG]
>>Masterfully done.
>
> [Hammond]
> TMG got that one right despite being a snivelling
> "WHO-EE" celebrity stalker and science harasser... DAN BROWN
> himself couldn't have written a better publiciy piece for
> Hammond! In fact, one person even remarked that Dan Brown
> probably wrote it!

Yeah, that one person was you though, you nutcase.


Will Brittland

unread,
Oct 3, 2006, 5:26:42 PM10/3/06
to

"George Hammond" <nowh...@notspam.org> wrote in message
news:hch5i25sv9i81oo40...@4ax.com...

I have been gone for about five years. I remembered you, but I forgot how
our Usenet "relationship" ended until just yesterday. And it will end the
same way this time. George, I will try not to challenge or heckle you any
more. When I said "sad" I was not being sarcastic. Despite your ranting,
cursing, yelling, and insulting, I realize that all of this is part of your
"condition" and I will take no pleasure in tormenting you any more. Just as
I would get no joy out of going to the special olympics and jeering and
laughing at the competitors.

If you have the resources, do try to get some help. It may allow you to
have some peace for your remaining years. You may be able to re-establish
old ties with friends and family, or maybe build some new ones. All this
spewing over your computer is getting you nowhere and I see what appears to
be a life in decay and despair. Give up on this haranguing, George. Live.
Enjoy. Do a few _little_ things that are accepted and appreciated...not
some _huge_ thing that will never be accepted or appreciated.

I say this in all sincerity, although there are those who will probably see
it as sardonic.

T Wake

unread,
Oct 3, 2006, 5:43:46 PM10/3/06
to

"George Hammond" <nowh...@notspam.org> wrote in message
news:hch5i25sv9i81oo40...@4ax.com...

Can we take bets on this?


T Wake

unread,
Oct 3, 2006, 5:45:14 PM10/3/06
to

"George Hammond" <nowh...@notspam.org> wrote in message
news:7vf5i2pr7g8m2mscf...@4ax.com...

Wow. George, look behind you - that was the deep end you just jumped
off.......


George Hammond

unread,
Oct 3, 2006, 6:40:46 PM10/3/06
to
On 3 Oct 2006 14:17:50 -0700, rip...@Azonic.co.nz wrote:

>
>Will Brittland wrote:
>
>> ( http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/George_Hammond )


>> George! George! Stop. Please. The article is a parody and you praised
>> it. You have made a fool of yourself again...just like that guy I wrote
>> about slamming himself into the door. I mean, do you actually believe the
>> following, from the article?...
>
>Well, actually, yes he does.
>

[Hammond]
Do you think Dan Brown believes Jesus married Mary
Magdalene and had 3 kids.... don't be fuckin stupid. This
is PUBLICITY WARFARE... and the guy who wrote "
The De-Carte Code
( http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/George_Hammond )
is a major player and he's ON MY SIDE!!
Bend over and prepare to have your ass kicked hecklers!!


>
>Parody ? No of course it isn't parody to George,

[Hammond]
And the Da Vinci Code is not considered a parody by the
Pope either you fuckwit... its HELPFUL PUBLICITY as far as
the Pope is concerned, and "The De-Carte Code":
( http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/George_Hammond )
is HELPFUL PUBLICITY for the SPOG ... "masterfully written"
as one helckler put it as he was dutifully bending over
preparing to have his ass kicked!

TMG

unread,
Oct 3, 2006, 7:07:13 PM10/3/06
to

George Hammond wrote:

<snip delusional, foaming rant>

> "masterfully written"
> as one helckler put it as he was dutifully bending over
> preparing to have his ass kicked!

Yes - it is a masterly written, mocking, hilarious parody of you and
your delusions of grandeur. The author is a fine comedy writer. Everyone
(including the pieces author) sees it - I wonder why you can't.

And I was bending over for you to plant your lips on my ass, and make
that kissing sound you do so well.

T Wake

unread,
Oct 3, 2006, 7:04:26 PM10/3/06
to

"TMG" <T...@Nowhere.org> wrote in message
news:adqdnfcdeLuwdr_Y...@comcast.com...

I still think George doesn't get it.


George Hammond

unread,
Oct 3, 2006, 7:05:36 PM10/3/06
to
On Tue, 3 Oct 2006 17:26:42 -0400, "Will Brittland"
<jwb...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>.... I will take no pleasure in tormenting you any more. Just as

>I would get no joy out of going to the special olympics and jeering and
>laughing at the competitors.
>

>I say this in all sincerity.
>
>Will B.
>

[Hammond]
Will... years of squating in front of your computer and
sliding a greased Coke bottle up and down your ass HAS
clouded your brain. For one thing you believe that even
with ABSOLUTELY NO scientific credentials that you are
qualified to sit there and argue with graduate physicist who
has published this theory in TWO PEER REVIEWED scientific
journals and reported it personally at International
scientific symposiums and discussed it with internationally
prominent scientists.
You're obviously just another no account wannabee jerk,
and I suggest you find another hobby. the US Keds imprints
on your pants suggest you are a failure at Usenet heckling.

TMG

unread,
Oct 3, 2006, 7:18:03 PM10/3/06
to

George Hammond wrote:

> [Hammond]
> And the Da Vinci Code is not considered a parody by the
> Pope either you fuckwit... its HELPFUL PUBLICITY as far as
> the Pope is concerned, and "The De-Carte Code":
> ( http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/George_Hammond )
> is HELPFUL PUBLICITY for the SPOG ... "masterfully written"

Pssst - George.

http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/Uncyclopedia:How_To_Be_Funny_And_Not_Just_Stupid

Just in case you don't think it a parody.

Then take a look at:

http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/Main_Page

Read the page George,...read the page.

T Wake

unread,
Oct 3, 2006, 7:10:44 PM10/3/06
to

"George Hammond" <nowh...@notspam.org> wrote in message
news:4hq5i2lht4u3lvp7d...@4ax.com...

> [Hammond]
> Will... years of squating in front of your computer and
> sliding a greased Coke bottle up and down your ass HAS
> clouded your brain. For one thing you believe that even
> with ABSOLUTELY NO scientific credentials that you are
> qualified to sit there and argue with graduate physicist who
> has published this theory in TWO PEER REVIEWED scientific
> journals and reported it personally at International
> scientific symposiums and discussed it with internationally
> prominent scientists.
> You're obviously just another no account wannabee jerk,
> and I suggest you find another hobby. the US Keds imprints
> on your pants suggest you are a failure at Usenet heckling.

It is funny that you think this is a reasonable response....


Golden Monkey

unread,
Oct 4, 2006, 1:40:18 PM10/4/06
to

Stop looking for codes where they don't exist

George Hammond

unread,
Oct 4, 2006, 2:28:35 PM10/4/06
to
On 4 Oct 2006 10:40:18 -0700, "Golden Monkey"
<alittl...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>
>
>Stop looking for codes where they don't exist


[Hammond]
The C-R-O-S-S is the mathematical C-O-D-E of Christianity:

========================================
The CROSS=The Cartesian Coordinate System=DE-CARTE CODE
========================================

The structure of the entire Bible and all of Religion is a
quadrature and can be deciphered using the DE-CARTE CODE.
For instance, the DE CARTE CODE explains:

1. The Cross of Christianity.
2. The Egyption Ankh.
3. Why there are FOUR GOSPELS (Mt,Mk,Lk,Jn).
4. Why there are 4 VARNAS (castes) in Hinduism.
5. Why the 4-Gospels cause the BI/2-PARTY SYSTEM
6. Why they bulit pyramids as monuments to God.
6. Why the Moslems worship a CUBE in the center of Mecca.
(This CUBE is the Moslem CROSS, and stands in the
center of Mecca.. which is why Moslems bow to Mecca..
for the SAME REASON we bow our heads to the Cross!)
7. Why there are 4 rivers in Eden (Gen 2:10).
8. Why people spend their lives doing "cross word
puzzles" (ans: because they can't figure out what the
DE CARTE CODE is or where it comes from!
(of course it comes from the Cartesian Geom. of the
Human Body... which is WHY a human body is nailed to a
Cross for us to inspect every Sunday morining!)
9. etc. ad infinitum...

George Hammond

unread,
Oct 4, 2006, 2:31:22 PM10/4/06
to

T Wake

unread,
Oct 4, 2006, 2:44:34 PM10/4/06
to

"George Hammond" <nowh...@notspam.org> wrote in message
news:gcv7i2tqf4gphf2ie...@4ax.com...

I would say you have lost it, but that has been obvious for a long time now.
ko0k on nutter.


FreeThinker

unread,
Oct 4, 2006, 3:12:43 PM10/4/06
to
The head of the Galactic Federation (76 planets around larger stars
visible from here) (founded 5,000,000 years ago, very space opera)
solved overpopulation (250 billion or so per planet, 178 billion on
average) by mass implanting. He caused people to be brought to
Teegeeack (Earth) and put an H-Bomb on the principal volcanos (Incident
II) and then the Pacific area ones were taken in boxes to Hawaii and
the Atlantic area ones to Las Palmas and there "packaged".

His name was Xenu. He used renegades. Various misleading data by means
of circuits etc. was placed in the implants.

When through with his crime loyal officers (to the people) captured him
after six years of battle and put him in an electronic mountain trap
where he still is. "They" are gone. The place (Confederation) has since
been a desert. The length and brutality of it all was such that this
Confederation never recovered. The implant is calculated to kill (by
pneumonia etc) anyone who attempts to solve it. This liability has been
dispensed with by my tech development.

One can freewheel through the implant and die unless it is approached
as precisely outlined. The "freewheel" (auto-running on and on) lasts
too long, denies sleep etc and one dies. So be careful to do only
Incidents I and II as given and not plow around and fail to complete
one thetan at a time.

In December 1967 I knew someone had to take the plunge. I did and
emerged very knocked out, but alive. Probably the only one ever to do
so in 75,000,000 years. I have all the data now, but only that given
here is needful.

One's body is a mass of individual thetans stuck to oneself or to the
body.

One has to clean them off by running incident II and Incident I. It is
a long job, requiring care, patience and good auditing. You are running
beings. They respond like any preclear. Some large, some small.

Thetans believed they were one. This is the primary error. Good luck.

Will Brittland

unread,
Oct 4, 2006, 7:06:42 PM10/4/06
to

"George Hammond" <nowh...@notspam.org> wrote in message
news:4hq5i2lht4u3lvp7d...@4ax.com...

And so, we conclude. I wish you the best of luck, George. Believe me, what
I am about to do is for your own good. My only hope is that everybody else
takes pity on you and does the same. Then there would be no reason for you
to continue this pointless and clearly stressful activity.

Bye-bye.

*plonk*

(I'm sure mine will work just fine.)

Will B.

***Welcome to the Piscataway Nation.
Now learn Algonquian. ***

Frontier guy

unread,
Oct 4, 2006, 9:06:03 PM10/4/06
to

..........I always wondered how a static could have a size. Also, Ron
says on OT 3, there are hundreds of bts to each case.

On OT III, the individual finds "body thetans" by locating any
sensation of pressure or mass in his or her body. This is addressed
"telepathically" as a cluster, and taken through the cluster-making
incident of 75 million years ago. Once this is done, the individual
body thetans should be available to be taken through either the same
incident or through incident one. (...) According to OT III, everyone
on Earth is in fact a collection of such clusters (Hubbard says that
each person doing OT III will find "hundreds" of body thetans - many
victims of this course believe that they find millions).

.......So in the old days, taking one at a time, was a short cycle.
Not sure how it goes with the RTC version. Hell, one could find
millions or squillions now on (Is there a new OT 3?).

TMG

unread,
Oct 4, 2006, 9:28:45 PM10/4/06
to

George Hammond wrote:

<snip an ummm, interesting,...yeah...interesting rant>

Tsk, tsk, tsk - posting to alt.religion.kibology again George? And you
went to such lengths to rant against posting to ark.

Is it because you noticed the link in your highly prized

http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/George_Hammond

post that give the reader the fine lyrics to "The George Hammond
Conspiracy" song (you can also play the toe-tapping tune)?

It *IS* glorious!

http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/index.php?song=The%20George%20Hammond%20Conspiracy


All brought to you by your friends in ARK.

You're welcome.

Lester Mosley

unread,
Oct 5, 2006, 3:54:54 AM10/5/06
to
I was watching something, i forget what it was but it had this guy in
it drinking this thing. I went to this store looking for that thing.

I asked the clerk for the thing, she said no come back next week
between Tuesday and Thursday and we will have it. I was so happy
there..

George Hammond

unread,
Oct 5, 2006, 12:02:06 PM10/5/06
to
On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 21:28:45 -0400, TMG <T...@Nowhere.org>
wrote:

[Hammond]
There is a much shorter(direct) URL for the "SPOG FOLK SONG"

http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3

marika

unread,
Oct 5, 2006, 7:42:02 PM10/5/06
to

Lester Mosley wrote:
> I was watching something,

I remeber because it was yesterday, at Buffalo Wild Wings. It was the
Simpson's and that Rosie Odonell was on the mediocre rocket

>i forget what it was but it had this guy in
> it drinking this thing. I went to this store looking for that thing.
>

> I asked the clerk for the thing, she said no come back next week
> between Tuesday and Thursday and we will have it. I was so happy
> there..
>

That was yesterday, too. It was Aspen Beer made by Coors. You knew
what it was yesterday and I had never heard of it before, but now you
have forgotten what it was, but I know what it is today.

mk5000

"But that's not "values". Values are about how we treat others.
Conversely, there's no value in eating bon-bons, but some people eat
'em on a whim, or
they have a natural talent for being fat. :)"--steve Magruder

0 new messages