Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

HOW EINSTEINIANS UNDERSTAND SCIENCE

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Pentcho Valev

unread,
Mar 24, 2007, 3:35:53 AM3/24/07
to
http://www.phil-inst.hu/PIRT.Budapest : "Mathematics, Physics and
Philosophy in the Interpretations of Relativity Theory" - Budapest,
Hungary, 7-9 September 2007. Objectives: "While the organizing
committee encourages critical investigations and welcomes both
Einsteinian and non-Einsteinian (Lorentzian, etc.) approaches,
including the recently proposed ether-type theories, it is assumed
that the received formal structure of the theory is valid and anti-
relativistic papers will not be accepted."

Pentcho Valev

Eric Gisse

unread,
Mar 24, 2007, 4:32:34 AM3/24/07
to

Whining about it on USENET is sure to get it changed.

>
> Pentcho Valev


Androcles

unread,
Mar 24, 2007, 4:47:24 AM3/24/07
to

"Pentcho Valev" <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1174721753.7...@p15g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...

Well, yes, of course.
One would not expect the Vatican to accept papers challenging the
existence of gawd.
It is assumed that the received formal structure of christianity is valid
and anti-christ papers will not be accepted.
The good book says the bloke was born of a virgin, walked on water,
turned water into wine and fed a multitude who forgot to bring
their own lunch with fish sandwiches.

You can discuss the wine's vintage, bouquet and colour, debate
whether it was cod on whole-wheat or haddock on bagel, but not change
the "facts"; skis + outboard motor is a no no. I'm not getting into virginity here.

josefmatz

unread,
Mar 24, 2007, 6:22:26 AM3/24/07
to
So physics is forced to become religious
"Androcles" <Engi...@hogwarts.physics.co.uk> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:wA5Nh.163315$nW6.1...@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...

Shubee

unread,
Mar 24, 2007, 7:50:25 AM3/24/07
to

I think it's reasonable to say that special relativity is essentially
correct and that if anyone disagrees, then that androclod is either
remarkably ignorant or just mentally disturbed.

Shubee
http://www.everythingimportant.org/relativity/special.pdf

Androcles

unread,
Mar 24, 2007, 10:16:51 AM3/24/07
to
No, just the Holey Church of Relativity black hole seekers, time travelling
twins and farmers who try to put 6ft polacks in 5 ft barns.
Real physicists designing the next generation of computers, spacecraft
and aircraft are pretty much exempt, although even they have their
crackpot fringe. Some of them are Xtians and Buddhists with a few
Hindus and Moslems thrown in for good measure.

Logic cannot overcome blind faith, as this dumb hunky bigot proves:

"JanPB" <fil...@gmail.com> wrote in message news:1172078787....@t69g2000cwt.googlegroups.com...
> On Feb 21, 1:33 am, "Androcles" <Engin...@hogwarts.physics.co.uk>
> wrote:
>> "JanPB" <film...@gmail.com> wrote in message news:1172045378.4...@m58g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...
>> > On Feb 20, 10:54 pm, "Androcles" <Engin...@hogwarts.physics.co.uk>
>> > wrote:
>> >> "JanPB" <film...@gmail.com> wrote in message news:1172021102.6...@p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
>> >> > On Feb 20, 2:55 pm, "Androcles" <Engin...@hogwarts.physics.co.uk>
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> "JanPB" <film...@gmail.com> wrote in message news:1172010259.6...@h3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
>> >> >> > On Feb 20, 1:04 pm, "Androcles" <Engin...@hogwarts.physics.co.uk>
>> >> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> >> "JanPB" <film...@gmail.com> wrote in message news:1171996424.5...@v33g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...
>> >> >> >> > On Feb 20, 10:00 am, "Androcles" <Engin...@hogwarts.physics.co.uk>
>> >> >> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> "JanPB" <film...@gmail.com> wrote in message news:1171990329.5...@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com...
>> >> >> >> >> > On Feb 20, 7:38 am, "Androcles" <Engin...@hogwarts.physics.co.uk>
>> >> >> >> >> > wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> Two way travel time is easy but I can't get past the two way velocity of light,
>> >> >> >> >> >> dumbdumb, and if the introduction is wrong then all that follows is total poop.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > Just ask your question precisely.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> HAHAHA!
>> >> >> >> >> As if you'd give a precise answer.
>> >> >> >> >> Ok, I will anyway.
>> >> >> >> >> How far is it from A to A and how long will it take to get there... err... dumbhead?
>>
>> >> >> >> > It obviously depends
>>
>> >> >> >> HAHAHA!
>> >> >> >> As if you'd give a precise answer. I'll try again.
>>
>> >> >> >> How far is it from A to A and how long will it take to get there... err... stupid dumbhead?
>>
>> >> >> > Saying "from A to A"
>>
>> >> >> HAHAHA!
>> >> >> As if you'd give a precise answer. I'll try again.
>>
>> >> >> How far is it from A to A and how long will it take to get there... err... stoopid dumbheaded imbecile?
>>
>> >> > The question "How far is it from A to A" has infinitely many answers.
>>
>> >> HAHAHA!
>> >> Three strikes, you are out, stooopid.
>> >> The answer was zero.
>>
>> > No, the answer is not zero.
>>
>> HAHAHA!
>> That's a keeper.
>> "A-A <> 0" - Bilewacky.
>
> Distance travelled by photon from A to A is not A-A. End of story.

Einstein said it, he believes it, that settles it. The perfect example
of bigotry at its finest.

FAQ-1. Who mentioned any photon in the exchange?
A. Jan Bielawski, Polack High Priest of the Holey Church of Relativity.

FAQ-2. What did Jan Bielawski fear and why did he have no answer, squirming for an escape?

A. This:

"In agreement with experience we further assume the quantity
2AB/(t'A-tA) = c
to be a universal constant--the velocity of light in empty space." -- Albert Einstein

Reference: http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/

FAQ-3: How many relativists does it take to screw in a light bulb?

Four:
One to hold the bulb, two to turn the step ladder beneath him
and the fourth to yell "let go" when the light comes on, otherwise
he'll unscrew it again.

Here are the others:

Dork Van de merde (still struggling with frames of reference):
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/TwinsEvents.html
"We use 3 inertial reference frames" [because Dorks can't get the result
they want in two].
"In neither of these frames any form of acceleration is felt" [neither one of
all three].
"In order for the travelling twin to make HIS trip, SHE must be in frame S'
while going away".
"if T = 5 years and v = 0.8c, then the stay at home twin will have aged
10 years".

ASSistant professor Paul B. Andersen, tusseladd:

"That is, we can reverse the directions of the frames
which is the same as interchanging the frames,
which - as I have told you a LOT of times,
OBVIOUSLY will lead to the transform:
t = (tau-xi*v/c^2)/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)
x = (xi - v*tau)/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)
or:
tau = (t+xv/c^2)/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)
xi = (x + vt)/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)"

Steve Lawrence (sal) the hypocrite:
"In general I'd say there are three main reasons people ignore
questions in this forum.
1) They accidentally overlook the question (not really ignoring it)
2) They think it's boring and don't want to discuss it
3) They can't answer it and don't want to admit that."
Ref: news:pan.2007.01.14....@nospam.org.

4) They know the answer but don't want to answer it
because that would be embarrassing to them. Fuck 'em.

How far is it from A to A and how long will it take to get there?
3) They can't answer it and don't want to admit that.


"josefmatz" <jose...@arcor.de> wrote in message news:4604f9fc$0$6403$9b4e...@newsspool2.arcor-online.net...

Androcles

unread,
Mar 24, 2007, 10:16:52 AM3/24/07
to

"Shubee" <e.sh...@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1174737025.4...@b75g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...

> On Mar 24, 12:35 am, "Pentcho Valev" <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> http://www.phil-inst.hu/PIRT.Budapest: "Mathematics, Physics and
>> Philosophy in the Interpretations of Relativity Theory" - Budapest,
>> Hungary, 7-9 September 2007. Objectives: "While the organizing
>> committee encourages critical investigations and welcomes both
>> Einsteinian and non-Einsteinian (Lorentzian, etc.) approaches,
>> including the recently proposed ether-type theories, it is assumed
>> that the received formal structure of the theory is valid and anti-
>> relativistic papers will not be accepted."
>>
>> Pentcho Valev
>
> I think

No you don't, you lying shit.

The_Man

unread,
Mar 24, 2007, 10:32:16 AM3/24/07
to

The Europeans set up their scientific meetings with a lot of
class. There is always a lot of excellent food and drink, and they are
(usually) kind enough to hold the proceedings in English.
If you want to throw your own crackpot conference, go ahead. You,
Androcles, and Porat will have a smashing get-together. Maybe you can
hold it at a hotel that is also featuring Flat Earth, Creationist, and
"Moon Landing Hoax" meetings as well, thereby doing the authorities a
favor by ensuring that all the crazies are in one place at one time.

It's a Miracle

unread,
Mar 24, 2007, 10:21:00 AM3/24/07
to
Androcles said:
>You can discuss the wine's vintage,
> bouquet and colour, debate whether it
> was cod on whole-wheat or haddock on
> bagel, but not change the "facts"; skis +
> outboard motor is a no no. I'm not
> getting into virginity here.

Actually there is a church started already in my honor it's name is
related to music but I won't tell you what it is so I don't start a
migration. They prey with open hands for an anti-nazi and they sing with
tamborines for banging drums with bells. The head guy I don't know his
title plays a guitar and we all went on a christian retreat where we
rented a house with a fireplace and the feeling is brotherly which I
like. I don't know how to make a bible out of smacking organized crime
but there is at least one church in my name. I doubt I personally want
to design a bible but the catholic diosces wants me and monday I turn
myself in. So I go from there.

--
My kaleidoscope art webpage:
http://community-2.webtv.net/Amused_2_Death_/Kaleidoscope/

Keep spam illegitimate, Report spam to:
http://spamcop.net/

It's a Miracle

unread,
Mar 24, 2007, 10:39:16 AM3/24/07
to
Androcles said:
>The good book says the bloke was born
> of a virgin, walked on water, turned
> water into wine and fed a multitude who
> forgot to bring their own lunch with fish
> sandwiches.

There is a magician on TV called Chris Angel "MINDFREAK" that walks on
water and walks down the sides of skyscrapers and it isn't a fraud.
Dominoe theory once mastered is a schizophrenia hack and I seen plenty
of one trick ponies and Me and my friend Joe created a miracle and saw
a spiral arm of the milky way galaxy.

Miracles are just schizophrenia hacks and everybody is a one trick pony
except for Jesus and this Chris Angel mind freak magician.

It's a Miracle

unread,
Mar 24, 2007, 10:55:51 AM3/24/07
to
Androcles said:
>You can discuss the wine's vintage,
> bouquet and colour, debate whether it
> was cod on whole-wheat or haddock on
> bagel, but not change the "facts"; skis +
> outboard motor is a no no. I'm not
> getting into virginity here.

Also I have a dominoe that was painted with a spark from a gun. It goes
forwards and backwards and the spark is in 2-D. If the dominoe with
sound that controls evolution was painted with a spark I could control
time but the wrong dominoe is painted with a spark.

The dominoe is a cop in a gold detective car and he said quote " Your
just like my son". Thats the exact words. I don't know if I had a virgin
birth but I met my Dad and I would say I'm related to him unless they
made some fraud which I doubt.

But you never know I won't know for sure untill later.

John Jones

unread,
Mar 24, 2007, 5:20:24 PM3/24/07
to

Pentcho Valev

unread,
May 12, 2007, 5:17:35 AM5/12/07
to

So Einsteinians will discuss non-Einsteinian approaches but by no
means anti-relativistic papers. There has always been some subtle
mystery in Einstein's criminal cult.

Pentcho Valev

karand...@yahoo.com

unread,
May 12, 2007, 1:36:06 PM5/12/07
to

Bulgarian cretin, PIRT is actually an antirelativist meeting. Go
there, it is close to your home, you will manage to meet "luminaries"
like Winterberg, David Thompson, etc,etc.

0 new messages